Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Tombros, T.; Crestani, F.: Users' perception of relevance of spoken documents (2000) 0.09
    0.08917837 = product of:
      0.17835674 = sum of:
        0.17835674 = product of:
          0.35671347 = sum of:
            0.35671347 = weight(_text_:perception in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.35671347 = score(doc=4996,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                1.1100436 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    We present the results of a study of user's perception of relevance of documents. The aim is to study experimentally how users' perception varies depending on the form that retrieved documents are presented. Documents retrieved in response to a query are presented to users in a variety of ways, from full text to a machine spoken query-biased automatically-generated summary, and the difference in users' perception of relevance is studied. The experimental results suggest that the effectiveness of advanced multimedia Information Retrieval applications may be affected by the low level of users' perception of relevance of retrieved documents
  2. Wolfram, D.; Dimitroff, A.: Preliminary findings on searcher performance and perceptions of performance in a hypertext bibliographic retrieval system (1997) 0.04
    0.03988178 = product of:
      0.07976356 = sum of:
        0.07976356 = product of:
          0.15952712 = sum of:
            0.15952712 = weight(_text_:perception in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15952712 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.32135084 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.49642664 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.4187727 = idf(docFreq=195, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on research examining the relationship of searcher performance and perception of performance, particulary for hypertext-based onformation retrieval systems for bibliographic data. Employs a prototype hypertext bibliographic retrieval system called HyperLynx. Evaluates its use by 83 subjects at the School of Library and Information Science and the Golda Meir Library at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA. Measures of system usgae indicate that there is no significant relationship between confidence and the number of record pages visited, although confident searchers searched for shorter time periods. The reality check measures shows that both novice and experienced searchers were over confident in their performance
  3. Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984) 0.02
    0.02374054 = product of:
      0.04748108 = sum of:
        0.04748108 = product of:
          0.09496216 = sum of:
            0.09496216 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09496216 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20.10.2000 12:22:23
  4. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.02
    0.02374054 = product of:
      0.04748108 = sum of:
        0.04748108 = product of:
          0.09496216 = sum of:
            0.09496216 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09496216 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  5. Voorhees, E.M.; Harman, D.: Overview of the Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6) (2000) 0.02
    0.02374054 = product of:
      0.04748108 = sum of:
        0.04748108 = product of:
          0.09496216 = sum of:
            0.09496216 = weight(_text_:22 in 6438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09496216 = score(doc=6438,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6438, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6438)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 16:22:19
  6. Dalrymple, P.W.: Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs : toward a cognitive model of searching behavior (1990) 0.02
    0.02374054 = product of:
      0.04748108 = sum of:
        0.04748108 = product of:
          0.09496216 = sum of:
            0.09496216 = weight(_text_:22 in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09496216 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:43:54
  7. Allan, J.; Callan, J.P.; Croft, W.B.; Ballesteros, L.; Broglio, J.; Xu, J.; Shu, H.: INQUERY at TREC-5 (1997) 0.02
    0.016957529 = product of:
      0.033915058 = sum of:
        0.033915058 = product of:
          0.067830116 = sum of:
            0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067830116 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:55:22
  8. Ng, K.B.; Loewenstern, D.; Basu, C.; Hirsh, H.; Kantor, P.B.: Data fusion of machine-learning methods for the TREC5 routing tak (and other work) (1997) 0.02
    0.016957529 = product of:
      0.033915058 = sum of:
        0.033915058 = product of:
          0.067830116 = sum of:
            0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067830116 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    27. 2.1999 20:59:22
  9. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.02
    0.016957529 = product of:
      0.033915058 = sum of:
        0.033915058 = product of:
          0.067830116 = sum of:
            0.067830116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067830116 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  10. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: ¬A test for the separation of relevant and non-relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections (1973) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 5002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=5002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1996 11:22:12
  11. Sanderson, M.: ¬The Reuters test collection (1996) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 6971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=6971,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6971, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6971)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  12. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  13. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
  14. Pemberton, J.K.; Ojala, M.; Garman, N.: Head to head : searching the Web versus traditional services (1998) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=3572,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.24-26,28
  15. Dresel, R.; Hörnig, D.; Kaluza, H.; Peter, A.; Roßmann, A.; Sieber, W.: Evaluation deutscher Web-Suchwerkzeuge : Ein vergleichender Retrievaltest (2001) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die deutschen Suchmaschinen, Abacho, Acoon, Fireball und Lycos sowie die Web-Kataloge Web.de und Yahoo! werden einem Qualitätstest nach relativem Recall, Precision und Availability unterzogen. Die Methoden der Retrievaltests werden vorgestellt. Im Durchschnitt werden bei einem Cut-Off-Wert von 25 ein Recall von rund 22%, eine Precision von knapp 19% und eine Verfügbarkeit von 24% erreicht
  16. Ellis, D.: Progress and problems in information retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26. 7.2002 20:22:46
  17. ¬The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference, TREC 2002 (2003) 0.01
    0.013566022 = product of:
      0.027132044 = sum of:
        0.027132044 = product of:
          0.054264087 = sum of:
            0.054264087 = weight(_text_:22 in 4049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054264087 = score(doc=4049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the llth TREC-conference held in Gaithersburg, Maryland (USA), November 19-22, 2002. Aim of the conference was discussion an retrieval and related information-seeking tasks for large test collection. 93 research groups used different techniques, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The tasks are: Cross-language searching, filtering, interactive searching, searching for novelty, question answering, searching for video shots, and Web searching.
  18. Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966) 0.01
    0.01187027 = product of:
      0.02374054 = sum of:
        0.02374054 = product of:
          0.04748108 = sum of:
            0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748108 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
  19. Smithson, S.: Information retrieval evaluation in practice : a case study approach (1994) 0.01
    0.01187027 = product of:
      0.02374054 = sum of:
        0.02374054 = product of:
          0.04748108 = sum of:
            0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 7302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748108 = score(doc=7302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7302)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The evaluation of information retrieval systems is an important yet difficult operation. This paper describes an exploratory evaluation study that takes an interpretive approach to evaluation. The longitudinal study examines evaluation through the information-seeking behaviour of 22 case studies of 'real' users. The eclectic approach to data collection produced behavioral data that is compared with relevance judgements and satisfaction ratings. The study demonstrates considerable variations among the cases, among different evaluation measures within the same case, and among the same measures at different stages within a single case. It is argued that those involved in evaluation should be aware of the difficulties, and base any evaluation on a good understanding of the cases in question
  20. Blair, D.C.: STAIRS Redux : thoughts on the STAIRS evaluation, ten years after (1996) 0.01
    0.01187027 = product of:
      0.02374054 = sum of:
        0.02374054 = product of:
          0.04748108 = sum of:
            0.04748108 = weight(_text_:22 in 3002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04748108 = score(doc=3002,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17531638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05006422 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3002, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.1, S.4-22