Search (1315 results, page 1 of 66)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.31 
    0.30675635 = sum of:
  0.07207768 = product of:
    0.21623303 = sum of:
      0.21623303 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.21623303 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.21623303 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
    0.21623303 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
      0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
        8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
        0.04538139 = queryNorm
      0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
        1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
          2.0 = termFreq=2.0
        8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
        0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.018445654 = product of:
    0.036891308 = sum of:
      0.036891308 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036891308 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.26 
    0.2562762 = product of:
  0.3844143 = sum of:
    0.09610357 = product of:
      0.2883107 = sum of:
        0.2883107 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2883107 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2883107 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2883107 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  3. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.22 
    0.2242417 = product of:
  0.33636254 = sum of:
    0.084090635 = product of:
      0.2522719 = sum of:
        0.2522719 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2522719 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.2522719 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2522719 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  4. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.19 
    0.19220714 = product of:
  0.2883107 = sum of:
    0.07207768 = product of:
      0.21623303 = sum of:
        0.21623303 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21623303 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21623303 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21623303 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  5. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.16 
    0.16017263 = product of:
  0.24025893 = sum of:
    0.060064733 = product of:
      0.1801942 = sum of:
        0.1801942 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1801942 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.1801942 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1801942 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  6. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.13 
    0.1281381 = product of:
  0.19220714 = sum of:
    0.048051786 = product of:
      0.14415535 = sum of:
        0.14415535 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14415535 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14415535 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14415535 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  7. Wu, I.-L.; Lin, H.-C.: ¬A strategy-based process for implementing knowledge management : an integrative view and empirical study (2009) 0.09 
    0.09158861 = product of:
  0.27476582 = sum of:
    0.27476582 = sum of:
      0.23787451 = weight(_text_:firm in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23787451 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.7010043 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.036891308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036891308 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:08:51
  8. Lamb, R.; King, J.L.; Kling, R.: Informational environments : organizational contexts of online information use (2003) 0.07 
    0.06836466 = product of:
  0.20509396 = sum of:
    0.20509396 = sum of:
      0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16820265 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
      0.036891308 = weight(_text_:22 in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036891308 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    In this issue we begin with Lamb, King and Kling who are interested in the effect of the industry environment on information gathering practices, particularly those involving information and communication technologies like online searching. They studied use of online services in 26 widely differing California firms operating in law, real estate, or biotechnology over a 17 month period. Data was gathered through semi-structured on-site interviews. Five influences on online usage were identified: interaction with regulatory agencies; demonstration of competence to clients; client expectations for timely, cost effective information; the possibility of shifting information responsibilities outside the organization; and the existence of industry wide infrastructures as information sources. The institutional and technical environment of a firm consistently circumscribes the domain in which choices of online resources are made by its employees. Firms the operate in highly technical and institutional environments have more incentive to gather information than do those in low tech unregulated industries.
    Date
    5. 7.2006 18:43:22
  9. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.07 
    0.06836466 = product of:
  0.20509396 = sum of:
    0.20509396 = sum of:
      0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16820265 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.036891308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036891308 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
  10. Dolfsma, W.: Making knowledge work : intra-firm networks, gifts, and innovation (2008) 0.05 
    0.046722963 = product of:
  0.14016889 = sum of:
    0.14016889 = product of:
      0.28033778 = sum of:
        0.28033778 = weight(_text_:firm in 2490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28033778 = score(doc=2490,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.8261415 = fieldWeight in 2490, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2490)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Exchanging knowledge between individuals working in a firm, between but even within divisions, does not occur automatically (Szulanski 1996). It is not obvious that people exchange ideas, point each other to information that the other might use, or give feedback, even when they have no evil motives for not cooperating in such a manner. As a firm's competitive advantage is closely related to its innovative capacity, however, largely based on how it uses knowledge that is already available, the question then is: How does knowledge flow within a firm? What can be done to stimulate or re-direct knowledge flow within a firm? In recent years, increasing attention is given, by scholars in social sciences in general and in management in particular, to the networks of relations between individuals within firms involved in knowledge transfer and development. Consultancies too are scrambling to set up units that can analyze these networks for firms. In addition to the structural issue of who relates how to whom, I will argue that there is a need to look at why relations are established and maintained. This article thus discusses insights from both the literature on social networks and the anthropological literature on gift and favor exchange. As such, the how and the why of knowledge transfer.
  11. Medienkompetenz : wie lehrt und lernt man Medienkompetenz? (2003) 0.05 
    0.04557644 = product of:
  0.13672931 = sum of:
    0.13672931 = sum of:
      0.11213511 = weight(_text_:firm in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11213511 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.33045658 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
      0.024594206 = weight(_text_:22 in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024594206 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz wird künftig zu den Kernaufgaben der Bibliotheken gehören müssen. Dies ist auch eines der Hauptarbeitsfelder des Rezensenten, der aus eigener Praxis sieht, welche Schwierigkeiten sich hierbei finden: Viele Klienten erkennen ihren eigenen Informationsbedarf nicht, können ein fachliches nicht von einem informatorischen Problem trennen, sind nicht in der Lage, für ihr spezifisches Problem potenzielle Informationsquellen zu finden und haben vor allem Probleme, die Verbindung zwischen elektronischer und gedruckter WeIt zu schaffen, die somit praktisch unverbunden nebeneinander existieren (vgl. Rainer Strzolka: Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz als Informationsdienstleistung? Vortrag, FH Köln, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Institut für Informationswissenschaft, am 31. Oktober 2003). Der Brückenschlag zwischen diesen beiden Welten gehört zu den Aufgaben professioneller Informationsvermittler, die nicht nur in der Digitalwelt firm sein müssen, aber auch dort. Nicht zuletzt müssen die gefundenen Informationen ergebnisorientiert genutzt und kritisch bewertet werden und die gefundenen Antworten zur Problemlösung eingesetzt werden. Die Informationslandschaft ist mit ihren verschiedenen Wissensmarktplätzen und Informationsräumen inzwischen so komplex geworden, dass eine kleine Handreichung dazu geeignet erscheint, vor allem die eigene Position des Informationsvermittlers zu überdenken. Zudem ist die aktive Informationsvermittlung noch ein dürres Feld in Deutschland. Die vorliegende kleine Erfahrungsstudie schickt sich an, dies zu ändern. Der Ansatz geht davon aus, dass jeder Vermittler von Medienkompetenz Lehrer wie Lernender zugleich ist; die Anlage ist wie bei allen BibSpider-Publikationen international ausgerichtet. Der Band ist komplett zweisprachig und versammelt Erfahrungsberichte aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, den USA und Südafrika, die eher als Ansatz zur Bewusstseinsbildung denn als Arbeitsanleitung gedacht sind. Eingeleitet wird der Band von einer terminologischen Herleitung des Begriffs aus dem Angelsächsischen und den verschiedenen Bedeutungsebenen, die durch unterschiedliche Bildungs- und Informationskulturen bedingt sind. Angerissen werden verschiedene Arbeitsgebiete und -erfahrungen.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 18:05:16
  12. Choo, C.W.; Detlor, B.; Turnbull, D.: Information seeking on the Web : an integrated model of browsing and searching (2000) 0.03 
    0.032706074 = product of:
  0.09811822 = sum of:
    0.09811822 = product of:
      0.19623645 = sum of:
        0.19623645 = weight(_text_:firm in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19623645 = score(doc=4438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.57829905 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings from a study of how knowledge workers use the Web to seek external information as part of their daily work. 34 users from 7 companies took part in the study. Participants were mainly IT-specialists, managers, and research/marketing/consulting staff working in organizations that included a large utility company; a major bank, and a consulting firm. Participants answered a detailed questionnaire and were interviewed individually in order to understand their information needs and information seeking preferences. A custom-developed WebTracker software application was installed on each of their work place PCs, and participants' Web-use activities were then recorded continuously during two-week periods
  13. Hunter, E.J.: Classification - made simple (2002) 0.03 
    0.032706074 = product of:
  0.09811822 = sum of:
    0.09811822 = product of:
      0.19623645 = sum of:
        0.19623645 = weight(_text_:firm in 3390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19623645 = score(doc=3390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.57829905 = fieldWeight in 3390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This is an attempt to simplify the initial study of classification as used for information retrieval. The text adopts a gradual progression from very basic principles, one which should enable the reader to gain a firm grasp of one idea before proceeding to the next.
  14. Joint, N.: URLs in the OPAC : comparative reflections on US vs UK practice (2007) 0.03 
    0.028033776 = product of:
  0.08410133 = sum of:
    0.08410133 = product of:
      0.16820265 = sum of:
        0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16820265 = score(doc=857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=857)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose - To examine whether placing URLs into library OPACs has been an effective way of enhancing the role of the catalogue for the contemporary library user. Design/methodology/approach - A brief review of the literature combined with an analysis of publicly available statistics for library use in the USA and the UK. Findings - That certain ways of placing URLs into the OPAC are loosely associated with a successful library environment, i.e. with constant or increasing levels of stock circulation and OPAC use, while other forms of hyper-linking OPAC records are loosely associated with declining levels of library use. Research limitations/implications - The loose association between different OPAC management practices and apparent statistical trends of library use could be investigated in greater depth by further subsequent research, but along the lines and methodology suggested herein. Practical implications - Firm suggestions on how to place and manage URLs in the online catalogue are made. Originality/value - This paper takes certain catalogue enhancement practices which are identified with the US library environment and investigates them in a UK, and specifically Scottish context, to shed light on the original US ideas behind these practices.
  15. Choo, C.W.; Bergeron, P.; Detlor, B.; Heaton, L.: Information culture and information use : an exploratory study of three organizations (2008) 0.03 
    0.028033776 = product of:
  0.08410133 = sum of:
    0.08410133 = product of:
      0.16820265 = sum of:
        0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 1613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16820265 = score(doc=1613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 1613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    This research explores the link between information culture and information use in three organizations. We ask if there is a way to systematically identify information behaviors and values that can characterize the information culture of an organization, and whether this culture has an effect on information use outcomes. The primary method of data collection was a questionnaire survey that was applied to a national law firm, a public health agency, and an engineering company. Over 650 persons in the three organizations answered the survey. Data analysis suggests that the questionnaire instrument was able to elicit information behaviors and values that denote an organization's information culture. Moreover, the information behaviors and values of each organization were able to explain 30-50% of the variance in information use outcomes. We conclude that it is possible to identify behaviors and values that describe an organization's information culture, and that the sets of identified behaviors and values can account for significant proportions of the variance in information use outcomes.
  16. Joint, N.: ¬The practitioner librarian and the semantic web : ANTAEUS (2008) 0.03 
    0.028033776 = product of:
  0.08410133 = sum of:
    0.08410133 = product of:
      0.16820265 = sum of:
        0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 2012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16820265 = score(doc=2012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 2012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2012)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Purpose -To describe and evoke the potential impact of semantic web systems at the level of library practice. Design/methodology/approach - A general outline of some of the broad issues associated with the semantic web, together with a brief, simple explanation of basic semantic web procedures with some examples of specific practical outcomes of semantic web development. Findings - That the semantic web is of central relevance to contemporary LIS practitioners, whose involvement in its development is necessary in order to determine what will be the true benefits of this form of information service innovation. Research limitations/implications - Since much of the initial discussion of this topic has been developmental and futuristic, applied practitioner-oriented research is required to ground these discussions in a firm bedrock of applications. Practical implications - semantic web technologies are of great practical relevance to areas of LIS practice such as digital repository development and open access services. Originality/value - The paper attempts to bridge the gap between the abstractions of theoretical writing in this area and the concerns of the working library professional.
  17. Koenig, M.; Neveroski, K.: Knowledge management : early development (2009) 0.03 
    0.028033776 = product of:
  0.08410133 = sum of:
    0.08410133 = product of:
      0.16820265 = sum of:
        0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 3827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16820265 = score(doc=3827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 3827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3827)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Knowledge management (KM) as a business concept, though it had earlier antecedents, evolved in the late 1980s. It sprang from the combination of the recognition of the importance to a firm of its information and knowledge assets, and from the appearance of the Internet and the recognition of the utility of the Internet as an information and knowledge sharing tool, particularly for geographically dispersed organizations. KM has gone through four stages: 1. An emphasis upon the new technology, the Internet, and upon the development of "best practices" or "lessons learned." 2. An increased recognition of human and cultural factors, and upon the development of "communities of practice" to facilitate the sharing of information. 3. An increased recognition of the importance of designing the systems for retrievability, and the importance of data design and taxonomies. 4. An emphasis upon extending KM systems beyond the parent organization to include, for example, vendors and suppliers, customers, users, alumni, etc. KM has exhibited remarkable staying power and growth in a fashion that is dramatically different from other business enthusiasms of the late twentieth century.
  18. Auletta, K: Googled : the end of the world as we know it (2009) 0.03 
    0.0264305 = product of:
  0.0792915 = sum of:
    0.0792915 = product of:
      0.158583 = sum of:
        0.158583 = weight(_text_:firm in 1991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.158583 = score(doc=1991,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.4673362 = fieldWeight in 1991, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    LCSH
    Google (Firm)
    Subject
    Google (Firm)
  19. Davenport, E.; Rosenbaum, H.: ¬A system for organizing situational knowledge in the workplace that is based on the shape of documents (2000) 0.02 
    0.023361482 = product of:
  0.070084445 = sum of:
    0.070084445 = product of:
      0.14016889 = sum of:
        0.14016889 = weight(_text_:firm in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14016889 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.41307074 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    The authors propose a system for organizing situational knowledge, or knowledge of appropriate conduct, in workplaces that rely on web-based interaction. The conceptual framework that underlies the system is based on five propositions. First, recurrent and routine practice in organizations is articulated in, and co-evolves with distinct documentary forms, or genres. Second, the presence of sets of documentary genres in a group or other form of organization is indicative of activities that characterize such organization. Third, such indexicality may be observed at different levels of organization (the project, the unit, the firm), and clusters of genres at different levels of aggregation may provide profiles of activities at those different levels. Fourth, a notation (such as XML) which captures the 'shape' of documents may be used to model flexible documentary 'compounds' that capture situational knowledge, or knowledge of appropriate activity in an organization. Fifth, such encodings may be used compare organizations and sort them on the basis of their genre and activity profiles; visualization may accelerate the sorting process. An activity classifying system that integrates these proposals might improve organizational experience in a number of evaluative contexts (like benchmarking, team formation, or merger)
  20. Gray Southon, F.C.; Todd, R.J.; Seneque, M.: Knowledge management in three organizations : an exploratory study (2002) 0.02 
    0.023361482 = product of:
  0.070084445 = sum of:
    0.070084445 = product of:
      0.14016889 = sum of:
        0.14016889 = weight(_text_:firm in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14016889 = score(doc=977,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.41307074 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    A major professional concern for people undertaking knowledge management initiatives is interpreting the field for managers and others in their organization. This exploratory research sought to investigate the dynamics of knowledge in organizations: how (if at all) it was perceived, interpreted, utilized, and integrated into the functions, processes, and outputs of the organization. Three organizations with differing functions and outputs were studied: a law firm, an educational institution, and a suburban local council, each being between 100 and 200 employees in size. Semistructured Interviews (both individual and Small group) were carried out with people at all levels to gather perceptions of the dynamics of knowledge in that organization. It was found that knowledge structures and cultures differed substantially between organizations, and were heavily influenced by the commercial environment and the governing structures. People at all levels had substantial awareness of the nature of knowledge within the organization, and there were a significant number of initiatives targeted at improving the way that knowledge was used. The concept of knowledge itself was quite unproblematic, although it was considerably more complex and nuanced than most definitions allow for. Information services had an important, although not a central role in knowledge dynamics. These findings raise a number of questions about the suitability of much knowledge management theory.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 1100
  • m 149
  • el 63
  • s 50
  • b 26
  • x 13
  • i 8
  • n 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications