Search (3706 results, page 2 of 186)

0.15645246 = product of:
  0.23467869 = sum of:
    0.21623303 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21623303 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
    0.018445654 = product of:
      0.036891308 = sum of:
        0.036891308 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036891308 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.

Date

10. 1.2013 19:22:47

0.1281381 = product of:
  0.19220714 = sum of:
    0.048051786 = product of:
      0.14415535 = sum of:
        0.14415535 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14415535 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14415535 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14415535 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.1189221 = product of:
  0.35676628 = sum of:
    0.35676628 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.35676628 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.

0.101933226 = product of:
  0.30579966 = sum of:
    0.30579966 = weight(_text_:2f in 4032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30579966 = score(doc=4032,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 4032, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4032)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Online unter: https://hwph.ch/ bzw. https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27hwph_productpage%27%5D__1515856966402.

0.09610357 = product of:
  0.2883107 = sum of:
    0.2883107 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2883107 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04538139 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.

0.09158861 = product of:
  0.27476582 = sum of:
    0.27476582 = sum of:
      0.23787451 = weight(_text_:firm in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23787451 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.7010043 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.036891308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036891308 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Knowledge resource is unique and valuable for a link to competitive advantage based on the knowledge-based perspective. Effective knowledge management is the major concern of contemporary business managers. The key determinant of effective knowledge management is the firm's competitive strategy. The link between business strategy and knowledge management, while often discussed, has been widely ignored in practice. Moreover, while knowledge management is complex in nature, it is difficult to directly translate a firm's competitive strategy into the specific knowledge management activities. This requires first defining knowledge strategy to guide further information technology (IT)-supported implementation approaches. Finally, the ultimate goal of knowledge management lies in the realization of firm performance. Previous studies have just discussed partial relationship among these relevant knowledge concepts rather than in an integrative manner. Thus, this research proposes a complete process-based model with four components: competitive strategy, knowledge strategy, implementation approach, and firm performance. Empirical results have shown positive relationships between any two consecutive components and useful insight for knowledge implementation practice.

Date

22. 3.2009 19:08:51

0.09115288 = product of:
  0.27345863 = sum of:
    0.27345863 = sum of:
      0.22427022 = weight(_text_:firm in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22427022 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.66091317 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
      0.049188413 = weight(_text_:22 in 1849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.049188413 = score(doc=1849,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1849, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1849)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This article explores the reasons why librarians should be at the heart of Internet site development. There are two distinct ways in which librarians can most effectively contribute to this medium. The first is by getting involved in information architecture. This new discipline requires skills such as expertise in search techniques and navigational logic, and generally involves the librarian working closely with graphic designers to create a firm foundation for the site. The second area is the role librarians can play in the structuring of the data which drives the site (data management).

Date

21. 1.2007 14:22:02

0.06836466 = product of:
  0.20509396 = sum of:
    0.20509396 = sum of:
      0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16820265 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
      0.036891308 = weight(_text_:22 in 5149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036891308 = score(doc=5149,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5149, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5149)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

In this issue we begin with Lamb, King and Kling who are interested in the effect of the industry environment on information gathering practices, particularly those involving information and communication technologies like online searching. They studied use of online services in 26 widely differing California firms operating in law, real estate, or biotechnology over a 17 month period. Data was gathered through semi-structured on-site interviews. Five influences on online usage were identified: interaction with regulatory agencies; demonstration of competence to clients; client expectations for timely, cost effective information; the possibility of shifting information responsibilities outside the organization; and the existence of industry wide infrastructures as information sources. The institutional and technical environment of a firm consistently circumscribes the domain in which choices of online resources are made by its employees. Firms the operate in highly technical and institutional environments have more incentive to gather information than do those in low tech unregulated industries.

Date

5. 7.2006 18:43:22

0.06836466 = product of:
  0.20509396 = sum of:
    0.20509396 = sum of:
      0.16820265 = weight(_text_:firm in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16820265 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.49568486 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
      0.036891308 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036891308 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.

Date

30.12.2008 18:22:46

0.061215237 = product of:
  0.18364571 = sum of:
    0.18364571 = sum of:
      0.14016889 = weight(_text_:firm in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14016889 = score(doc=1629,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.41307074 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
      0.043476824 = weight(_text_:22 in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043476824 = score(doc=1629,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - In today's knowledge-based economy, knowledge networks (KN) increasingly are becoming vital channels for pursuing strategic objectives in project-based organizations (PBO), in which the project is the basic organizational element in its operation. KN initiatives often are started with the selection of a creation methodology, which involves complex decisions for successful implementation. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to address this critical selection of methodology and proposes a holistic framework for selecting an appropriate methodology in this kind of flatter, speedier, and more flexible organizational form. Design/methodology/approach - In the first step, the study established a theoretical background addressing the problem of KN creation in PBO. The second step defined selection criteria based on extensive literature review. In the third step, a holistic framework was constructed based on different characteristics of existing methodologies categorized according to the selected criteria. Finally, the suggested framework was empirically tested in a project-based firm and the case study and the results are discussed. Findings - A holistic framework was determined by including different aspects of a KN such as network perspectives, tools and techniques, objectives, characteristics, capabilities, and approaches. The proposed framework consisted of ten existing KN methodologies that consider qualitative and quantitative dimensions with micro and macro approaches. Originality/value - The development of the theory of KN creation methodology is the main contribution of this research. The selection framework, which was theoretically and empirically grounded, has attempted to offer a more rational and less ambiguous solution to the KN methodology selection problem in PBO forms.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22
18. 9.2018 16:27:22

0.05697055 = product of:
  0.17091165 = sum of:
    0.17091165 = sum of:
      0.14016889 = weight(_text_:firm in 914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14016889 = score(doc=914,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.41307074 = fieldWeight in 914, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=914)
      0.030742759 = weight(_text_:22 in 914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030742759 = score(doc=914,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 914, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=914)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

We are in the midst of a new business revolution driven by information technology. The centerpiece of this business revolution is a new kind of product which delivers instant customer gratification in a cost-effective way. The ability to make such products will determine the successful corporations of the next century. The new business revolution demands drastic changes in organizational knowledge creation, among corporations as well as in a corporation. The key attributes of Japan's success in creation of organizational knowledge are: (1) participative management, (2) "Kaizen," and (3) "Keiretsu." In today's world of fast-moving markets and fierce competition, however, the Japan model betrays its weakness: too much time required for organizational decision making, difficulty to make revolutionary change, and obscurity of responsibility. To solve the problems, Japanese companies are decentralizing the organizations and forming virtual corporations. The changes from consensus management to responsibility management and from "keiretsu" groups to virtual corporations pose three fundamental challenges to Japanese corporations in organizational knowledge creation: (1) co-existence of firm central direction and maximum individual autonomy; (2) construction of sophisticated information networks; and (3) intercultural communication. Corporations, MITI, and universities in Japan are making concerted efforts to deal wich the winds of change that are sweeping through industry and the economy.

Source

Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers

0.052861 = product of:
  0.158583 = sum of:
    0.158583 = product of:
      0.317166 = sum of:
        0.317166 = weight(_text_:firm in 3037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.317166 = score(doc=3037,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.9346724 = fieldWeight in 3037, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3037)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Concentrates on the use of Intranet technology to further the goals and ideals og knowledge management in a law firm. Emphasises the need for research on the implementation of corporate Intranets and defines concepts commonly used when dealing with knowledge management and collaborative technology. discusses the benefits and disadvantages of proprietary collaborative technology and the potential of Intranets to enable enterprise-wide transformation

0.050290745 = product of:
  0.075436115 = sum of:
    0.060064733 = product of:
      0.1801942 = sum of:
        0.1801942 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1801942 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.38474393 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.015371379 = product of:
      0.030742759 = sum of:
        0.030742759 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030742759 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.046722963 = product of:
  0.14016889 = sum of:
    0.14016889 = product of:
      0.28033778 = sum of:
        0.28033778 = weight(_text_:firm in 2490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28033778 = score(doc=2490,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.8261415 = fieldWeight in 2490, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2490)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Exchanging knowledge between individuals working in a firm, between but even within divisions, does not occur automatically (Szulanski 1996). It is not obvious that people exchange ideas, point each other to information that the other might use, or give feedback, even when they have no evil motives for not cooperating in such a manner. As a firm's competitive advantage is closely related to its innovative capacity, however, largely based on how it uses knowledge that is already available, the question then is: How does knowledge flow within a firm? What can be done to stimulate or re-direct knowledge flow within a firm? In recent years, increasing attention is given, by scholars in social sciences in general and in management in particular, to the networks of relations between individuals within firms involved in knowledge transfer and development. Consultancies too are scrambling to set up units that can analyze these networks for firms. In addition to the structural issue of who relates how to whom, I will argue that there is a need to look at why relations are established and maintained. This article thus discusses insights from both the literature on social networks and the anthropological literature on gift and favor exchange. As such, the how and the why of knowledge transfer.

0.046253376 = product of:
  0.13876012 = sum of:
    0.13876012 = product of:
      0.27752024 = sum of:
        0.27752024 = weight(_text_:firm in 8296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27752024 = score(doc=8296,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.8178384 = fieldWeight in 8296, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

A case study was used to define information needs of professionals in an active exhibit design firm. Structured, open ended interviews served as the data collection instrument. Information as how users gather and use needed information was compiled. Information was often collected through similar actions by different users. Personal experiences of colleagues served as commonly used sources. Text sources were used when available, but reliance on them was minimal. The main conclusion is that this design firm would benefit from the use of centralized information sources and, although this conclusion is applicable to the exhibit design and the design field in general, the technical nature of this environment and its subject matter may not provide a suitable acreer alternative for the art librarian

0.046253376 = product of:
  0.13876012 = sum of:
    0.13876012 = product of:
      0.27752024 = sum of:
        0.27752024 = weight(_text_:firm in 4169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27752024 = score(doc=4169,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.8178384 = fieldWeight in 4169, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

The management information systems literature reveals a list of parameters essential for the successful implementation of an information system palnning process. Some studies stress the importance of integrating the corporate objectives of a firm into the information systems planning process. Other studies discuss the importance of performing an analysis of competitors, or determining the stage of maturity a firm has reached, or the framework used for setting information technology investment priorities. Yet others state that the choice of methodology that will be utilized to develop the information systems plan will be crucial to the success of that plan. Aims to develop a holistic model

0.046253376 = product of:
  0.13876012 = sum of:
    0.13876012 = product of:
      0.27752024 = sum of:
        0.27752024 = weight(_text_:firm in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27752024 = score(doc=1066,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            0.8178384 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Knowledge organization structures are dependent upon domain-analytical processes for determining ontological imperatives. Boundary objects-terms used in multiple domains but understood differently in each-are ontological clash points. Cognitive Work Analysis is an effective qualitative methodology for domain analysis of a group of people who work together. CWA was used recently to understand the ontology of a human resources firm. Boundary objects from the taxonomy that emerged from narrative analysis are presented here for individual analysis.

0.04557644 = product of:
  0.13672931 = sum of:
    0.13672931 = sum of:
      0.11213511 = weight(_text_:firm in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11213511 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.33933386 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.33045658 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.4773793 = idf(docFreq=67, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
      0.024594206 = weight(_text_:22 in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024594206 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04538139 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Die Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz wird künftig zu den Kernaufgaben der Bibliotheken gehören müssen. Dies ist auch eines der Hauptarbeitsfelder des Rezensenten, der aus eigener Praxis sieht, welche Schwierigkeiten sich hierbei finden: Viele Klienten erkennen ihren eigenen Informationsbedarf nicht, können ein fachliches nicht von einem informatorischen Problem trennen, sind nicht in der Lage, für ihr spezifisches Problem potenzielle Informationsquellen zu finden und haben vor allem Probleme, die Verbindung zwischen elektronischer und gedruckter WeIt zu schaffen, die somit praktisch unverbunden nebeneinander existieren (vgl. Rainer Strzolka: Vermittlung von Informationskompetenz als Informationsdienstleistung? Vortrag, FH Köln, Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Institut für Informationswissenschaft, am 31. Oktober 2003). Der Brückenschlag zwischen diesen beiden Welten gehört zu den Aufgaben professioneller Informationsvermittler, die nicht nur in der Digitalwelt firm sein müssen, aber auch dort. Nicht zuletzt müssen die gefundenen Informationen ergebnisorientiert genutzt und kritisch bewertet werden und die gefundenen Antworten zur Problemlösung eingesetzt werden. Die Informationslandschaft ist mit ihren verschiedenen Wissensmarktplätzen und Informationsräumen inzwischen so komplex geworden, dass eine kleine Handreichung dazu geeignet erscheint, vor allem die eigene Position des Informationsvermittlers zu überdenken. Zudem ist die aktive Informationsvermittlung noch ein dürres Feld in Deutschland. Die vorliegende kleine Erfahrungsstudie schickt sich an, dies zu ändern. Der Ansatz geht davon aus, dass jeder Vermittler von Medienkompetenz Lehrer wie Lernender zugleich ist; die Anlage ist wie bei allen BibSpider-Publikationen international ausgerichtet. Der Band ist komplett zweisprachig und versammelt Erfahrungsberichte aus der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, den USA und Südafrika, die eher als Ansatz zur Bewusstseinsbildung denn als Arbeitsanleitung gedacht sind. Eingeleitet wird der Band von einer terminologischen Herleitung des Begriffs aus dem Angelsächsischen und den verschiedenen Bedeutungsebenen, die durch unterschiedliche Bildungs- und Informationskulturen bedingt sind. Angerissen werden verschiedene Arbeitsgebiete und -erfahrungen.

Date

22. 3.2008 18:05:16

0.040578373 = product of:
  0.12173512 = sum of:
    0.12173512 = product of:
      0.24347024 = sum of:
        0.24347024 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24347024 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.040578373 = product of:
  0.12173512 = sum of:
    0.12173512 = product of:
      0.24347024 = sum of:
        0.24347024 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24347024 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15891789 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04538139 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22