Search (460 results, page 1 of 23)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.44
    0.43564838 = product of:
      1.5247693 = sum of:
        0.49968433 = weight(_text_:3b in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49968433 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2667077 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            1.873528 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
        0.49968433 = weight(_text_:3b in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49968433 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2667077 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            1.873528 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
        0.49968433 = weight(_text_:3b in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.49968433 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2667077 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            1.873528 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
        0.025716338 = product of:
          0.07714901 = sum of:
            0.07714901 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07714901 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(4/14)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  2. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.03
    0.029909339 = product of:
      0.20936537 = sum of:
        0.19800024 = weight(_text_:1938 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19800024 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236381 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.9323634 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
        0.011365123 = product of:
          0.03409537 = sum of:
            0.03409537 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03409537 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.11, S.1931-1938
  3. Soper, M.E.: Nineteen Thirty-Eight to today : problems in cataloging then and now (1987) 0.02
    0.016000837 = product of:
      0.2240117 = sum of:
        0.2240117 = weight(_text_:1938 in 397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2240117 = score(doc=397,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21236381 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            1.0548488 = fieldWeight in 397, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=397)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    In 1938 the Catalog Section of the American Library Association (ALA) mailed a questionnaire to approximately 1600 librarians, asking their opinions concerning various problems in cataloging and classification. Many changes have occurred since then, but there are problems cited in 1938 that are still with us in one form or another. The items listed in the questionnaire are discussed, and conclusions drawn as to their pertinence for today.
  4. Silva, S.M. de; Zainab, A.N.: ¬An adviser for cataloguing conference proceedings : design and development of CoPAS (2000) 0.02
    0.015770845 = product of:
      0.110395916 = sum of:
        0.10066475 = weight(_text_:mental in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10066475 = score(doc=966,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.6123845 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
        0.009731165 = product of:
          0.029193494 = sum of:
            0.029193494 = weight(_text_:29 in 966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029193494 = score(doc=966,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 966, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=966)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the design and development of an expert adviser to catalogue published conference proceedings. The Conference Proceeding Adviser System (CoPAS) was designed to educate novice cataloguers in creating bibliographic records for published conference proceedings as well as to improve conventional instruction in the cataloguing of conference proceedings. The development tool was Asymetrix ToolBook !!. The knowledge base of the expert system was in the domain of cataloguing published conference proceedings and consists of public and private knowledge. Public/published knowledge are the relevant AACR2R rules that wer, identified based an the nine types of published conference proceedings. Private knowledge or heuristics was elicited from three human expert cataloguers through a multiple-observation approach. The elicited personal knowledge was then modelled into a mental map of their thought processes an how to provide a bibliographic description for published conference proceedings. Based an the mental mapping of the experts, the expert adviser system was designed and developed.
    Date
    4. 9.2002 9:29:37
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.3, S.63-80
  5. Popst, H.; Croissant, C.R.: ¬The development of descriptive cataloging in Germany (2002) 0.01
    0.014962038 = product of:
      0.104734264 = sum of:
        0.09900012 = weight(_text_:1938 in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09900012 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21236381 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.4661817 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the development of descriptive cataloging in Germany and the evolution of cataloging principles. The Instruktionen für die alphabetischen Kataloge der preußischen Bibliotheken (Instructions for the Alphabetic Catalogs of the Prussian Libraries, known as the Prussian Instructions, or PI, for short) were published in 1899. The so-called Berliner Anweisungen ("Berlin Instructions," Instructions for the Alphabetic Catalog in Public Libraries) appeared in 1938. Discussion for reform of cataloging rules began in the 1950s and received impetus from the International Conference on Cataloging Principles in Paris in 1961 and from the International Meeting of Cataloging Experts in Copenhagen in 1969. Preliminary drafts of the new Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung, RAK (Rules for Descriptive Cataloging) were issued between 1969 and 1976; the complete edition of the RAK was published in the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) in 1976 and in a slightly different version in 1977 for the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). A version for academic libraries appeared in 1983, followed by a version for public libraries in 1986. Between 1987 and 1997, supplementary rules for special categories of materials were published.
    Date
    29. 7.2006 19:47:05
  6. Smiraglia, R.P.: Work (2019) 0.01
    0.01267807 = product of:
      0.08874649 = sum of:
        0.059317272 = weight(_text_:mental in 5312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059317272 = score(doc=5312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.36085102 = fieldWeight in 5312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5312)
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 5312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=5312,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 5312, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5312)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    A work is a deliberately created informing entity intended for communication. A work consists of abstract intellectual content that is distinct from any object that is its carrier. In library and information science, the importance of the work lies squarely with the problem of information retrieval. Works are mentefacts-intellectual (or mental) constructs that serve as artifacts of the cultures in which they arise. The meaning of a work is abstract at every level, from its creator's conception of it, to its reception and inherence by its consumers. Works are a kind of informing object and are subject to the phenomenon of instantiation, or realization over time. Research has indicated a base typology of instantiation. The problem for information retrieval is to simultaneously collocate and disambiguate large sets of instantiations. Cataloging and bibliographc tradition stipulate an alphabetico-classed arrangement of works based on an authorship principle. FRBR provided an entity-relationship schema for enhanced control of works in future catalogs, which has been incorporated into RDA. FRBRoo provides an empirically more precise model of work entities as informing objects and a schema for their representation in knowledge organization systems.
  7. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 2: comparison task and conclusions (2010) 0.01
    0.01037836 = product of:
      0.14529704 = sum of:
        0.14529704 = weight(_text_:mental in 4146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14529704 = score(doc=4146,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.8839008 = fieldWeight in 4146, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4146)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to provide some insight into mental models of the bibliographic universe and how they compare with functional requirements for bibliographic records (FRBR) as a conceptual model of the bibliographic universe. Design/methodology/approach - To get a more complete picture of the mental models, different elicitation techniques were used. The three tasks of the paper were: card-sorting, concept mapping and comparison task. The paper deals with comparison task, which consisted of interviews and rankings, and provides a discussion of the results of the paper as a whole. Findings - Results of the ranking part of the comparison task confirm the findings of concept mapping task. In both cases, while there are individual differences between mental models, on average they gravitate towards FRBR. Research limitations/implications - This is a small study and it provides only a glimpse of the implications of using FRBR as a conceptual basis for cataloguing. More FRBR-related user studies are needed, including similar studies on different groups of individuals and different types of materials, as well as practical studies of user needs and user interfaces. Practical implications - The results of this study are the first user-tested indication of the validity of FRBR as a conceptual basis for the future of cataloguing. Originality/value - This is the first published paper of mental models of the bibliographic universe and uses a unique combination of mental model elicitation techniques.
  8. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: How do non-librarians see the bibliographic universe? (2008) 0.01
    0.008806332 = product of:
      0.12328864 = sum of:
        0.12328864 = weight(_text_:mental in 2501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12328864 = score(doc=2501,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.7500148 = fieldWeight in 2501, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2501)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Content
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) is a relatively new conceptual model of the bibliographic universe. While it is recognized among library experts, there is a considerable lack of user studies. A pilot study, consisting of three different tasks, was conducted to test the instruments for acquiring mental models of the bibliographic universe. Results show that users do not have a consistent mental model of the bibliographic universe and that various techniques used can be useful for acquiring individuals' mental models of the bibliographic universe. Of the three tasks, the one asking people to rank pairs of similar item according to substitutability revealed results that were closest to FRBR, while card sorting and concept mapping exercises failed to provide a single alternative model.
  9. Pisanski, J.; Zumer, M.: Mental models of the bibliographic universe : part 1: mental models of descriptions (2010) 0.01
    0.008473896 = product of:
      0.118634544 = sum of:
        0.118634544 = weight(_text_:mental in 4145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118634544 = score(doc=4145,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.72170204 = fieldWeight in 4145, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4145)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The paper aims to present the results of the first two tasks of a user study looking into mental models of the bibliographic universe and especially their comparison to the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) conceptual model, which has not yet been user tested. Design/methodology/approach - The paper employes a combination of techniques for eliciting mental models and consisted of three tasks, two of which, card sorting and concept mapping, are presented herein. Its participants were 30 individuals residing in the general area of Ljubljana, Slovenia. Findings - Cumulative results of concept mapping show a strong resemblance to FRBR. Card sorts did not produce conclusive results. In both tasks, participants paid special attention to the original expression, indicating that a special place for it should be considered. Research limitations/implications - The study was performed using a relatively small sample of participants living in a geographically limited space using relatively straight-forward examples. Practical implications - Some solid evidence is provided for adoption of FRBR as the conceptual basis for cataloguing. Originality/value - This is the first widely published user study of FRBR, applying novel methodological approaches in the field of Library and Information Science.
  10. Pauman Budanovi, M.; Zumer, M.: Investigating mental models of cataloguers as the first step towards the development of intuitive cataloguer's tools (2015) 0.01
    0.008473896 = product of:
      0.118634544 = sum of:
        0.118634544 = weight(_text_:mental in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118634544 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.72170204 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  11. Cossham, A.F.: Models of the bibliographic universe (2017) 0.01
    0.00838873 = product of:
      0.117442206 = sum of:
        0.117442206 = weight(_text_:mental in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.117442206 = score(doc=3817,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.7144486 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    What kinds of mental models do library catalogue users have of the bibliographic universe in an age of online and electronic information? Using phenomenography and grounded analysis, it identifies participants' understanding, experience, and conceptualisation of the bibliographic universe, and identifies their expectations when using library catalogues. It contrasts participants' mental models with existing LIS models, and explores the nature of the bibliographic universe. The bibliographic universe can be considered to be a social object that exists because it is inscribed in catalogue records, cataloguing codes, bibliographies, and other bibliographic tools. It is a socially constituted phenomenon.
  12. Franca, A.S.; Silveira, N.C.: ¬The bibliographic representation of authorship of autochthonous communities (2016) 0.01
    0.00803734 = product of:
      0.05626138 = sum of:
        0.04708675 = weight(_text_:representation in 4948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04708675 = score(doc=4948,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.40667427 = fieldWeight in 4948, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4948)
        0.00917463 = product of:
          0.027523888 = sum of:
            0.027523888 = weight(_text_:29 in 4948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027523888 = score(doc=4948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4948)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  13. Yakel, E.: Archival representation (2003) 0.01
    0.006726679 = product of:
      0.0941735 = sum of:
        0.0941735 = weight(_text_:representation in 409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0941735 = score(doc=409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=409)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  14. Artandi, S.: Document description and representation (1970) 0.01
    0.006726679 = product of:
      0.0941735 = sum of:
        0.0941735 = weight(_text_:representation in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0941735 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  15. Vickery, B.C.: Document description and representation (1971) 0.01
    0.006726679 = product of:
      0.0941735 = sum of:
        0.0941735 = weight(_text_:representation in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0941735 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  16. Richmond, P.A.: Document description and representation (1972) 0.01
    0.006726679 = product of:
      0.0941735 = sum of:
        0.0941735 = weight(_text_:representation in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0941735 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  17. Batten, W.E.: Document description and representation (1973) 0.01
    0.006726679 = product of:
      0.0941735 = sum of:
        0.0941735 = weight(_text_:representation in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0941735 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  18. Harris, J.L.: Document description and representation (1974) 0.01
    0.006726679 = product of:
      0.0941735 = sum of:
        0.0941735 = weight(_text_:representation in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0941735 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  19. Carlyle, A.; Fusco, L.M.: Equivalence in Tillett's bibliographic relationships taxonomy : a revision (2003) 0.01
    0.006028005 = product of:
      0.04219603 = sum of:
        0.03531506 = weight(_text_:representation in 2719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03531506 = score(doc=2719,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 2719, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2719)
        0.006880972 = product of:
          0.020642916 = sum of:
            0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 2719) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020642916 = score(doc=2719,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2719, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2719)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:40:29
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
  20. Frías, J.A.; Ríos Hilario, A.B.: Visibility and invisibility of the kindship relationships in bibliographic families of the library catalogue : a revision (2003) 0.01
    0.006028005 = product of:
      0.04219603 = sum of:
        0.03531506 = weight(_text_:representation in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03531506 = score(doc=2721,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
        0.006880972 = product of:
          0.020642916 = sum of:
            0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020642916 = score(doc=2721,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    11. 9.2004 17:44:29
    Source
    Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas

Authors

Languages

  • e 377
  • d 65
  • f 5
  • i 5
  • a 1
  • ru 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 421
  • m 26
  • b 15
  • s 15
  • el 10
  • r 2
  • ? 1
  • l 1
  • n 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects