Search (250 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.06
    0.057812307 = product of:
      0.26979077 = sum of:
        0.029976752 = product of:
          0.11990701 = sum of:
            0.11990701 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11990701 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.11990701 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11990701 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.11990701 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11990701 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.05
    0.048176926 = product of:
      0.22482565 = sum of:
        0.024980627 = product of:
          0.09992251 = sum of:
            0.09992251 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09992251 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.09992251 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09992251 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.09992251 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09992251 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21335082 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Shahbazi, M.; Bunker, D.; Sorrell, T.C.: Communicating shared situational awareness in times of chaos : social media and the COVID-19 pandemic (2023) 0.02
    0.015489013 = product of:
      0.108423084 = sum of:
        0.102740526 = weight(_text_:mental in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102740526 = score(doc=1054,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.6250123 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
        0.0056825615 = product of:
          0.017047685 = sum of:
            0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017047685 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    To effectively manage a crisis, most decisions made by governments, organizations, communities, and individuals are based on "shared situational awareness" (SSA) derived from multiple information sources. Developing SSA depends on the alignment of mental models, which "represent our shared version of truth and reality on which we can act." Social media has facilitated public sensemaking during a crisis; however, it has also encouraged mental model dissonance, resulting in the digital destruction of mental models and undermining adequate SSA. The study is concerned with the challenges of creating SSA during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. This paper documents a netnography of Australian public health agencies' Facebook communication, exploring the initial impact of COVID-19 on SSA creation. Chaos theory is used as a theoretical lens to examine information perception, meaning, and assumptions relating to SSA from pre to post-pandemic periods. Our study highlights how the initial COVID-19 "butterfly effect" swamped the public health communication channel, leaving little space for other important health issues. This research contributes to information systems, information science, and communications by illustrating how the emergence of a crisis impacts social media communication, the creation of SSA, and what this means for social media adoption for crisis communication purposes.
    Date
    22. 9.2023 16:02:26
  4. Zhang, Y.; Trace, C.B.: ¬The quality of health and wellness self-tracking data : a consumer perspective (2022) 0.01
    0.01267807 = product of:
      0.08874649 = sum of:
        0.059317272 = weight(_text_:mental in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059317272 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.36085102 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Information quality (IQ) is key to users' satisfaction with information systems. Understanding what IQ means to users can effectively inform system improvement. Existing inquiries into self-tracking data quality primarily focus on accuracy. Interviewing 20 consumers who had self-tracked health indicators for at least 6 months, we identified eight dimensions that consumers apply to evaluate self-tracking data quality: value-added, accuracy, completeness, accessibility, ease of understanding, trustworthiness, aesthetics, and invasiveness. These dimensions fell into four categories-intrinsic, contextual, representational, and accessibility-suggesting that consumers judge self-tracking data quality not only based on the data's inherent quality but also considering tasks at hand, the clarity of data representation, and data accessibility. We also found that consumers' self-tracking data quality judgments are shaped primarily by their goals or motivations, subjective experience with tracked activities, mental models of how systems work, self-tracking tools' reputation, cost, and design, and domain knowledge and intuition, but less by more objective criteria such as scientific research results, validated devices, or consultation with experts. Future studies should develop and validate a scale for measuring consumers' perceptions of self-tracking data quality and commit efforts to develop technologies and training materials to enhance consumers' ability to evaluate data quality.
  5. Metzinger, T.: Artificial suffering : an argument for a global moratorium on synthetic phenomenology (2021) 0.01
    0.011692059 = product of:
      0.16368882 = sum of:
        0.16368882 = weight(_text_:phenomenology in 1212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16368882 = score(doc=1212,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20961581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.7808992 = fieldWeight in 1212, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1212)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    This paper has a critical and a constructive part. The first part formulates a political demand, based on ethical considerations: Until 2050, there should be a global moratorium on synthetic phenomenology, strictly banning all research that directly aims at or knowingly risks the emergence of artificial consciousness on post-biotic carrier systems. The second part lays the first conceptual foundations for an open-ended process with the aim of gradually refining the original moratorium, tying it to an ever more fine-grained, rational, evidence-based, and hopefully ethically convincing set of constraints. The systematic research program defined by this process could lead to an incremental reformulation of the original moratorium. It might result in a moratorium repeal even before 2050, in the continuation of a strict ban beyond the year 2050, or a gradually evolving, more substantial, and ethically refined view of which if any kinds of conscious experience we want to implement in AI systems.
  6. Hauff-Hartig, S.: Wissensrepräsentation durch RDF: Drei angewandte Forschungsbeispiele : Bitte recht vielfältig: Wie Wissensgraphen, Disco und FaBiO Struktur in Mangas und die Humanities bringen (2021) 0.01
    0.010811832 = product of:
      0.07568282 = sum of:
        0.06659072 = weight(_text_:representation in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06659072 = score(doc=318,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.57512426 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
        0.009092098 = product of:
          0.027276294 = sum of:
            0.027276294 = weight(_text_:22 in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027276294 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    In der Session "Knowledge Representation" auf der ISI 2021 wurden unter der Moderation von Jürgen Reischer (Uni Regensburg) drei Projekte vorgestellt, in denen Knowledge Representation mit RDF umgesetzt wird. Die Domänen sind erfreulich unterschiedlich, die gemeinsame Klammer indes ist die Absicht, den Zugang zu Forschungsdaten zu verbessern: - Japanese Visual Media Graph - Taxonomy of Digital Research Activities in the Humanities - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  7. Pepper, S.; Arnaud, P.J.L.: Absolutely PHAB : toward a general model of associative relations (2020) 0.01
    0.00929306 = product of:
      0.065051414 = sum of:
        0.059317272 = weight(_text_:mental in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059317272 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.36085102 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=103)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    There have been many attempts at classifying the semantic modification relations (R) of N + N compounds but this work has not led to the acceptance of a definitive scheme, so that devising a reusable classification is a worthwhile aim. The scope of this undertaking is extended to other binominal lexemes, i.e. units that contain two thing-morphemes without explicitly stating R, like prepositional units, N + relational adjective units, etc. The 25-relation taxonomy of Bourque (2014) was tested against over 15,000 binominal lexemes from 106 languages and extended to a 29-relation scheme ("Bourque2") through the introduction of two new reversible relations. Bourque2 is then mapped onto Hatcher's (1960) four-relation scheme (extended by the addition of a fifth relation, similarity , as "Hatcher2"). This results in a two-tier system usable at different degrees of granularities. On account of its semantic proximity to compounding, metonymy is then taken into account, following Janda's (2011) suggestion that it plays a role in word formation; Peirsman and Geeraerts' (2006) inventory of 23 metonymic patterns is mapped onto Bourque2, confirming the identity of metonymic and binominal modification relations. Finally, Blank's (2003) and Koch's (2001) work on lexical semantics justifies the addition to the scheme of a third, superordinate level which comprises the three Aristotelean principles of similarity, contiguity and contrast.
    Source
    ¬The Mental Lexicon. 15(2020) no.1, S.101-122
  8. Machado, L.; Veronez Júnior, W.R.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: ¬A indeterminação ontológica dos conceitos : interpretações linguísticas e psicológicas [The ontologic indetermination of concepts: linguistic and psychological interpretations] (2022) 0.01
    0.008806332 = product of:
      0.12328864 = sum of:
        0.12328864 = weight(_text_:mental in 832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12328864 = score(doc=832,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.7500148 = fieldWeight in 832, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=832)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    In the context of Knowledge Organization (KO) the ontological focus is sometimes overlooked in studies related to the nature of the concept. This study presents an analysis with this purpose, questioning possible modes of existence of concepts (such as mental representations, cognitive abilities or abstract objects), framed in four different readings: a linguistic one, the psychological one, the epistemological one, and the ontological one; and focuses on the two first ones. The suitability of using the concept as an elementary unit of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) is analyzed according to the different perspectives. From a mental entity, passing to another one that exists in a non-mental realm, although also non-physical, moving on to another one with an objective linguistic existence.
  9. Marques Redigolo, F.; Lopes Fujita, M.S.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Guidelines for subject analysis in subject cataloging (2022) 0.01
    0.008117716 = product of:
      0.05682401 = sum of:
        0.049943037 = weight(_text_:representation in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049943037 = score(doc=736,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.4313432 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
        0.006880972 = product of:
          0.020642916 = sum of:
            0.020642916 = weight(_text_:29 in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020642916 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The representation of information in subject cataloging as a result of subject analysis will depend on the cataloger's prior knowledge, influenced by subjectivity. The subject analysis in cataloging is a central theme of this investigation with the aim to elaborate guidelines for subject analysis in cataloging. For this purpose, how books are cataloged in university libraries has been verified. The Individual Verbal Protocol was applied with catalogers from Brazilian and Spanish University Libraries. Directions for the elements and variables of the subject analysis and procedures for good development were obtained to constitute the Guidelines of Subject Analysis in Cataloging. It is concluded that the guidelines formed by four sections are indicated for incorporation in subject cataloging procedure manuals for the purpose of improving the levels of representation and information retrieval results.
    Date
    29. 9.2022 18:14:27
  10. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.01
    0.007466091 = product of:
      0.052262634 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.022833413 = product of:
          0.034250118 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
            0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017047685 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:29:13
  11. Wagner, T.: Body-oriented cataloging as a method of inclusive gender representation (2022) 0.01
    0.0070326724 = product of:
      0.049228705 = sum of:
        0.041200902 = weight(_text_:representation in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041200902 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
        0.008027801 = product of:
          0.024083402 = sum of:
            0.024083402 = weight(_text_:29 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024083402 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Date
    22.11.2023 18:02:29
  12. Gorichanaz, T.: Understanding and information in the work of visual artists (2020) 0.01
    0.0068896124 = product of:
      0.09645457 = sum of:
        0.09645457 = weight(_text_:phenomenology in 5875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09645457 = score(doc=5875,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20961581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.4601493 = fieldWeight in 5875, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5875)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    To better account for information behavior in everyday life, the field must more fully explore information phenomena in the lifeworld, that is, information experience. This article shows that one way to do this is through the concept of understanding. Visual art is identified as an illuminating domain for an initial foray into such research. This article presents findings from a phenomenology-of-practice study of the information behavior of visual artists. Seven local artists documented their experiences creating self-portraits, and semistructured follow-up interviews were conducted. The findings show how these participants built understanding with information in their work of creating individual self-portraits. These understandings fall into two categories: of the self and of the artistic process. Many forms of information, traditional and novel, contribute to these understandings; examples of the latter include memories, the lived environment, profound experiences, and online browsing. These findings extend the literature on artists' information behavior, connect everyday information behavior to information experience, and illustrate a method for studying understanding empirically in information science. The article closes by discussing the meaning of these findings for the future of information science, suggesting that the kinds of information employed by artists might be recognized and appreciated more widely throughout society.
  13. Midtgarden, T.: Peirce's Classification of the Sciences (2020) 0.01
    0.0068896124 = product of:
      0.09645457 = sum of:
        0.09645457 = weight(_text_:phenomenology in 5885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09645457 = score(doc=5885,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20961581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.4601493 = fieldWeight in 5885, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5885)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Charles Peirce's classification of the sciences was designed shortly after the turn of the twentieth century. The classification has two main sources of inspiration: Comte's science classification and Kant's theoretical philosophy. Peirce's classification, like that of Comte, is hierarchically organised in that the more general an abstract sciences provide principles for the less general and more concrete sciences. However, Peirce includes and assigns a superordinate role to philosophical disciplines which analyse and provide logical, methodological and ontological principles for the specialised sciences, and which are based on everyday life experience. Moreover, Peirce recognises two main branches of specialised empirical science: the natural sciences, on the one hand, and the social sciences, the humanities and psychology on the other. While both branches share logical and methodological principles, they are based on different ontological principles in studying physical nature and the human mind and its products, respectively. Peirce's most basic philosophical discipline, phenomenology, transforms his early engagement with Kant. Peirce's classification of aesthetics, ethics and logic as normative sub-disciplines of philosophy relate to his philosophical pragmatism. Yet his more overarching division between theoretical (philosophical and specialised) sciences and practical sciences may be seen as problematic. Taking Peirce's historical account of scientific developments into consideration, however, I argue that his science classification and its emphasis on the interdependencies between the sciences could be seen as sustaining and supporting interdisciplinarity and interaction across fields of research, even across the divide between theoretical and practical sciences.
  14. Prokop, M.: Hans Jonas and the phenomenological continuity of life and mind (2022) 0.01
    0.0068896124 = product of:
      0.09645457 = sum of:
        0.09645457 = weight(_text_:phenomenology in 1048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09645457 = score(doc=1048,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20961581 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.4601493 = fieldWeight in 1048, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.329592 = idf(docFreq=28, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1048)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Phenomenology and the cognitive sciences [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09863-1]
  15. Schoepe, B.: ¬Die Digitalisierung und ihre Effizienzgewinneaus pädagogischer Perspektive : Datenschutzrechtliche Probleme der Coronakrisen-induzierten"Digitalisierungsoffensive". Mit einer kritischen Bewertungzur Einführung der Microsoft 365 / Microsoft Teams -Software an derSekundarstufe Iund II der Fritz-Schumacher-Schule (FSS), Hamburg (2021) 0.01
    0.0065051415 = product of:
      0.04553599 = sum of:
        0.04152209 = weight(_text_:mental in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04152209 = score(doc=115,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16438161 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25259572 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.532101 = idf(docFreq=174, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
        0.0040139006 = product of:
          0.012041701 = sum of:
            0.012041701 = weight(_text_:29 in 115) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012041701 = score(doc=115,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 115, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=115)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Die Effizienzgewinne der Digitalisierung werden im Kontext der Etablierung eines neuen Typus von Kontrollgesellschaft diskutiert, der als epochale Zäsur für das Schul-und Bildungssystem dargestellt wird. In diesem Zusammenhang wird aufgezeigt, wie durch die beabsichtigte Digitalisierung Methoden des Profiling, der Verhaltenssteuerung und des Mental-Programming (vulgo: Gehirnwäsche) die Klassenzimmer erobern. Komplementär dazu wird die Rolle der Empirischen Bildungsforschung, der kompetenzorientierten Bildung und des sogenannten Bildungsmonitorings als neue Ideologie-, Konditionierungs-und Kontrollinstanzen des Schulumbaus untersucht und kritisch gedeutet.
    Date
    29. 1.2021 13:01:49
  16. Soos, C.; Leazer, H.H.: Presentations of authorship in knowledge organization (2020) 0.01
    0.005023338 = product of:
      0.035163365 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
        0.005734144 = product of:
          0.017202431 = sum of:
            0.017202431 = weight(_text_:29 in 21) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017202431 = score(doc=21,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08852329 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 21, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=21)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The "author" is a concept central to many publication and documentation practices, often carrying legal, professional, social, and personal importance. Typically viewed as the solitary owner of their creations, a person is held responsible for their work and positioned to receive the praise and criticism that may emerge in its wake. Although the role of the individual within creative production is undeniable, literary (Foucault 1977; Bloom 1997) and knowledge organization (Moulaison et. al. 2014) theorists have challenged the view that the work of one person can-or should-be fully detached from their professional and personal networks. As these relationships often provide important context and reveal the role of community in the creation of new things, their absence from catalog records presents a falsely simplified view of the creative process. Here, we address the consequences of what we call the "author-asowner" concept and suggest that an "author-as-node" approach, which situates an author within their networks of influence, may allow for more relational representation within knowledge organization systems, a framing that emphasizes rather than erases the messy complexities that affect the production of new objects and ideas.
    Date
    31.10.2020 18:53:29
  17. Asubiaro, T.V.; Onaolapo, S.: ¬A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023) 0.01
    0.005015969 = product of:
      0.03511178 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
        0.0056825615 = product of:
          0.017047685 = sum of:
            0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017047685 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This is the first study that evaluated the coverage of journals from Africa in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef. A list of active journals published in each of the 55 African countries was compiled from Ulrich's periodicals directory and African Journals Online (AJOL) website. Journal master lists for Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef were searched for the African journals. A total of 2,229 unique active African journals were identified from Ulrich (N = 2,117, 95.0%) and AJOL (N = 243, 10.9%) after removing duplicates. The volume of African journals in Web of Science and Scopus databases is 7.4% (N = 166) and 7.8% (N = 174), respectively, compared to the 45.6% (N = 1,017) covered in CrossRef. While making up only 17.% of all the African journals, South African journals had the best coverage in the two most authoritative databases, accounting for 73.5% and 62.1% of all the African journals in Web of Science and Scopus, respectively. In contrast, Nigeria published 44.5% of all the African journals. The distribution of the African journals is biased in favor of Medical, Life and Health Sciences and Humanities and the Arts in the three databases. The low representation of African journals in CrossRef, a free indexing infrastructure that could be harnessed for building an African-centric research indexing database, is concerning.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:09:06
  18. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, G.; Lu, J.: Stepping beyond your comfort zone : diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation (2023) 0.01
    0.005015969 = product of:
      0.03511178 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.0056825615 = product of:
          0.017047685 = sum of:
            0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017047685 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Predicting a researcher's knowledge trajectories beyond their current foci can leverage potential inter-/cross-/multi-disciplinary interactions to achieve exploratory innovation. In this study, we present a method of diffusion-based network analytics for knowledge trajectory recommendation. The method begins by constructing a heterogeneous bibliometric network consisting of a co-topic layer and a co-authorship layer. A novel link prediction approach with a diffusion strategy is then used to capture the interactions between social elements (e.g., collaboration) and knowledge elements (e.g., technological similarity) in the process of exploratory innovation. This diffusion strategy differentiates the interactions occurring among homogeneous and heterogeneous nodes in the heterogeneous bibliometric network and weights the strengths of these interactions. Two sets of experiments-one with a local dataset and the other with a global dataset-demonstrate that the proposed method is prior to 10 selected baselines in link prediction, recommender systems, and upstream graph representation learning. A case study recommending knowledge trajectories of information scientists with topical hierarchy and explainable mediators reveals the proposed method's reliability and potential practical uses in broad scenarios.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:07:12
  19. Hjoerland, B.: Table of contents (ToC) (2022) 0.01
    0.005015969 = product of:
      0.03511178 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
        0.0056825615 = product of:
          0.017047685 = sum of:
            0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017047685 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    A table of contents (ToC) is a kind of document representation as well as a paratext and a kind of finding device to the document it represents. TOCs are very common in books and some other kinds of documents, but not in all kinds. This article discusses the definition and functions of ToC, normative guidelines for their design, and the history and forms of ToC in different kinds of documents and media. A main part of the article is about the role of ToC in information searching, in current awareness services and as items added to bibliographical records. The introduction and the conclusion focus on the core theoretical issues concerning ToCs. Should they be document-oriented or request-oriented, neutral, or policy-oriented, objective, or subjective? It is concluded that because of the special functions of ToCs, the arguments for the request-oriented (policy-oriented, subjective) view are weaker than they are in relation to indexing and knowledge organization in general. Apart from level of granularity, the evaluation of a ToC is difficult to separate from the evaluation of the structuring and naming of the elements of the structure of the document it represents.
    Date
    18.11.2023 13:47:22
  20. Li, Z.; He, L.; Gao, D.: Ontology construction and evaluation for Chinese traditional culture : towards digital humanity (2022) 0.01
    0.005015969 = product of:
      0.03511178 = sum of:
        0.02942922 = weight(_text_:representation in 1097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02942922 = score(doc=1097,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11578492 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025165197 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 1097, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1097)
        0.0056825615 = product of:
          0.017047685 = sum of:
            0.017047685 = weight(_text_:22 in 1097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017047685 = score(doc=1097,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08812423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025165197 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1097, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1097)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Against the background that the top-level semantic framework of Chinese traditional culture is not comprehensive and unified, this study aims to preserve and disseminate cultural heritage information about Chinese traditional culture through the development of a domain ontology which is constructed from ancient books. A combination of top-down and bottom-up approaches was used to construct the ontology for Chinese traditional culture (CTCO). An investigation of historians' needs, and LDA topic clustering model were conducted, understanding the specific needs of historians, collecting the topic, concepts and relationships. CIDOC CRM was reused to construct the basic framework of CTCO. Ontology structure and function were adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of CTCO. Evaluation results show that the ontology meets all the quality criteria of OntoMetrics, and the experts agreed on content representation (average score = 4.30). CTCO contributes to the organization of traditional Chinese culture and the construction of related databases. The study also forms a common path and puts forward proposals for the construction of domain ontology, which has great social relevance.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 49(2022) no.1, S.22 - 39

Languages

  • e 180
  • d 68
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 228
  • el 44
  • m 8
  • p 5
  • x 2
  • More… Less…