-
Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Introducing FRSAD and mapping it with SKOS and other models (2009)
0.01
0.008591056 = product of:
0.034364223 = sum of:
0.019452421 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019452421 = score(doc=3150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
0.014911801 = product of:
0.029823601 = sum of:
0.029823601 = weight(_text_:system in 3150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029823601 = score(doc=3150,freq=4.0), product of:
0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 3150, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3150)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records (FRSAR) Working Group was formed in 2005 as the third IFLA working group of the FRBR family to address subject authority data issues and to investigate the direct and indirect uses of subject authority data by a wide range of users. This paper introduces the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD), the model developed by the FRSAR Working Group, and discusses it in the context of other related conceptual models defined in the specifications during recent years, including the British Standard BS8723-5: Structured vocabularies for information retrieval - Guide Part 5: Exchange formats and protocols for interoperability, W3C's SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference, and OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. These models enable the consideration of the functions of subject authority data and concept schemes at a higher level that is independent of any implementation, system, or specific context, while allowing us to focus on the semantics, structures, and interoperability of subject authority data.
-
Chan, L.M.; Zeng, M.L.: Metadata interoperability and standardization - a study of methodology, part I : achieving interoperability at the schema level (2006)
0.00
0.003248495 = product of:
0.02598796 = sum of:
0.02598796 = product of:
0.05197592 = sum of:
0.05197592 = weight(_text_:etc in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05197592 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.2992217 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- The rapid growth of Internet resources and digital collections has been accompanied by a proliferation of metadata schemas, each of which has been designed based on the requirements of particular user communities, intended users, types of materials, subject domains, project needs, etc. Problems arise when building large digital libraries or repositories with metadata records that were prepared according to diverse schemas. This article (published in two parts) contains an analysis of the methods that have been used to achieve or improve interoperability among metadata schemas and applications, for the purposes of facilitating conversion and exchange of metadata and enabling cross-domain metadata harvesting and federated searches. From a methodological point of view, implementing interoperability may be considered at different levels of operation: schema level, record level, and repository level. Part I of the article intends to explain possible situations in which metadata schemas may be created or implemented, whether in individual projects or in integrated repositories. It also discusses approaches used at the schema level. Part II of the article will discuss metadata interoperability efforts at the record and repository levels.
-
Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012)
0.00
0.0023042648 = product of:
0.018434118 = sum of:
0.018434118 = product of:
0.036868237 = sum of:
0.036868237 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036868237 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.032069415 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
