Search (342 results, page 1 of 18)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.06
    0.05942386 = product of:
      0.23769544 = sum of:
        0.05942386 = product of:
          0.17827158 = sum of:
            0.17827158 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17827158 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27188486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17827158 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17827158 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27188486 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  2. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.04
    0.04244561 = product of:
      0.16978244 = sum of:
        0.04244561 = product of:
          0.12733683 = sum of:
            0.12733683 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12733683 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27188486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12733683 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12733683 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27188486 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  3. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.04
    0.04244561 = product of:
      0.16978244 = sum of:
        0.04244561 = product of:
          0.12733683 = sum of:
            0.12733683 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12733683 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27188486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.12733683 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12733683 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27188486 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  4. Cole, C.: Activity of understanding a problem during interaction with an 'enabling' information retrieval system : modeling information flow (1999) 0.03
    0.026388137 = product of:
      0.070368364 = sum of:
        0.027509877 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027509877 = score(doc=3675,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
        0.029823601 = product of:
          0.059647202 = sum of:
            0.059647202 = weight(_text_:system in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059647202 = score(doc=3675,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.5905411 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013034889 = product of:
          0.026069777 = sum of:
            0.026069777 = weight(_text_:22 in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026069777 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This article is about the mental coding processes involved in the flow of 'information' when the user is interacting with an 'enabling' information retrieval system. An 'enabling' IR system is designed to stimulate the user's grasping towards a higher understanding of the information need / problem / task that brought the user to the IR system. C. Shannon's (1949/1959) model of the flow of information and K.R. Popper's (1975) 3 worlds concept are used to diagram the flow of information between the user and system when the user receives a stimulating massage, with particluar emphasis on the decoding and encoding operations involved as the user processes the message. The key difference between the model of information flow proposed here and the linear transmission, receiver-oriented model now in use is that we assume that users of a truly interactive, 'enabling' IR system are primarily message senders, not passive receivers of the message, because they must create a new message back to the system, absed on a reconceptualization of their information need, while they are 'online' interacting with the system
    Date
    22. 5.1999 14:51:49
  5. Gödert, W.: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (2003) 0.03
    0.025398523 = product of:
      0.10159409 = sum of:
        0.01315321 = product of:
          0.02630642 = sum of:
            0.02630642 = weight(_text_:29 in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02630642 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08844088 = sum of:
          0.062371105 = weight(_text_:etc in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.062371105 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032069415 = queryNorm
              0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
          0.026069777 = weight(_text_:22 in 1506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026069777 = score(doc=1506,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.032069415 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1506, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1506)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Die Informations- oder Wissensgesellschaft ist in aller Munde, das Verständnis derselben ist gleichwohl unklar. Unscharf ist auch das Verständnis der zugrunde liegenden Begriffe Information und Wissen sowie des Erwerbs von Information aus den verschiedenen medialen Repräsentationsformen. Allenfalls lässt sich eine gewisse Einseitigkeit bemerken, die durch den informationstechnischen Primat und an der Nachrichtentechnik orientierten Übertragungsformen geprägt ist. Ausgangspunkt der Erörterung ist die Beobachtung, dass Menschen Informationsbedürfnisse besitzen, die sie durch Inanspruchnahme verschiedenster externer Quellen und Hilfsmittel befriedigen wollen. Die neuartigen Speicher- und Findeformen führen zu übersteigerten Erwartungen, wenn man an all die Formulierungen mit virtuell, cyber, Hyper, Multimedia, Information Superhighway etc. denkt. Häufig wird dabei suggeriert, die veränderte mediale Präsentation habe neuartige und bessere Qualitäten für die Rezeption von Information, ohne dass die dabei beteiligten Prozesse völlig verstanden sind. Innerhalb eines konstruktivistischen Modells der kognitiven Informationsverarbeitung und der Rezeption medial gespeicherter Information werden Fragen der Darstellung und Rezeption von Information untersucht.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:29
  6. Verdi, M.P.; Kulhavy, R.W.; Stock, W.A.; Rittscho, K.A.; Savenye, W.: Why maps improve memory for text : the influence of structural information on working-memory operations (1993) 0.02
    0.019158375 = product of:
      0.051089 = sum of:
        0.027509877 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027509877 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
        0.010544236 = product of:
          0.021088472 = sum of:
            0.021088472 = weight(_text_:system in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021088472 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013034889 = product of:
          0.026069777 = sum of:
            0.026069777 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026069777 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    In order to test how associated verbal and spatial stimuli are processed in memory, undergraduates studied a reference map as either an intact unit or as a series of individual features, and read a text containing facts related to map features. In Addition, the map was presented either before or after reading the text. Seeing the intact map prior to the text led to better recall of both map information and facts from the text. These results support a dual coding modell, where stimuli such as maps possess a retrieval advantage because they allow simultaneous representation in working memory. This advantage occurs because information from the map can be used to cue retrieval of associated verbal facts, without exceeding the processing constraints of the memorial system
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:18:18
  7. Sommer, F.T.: Theorie neuronaler Assoziativspeicher : lokales Lernen und iteratives Retrieval von Information (1994) 0.02
    0.01901995 = product of:
      0.0760798 = sum of:
        0.04538898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04538898 = score(doc=3101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3101)
        0.030690823 = product of:
          0.061381646 = sum of:
            0.061381646 = weight(_text_:29 in 3101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061381646 = score(doc=3101,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3101, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 9:55:19
  8. Martin, W.J.: ¬The information society (1995) 0.02
    0.016893653 = product of:
      0.06757461 = sum of:
        0.045849796 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045849796 = score(doc=1201,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
        0.021724815 = product of:
          0.04344963 = sum of:
            0.04344963 = weight(_text_:22 in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04344963 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    15. 7.2002 14:22:55
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Social aspects
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Social aspects
  9. Proper, H.A.; Bruza, P.D.: What is information discovery about? (1999) 0.02
    0.015888862 = product of:
      0.06355545 = sum of:
        0.019452421 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019452421 = score(doc=3912,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3912, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3912)
        0.04410303 = product of:
          0.08820606 = sum of:
            0.08820606 = weight(_text_:etc in 3912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08820606 = score(doc=3912,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.50779605 = fieldWeight in 3912, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3912)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet has led to an increase in the quantity and diversity of information available for searching. Furthermore, users are bombarded by a constant barrage of electronic messages in the form of e-mail, faxes, etc. This has led to a plethora of search engines, 'intelligent'agents, etc., that aim to help users in their quest for relevant information, or shield them against irrelevant information. All these systems aim to identify the potentially relevant information in among a large pool of available information. No unifying underlying theory for information discovery systems exist as yet. The aim of this article is to provide a logic-based framework for information discovery, and relate this to the traditional field of information retrieval. Furthermore, the often ignored user receives special emphasis. In information discovery, a good understanding of a user's (sometimes hidden) needs and beliefs is essential. We will develop a logic-based approach to express the mechanics of information discovery, while the pragmatics are based on an analysis of the underlying informational semantics of information carriers and information needs of users
  10. Wozniak, J.: Kognitywizm w informacji (1997) 0.01
    0.014745606 = product of:
      0.058982424 = sum of:
        0.044923443 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044923443 = score(doc=2972,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
        0.014058981 = product of:
          0.028117962 = sum of:
            0.028117962 = weight(_text_:system in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028117962 = score(doc=2972,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Cognitive research into information science started at the International Workshop on the Cognitive viewpoint, Ghent, Belgium, 1977, where it was made clear that the task of research is to improve information flow, specifically through creating models of users' knowledge compatible with the conceptual frameworks used by information retrieval systems. Divides users' knowledge into knowledge of the world, of the information retrieval system, of the task and of the domain. Cognitivism as a research direction in information science explains how the cognitive processes and objects might influence information retrieval and representation
  11. Völz, H.: Information verstehen : Facetten eines neuen Zugangs zur Welt (1994) 0.01
    0.01431406 = product of:
      0.05725624 = sum of:
        0.01315321 = product of:
          0.02630642 = sum of:
            0.02630642 = weight(_text_:29 in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02630642 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.04410303 = product of:
          0.08820606 = sum of:
            0.08820606 = weight(_text_:etc in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08820606 = score(doc=1520,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.50779605 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Classification
    ST 110 Informatik / Monographien / Allgemeine Darstellungen (Lehrbücher, Einführungen etc.)
    Date
    29. 2.2008 20:41:49
    RVK
    ST 110 Informatik / Monographien / Allgemeine Darstellungen (Lehrbücher, Einführungen etc.)
  12. Smeaton, A.F.: Retrieving information from hypertext : issues and problems (1991) 0.01
    0.014140559 = product of:
      0.056562237 = sum of:
        0.036679838 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036679838 = score(doc=4278,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4278, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4278)
        0.019882401 = product of:
          0.039764803 = sum of:
            0.039764803 = weight(_text_:system in 4278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039764803 = score(doc=4278,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.3936941 = fieldWeight in 4278, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4278)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Hypertext uses a browsing rather than a searching strategy. Hypertext systems have found applications in a number of areas. They give users choice of information but this can prove a drawback. Examnines the effectiveness of hypertext as a way of retrieving information and reviews conventional information retrieval techniques. Considers previous attempts at combining information retrieval and hypertext and outlines a prototype systems developed to generate guided tours for users to direct them through hypertext to information they have requested. Discusses how adding this kind of itelligent guidance to a hypertext system would affect its usability as an information system
  13. Cardoso, A.M.P.: Pos-modernidade e informacao : conceitos complementares? (1996) 0.01
    0.0129321385 = product of:
      0.051728554 = sum of:
        0.015345411 = product of:
          0.030690823 = sum of:
            0.030690823 = weight(_text_:29 in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030690823 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.036383145 = product of:
          0.07276629 = sum of:
            0.07276629 = weight(_text_:etc in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07276629 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.41891038 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Throughout history, science has been considered as the engine of modernity, signalling the supremacy of rational thought. The post-modern world, in contrast, is characterised by globalisation engendered by the development of communication technology. In this context, information is a social product and information science has broken from the traditional model of science, abandoning its initial attempt to establish laws and focusing instead on users. This has resulted in interdisciplinary links with related fields such as psychology, communications theory etc. In Brazil development is unequal, with some regions at a post-modern stage and other still feudal or pre-modern. The role of information here is to level these disparities and create a more just society
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
  14. Dyer, H.: Beyond relevance, precision and recall : the 'worth' of information retrieval results (1994) 0.01
    0.012684705 = product of:
      0.05073882 = sum of:
        0.036679838 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036679838 = score(doc=8321,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 8321, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8321)
        0.014058981 = product of:
          0.028117962 = sum of:
            0.028117962 = weight(_text_:system in 8321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028117962 = score(doc=8321,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 8321, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8321)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    The existing tools of relevance, recall and precision have their place in the evaluation of information retrieval systems, but do not tell the whole story. They cannot, for example, make allowance for the enquirer already knowing of the existence of a document or the subsequent availability of items. Utility theory goes part way towards meeting the need by assessing the likely usefulness of documents. Arguing that information is not information until it is used, the paper suggests an additional approach to information system evaluation - the 'use-value' of information
  15. Cole, C.: Interaction with an enabling information retrieval system : modeling the user's decoding and encoding operations (2000) 0.01
    0.011944476 = product of:
      0.047777902 = sum of:
        0.022924898 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022924898 = score(doc=4585,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 4585, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4585)
        0.024853004 = product of:
          0.04970601 = sum of:
            0.04970601 = weight(_text_:system in 4585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04970601 = score(doc=4585,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 4585, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    With new interactive technology, we can increase user satisfaction by designing information retrieval systems that inform the user while the user is on-line interacting with the system. The purpose of this article is to model the information processing operations of a generic user who has just received an information message from the system and is stimulated by the message into grasping at a higher understanding of his or her information task or problem. The model consists of 3 levels, each of which forms a separate subsystem. In the Perseption subsystem, the user perceives the system message in a visual sense; in the Comprehension subsystem, the user must comprehend the system message; and in the Application subsystem, the user must (a) interpret the system message in terms of the user's task at hand, and (b) create and send a new message back to the system to complete the interaction. Because of the information process stimulated by the interaction, the user's new message forms a query to the system that more accurately represents the user's information need than would have been the case if the interaction had not taken place. This article proposes a device to enable clarification of the user's task, and thus his/her information need at the Application subsystem level of the model
  16. Rijsbergen, C.J. van; Lalmas, M.: Information calculus for information retrieval (1996) 0.01
    0.011211801 = product of:
      0.044847205 = sum of:
        0.032420702 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032420702 = score(doc=4201,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09700725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032069415 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 4201, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4201)
        0.012426502 = product of:
          0.024853004 = sum of:
            0.024853004 = weight(_text_:system in 4201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024853004 = score(doc=4201,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10100432 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 4201, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Information is and always has been an elusive concept; nevertheless many philosophers, mathematicians, logicians and computer scientists have felt that it is fundamental. Many attempts have been made to come up with some sensible and intuitively acceptable definition of information; up to now, none of these have succeeded. This work is based on the approach followed by Dretske, Barwise, and Devlin, who claimed that the notion of information starts from the position that given an ontology of objects individuated by a cognitive agent, it makes sense to speak of the information an object (e.g., a text, an image, a video) contains about another object (e.g. the query). This phenomenon is captured by the flow of information between objects. Its exploitation is the task of an information retrieval system. These authors proposes a theory of information that provides an analysis of the concept of information (any type, from any media) and the manner in which intelligent organisms (referring to as cognitive agents) handle and respond to the information picked up from their environment. They defined the nature of information flow and the mechanisms that give rise to such a flow. The theory, which is based on Situation Theory, is expressed with a calculus defined on channels. The calculus was defined so that it satisfies properties that are attributes to information and its flows. This paper demonstrates the connection between this calculus and information retrieval, and porposes a model of an information retrieval system based on this calculus
  17. Gödert, W.: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (2000) 0.01
    0.011084691 = product of:
      0.044338763 = sum of:
        0.01315321 = product of:
          0.02630642 = sum of:
            0.02630642 = weight(_text_:29 in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02630642 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.031185552 = product of:
          0.062371105 = sum of:
            0.062371105 = weight(_text_:etc in 4397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062371105 = score(doc=4397,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17370372 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.35906604 = fieldWeight in 4397, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.4164915 = idf(docFreq=533, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4397)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Die Informations- oder Wissensgesellschaft ist in aller Munde, das Verständnis derselben ist gleichwohl unklar. Unscharf ist auch das Verständnis der zugrunde liegenden Begriffe Information und Wissen sowie des Erwerbs von Information aus den verschiedenen medialen Repräsentationsformen. Allenfalls lässt sich eine gewisse Einseitigkeit bemerken, die durch den informationstechnischen Primat und an der Nachrichtentechnik orientierten Übertragungsformen geprägt ist. Ausgangspunkt der Erörterung ist die Beobachtung, dass Menschen Informationsbedürfnisse besitzen, die sie durch Inanspruchnahme verschiedenster externer Quellen und Hilfsmittel befriedigen wollen. Die neuartigen Speicher- und Findeformen führen zu übersteigerten Erwartungen, wenn man an all die Formulierungen mit virtuell, cyber, Hyper, Multimedia, Information Superhighway etc. denkt. Häufig wird dabei suggeriert, die veränderte mediale Präsentation habe neuartige und bessere Qualitäten für die Rezeption von Information, ohne dass die dabei beteiligten Prozesse völlig verstanden sind. Innerhalb eines konstruktivistischen Modells der kognitiven Informationsverarbeitung und der Rezeption medial gespeicherter Information werden Fragen der Darstellung und Rezeption von Information untersucht.
    Date
    9. 8.2018 12:59:29
  18. Logothetis, N.K.: ¬Das Sehen : ein Fenster zum Bewußtsein (2000) 0.01
    0.010911709 = product of:
      0.043646835 = sum of:
        0.021922018 = product of:
          0.043844037 = sum of:
            0.043844037 = weight(_text_:29 in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043844037 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021724815 = product of:
          0.04344963 = sum of:
            0.04344963 = weight(_text_:22 in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04344963 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    22. 7.2000 19:02:07
  19. Roth, G.; Dicke, U.; Wiggers, W.: Wie das Gehirn eine Fliege erkennt (1999) 0.01
    0.010911709 = product of:
      0.043646835 = sum of:
        0.021922018 = product of:
          0.043844037 = sum of:
            0.043844037 = weight(_text_:29 in 4229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043844037 = score(doc=4229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021724815 = product of:
          0.04344963 = sum of:
            0.04344963 = weight(_text_:22 in 4229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04344963 = score(doc=4229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    22. 7.2000 19:04:41
  20. Information, eine dritte Wirklichkeitsart neben Materie und Geist (1995) 0.01
    0.010911709 = product of:
      0.043646835 = sum of:
        0.021922018 = product of:
          0.043844037 = sum of:
            0.043844037 = weight(_text_:29 in 6003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043844037 = score(doc=6003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11281017 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 6003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6003)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.021724815 = product of:
          0.04344963 = sum of:
            0.04344963 = weight(_text_:22 in 6003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04344963 = score(doc=6003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.112301625 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.032069415 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6003)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Date
    29. 7.2001 10:22:25

Languages

Types

  • a 271
  • m 58
  • s 12
  • el 11
  • ? 2
  • r 2
  • fi 1
  • i 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications