Search (43 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Hafter, R.: ¬The performance of card catalogs : a review of research (1979) 0.03
    0.027366336 = product of:
      0.054732673 = sum of:
        0.054732673 = product of:
          0.109465346 = sum of:
            0.109465346 = weight(_text_:22 in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109465346 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3.10.2000 20:48:22
  2. Tennant, R.: ¬The print perplex : building the future catalog (1998) 0.03
    0.027366336 = product of:
      0.054732673 = sum of:
        0.054732673 = product of:
          0.109465346 = sum of:
            0.109465346 = weight(_text_:22 in 6462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109465346 = score(doc=6462,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6462, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6462)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 123(1998) no.19, S.22-24
  3. Treichler, W.: Katalogisierungsregeln, Kataloge und Benützer in schweizerischen Bibliotheken (1986) 0.02
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = product of:
          0.082099006 = sum of:
            0.082099006 = weight(_text_:22 in 5352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082099006 = score(doc=5352,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5352, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:22:27
  4. Martin, S.K.: ¬The union catalogue : summary and future directions (1982) 0.02
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = product of:
          0.082099006 = sum of:
            0.082099006 = weight(_text_:22 in 290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082099006 = score(doc=290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 14:49:22
  5. Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.020524751 = product of:
      0.041049503 = sum of:
        0.041049503 = product of:
          0.082099006 = sum of:
            0.082099006 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.082099006 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
  6. Calhoun, K.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools : Prepared for the Library of Congress (2006) 0.02
    0.019191254 = product of:
      0.038382508 = sum of:
        0.038382508 = product of:
          0.076765016 = sum of:
            0.076765016 = weight(_text_:literacy in 5013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076765016 = score(doc=5013,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.25919902 = fieldWeight in 5013, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5013)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The destabilizing influences of the Web, widespread ownership of personal computers, and rising computer literacy have created an era of discontinuous change in research libraries a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. The library catalog is such an asset. Today, a large and growing number of students and scholars routinely bypass library catalogs in favor of other discovery tools, and the catalog represents a shrinking proportion of the universe of scholarly information. The catalog is in decline, its processes and structures are unsustainable, and change needs to be swift. At the same time, books and serials are not dead, and they are not yet digital. Notwithstanding widespread expansion of digitization projects, ubiquitous e-journals, and a market that seems poised to move to e-books, the role of catalog records in discovery and retrieval of the world's library collections seems likely to continue for at least a couple of decades and probably longer. This report, commissioned by the Library of Congress (LC), offers an analysis of the current situation, options for revitalizing research library catalogs, a feasibility assessment, a vision for change, and a blueprint for action. Library decision makers are the primary audience for this report, whose aim is to elicit support, dialogue, collaboration, and movement toward solutions. Readers from the business community, particularly those that directly serve libraries, may find the report helpful for defining research and development efforts. The same is true for readers from membership organizations such as OCLC Online Computer Library Center, the Research Libraries Group, the Association for Research Libraries, the Council on Library and Information Resources, the Coalition for Networked Information, and the Digital Library Federation. Library managers and practitioners from all functional groups are likely to take an interest in the interview findings and in specific actions laid out in the blueprint.
  7. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02
    0.01710396 = product of:
      0.03420792 = sum of:
        0.03420792 = product of:
          0.06841584 = sum of:
            0.06841584 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06841584 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  8. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.02
    0.01710396 = product of:
      0.03420792 = sum of:
        0.03420792 = product of:
          0.06841584 = sum of:
            0.06841584 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06841584 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02
    0.01710396 = product of:
      0.03420792 = sum of:
        0.03420792 = product of:
          0.06841584 = sum of:
            0.06841584 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06841584 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  10. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01
    0.014513192 = product of:
      0.029026384 = sum of:
        0.029026384 = product of:
          0.058052767 = sum of:
            0.058052767 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058052767 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  11. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  12. Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
  13. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.013683168 = product of:
      0.027366336 = sum of:
        0.027366336 = product of:
          0.054732673 = sum of:
            0.054732673 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054732673 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  17. Libraries and Google (2005) 0.01
    0.013570267 = product of:
      0.027140534 = sum of:
        0.027140534 = product of:
          0.054281067 = sum of:
            0.054281067 = weight(_text_:literacy in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054281067 = score(doc=1973,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.29616246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.18328139 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Introduction: Libraries and Their Interrelationships with Google - William Miller Disruptive Beneficence: The Google Print Program and the Future of Libraries - Mark Sandler The Google Library Project at Oxford - Ronald Milne The (Uncertain) Future of Libraries in a Google World: Sounding an Alarm - Rick Anderson A Gaggle of Googles: Limitations and Defects of Electronic Access as Panacea - -Mark Y. Herring Using the Google Search Appliance for Federated Searching: A Case Study - Mary Taylor Google's Print and Scholar Initiatives: The Value of and Impact on Libraries and Information Services - Robert J. Lackie Google Scholar vs. Library Scholar: Testing the Performance of Schoogle - Burton Callicott; Debbie Vaughn Google, the Invisible Web, and Librarians: Slaying the Research Goliath - Francine Egger-Sider; Jane Devine Choices in the Paradigm Shift: Where Next for Libraries? - Shelley E. Phipps; Krisellen Maloney Calling the Scholars Home: Google Scholar as a Tool for Rediscovering the Academic Library - Maurice C. York Checking Under the Hood: Evaluating Google Scholar for Reference Use - Janice Adlington; Chris Benda Running with the Devil: Accessing Library-Licensed Full Text Holdings Through Google Scholar - Rebecca Donlan; Rachel Cooke Directing Students to New Information Types: A New Role for Google in Literature Searches? - Mike Thelwall Evaluating Google Scholar as a Tool for Information Literacy Rachael Cathcart - Amanda Roberts Optimising Publications for Google Users - Alan Dawson Google and Privacy - Paul S. Piper Image: Google's Most Important Product - Ron Force Keeping Up with Google: Resources and Strategies for Staying Ahead of the Pack - Michael J. Krasulski; Steven J. Bell
    Footnote
    Ebenfalls direkt aus der Praxis erhält der Leser Informationen zum Google-PrintProgramm. Robert Milne beschreibt die Zusammenarbeit von Google und der Universität Oxford. In diesem Aufsatz wird - was dem Autor natürlich nicht anzulasten ist - ein Problem des vorliegenden Werks deutlich: Viele Informationen sind doch von sehr beschränkter Haltbarkeit. Der Redaktionsschluss war im Frühsommer 2005, sodass sich in vielen Bereichen bereits neue Entwicklungen ergeben haben. Dies ist beim Print-Programm der Fall, vor allem wird es aber bei dem Hauptthema des Bandes, nämlich Google Scholar, deutlich. Dieser Dienst wurde im November 2004 gestartet und stieß auf unterschiedlichste Reaktionen, die (anhand von Beispielen amerikanischer Bibliotheken) im Beitrag von Maurice C. York beschrieben werden. Einige Bibliotheken nahmen den Dienst begeistert auf und verlinkten diesen mit Lob versehen auf ihren Websites. Andere reagierten gegenteilig und warnten vor dessen schlechter Qualität. Auch weil vorauszusehen war, dass Google Scholar bei den Nutzern gut ankommen würde, darf das folgende Statement von einer Bibliothekswebsite geradezu als ignorant gelten: Google Scholar »is wonderful for those who do not have access to the library's databases« (S.119). Wie nun die Scholar-Nutzer auf die Bibliotheksangebote gelenkt werden können, beschreibt der ironisch »Running with the Devil« betitelte Aufsatz von Rebecca Donlan und Rachel Cooke. Die Autorinnen beschreiben den Einsatz von Link-Resolvern und gehen auf die in Google Scholar bestehenden Probleme durch unklare Bezeichnungen in den Trefferlisten ein. Einige Beispiele zeigen, dass Google Scholar auch in Kombination mit der Verlinkung auf die Bibliotheksbestände keine befriedigende Recherchesituation herstellt, sondern vielmehr weitere Anstrengungen nötig sind, um »das Beste beider Welten« zusammenzuführen. Zwei weitere Aufsätze beschäftigen sich mit der Frage, wie gut Google Scholar eigentlich ist. Einmal geht es darum, wie gut Scholar den »ACRL Information Literacy Standards« genügt. Der zweite Beitrag vergleicht Google Scholar anhand von fünf Suchaufgaben einerseits mit einem lokalen Bibliothekskatalog, andererseits mit EBSCOs Academic Search Premier und jeweils einer fachspezifischen Datenbank. Die Ergebnisse zeigen keine durchgehende Überlegenheit einer Suchlösung, vielmehr wird deutlich, dass es auf die Auswahl des richtigen Suchwerkzeugs für die bestehende Suchanfrage ankommt bzw. dass erst eine Kombination dieser Werkzeuge zu optimalen Ergebnissen führt. Man könnte also auch hier wieder sagen: Google und Bibliotheken, nicht Google oder Bibliotheken.
  18. Hillmann, D.I.: 'Parallel universes' or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996) 0.01
    0.011972772 = product of:
      0.023945544 = sum of:
        0.023945544 = product of:
          0.047891088 = sum of:
            0.047891088 = weight(_text_:22 in 3656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047891088 = score(doc=3656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  19. Solis, A.Q.; Navarrete, O.A.: Medidas de calidad en la creacion de catalogos de bibliotecas (1998) 0.01
    0.011972772 = product of:
      0.023945544 = sum of:
        0.023945544 = product of:
          0.047891088 = sum of:
            0.047891088 = weight(_text_:22 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047891088 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 1.1999 19:22:45
  20. Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001) 0.01
    0.011972772 = product of:
      0.023945544 = sum of:
        0.023945544 = product of:
          0.047891088 = sum of:
            0.047891088 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047891088 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17683028 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05049654 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 4.2001 16:49:22

Years

Languages

  • e 29
  • d 12
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 38
  • m 4
  • b 3
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…