Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

0.070064545 = product of:
  0.14012909 = sum of:
    0.14012909 = sum of:
      0.09789524 = weight(_text_:organization in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.09789524 = score(doc=1414,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.5284991 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
      0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042233843 = score(doc=1414,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1414, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1414)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Marc Bloch's famous methodological essay, The Historian's Craft, contains many relevant considerations on knowledge organization. These have been selected and grouped into four main themes: terminology problems in history; principles for the organization of historical knowledge, with special reference to the genetic principle; sources of historical information, to be found not only in archives but also in very different media and contexts; and the nature and boundaries of history as a discipline. Analysis of them shows that knowledge organization is an important part of historians' work, and suggests that it can be especially fruitful when a cross-medial, interdisciplinary approach is adopted.

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.04300696 = product of:
  0.08601392 = sum of:
    0.08601392 = sum of:
      0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043780077 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
      0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042233843 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Beitrag eines Special Issue: ISKO-Italy: 8' Incontro ISKO Italia, Università di Bologna, 22 maggio 2017, Bologna, Italia.

Source

Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.8, S.638-643

0.04300696 = product of:
  0.08601392 = sum of:
    0.08601392 = sum of:
      0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043780077 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042233843 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

17. 2.2018 18:22:25

Source

Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.43-53

0.035839137 = product of:
  0.07167827 = sum of:
    0.07167827 = sum of:
      0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0364834 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
      0.035194874 = weight(_text_:22 in 3698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035194874 = score(doc=3698,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3698, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3698)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2010 20:40:08

Source

Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.3, S.223-229

0.035839137 = product of:
  0.07167827 = sum of:
    0.07167827 = sum of:
      0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0364834 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
      0.035194874 = weight(_text_:22 in 3739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035194874 = score(doc=3739,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3739, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3739)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Integrative Level Classification (ILC) research project is experimenting with a knowledge organization system based on phenomena rather than disciplines. Each phenomenon has a constant notation, which can be combined with that of any other phenomenon in a freely faceted structure. Citation order can express differential focality of the facets. Very specific subjects can have long classmarks, although their complexity is reduced by various devices. Freely faceted classification is being tested by indexing a corpus of about 3300 papers in the interdisciplinary domain of bioacoustics. The subjects of these papers often include phenomena from a wide variety of integrative levels (mechanical waves, animals, behaviour, vessels, fishing, law, ...) as well as information about the methods of study, as predicted in the León Manifesto. The archive is recorded in a MySQL database, and can be fed and searched through PHP Web interfaces. Indexer's work is made easier by mechanisms that suggest possible classes on the basis of matching title words with terms in the ILC schedules, and synthesize automatically the verbal caption corresponding to the classmark being edited. Users can search the archive by selecting and combining values in each facet. Search refinement should be improved, especially for the cases where no record, or too many records, match the faceted query. However, experience is being gained progressively, showing that freely faceted classification by phenomena, theories, and methods is feasible and successfully working.

Source

Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

0.025276441 = product of:
  0.050552882 = sum of:
    0.050552882 = product of:
      0.101105765 = sum of:
        0.101105765 = weight(_text_:organization in 4804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101105765 = score(doc=4804,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.5458315 = fieldWeight in 4804, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4804)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16

Source

Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira

0.025276441 = product of:
  0.050552882 = sum of:
    0.050552882 = product of:
      0.101105765 = sum of:
        0.101105765 = weight(_text_:organization in 4931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.101105765 = score(doc=4931,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.5458315 = fieldWeight in 4931, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4931)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.15

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

0.021890039 = product of:
  0.043780077 = sum of:
    0.043780077 = product of:
      0.087560154 = sum of:
        0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087560154 = score(doc=2663,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Several authors remark that categories used in languages, including indexing ones, are affected by cultural biases, and do not reflect reality in an objective way. Hence knowledge organization would essentially be determined by pragmatic factors. However, human categories are connected with the structure of reality through biological bonds, and this allows for a naturalistic approach too. Naturalism has been adopted by Farradane in proposing relational categories, and by Dahlberg and the CRG in applying the theory of integrative levels to general classification schemes. The latter is especially relevant for possible developments in making the structure of schemes independent from disciplines, and in applying it to digital information retrieval.

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9

Source

Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine

0.021890039 = product of:
  0.043780077 = sum of:
    0.043780077 = product of:
      0.087560154 = sum of:
        0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 3524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087560154 = score(doc=3524,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 3524, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3524)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Three major principles in the structure of knowledge organization systems are identified and discussed: hierarchical trees of types, sets of facets conforming to general categories, and series of levels of reality. Each principle can be present at various degrees in different systems. The three principles can interact between them in various ways, depending on priority choices in system construction. Examples are reviewed of different priority options adopted in classifications and thesauri, both special and general, and their effects are critically examined. It is found that levels of reality, although less often explicitly acknowledged than other principles, contribute an important tool for knowledge organization.

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12

Source

Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010 Rome, Italy. Edited by Claudio Gnoli and Fulvio Mazzocchi

0.021890039 = product of:
  0.043780077 = sum of:
    0.043780077 = product of:
      0.087560154 = sum of:
        0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087560154 = score(doc=3177,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

After making the case that phenomena can be the primary unit of classification (Part 1), some basic principles to group and sort phenomena are considered. Entities can be grouped together on the basis of both their similarity (morphology) and their common origin (phylogeny). The resulting groups will form the classical hierarchical chains of types and subtypes. At every hierarchical degree, phenomena can form ordered sets (arrays), where their sorting can reflect levels of increasing organization, corresponding to an evolutionary order of appearance (emergence). The theory of levels of reality has been investigated by many philosophers and applied to knowledge organization systems by various authors, which are briefly reviewed. At the broadest degree, it allows to identify some major strata of phenomena (forms, matter, life, minds, societies and culture) in turn divided into layers. A list of twenty-six layers is proposed to form the main classes of the Integrative Levels Classification system. A combination of morphology and phylogeny can determine whether a given phenomenon should be a type of an existing level, or a level on its own.

Footnote

Part 1 in: Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.6, S.403-415.

Source

Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.1, S.37-54

0.021890039 = product of:
  0.043780077 = sum of:
    0.043780077 = product of:
      0.087560154 = sum of:
        0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087560154 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee

0.018957332 = product of:
  0.037914664 = sum of:
    0.037914664 = product of:
      0.07582933 = sum of:
        0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 2134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07582933 = score(doc=2134,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 2134, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2134)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Research can benefit by periodical consideration of its status in a long-term perspective. In knowledge organization (KO), a number of basic questions remain to be addressed in the 21st century. Ten of them are identified and synthetically discussed: (1) Can KO principles be extended to a broader scope, including hypertexts, multimedia, museum objects, and monuments? (2) Can the two basic approaches, ontological and epistemological, be reconciled? (3) Can any ontological foundation of KO be identified? (4) Should disciplines continue to be the structural base of KO? (5) How can viewpoint warrant be respected? (6) How can KO be adapted to local collection needs? (7) How can KO deal with changes in knowledge? (8) How can KO systems represent all the dimensions listed above? (9) How can software and formats be improved to better serve these needs? (10) Who should do KO: information professionals, authors or readers?

Source

Knowledge organization. 35(2008) nos.2/3, S.137-149

0.018957332 = product of:
  0.037914664 = sum of:
    0.037914664 = product of:
      0.07582933 = sum of:
        0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07582933 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Notations are systems of symbols that can be combined according to syntactical rules to represent meanings in a specialized domain. In knowledge organization, they are systems of numerals, letters and punctuation marks associated to a concept that mechanically produce helpful sequences of them for arranging books on shelves, browsing subjects in directories and displaying items in catalogues. Most bibliographic classification systems, like Dewey Decimal Classification, use a positional notation allowing for expression of increasingly specific subjects by additional digits. However, some notations like that of Bliss Bibliographic Classification are purely ordinal and do not reflect the hierarchical degree of a subject. Notations can also be expressive of the syntactical structure of compound subjects (common auxiliaries, facets etc.) in various ways. In the digital media, notation can be recorded and managed in databases and exploited to provide appropriate search and display functionalities.

Series

Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization

Source

Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.8, S.667-684

0.018957332 = product of:
  0.037914664 = sum of:
    0.037914664 = product of:
      0.07582933 = sum of:
        0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 4964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07582933 = score(doc=4964,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 4964, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4964)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The ontological approach in the development of KOS is an attempt to overcome the limitations of the traditional epistemological approach. Questions raise about the representation and organization of ontologically-oriented KO units, such as BFO universals or ILC phenomena. The study aims to compare the ontological approaches of BFO and ILC using a hermeneutic approach. We found that the differences between the units of the two systems are primarily due to the formal level of abstraction of BFO and the different organizations, namely the grouping of phenomena into ILC classes that represent complex compounds of entities in the BFO approach. In both systems the use of concepts is considered instrumental, although in the ILC they constitute the intersubjective component of the phenomena whereas in BFO they serve to access the entities of reality but are not part of them.

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.17

Source

Knowledge Organization at the Interface. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference, 2020 Aalborg, Denmark. Ed.: M. Lykke et al

0.0182417 = product of:
  0.0364834 = sum of:
    0.0364834 = product of:
      0.0729668 = sum of:
        0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 3417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0729668 = score(doc=3417,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 3417, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This is the first part of a study on the classification of phenomena. It starts by addressing the status of classification schemes among knowledge organization systems (KOSs), as some features of them have been overlooked in recent reviews of KOS types. It then considers the different dimensions implied in a KOS, which include: the observed phenomena, the cultural and disciplinary perspective under which they are treated, the features of documents carrying such treatment, the collections of such documents as managed in libraries, archives or museums, the information needs prompting to search and use these collections and the people experiencing such different information needs. Until now, most library classification schemes have given priority to the perspective dimension as they first list disciplines. However, an increasing number of voices are now considering the possibility of classification schemes giving priority to phenomena as advocated in the León Manifesto. Although these schemes first list phenomena as their main classes, they can as well express perspective or the other relevant dimensions that occur in a classified item. The independence of a phenomenon-based classification from the institutional divisions into disciplines contributes to giving knowledge organization a more proactive and influential role.

Footnote

Part 2 in: Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.1, S.37-54.

Source

Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.6, S.403-415

0.018058361 = product of:
  0.036116723 = sum of:
    0.036116723 = product of:
      0.072233446 = sum of:
        0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 2250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072233446 = score(doc=2250,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 2250, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2250)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.11

Source

Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis

0.015797775 = product of:
  0.03159555 = sum of:
    0.03159555 = product of:
      0.0631911 = sum of:
        0.0631911 = weight(_text_:organization in 661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0631911 = score(doc=661,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 661, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=661)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Some relevant proposals regarding the future of knowledge organization emerged during the 8th conference of the ISKO Spanish chapter, which took place in the beautiful, lively atmosphere of the town of León, between 18 and 20 of April 2007. These proposals are here labeled as "the Leon manifesto", and can be summarized in the following points: - the current trend towards an increasing interdisciplinarity of knowledge calls for essentially new knowledge organization systems (KOS), based on a substantive revision of the principles underlying the traditional discipline-based KOS; - this innovation is not only desirable, but also feasible, and should be implemented by actually developing some new KOS; instead of disciplines, the basic unity of the new KOS should be phenomena of the real world as it is represented in human knowledge; - the new KOS should allow users to shift from one perspective or viewpoint to another, thus reflecting the multidimensional nature of complex thought. In particular, it should allow them to search independently for particular phenomena, for particular theories about phenomena (and about relations between phenomena), and for particular methods of investigation; - the connections between phenomena, those between phenomena and the theories studying them, and those between phenomena and the methods to investigate them, can be expressed and managed by analytico-synthetic techniques already developed in faceted classification.

Source

Knowledge organization. 34(2007) no.1, S.6-8

0.015797775 = product of:
  0.03159555 = sum of:
    0.03159555 = product of:
      0.0631911 = sum of:
        0.0631911 = weight(_text_:organization in 1092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0631911 = score(doc=1092,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 1092, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Bericht über: Levels of Reality, Seminar, Bolzano (Bozen) Italy, 26-28 September 2007: Ontologies, the knowledge organization systems now widely used in knowledge management applications, take their name from a branch of philosophy. Philosophical ontology deals with the kinds and the properties of what exists, and with how they can be described by categories like entity, attribute, or process. Readers familiar with facet analysis will notice some analogy with the "fundamental categories" of faceted classifications, and this resemblance is not accidental. Indeed, knowledge organization systems use conceptual structures that can be variously reconnected with the categories of ontology. Though having more practical purposes, the ontologies and classifications of information science can benefit of those of philosophy.

Source

Knowledge organization. 34(2007) no.3, S.169-171

0.015797775 = product of:
  0.03159555 = sum of:
    0.03159555 = product of:
      0.0631911 = sum of:
        0.0631911 = weight(_text_:organization in 1095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0631911 = score(doc=1095,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 1095, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Most existing knowledge organization systems (KOS) are based on disciplines. However, as research is increasingly multidisciplinary, scholars need tools allowing them to explore relations between phenomena throughout the whole spectrum of knowledge. We focus on the dependence relationship, holding between one phenomenon and those at lower integrative levels on which it depends for its existence, like alpinism on mountains, and mountains on rocks. This relationship was first described by D.J. Foskett in the context of CRG's work towards a non-disciplinary scheme. We discuss its possible status and representation in three kinds of KOS: thesauri, classification schemes, and ontologies. In thesaural structures, dependence could be one of the subtypes of associative relationships (RT) which have been wished to enrich their semantic functions. In classification, it could act together with hierarchy as a structuring principle, providing a way of connecting and sorting main classes based on integrative levels. In ontologies, it could be defined as a dependsOn direct slot, expressing the fact that through it a class does not inherit all properties of the other class on which it depends. We argue that providing search interfaces with cross-disciplinary links of this kind can give users more adequate tools to examine the recorded knowledge through creative paths overcoming some limitations of its canonical segmentation into disciplines.

Source

¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez

0.015797775 = product of:
  0.03159555 = sum of:
    0.03159555 = product of:
      0.0631911 = sum of:
        0.0631911 = weight(_text_:organization in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0631911 = score(doc=323,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The spread of many new media and formats is changing the scenario faced by knowledge organizers: as printed monographs are not the only standard form of knowledge carrier anymore, the traditional kind of knowledge organization (KO) systems based on academic disciplines is put into question. A sounder foundation can be provided by an analysis of the different dimensions concurring to form the content of any knowledge item-what Brian Vickery described as the steps "from the world to the classifier." The ultimate referents of documents are the phenomena of the real world, that can be ordered by ontology, the study of what exists. Phenomena coexist in subjects with the perspectives by which they are considered, pertaining to epistemology, and with the formal features of knowledge carriers, adding a further, pragmatic layer. All these dimensions can be accounted for in metadata, but are often done so in mixed ways, making indexes less rigorous and interoperable. For example, while facet analysis was originally developed for subject indexing, many "faceted" interfaces today mix subject facets with form facets, and schemes presented as "ontologies" for the "semantic Web" also code for non-semantic information. In bibliographic classifications, phenomena are often confused with the disciplines dealing with them, the latter being assumed to be the most useful starting point, for users will have either one or another perspective. A general citation order of dimensions- phenomena, perspective, carrier-is recommended, helping to concentrate most relevant information at the beginning of headings.

Source

Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.4, S.268-275