Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Park, J.-r.: Cross-lingual name and subject access : mechanisms and challenge (2007) 0.06

0.057342615 = product of:
  0.11468523 = sum of:
    0.11468523 = sum of:
      0.058373436 = weight(_text_:organization in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058373436 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
      0.056311794 = weight(_text_:22 in 255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056311794 = score(doc=255,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 255, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=255)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract: This paper considers issues surrounding name and subject access across languages and cultures, particularly mechanisms and knowledge organization tools (e.g., cataloging, metadata) for cross-lingual information access. The author examines current mechanisms for cross-lingual name and subject access and identifies major factors that hinder cross-lingual information access. The author provides examples from the Korean language that demonstrate the problems with cross-language name and subject access.
Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Park, J.-r.: Evolution of concept networks and implications for knowledge representation (2007) 0.02
```
0.015797775 = product of:
  0.03159555 = sum of:
    0.03159555 = product of:
      0.0631911 = sum of:
        0.0631911 = weight(_text_:organization in 847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0631911 = score(doc=847,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 847, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=847)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present descriptive characteristics of the historical development of concept networks. The linguistic principles, mechanisms and motivations behind the evolution of concept networks are discussed. Implications emanating from the idea of the historical development of concept networks are discussed in relation to knowledge representation and organization schemes. Design/methodology/approach - Natural language data including both speech and text are analyzed by examining discourse contexts in which a linguistic element such as a polysemy or homonym occurs. Linguistic literature on the historical development of concept networks is reviewed and analyzed. Findings - Semantic sense relations in concept networks can be captured in a systematic and regular manner. The mechanism and impetus behind the process of concept network development suggest that semantic senses in concept networks are closely intertwined with pragmatic contexts and discourse structure. The interrelation and permeability of the semantic senses of concept networks are captured on a continuum scale based on three linguistic parameters: concrete shared semantic sense; discourse and text structure; and contextualized pragmatic information. Research limitations/implications - Research findings signify the critical need for linking discourse structure and contextualized pragmatic information to knowledge representation and organization schemes. Originality/value - The idea of linguistic characteristics, principles, motivation and mechanisms underlying the evolution of concept networks provides theoretical ground for developing a model for integrating knowledge representation and organization schemes with discourse structure and contextualized pragmatic information.

Park, J.-r.; Tosaka, Y.; Lu, C.: Locally added homegrown metadata semantics : issues and implications 0.02

0.015478596 = product of:
  0.030957192 = sum of:
    0.030957192 = product of:
      0.061914384 = sum of:
        0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061914384 = score(doc=3543,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Series: Advances in knowledge organization; vol.12
Source: Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M

Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.01

0.010558461 = product of:
  0.021116922 = sum of:
    0.021116922 = product of:
      0.042233843 = sum of:
        0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042233843 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 3.2009 19:20:24

Park, J.-r.: Semantic interoperability and metadata quality : an analysis of metadata item records of digital image collections (2006) 0.01

0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Knowledge organization. 33(2006) no.1, S.20-34

Park, J.-r.; Maszaros, S.: Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) in digital repositories : an exploratory study of metadata use and quality (2009) 0.01

0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=3258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.1, S.46-59

Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.01
```
0.00912085 = product of:
  0.0182417 = sum of:
    0.0182417 = product of:
      0.0364834 = sum of:
        0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0364834 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.

Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Themes