Search (44 results, page 1 of 3)

0.043395095 = product of:
  0.08679019 = sum of:
    0.08679019 = sum of:
      0.05159532 = weight(_text_:organization in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05159532 = score(doc=3692,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.035194874 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035194874 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051953442 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The death of Brian Vickery sees a great era of classification research coming towards an end. Born in Australia, he completed his schooling in England, before going up to Brasenose to read Chemistry just before the outbreak of the Second World War. Brian was never in the services, but after Oxford he worked as a chemist in the Royal Ordnance Factory from 1941-45. After the War he became a librarian at Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI). He was a delegate at the Royal Society Scientific Information Conference held in 1948. One of the offshoots of that conference was the formation of a small committee of scientists under the leadership of Professor J.D. Bernal, to make a study of library classification. After two years of discussions, they elicited the assistance of Jack Wells, then editor of the British National Bibliography, and Brian. They circularized a group of colleagues and convened a meeting in February 1952 which led to the formation of the Classification Research Group. As is well known, this Group, all practising librarians, were to exert a groundbreaking influence on the organization and retrieval of information.

Date

22. 7.2010 19:32:06

Source

Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.3, S.155-156

0.036116723 = product of:
  0.072233446 = sum of:
    0.072233446 = product of:
      0.14446689 = sum of:
        0.14446689 = weight(_text_:organization in 7516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14446689 = score(doc=7516,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.7799217 = fieldWeight in 7516, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7516)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization. 24(1997) no.1, S.35-40

0.034841146 = product of:
  0.06968229 = sum of:
    0.06968229 = product of:
      0.13936459 = sum of:
        0.13936459 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13936459 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 7.2007 12:05:26
22. 7.2007 12:08:24

0.029186718 = product of:
  0.058373436 = sum of:
    0.058373436 = product of:
      0.11674687 = sum of:
        0.11674687 = weight(_text_:organization in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11674687 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.8, S.581-585

0.029186718 = product of:
  0.058373436 = sum of:
    0.058373436 = product of:
      0.11674687 = sum of:
        0.11674687 = weight(_text_:organization in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11674687 = score(doc=5760,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Dr. Ingetraut Dahlberg essentially introduced and shaped the term "knowledge organization." She also was the main engine in the founding of the scientific associations Society for Classification and International Society for Knowledge Organization as well as the journals International Classification and Knowledge Organization. In 2017, Ingetraut Dahlberg died at the age of ninety years. Some life data and scientific contributions are presented here.

Source

Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.2, S.173-182

0.028155897 = product of:
  0.056311794 = sum of:
    0.056311794 = product of:
      0.11262359 = sum of:
        0.11262359 = weight(_text_:22 in 2688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11262359 = score(doc=2688,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2688, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2688)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

DK-Mitteilungen. 13(1968) Nr.6, S.21-22

0.028155897 = product of:
  0.056311794 = sum of:
    0.056311794 = product of:
      0.11262359 = sum of:
        0.11262359 = weight(_text_:22 in 6075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11262359 = score(doc=6075,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6075, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6075)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Mathematical intelligencer. 7(1985), S.18-22

0.028155897 = product of:
  0.056311794 = sum of:
    0.056311794 = product of:
      0.11262359 = sum of:
        0.11262359 = weight(_text_:22 in 7447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11262359 = score(doc=7447,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7447, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7447)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 1.2016 19:11:37

0.02553838 = product of:
  0.05107676 = sum of:
    0.05107676 = product of:
      0.10215352 = sum of:
        0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 6085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10215352 = score(doc=6085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 6085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization. 35(2008) nos.2/3, S.82-85

0.02553838 = product of:
  0.05107676 = sum of:
    0.05107676 = product of:
      0.10215352 = sum of:
        0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10215352 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.6, S.436-440

0.02463641 = product of:
  0.04927282 = sum of:
    0.04927282 = product of:
      0.09854564 = sum of:
        0.09854564 = weight(_text_:22 in 440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09854564 = score(doc=440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Mathematical intelligencer. 20(1998) no.1, S.22-28

0.02463641 = product of:
  0.04927282 = sum of:
    0.04927282 = product of:
      0.09854564 = sum of:
        0.09854564 = weight(_text_:22 in 5623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09854564 = score(doc=5623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5623)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: FR, Nr.125 vom 31.5.2001, S.22 (S. Hanuschek)

0.021890039 = product of:
  0.043780077 = sum of:
    0.043780077 = product of:
      0.087560154 = sum of:
        0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 7129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087560154 = score(doc=7129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 7129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7129)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

First publ.: London: Library Association 1974. - Rez. in: Knowledge organization 21(1994) no.3, S.161-162 (S.W. Davis)

0.021890039 = product of:
  0.043780077 = sum of:
    0.043780077 = product of:
      0.087560154 = sum of:
        0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 1481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087560154 = score(doc=1481,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 1481, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1481)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Presents a brief overview of Prof. A. Neelameghan's works/contributions more particularly to classification and knowledge organization, based on papers abstracted in Library and Information Science Abstracts and Information Science Abstracts, since the early 1960s when he joined Dr. S.R. Ranganathan at the Documentation Research and Training Centre, in Bangalore. Concludes "Following the path of Neelameghan's research and publication we get a picture of how certain aspects of knowledge organization have developed with particular emphasis on the importance and impact offaceted classification in that development. The result is an outstanding contribution to the history, development and application of the facet model developed by Ranganathan, affirmed at the Dorking Conference in 1957 and seemingly reaffirmed" in the present analysis in 2003.

Source

Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Eds.: K.S. Raghavan u. K.N. Prasad

0.021890039 = product of:
  0.043780077 = sum of:
    0.043780077 = product of:
      0.087560154 = sum of:
        0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 17) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.087560154 = score(doc=17,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 17, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=17)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Knowledge organization. 47(2020) no.6, S.431-435

0.021116922 = product of:
  0.042233843 = sum of:
    0.042233843 = product of:
      0.08446769 = sum of:
        0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08446769 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

26.12.2007 14:22:47

0.020394841 = product of:
  0.040789682 = sum of:
    0.040789682 = product of:
      0.081579365 = sum of:
        0.081579365 = weight(_text_:organization in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.081579365 = score(doc=127,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.44041592 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The analytico-synthetic facet methodology (ASM) of S.R.Ranganathan (SRR) helps to improve information retrieval online and on the Internet as well. Yahoo has been foreseen in the subject/query structuring based on ASM. Data mining and discovery, the design, development, use and evaluation of object-oriented databases and knowledge organization tools (KOTs) - faceted classification schemes, thesauri, classaurus, and subject indexing languages - are well supported by ASM. The fundamental nature of SRR's contributions attest to their continuing relevance and value in information storage and retrieval in the context of developments in information technology and the Internet. His theories, postulates and normative principles anchored on the Five Laws provide a holistic integrated approach to research, development and practice in knowledge organization in particular and information science in general. These contributions provide a sound foundation and stability to KOTs. SRR had visualized a self-perpetuating classification system. Computer graphics and imaging could help the examination in three or more dimensions the architecture of subject (and the associated Strength of Bond theory) proposed by SRR and the impact of interpolation of new concepts on the structure

Series

Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7

Source

Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al

0.018957332 = product of:
  0.037914664 = sum of:
    0.037914664 = product of:
      0.07582933 = sum of:
        0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 1511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07582933 = score(doc=1511,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 1511, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1511)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

When the festschrift volume was conceived, I was asked to contribute to the volume because of my professional association with Professor A. Neelameghan (AN), who was my teacher at the Documentation Research and Training Centre (DRTC) established by Dr S.R. Ranganathan in 1962. We have co-authored papers for conferences and periodicals and he has been a mentor for my own research. I am delighted to contribute this article based on interviews and discussions with him. Prof. Neelameghan (AN) has had a very distinguished professional career with a broad range of interests including, library and information science education, information systems and services, information policy, management, industrial information services, database design, knowledge organization and related tools. He joined Dr. S.R. Ranganathan in 1962 at the DRTC in Bangalore, India, where he made prolific contributions to research, especially in the area of knowledge organization.

Source

Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad

0.018957332 = product of:
  0.037914664 = sum of:
    0.037914664 = product of:
      0.07582933 = sum of:
        0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07582933 = score(doc=590,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

After two decades in the 21st Century, and despite all the advances in the area, some very important names from past centuries still do not have the recognition they deserve in the global history of library and information science and, specifically, of knowledge organization. Although acknowledged in British librarianship, the name of James Duff Brown (1862-1914) still does not have a proper recognition on a global scale. His contributions to a free and more democratic library had a prominent place in the works and projects he developed during his time at the libraries of Clerkenwell and Islington in London. Free access to the library shelves, an architecture centered on books and people, and classifications that are more dynamic were dreams fulfilled by Brown. With this biographical article, we hope to live up to his legacy and pay homage to a true librarian and an advocate of the public library and subject classification.

Series

Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization

Source

Knowledge organization. 48(2021) no.5, S.375-396

0.0182417 = product of:
  0.0364834 = sum of:
    0.0364834 = product of:
      0.0729668 = sum of:
        0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 8816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0729668 = score(doc=8816,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051953442 = queryNorm
            0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 8816, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8816)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of documentation 50(1994) no.1, S.64-65 (D.J. Foskett); Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.1, S.59 (M.P. Satija); Education for information 11(1993) no.4, S.342-245 (P.B. Mangla)