-
Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017)
0.09
0.08601392 = product of:
0.17202784 = sum of:
0.17202784 = sum of:
0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087560154 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08446769 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 5.2017 18:46:22
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.2, S.129-134.
-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.08
0.08174196 = product of:
0.16348392 = sum of:
0.16348392 = sum of:
0.114211105 = weight(_text_:organization in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114211105 = score(doc=3494,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.6165823 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04927282 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification" (2010)
0.06
0.064897 = product of:
0.129794 = sum of:
0.129794 = sum of:
0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087560154 = score(doc=2945,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 2945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042233843 = score(doc=2945,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2945, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2945)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Argues that Beghtol's (2003) use of the terms "naive classification" and "professional classification" is valid because they are nominal definitions and that the distinction between these two types of classification points up the need for researchers in knowledge organization to broaden their scope beyond traditional classification systems intended for information retrieval. Argues that work by Beghtol (2003), Kwasnik (1999) and Bailey (1994) offer direction for the development of a classification of classifications based on the pragmatic dimensions of extant classification systems. Bezugnahme auf: Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society. In: Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag 2004. S.19-22. (Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.2, S.111-120
-
Howarth, L.C.; Jansen, E.H.: Towards a typology of warrant for 21st century knowledge organization systems (2014)
0.06
0.064897 = product of:
0.129794 = sum of:
0.129794 = sum of:
0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087560154 = score(doc=1425,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042233843 = score(doc=1425,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1425, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1425)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This paper returns to Beghtol's (1986) insightful typology of warrant to consider an empirical example of a traditional top-down hierarchical classification system as it continues to evolve in the early 21st century. Our examination considers there may be multiple warrants identified among the processes of design and the relationships to users of the National Occupational Classification (NOC), the standard occupational classification system published in Canada. We argue that this shift in semantic warrant signals a transition for traditional knowledge organization systems, and that warrant continues to be a relevant analytical concept and organizing principle, both within and beyond the domain of bibliographic control.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014)
0.06
0.064897 = product of:
0.129794 = sum of:
0.129794 = sum of:
0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087560154 = score(doc=1428,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042233843 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Qin, J.: Evolving paradigms of knowledge representation and organization : a comparative study of classification, XML/DTD and ontology (2003)
0.06
0.060226202 = product of:
0.120452404 = sum of:
0.120452404 = sum of:
0.09229651 = weight(_text_:organization in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09229651 = score(doc=2763,freq=20.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.49827373 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.028155897 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028155897 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The different points of views an knowledge representation and organization from various research communities reflect underlying philosophies and paradigms in these communities. This paper reviews differences and relations in knowledge representation and organization and generalizes four paradigms-integrative and disintegrative pragmatism and integrative and disintegrative epistemologism. Examples such as classification, XML schemas, and ontologies are compared based an how they specify concepts, build data models, and encode knowledge organization structures. 1. Introduction Knowledge representation (KR) is a term that several research communities use to refer to somewhat different aspects of the same research area. The artificial intelligence (AI) community considers KR as simply "something to do with writing down, in some language or communications medium, descriptions or pictures that correspond in some salient way to the world or a state of the world" (Duce & Ringland, 1988, p. 3). It emphasizes the ways in which knowledge can be encoded in a computer program (Bench-Capon, 1990). For the library and information science (LIS) community, KR is literally the synonym of knowledge organization, i.e., KR is referred to as the process of organizing knowledge into classifications, thesauri, or subject heading lists. KR has another meaning in LIS: it "encompasses every type and method of indexing, abstracting, cataloguing, classification, records management, bibliography and the creation of textual or bibliographic databases for information retrieval" (Anderson, 1996, p. 336). Adding the social dimension to knowledge organization, Hjoerland (1997) states that knowledge is a part of human activities and tied to the division of labor in society, which should be the primary organization of knowledge. Knowledge organization in LIS is secondary or derived, because knowledge is organized in learned institutions and publications. These different points of views an KR suggest that an essential difference in the understanding of KR between both AI and LIS lies in the source of representationwhether KR targets human activities or derivatives (knowledge produced) from human activities. This difference also decides their difference in purpose-in AI KR is mainly computer-application oriented or pragmatic and the result of representation is used to support decisions an human activities, while in LIS KR is conceptually oriented or abstract and the result of representation is used for access to derivatives from human activities.
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 17:22:35
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.8
- Source
- Challenges in knowledge representation and organization for the 21st century: Integration of knowledge across boundaries. Proceedings of the 7th ISKO International Conference Granada, Spain, July 10-13, 2002. Ed.: M. López-Huertas
-
Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014)
0.05
0.054080836 = product of:
0.10816167 = sum of:
0.10816167 = sum of:
0.0729668 = weight(_text_:organization in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0729668 = score(doc=1418,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
0.035194874 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035194874 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Categories, or concepts of high generality representing the most basic kinds of entities in the world, have long been understood to be a fundamental element in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), particularly faceted ones. Commentators on facet analysis have tended to foreground the role of categories in the structuring of controlled vocabularies and the construction of compound index terms, and the implications of this for subject representation and information retrieval. Less attention has been paid to the variety of ways in which categories can shape the overall architectonic framework of a KOS. This case study explores the range of functions that categories took in structuring various aspects of an early analytico-synthetic KOS, Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI). Within SI, categories not only functioned as mechanisms to partition an index vocabulary into smaller groupings of terms and as elements in the construction of compound index terms but also served as means of defining the units of indexing, or index items, incorporated into an index; determining the organization of card index files and the articulation of the guide card system serving as a navigational aids thereto; and setting structural constraints to the establishment of cross-references between terms. In all these ways, Kaiser's system of categories contributed to the general systematicity of SI.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007)
0.05
0.052074112 = product of:
0.104148224 = sum of:
0.104148224 = sum of:
0.061914384 = weight(_text_:organization in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061914384 = score(doc=780,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042233843 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Networked orientated standards for vocabulary publishing and exchange and proposals for terminological services and terminology registries will improve sharing and use of all knowledge organization systems in the networked information environment. This means that documentary classifications may also become more applicable for use outside their original domain of application. The paper summarises some characteristics common to documentary classifications and explains some terminological, functional and implementation aspects. The original purpose behind each classification scheme determines the functions that the vocabulary is designed to facilitate. These functions influence the structure, semantics and syntax, scheme coverage and format in which classification data are published and made available. The author suggests that attention should be paid to the differences between documentary classifications as these may determine their suitability for a certain purpose and may impose different requirements with respect to their use online. As we speak, many classifications are being created for knowledge organization and it may be important to promote expertise from the bibliographic domain with respect to building and using classification systems.
- Date
- 22.12.2007 17:22:31
-
Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004)
0.05
0.049192987 = product of:
0.098385975 = sum of:
0.098385975 = sum of:
0.0631911 = weight(_text_:organization in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0631911 = score(doc=3483,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.035194874 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035194874 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification". In: Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.2, S.111-120.
- Pages
- S.19-22
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Dousa, T.M.; Ibekwe-SanJuan, F.: Epistemological and methodological eclecticism in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs) : the case of analytico-synthetic KOSs (2014)
0.05
0.049192987 = product of:
0.098385975 = sum of:
0.098385975 = sum of:
0.0631911 = weight(_text_:organization in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0631911 = score(doc=1417,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.035194874 = weight(_text_:22 in 1417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035194874 = score(doc=1417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Zhang, J.; Zeng, M.L.: ¬A new similarity measure for subject hierarchical structures (2014)
0.04
0.043395095 = product of:
0.08679019 = sum of:
0.08679019 = sum of:
0.05159532 = weight(_text_:organization in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05159532 = score(doc=1778,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
0.035194874 = weight(_text_:22 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035194874 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to introduce a new similarity method to gauge the differences between two subject hierarchical structures. Design/methodology/approach - In the proposed similarity measure, nodes on two hierarchical structures are projected onto a two-dimensional space, respectively, and both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes are considered in the similarity between the two hierarchical structures. The extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be controlled by adjusting a parameter. An experiment was conducted to evaluate soundness of the measure. Eight experts whose research interests were information retrieval and information organization participated in the study. Results from the new measure were compared with results from the experts. Findings - The evaluation shows strong correlations between the results from the new method and the results from the experts. It suggests that the similarity method achieved satisfactory results. Practical implications - Hierarchical structures that are found in subject directories, taxonomies, classification systems, and other classificatory structures play an extremely important role in information organization and information representation. Measuring the similarity between two subject hierarchical structures allows an accurate overarching understanding of the degree to which the two hierarchical structures are similar. Originality/value - Both structural similarity and subject similarity of nodes were considered in the proposed similarity method, and the extent to which the structural similarity impacts on the similarity can be adjusted. In addition, a new evaluation method for a hierarchical structure similarity was presented.
- Date
- 8. 4.2015 16:22:13
-
Gnoli, C.: Classifying phenomena : part 4: themes and rhemes (2018)
0.04
0.04300696 = product of:
0.08601392 = sum of:
0.08601392 = sum of:
0.043780077 = weight(_text_:organization in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043780077 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042233843 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 18:22:25
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.43-53
-
Thellefsen, M.; Thellefsen, T.: Pragmatic semiotics and knowledge organization (2004)
0.03
0.031278 = product of:
0.062556 = sum of:
0.062556 = product of:
0.125112 = sum of:
0.125112 = weight(_text_:organization in 3535) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.125112 = score(doc=3535,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.675432 = fieldWeight in 3535, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3535)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The present paper presents a philosophical approach to knowledge organization, proposing the pragmatic doctrine of C.S. Peirce as basic analytical framework for knowledge domains. The theoretical framework discussed is related to the qualitative brauch of knowledge organization theory 1.e. within scope of Hjoerland's domain analytical view (Hjoerland and Albrechtsen 1995; Hjoerland 2002; Hjoerland 2004), and promote a general framework for analyzing domain knowledge and concepts. However, the concept of knowledge organization can be viewed in at least two perspectives, one that defines knowledge organization as an activity performed by a human actor e.g. an information specialist, and secondly a view that has the perspective of the inherent self-organizing structure of a knowledge domain the latter being investigated in the paper.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.3, S.177-187
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬A brief introduction to facets in knowledge organization (2017)
0.03
0.030957192 = product of:
0.061914384 = sum of:
0.061914384 = product of:
0.12382877 = sum of:
0.12382877 = weight(_text_:organization in 1131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12382877 = score(doc=1131,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.66850436 = fieldWeight in 1131, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1131)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Facets for clustering and disambiguation : the domain discourse of facets in knowledge organization (2017)
0.03
0.030957192 = product of:
0.061914384 = sum of:
0.061914384 = product of:
0.12382877 = sum of:
0.12382877 = weight(_text_:organization in 4153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12382877 = score(doc=4153,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.66850436 = fieldWeight in 4153, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4153)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
-
LaBarre, K.: Interrogating facet theory : decolonizing knowledge organization (2017)
0.03
0.030957192 = product of:
0.061914384 = sum of:
0.061914384 = product of:
0.12382877 = sum of:
0.12382877 = weight(_text_:organization in 4155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12382877 = score(doc=4155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.66850436 = fieldWeight in 4155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4155)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
-
Zins, C.: Knowledge organization : an epistemological perspective (2004)
0.03
0.029186718 = product of:
0.058373436 = sum of:
0.058373436 = product of:
0.11674687 = sum of:
0.11674687 = weight(_text_:organization in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11674687 = score(doc=3074,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This philosophical essay explores the epistemological foundations of knowledge organization and discusses implications for classification research. The study defines the concept of "knowledge," distinguishes between subjective knowledge (i.e., knowledge as a thought in the individual's mind) and objective knowledge (i.e., knowledge as an independent object), establishes the necessity of knowledge organization in the construction of knowledge and its key role in the creation, learning, and dissemination of knowledge, and concludes with implications for the development of classification schemes and knowledge maps.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.49-54
-
Bragato Barros, T.H.; Libonati Gomes, D.: Classification and knowledge organization systems : ontologies and archival classification (2018)
0.03
0.029186718 = product of:
0.058373436 = sum of:
0.058373436 = product of:
0.11674687 = sum of:
0.11674687 = weight(_text_:organization in 4715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11674687 = score(doc=4715,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 4715, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4715)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Adler, M.; Harper, L.M.: Race and ethnicity in classification systems : teaching knowledge organization from a social justice perspective (2018)
0.03
0.029186718 = product of:
0.058373436 = sum of:
0.058373436 = product of:
0.11674687 = sum of:
0.11674687 = weight(_text_:organization in 5518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11674687 = score(doc=5518,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 5518, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5518)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Classification and the organization of information are directly connected to issues surrounding social justice, diversity, and inclusion. This paper is written from the standpoint that political and epistemological aspects of knowledge organization are fundamental to research and practice and suggests ways to integrate social justice and diversity issues into courses on the organization of information.
-
Zhonghong, W.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.: Potential and prospects of taxonomies for content organization (2006)
0.03
0.028552776 = product of:
0.057105552 = sum of:
0.057105552 = product of:
0.114211105 = sum of:
0.114211105 = weight(_text_:organization in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114211105 = score(doc=169,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.051953442 = queryNorm
0.6165823 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While taxonomies are being increasingly discussed in published and grey literature, the term taxonomy still seems to be stated quite loosely and obscurely. This paper aims at explaining and clarifying the concept of taxonomy in the context of information organization. To this end, the salient features of taxonomies are identified and their scope, nature, and role are further elaborated based on an extensive literature review. In the meantime, the connection and distinctions between taxonomies and classification schemes and thesauri are also identified, and the rationale that taxonomies are chosen as a viable knowledge organization system used in organization-wide websites to support browsing and aid navigation is clarified.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 33(2006) no.3, S.160-169
