Search (5700 results, page 1 of 285)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.13
    0.13146347 = sum of:
      0.08251584 = product of:
        0.24754752 = sum of:
          0.24754752 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24754752 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44046187 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.04894762 = product of:
        0.09789524 = sum of:
          0.09789524 = weight(_text_:organization in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09789524 = score(doc=2918,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.5284991 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.10
    0.104148224 = product of:
      0.20829645 = sum of:
        0.20829645 = sum of:
          0.12382877 = weight(_text_:organization in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12382877 = score(doc=4786,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.66850436 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
          0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08446769 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Präsentation anlässlich: NKOS 2008 - Networked Knowledge Organization Systems, September 19th 2008 ECDL-Conference, Arhus.
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.10363276 = sum of:
      0.08251584 = product of:
        0.24754752 = sum of:
          0.24754752 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24754752 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44046187 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.021116922 = product of:
        0.042233843 = sum of:
          0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042233843 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. FID/CR news; 38 (1995) 0.10
    0.100349575 = product of:
      0.20069915 = sum of:
        0.20069915 = sum of:
          0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10215352 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
          0.09854564 = weight(_text_:22 in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09854564 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.41-42
  5. Tennis, J.T.: Ethos and ideology of knowledge organization : toward precepts for an engaged knowledge organization (2013) 0.10
    0.09964846 = product of:
      0.19929692 = sum of:
        0.19929692 = sum of:
          0.14298514 = weight(_text_:organization in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14298514 = score(doc=637,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.7719223 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.056311794 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056311794 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper provides rationale for considering precepts for an engaged knowledge organization based on a Buddhist conception of intentional action. Casting knowledge organization work as craft, this paper employs Zizek's conception of violence in language as a call to action. The paper closes with a listing of precepts for an engaged knowledge organization.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:54:49
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.42-49
  6. Mylopoulos, J.; Jurisica, J.; Yu, E.: Computational mechanisms for knowledge organization (1998) 0.09
    0.092204615 = product of:
      0.18440923 = sum of:
        0.18440923 = sum of:
          0.13513641 = weight(_text_:organization in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13513641 = score(doc=68,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.72955 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
          0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04927282 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews several knowledge organization techniques used in Computer Science, in areas such as Artificial Intelligence, Databases and Software Engineering. Some of these computational mechanisms may assist in the organization and management of immense digital information resources. At the same time, the paper notes an increasing need for computer-based information systems to operate in open networked environments. This need requires knowledge organization principles, which are flexible and can be used with informally expressed knowledge. We expect to find such knowledge organization techniques in Library and Information Sciences, and hope to integrate them with the computational techniques described in this paper
    Date
    30.12.2001 17:22:15
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  7. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.09
    0.08679019 = product of:
      0.17358038 = sum of:
        0.17358038 = sum of:
          0.10319064 = weight(_text_:organization in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10319064 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.55708694 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.07038975 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07038975 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  8. Nahotko, M.: Model of scientific publishing as knowledge organization process (2014) 0.09
    0.08678704 = product of:
      0.17357408 = sum of:
        0.17357408 = sum of:
          0.13134024 = weight(_text_:organization in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13134024 = score(doc=1459,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.7090559 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
          0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042233843 = score(doc=1459,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1459, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1459)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is exploration of possibilities of knowledge organization (KO) approach to scientific publishing. Resulting research model of KO in publishing represents relations between data organization (DO), information organization (IO) and KO in cycle of scientific research process. The role and place of knowledge organization systems (KOS), meant as metadiscourse tools is underlined. It is close to Hjørland's broader sense of KO (Hjørland, 2008, 86), where it can be treated as a social activity aimed at assigning a specific organizational structure to some knowledge resources that facilitates users' access to the knowledge. This activity means, for example, the organization of information in the form of documents - scientific publications, artifacts of knowledge - in the process of codification of knowledge. Furthermore, it also includes the organization of documents in the society, their types, functions and methods of formation.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  9. Yi, H.; Shubai, L.: Application of classification in information organization under the networking environment (1998) 0.09
    0.08652933 = product of:
      0.17305866 = sum of:
        0.17305866 = sum of:
          0.11674687 = weight(_text_:organization in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11674687 = score(doc=3236,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
          0.056311794 = weight(_text_:22 in 3236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056311794 = score(doc=3236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3236)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Classification plays a very important role in the traditional organization and manual retrieval of documents. The advantages of classification are becoming evident again in the networked environment, in the areas of online browsing, organization of non text information, management of hypertext, and as a common language for the organization of information, which will promote the integration of classification schemes and thesauri
    Source
    Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information. 17(1998) no.1, S.19-22
  10. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.09
    0.08652933 = product of:
      0.17305866 = sum of:
        0.17305866 = sum of:
          0.11674687 = weight(_text_:organization in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11674687 = score(doc=4826,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
          0.056311794 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056311794 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  11. Williamson, N.J.: Classification issues in 2011 : report (2012) 0.09
    0.08601392 = product of:
      0.17202784 = sum of:
        0.17202784 = sum of:
          0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087560154 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
          0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 6224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08446769 = score(doc=6224,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6224, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6224)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:17:00
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.55-59
  12. Top, J.: Objectifying domain knowledge (1996) 0.09
    0.08601392 = product of:
      0.17202784 = sum of:
        0.17202784 = sum of:
          0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087560154 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08446769 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  13. Xiao, G.: ¬A knowledge classification model based on the relationship between science and human needs (2013) 0.09
    0.08601392 = product of:
      0.17202784 = sum of:
        0.17202784 = sum of:
          0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087560154 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
          0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08446769 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:36:34
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.77-77
  14. Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification : response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300 (2013) 0.09
    0.08601392 = product of:
      0.17202784 = sum of:
        0.17202784 = sum of:
          0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087560154 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
          0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08446769 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:35:05
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.76-77
  15. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.09
    0.08601392 = product of:
      0.17202784 = sum of:
        0.17202784 = sum of:
          0.087560154 = weight(_text_:organization in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087560154 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
          0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08446769 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
    Footnote
    Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.2, S.129-134.
  16. Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014) 0.09
    0.085917905 = product of:
      0.17183581 = sum of:
        0.17183581 = sum of:
          0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10215352 = score(doc=1400,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
          0.06968229 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06968229 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
    Pages
    S.22-32
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  17. Hetmanski, M.: ¬The actual role of metaphors in knowledge organization (2014) 0.08
    0.083031304 = product of:
      0.16606261 = sum of:
        0.16606261 = sum of:
          0.12382877 = weight(_text_:organization in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12382877 = score(doc=1406,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.66850436 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
          0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042233843 = score(doc=1406,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1406, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In the paper I argue that metaphors widely used in presenting knowledge organization, despite of their methodological correctness, play an ambiguous role. They are mostly conceived and used as models of information/knowledge organization such as library documents, databases and internet tools and devices. But due to their suggestive power and pervasive role, they can also obscure the structure of such organization. One can expect explanatory (descriptive) benefits from spatial (e.g. terrestrial or aquatic) metaphors comparing modes of organizing and accessing knowledge to oceans, pathways networks or even rhizomes. But mapping or metaphorically presenting cognitive undertakings such as searching, browsing or retrieving information/knowledge can obscure their actual essence. As held by the cognitive theory of metaphor (Lakoff, Johnson, Ritchie), certain aspects of complex phenomena (i.e. knowledge organization) are repeatedly obscured and hidden. I argue that metaphors containing probability concepts, although not immediately intuitive or comprehensible, are more fruitful effective in mapping knowledge organization.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  18. Neelameghan, A.; Raghavan, K.S.: Science of consciousness as a domain : issues for knowledge organization (2014) 0.08
    0.08174196 = product of:
      0.16348392 = sum of:
        0.16348392 = sum of:
          0.114211105 = weight(_text_:organization in 1403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211105 = score(doc=1403,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.6165823 = fieldWeight in 1403, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1403)
          0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 1403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04927282 = score(doc=1403,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1403, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1403)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years there is growing interest in the study of paranormal phenomenon. A broad area referred to as the Science of Consciousness has emerged as a discipline. This paper is an attempt to map the domain, and examine its coverage in knowledge organization systems. An idea of the facets of the domain is also provided based on an analysis of the published literature with the suggestion that these need to be adequately provided for in systems of knowledge organization.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  19. Szostak, R.: Skepticism and knowledge organization (2014) 0.08
    0.08174196 = product of:
      0.16348392 = sum of:
        0.16348392 = sum of:
          0.114211105 = weight(_text_:organization in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211105 = score(doc=1404,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.6165823 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04927282 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The key argument of this paper is that the field of knowledge organization can potentially provide a powerful - and indeed the only powerful - response to the skeptical claims that are common in the contemporary academy. Though skeptical arguments have an important place in our field - the present author readily confesses to having learned much in responding to such arguments - it would be unfortunate if the field of knowledge organization were to assume the correctness of a skeptical outlook. Rather, the field should essay to combat the sources of skepticism. Strategies for doing so are outlined.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol. 14
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.08
    0.08174196 = product of:
      0.16348392 = sum of:
        0.16348392 = sum of:
          0.114211105 = weight(_text_:organization in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.114211105 = score(doc=3494,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.6165823 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
          0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04927282 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber

Authors

Languages

Types

  • el 130
  • b 35
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Classifications