Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × type_ss:"r"
  1. Deokattey, S.; Sharma, S.B.K.; Kumar, G.R.; Bhanumurthy, K.: Knowledge organization research : an overview (2015) 0.06
    0.060753133 = product of:
      0.12150627 = sum of:
        0.12150627 = sum of:
          0.072233446 = weight(_text_:organization in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.072233446 = score(doc=2092,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.04927282 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04927282 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051953442 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The object of this literature review is to provide a historical perspective of R and D work in the area of Knowledge Organization (KO). This overview/summarization will provide information on major areas of KO. Journal articles published in core areas of KO: (Classification, Indexing, Thesauri and Taxonomies, Internet and Subject approach to information in the electronic era and Ontologies will be predominantly covered in this literature review. Coverage in this overview may not be completely exhaustive, but it succinctly showcases major developments in the area of KO. This review is a good source of additional reading material on KO apart from prescribed reading material on KO
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:13:38
  2. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.03
    0.028155897 = product of:
      0.056311794 = sum of:
        0.056311794 = product of:
          0.11262359 = sum of:
            0.11262359 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11262359 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  3. UNISIST: Study report on the feasibility of a world science information system by the United Nation Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the International Council of Scientific Unions (1971) 0.03
    0.02553838 = product of:
      0.05107676 = sum of:
        0.05107676 = product of:
          0.10215352 = sum of:
            0.10215352 = weight(_text_:organization in 7843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10215352 = score(doc=7843,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 7843, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7843)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  4. Wheelbarger, J.J.; Clouse, R.W.: ¬A comparision of a manual library reclassification project with a computer automated library reclassification project (1975) 0.02
    0.02463641 = product of:
      0.04927282 = sum of:
        0.04927282 = product of:
          0.09854564 = sum of:
            0.09854564 = weight(_text_:22 in 3473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09854564 = score(doc=3473,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3473, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3473)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  5. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Local Area Networks and Wide Area Networks for libraries (1995) 0.02
    0.02463641 = product of:
      0.04927282 = sum of:
        0.04927282 = product of:
          0.09854564 = sum of:
            0.09854564 = weight(_text_:22 in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09854564 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  6. Hodge, G.: Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries : beyond traditional authority files (2000) 0.02
    0.02447381 = product of:
      0.04894762 = sum of:
        0.04894762 = product of:
          0.09789524 = sum of:
            0.09789524 = weight(_text_:organization in 4723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09789524 = score(doc=4723,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.5284991 = fieldWeight in 4723, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Access of digital materials continues to be an issue of great significance in the development of digital libraries. The proliferation of information in the networked digital environment poses challenges as well as opportunities. The author reports on a wide array of activities in the field. While this publication is not intended to be exhaustive, the reader will find, in a single work, an overview of systems of knowledge organization and pertinent examples of their application to digital materials
    Content
    (1) Knowledge organization systems: an overview; (2) Linking digital library resources to related resources; (3) Making resources accessible to other communities; (4) Planning and implementing knowledge organization systems in digital libraries; (5) The future of knowledge organization systems on the Web
  7. Information for a new age : redefining the librarian (1995) 0.02
    0.021116922 = product of:
      0.042233843 = sum of:
        0.042233843 = product of:
          0.08446769 = sum of:
            0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08446769 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.2, S.147 (A. Schultis)
  8. Cleverdon, C.W.: ASLIB Cranfield Research Project : Report on the first stage of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1960) 0.02
    0.021116922 = product of:
      0.042233843 = sum of:
        0.042233843 = product of:
          0.08446769 = sum of:
            0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 6158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08446769 = score(doc=6158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.3, S.228 (G. Jahoda)
  9. ¬The future of national bibliography (1997) 0.02
    0.021116922 = product of:
      0.042233843 = sum of:
        0.042233843 = product of:
          0.08446769 = sum of:
            0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 1715) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08446769 = score(doc=1715,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1715, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1715)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Select newsletter 1998, no.22, S.8 (P. Robinson)
  10. Carey, K.; Stringer, R.: ¬The power of nine : a preliminary investigation into navigation strategies for the new library with special reference to disabled people (2000) 0.02
    0.021116922 = product of:
      0.042233843 = sum of:
        0.042233843 = product of:
          0.08446769 = sum of:
            0.08446769 = weight(_text_:22 in 234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08446769 = score(doc=234,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 234, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=234)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    22 S
  11. Anderson, J.D.: Guidelines for indexes and related information retrieval devices (1997) 0.02
    0.018957332 = product of:
      0.037914664 = sum of:
        0.037914664 = product of:
          0.07582933 = sum of:
            0.07582933 = weight(_text_:organization in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07582933 = score(doc=3807,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This technical report provides guidelines for the content, organization, and presentation of indexes used for the retrieval of documents and parts of documents. It deals with the principles of indexing, regardless of the type of material indexed, the indexing method used (intellectual analysis, machine algorithm, or both), the medium of the index, or the method of presentation for searching. It emphasizes 4 processes essential for all indexes: comprehensive design, vocabulary management, and the provision of systax. It includes definitions of indexes and of their parts, attributes, and aspects; a uniform vocabulary; treatment of the nature and variety of indexes; and recommendations regarding the design, organization, and presentation of indexes. It does not suggest guidelines for every detail or technique of indexing. These can be determined for each index on the basis of factors covered in the technical report
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 25(1998) no.3, S.118-119 (R. Fugmann)
  12. Intellectual property and the National Information Infrastructure : a preliminary draft of the report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights (1994) 0.02
    0.017597437 = product of:
      0.035194874 = sum of:
        0.035194874 = product of:
          0.07038975 = sum of:
            0.07038975 = weight(_text_:22 in 7306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07038975 = score(doc=7306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.1996 19:53:48
  13. Drewer, P.; Massion, F; Pulitano, D: Was haben Wissensmodellierung, Wissensstrukturierung, künstliche Intelligenz und Terminologie miteinander zu tun? (2017) 0.02
    0.017597437 = product of:
      0.035194874 = sum of:
        0.035194874 = product of:
          0.07038975 = sum of:
            0.07038975 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07038975 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13.12.2017 14:17:22
  14. Tober, M.; Hennig, L.; Furch, D.: SEO Ranking-Faktoren und Rang-Korrelationen 2014 : Google Deutschland (2014) 0.01
    0.014077948 = product of:
      0.028155897 = sum of:
        0.028155897 = product of:
          0.056311794 = sum of:
            0.056311794 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056311794 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    13. 9.2014 14:45:22
  15. Harken, S.E.: Subject semantic interoperability. Report of the Subcommittee on Semantic Interoperability to the ALCTS Subject Analysis Committee : Final report (2006) 0.01
    0.01289883 = product of:
      0.02579766 = sum of:
        0.02579766 = product of:
          0.05159532 = sum of:
            0.05159532 = weight(_text_:organization in 906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05159532 = score(doc=906,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 906, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=906)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The need for improved semantic in teroperability between and among vocabularies and knowledge organization schemes is undeniable and growing in importance. There is an ever-increasing need to create an environment by which even multiple portals could be accessed via subject metadata using software that is neutral and available ubiquitously or directly to the user, that could be copied by libraries for use in their own environment. In order to develop or improve a knowledge organization system including emerging options in semantic interoperability, scholars and practitioners need to be able to evaluate a wide variety of projects and stay current with the professional literature. Based on its findings, the Subcommittee concludes that the development of a successful subject semantic interoperability project is a long and difficult process. It requires a substantial investment of financial, human and computer resources. The Subcommittee recommends using the information and tools in this report and its appendices to assist in developing a successful project incorporating subject semantic interoperability. Finally the Subcommittee concludes that since this field of endeavor is still relatively young and immature, it is too early to generate a set of Best Practices that could be used in developing a successful project. We are past the theoretical and basic research phase and into the development phase. Even though there are some successful projects in full production, more projects need to reach maturity and much more research needs to be done.
  16. ELINOR : Electronic Library Project (1998) 0.01
    0.010558461 = product of:
      0.021116922 = sum of:
        0.021116922 = product of:
          0.042233843 = sum of:
            0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 1404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042233843 = score(doc=1404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    British Library Research and Innovation Centre (BLRIC) report; 22
  17. McCormick, A.; Sutton, A.: Open learning and the Internet in public libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.010558461 = product of:
      0.021116922 = sum of:
        0.021116922 = product of:
          0.042233843 = sum of:
            0.042233843 = weight(_text_:22 in 3685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042233843 = score(doc=3685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 18:55:19
  18. Sykes, J.: ¬The value of indexing : a white paper prepared for Factiva, Factiva, a Dow Jones and Reuters Company (2001) 0.01
    0.010319063 = product of:
      0.020638127 = sum of:
        0.020638127 = product of:
          0.041276254 = sum of:
            0.041276254 = weight(_text_:organization in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041276254 = score(doc=720,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.22283478 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Finding particular documents after they have been reviewed and stored has been a challenge since the advent of the printed word. "Findability" is emphatically more important as we deal with information overload in general and with the specific need to quickly find relevant background information to support business decisions in a networked environment. Because time is arguably the most valuable asset in today's economy, information users value tools that help them (1) quickly find the information they are seeking and (2) manage the quantity and quality of information they manipulate and work with on a regular basis. Although the term "indexing" may lack the cachet of some other terms we use to describe current information organization and management concepts, indexing is fundamental to precise information organization and retrieval, especially when dealing with large sets of documents. Power users find great value in using a known, granular indexing language that can surface the most relevant items and filter out items of peripheral or no interest. Web architects and interface designers can likewise take advantage of indexing labels to present only the information meeting certain requirements for users who do not wish to learn the indexing structure or taxonomy. The user finds what is needed while the indexing language is used behind the scenes and is transparent to the user.
  19. Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001) 0.01
    0.00912085 = product of:
      0.0182417 = sum of:
        0.0182417 = product of:
          0.0364834 = sum of:
            0.0364834 = weight(_text_:organization in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0364834 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18523255 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
  20. Positionspapier zur Weiterentwicklung der Bibliotheksverbünde als Teil einer überregionalen Informationsinfrastruktur (2011) 0.01
    0.008798718 = product of:
      0.017597437 = sum of:
        0.017597437 = product of:
          0.035194874 = sum of:
            0.035194874 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035194874 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1819321 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051953442 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2011 19:52:22