Search (764 results, page 1 of 39)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.13 
    0.12925497 = sum of:
  0.08078585 = product of:
    0.24235754 = sum of:
      0.24235754 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24235754 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43122733 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.048469122 = product of:
    0.096938245 = sum of:
      0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.096938245 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.10 
    0.10462518 = product of:
  0.20925036 = sum of:
    0.20925036 = sum of:
      0.16790198 = weight(_text_:policy in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16790198 = score(doc=3612,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.6156448 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041348387 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  3. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.10146004 = sum of:
  0.08078585 = product of:
    0.24235754 = sum of:
      0.24235754 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24235754 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.43122733 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020674193 = product of:
    0.041348387 = sum of:
      0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041348387 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  4. Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000) 0.09 
    0.092191085 = product of:
  0.18438217 = sum of:
    0.18438217 = sum of:
      0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.12925099 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
      0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.055131186 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:39:23
  5. Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (2002) 0.08 
    0.08148618 = product of:
  0.16297236 = sum of:
    0.16297236 = sum of:
      0.11424282 = weight(_text_:policy in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11424282 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.048729543 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048729543 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.
  6. Heery, R.: Information gateways : collaboration and content (2000) 0.08 
    0.0806672 = product of:
  0.1613344 = sum of:
    0.1613344 = sum of:
      0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11309461 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048239786 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Information subject gateways provide targeted discovery services for their users, giving access to Web resources selected according to quality and subject coverage criteria. Information gateways recognise that they must collaborate on a wide range of issues relating to content to ensure continued success. This report is informed by discussion of content activities at the 1999 Imesh Workshop. The author considers the implications for subject based gateways of co-operation regarding coverage policy, creation of metadata, and provision of searching and browsing across services. Other possibilities for co-operation include working more closely with information providers, and diclosure of information in joint metadata registries
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:54
  7. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.08 
    0.0806672 = product of:
  0.1613344 = sum of:
    0.1613344 = sum of:
      0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11309461 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048239786 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001) 0.08 
    0.0806672 = product of:
  0.1613344 = sum of:
    0.1613344 = sum of:
      0.11309461 = weight(_text_:policy in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11309461 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
      0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048239786 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
    Date
    22. 1.2007 20:46:57
  9. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.07 
    0.07434991 = product of:
  0.14869982 = sum of:
    0.14869982 = sum of:
      0.11424282 = weight(_text_:policy in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11424282 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03445699 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Hernon, P.; Relyea, H.C.: Information policy: United States (2009) 0.07 
    0.0722535 = product of:
  0.144507 = sum of:
    0.144507 = product of:
      0.289014 = sum of:
        0.289014 = weight(_text_:policy in 3805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.289014 = score(doc=3805,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05086421 = queryNorm
            1.0597253 = fieldWeight in 3805, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3805)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Information policy, a field encompassing both public policy and information science, treats information as both a commodity-adheres to the economic theory of property rights-and a resource to be collected, protected, shared, manipulated, and managed. Although the literature often refers to information policy in the singular, there is no single all-encompassing policy. Rather, information policies tend to address specific issues and, at times, to be fragmented, overlapping, and contradictory.
  11. Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009) 0.06 
    0.06475571 = product of:
  0.12951142 = sum of:
    0.12951142 = sum of:
      0.08078188 = weight(_text_:policy in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08078188 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
      0.048729543 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.048729543 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:51
  12. Rabina, D.; Johnston, S.: Information policy: European Union (2009) 0.06 
    0.06322181 = product of:
  0.12644362 = sum of:
    0.12644362 = product of:
      0.25288725 = sum of:
        0.25288725 = weight(_text_:policy in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25288725 = score(doc=3804,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05086421 = queryNorm
            0.9272596 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This entry provides an overview of European Union (EU) information policy, focusing on its formation, its goals, and its influence. European Union information policy refers to the legislation and strategies pertaining to the European policy for the creation of the information society. It is concerned with economic and industrial competitiveness, with an emphasis on the role that information and communication technologies play in revolutionizing everyday life, a broad goal with far reaching socioeconomic implications. This discussion, however, will be confined to information policy areas of greatest interest to information professionals, namely copyright and intellectual property, data protection and privacy, e-government and digitization.
  13. Sen, B.K.: DDC readymade : a treasury to 15,000 readymade DDC class numbers relating to Indian subjects, English language and literature (2001) 0.06 
    0.057619434 = product of:
  0.11523887 = sum of:
    0.11523887 = sum of:
      0.08078188 = weight(_text_:policy in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08078188 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
      0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 1484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03445699 = score(doc=1484,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1484, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1484)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The book provides around 15,000 readymade class numbers relating to Indian subjects and English language and literature. It has covered four Indic religions, namely Buddhism, Hinduism, Jainism and Sikhism. For each of these religions class numbers for around fifty subdivisions of each of the impotent South Asian Languages like Assamese, Bengali, English Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Nepali, Oriya, Punjabi , Sanskrit Sindhi, Sinhalese, Tamil Telugu and Urdu have been provided. he numbers for other South Asian languages noticed in DDC have also been included. For literature of each of the aforementioned languages the class numbers for around 450 subdivisions have been provided. Around 750 class cumbers have been provided for English language and literature. More than 250 class numbers have been provided under the heading History including all the periods for such subjects as Architecture, Conservation of resources, Cultural contact, Economic development, Economic geography, Elections, Elementary educational, Fauna, Flora, Folk, dancing, Folk literature, Folk supply, General clubs, Geography Geology, Higher education, Journalism, Local public debt, Local taxes, Museums, Newspapers, Organizations, Painting and paintings Political situation, Postal organizations, Public administration, Public finance, Public policy on education, Revenue, Secondary education, Social problems/social welfare, Social welfare Problems and services, State taxes, Statistics, Strikes, and so on with more than 40 geographical subdivisions. In addition to this, more than a dozen class number have been provided for all the Indian states and union territories. Necessary instructions have been given as to how class numbers are to be located, and expanded when necessary.
    Object
    DDC-22
  14. Hu, D.; Kaza, S.; Chen, H.: Identifying significant facilitators of dark network evolution (2009) 0.06 
    0.057619434 = product of:
  0.11523887 = sum of:
    0.11523887 = sum of:
      0.08078188 = weight(_text_:policy in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08078188 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
      0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 2753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03445699 = score(doc=2753,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2753, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2753)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Social networks evolve over time with the addition and removal of nodes and links to survive and thrive in their environments. Previous studies have shown that the link-formation process in such networks is influenced by a set of facilitators. However, there have been few empirical evaluations to determine the important facilitators. In a research partnership with law enforcement agencies, we used dynamic social-network analysis methods to examine several plausible facilitators of co-offending relationships in a large-scale narcotics network consisting of individuals and vehicles. Multivariate Cox regression and a two-proportion z-test on cyclic and focal closures of the network showed that mutual acquaintance and vehicle affiliations were significant facilitators for the network under study. We also found that homophily with respect to age, race, and gender were not good predictors of future link formation in these networks. Moreover, we examined the social causes and policy implications for the significance and insignificance of various facilitators including common jails on future co-offending. These findings provide important insights into the link-formation processes and the resilience of social networks. In addition, they can be used to aid in the prediction of future links. The methods described can also help in understanding the driving forces behind the formation and evolution of social networks facilitated by mobile and Web technologies.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:50:30
  15. LC Classification Outline (2003) 0.06 
    0.056547306 = product of:
  0.11309461 = sum of:
    0.11309461 = product of:
      0.22618923 = sum of:
        0.22618923 = weight(_text_:policy in 4047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22618923 = score(doc=4047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05086421 = queryNorm
            0.8293662 = fieldWeight in 4047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Editor
    Library of Congress / Office for Subject Cataloging Policy
  16. Maxwell, T.A.: Mapping information policy frames : the politics of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (2004) 0.05 
    0.054190125 = product of:
  0.10838025 = sum of:
    0.10838025 = product of:
      0.2167605 = sum of:
        0.2167605 = weight(_text_:policy in 2063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2167605 = score(doc=2063,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05086421 = queryNorm
            0.79479396 = fieldWeight in 2063, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2063)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) was a significant milestone in congressional information policy legislation. However, the results were widely criticized in some circles as providing too much Power to certain stakeholder groups. This paper uses computerbased content analysis and a theoretical taxonomy of information policy values to analyze congressional hearing testimony. The results of document coding were then analyzed using a variety of statistical tools to map how different stakeholders framed issues in the debate and determine if congressional value statements about the legislation conformed more closely to certain stakeholders. Results of the analysis indicate that significant differences in the use of information policy terms occurred across stakeholders, and showed varying degrees of convergence between congressional or other stakeholders when framing information policy issues.
  17. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05 
    0.047125082 = product of:
  0.094250165 = sum of:
    0.094250165 = product of:
      0.2827505 = sum of:
        0.2827505 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2827505 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.43122733 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05086421 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  18. Spero, S.: LCSH is to thesaurus as doorbell is to mammal : visualizing structural problems in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (2008) 0.05 
    0.046095543 = product of:
  0.092191085 = sum of:
    0.092191085 = sum of:
      0.064625494 = weight(_text_:policy in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.064625494 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
      0.027565593 = weight(_text_:22 in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.027565593 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) has been developed over the course of more than a century, predating the semantic web by some time. Until the 1986, the only concept-toconcept relationship available was an undifferentiated "See Also" reference, which was used for both associative (RT) and hierarchical (BT/NT) connections. In that year, in preparation for the first release of the headings in machine readable MARC Authorities form, an attempt was made to automatically convert these "See Also" links into the standardized thesaural relations. Unfortunately, the rule used to determine the type of reference to generate relied on the presence of symmetric links to detect associatively related terms; "See Also" references that were only present in one of the related terms were assumed to be hierarchical. This left the process vulnerable to inconsistent use of references in the pre-conversion data, with a marked bias towards promoting relationships to hierarchical status. The Library of Congress was aware that the results of the conversion contained many inconsistencies, and intended to validate and correct the results over the course of time. Unfortunately, twenty years later, less than 40% of the converted records have been evaluated. The converted records, being the earliest encountered during the Library's cataloging activities, represent the most basic concepts within LCSH; errors in the syndetic structure for these records affect far more subordinate concepts than those nearer the periphery. Worse, a policy of patterning new headings after pre-existing ones leads to structural errors arising from the conversion process being replicated in these newer headings, perpetuating and exacerbating the errors. As the LCSH prepares for its second great conversion, from MARC to SKOS, it is critical to address these structural problems. As part of the work on converting the headings into SKOS, I have experimented with different visualizations of the tangled web of broader terms embedded in LCSH. This poster illustrates several of these renderings, shows how they can help users to judge which relationships might not be correct, and shows just exactly how Doorbells and Mammals are related.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  19. Luyt, B.: Defining the digital divide : the role of e-readiness indicators (2006) 0.05 
    0.04515844 = product of:
  0.09031688 = sum of:
    0.09031688 = product of:
      0.18063375 = sum of:
        0.18063375 = weight(_text_:policy in 655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18063375 = score(doc=655,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05086421 = queryNorm
            0.6623283 = fieldWeight in 655, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=655)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose - To show how e-readiness indicators, specifically the Networked Readiness Index (NRI), participate in the work of defining policy problems. Design/methodology/approach - The article critically examines the Networked Readiness Index in terms of its presentation and its underlying model. It relies on an approach to policy analysis that views policy problems as socially constructed. Findings - E-readiness assessment tools purport to show how ready the nations of the world are to exploit the potential of new information and communication technologies. Yet they do more than that; being actively engaged in constructing policy problems. In the case of the NRI, the problem of the international digital divide is defined in a particular way that privileges certain interests while at the same time legitimatizing its inclusion on the agenda of international organizations as a problem worthy of sustained attention. Practical implications - The findings of the article suggest a need for alternative indicators that register the voices of a wider range of groups and could therefore create a more inclusive digital divide policy problem. Originality/value - Little critical (as opposed to technical) analysis of e-readiness indicators exits in the literature. By focusing on these tools, the article contributes to the debate surrounding the issue of the digital divide.
  20. Dewey, M.: Dewey Decimal Classification and relative index (2003) 0.04 
    0.043481022 = product of:
  0.086962044 = sum of:
    0.086962044 = sum of:
      0.05712141 = weight(_text_:policy in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05712141 = score(doc=129,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.20944661 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
      0.029840631 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029840631 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05086421 = queryNorm
          0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 31(2004) no.2, S.112-114 (M.P. Satija) : "With nearly 130 years of eventful and checkered history, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is the oldest living yet thriving modern library classification. Having undergone 21 revisions, it is the most applied library classification structure all over the world. Apart from its use in libraries in more than 135 countries across six continents, many national and trade bibliographies use it for content organization. Furthermore, it is now making successful forays into the world of electronic documents and networked information. The print version of the 22nd edition was released in September 2003, two months later than the scheduled time of July 2003, and two months after the release of the electronic version, WebDewey. The period between print editions now seems settled to seven years as a matter of policy. As WebDewey, an the other hand, is updated an a quarterly basis, what really constitutes a new edition is problematic; edition is rolling, always in a flux without much fixity. The last half century, and more specifically the tenure of Benjamin A. Custer as editor (1956-1980; Editions 16-19), has been an era of structural changes in the DDC, backed by professional management and organizational planning. Custer was instrumental in not only resuscitating the system, but also in putting DDC back an the path of progress. His able successor, Dr. John P. Comaromi, edited the 20`h edition (1989) and ushered in a period of simplification and consolidation. Following the acquisition of Forest Press by OCLC in 1988, much more research has gone into making new editions of the DDC. The OCLC Office of Research has involved itself in classification research, especially in the harmonization of various knowledge classification systems and mapping of DDC numbers to subject headings, above all to make DDC capable of organizing electronic information of every sort. The acquisition of DDC by OCLC has also inaugurated an era of new products and services, along with organized marketing. DDC21 (1996) was a product of high IT, and the 22nd edition can safely be termed a child of network technology. It is indeed the first edition produced in the web environment. To stay abreast of current developments an knowledge practices, the editors relied an the Internet and electronic databases for new topics and terms. Editors and policy makes got constant feedback and suggestions via the Internet to add new features and to achieve accuracy and efficiency. In addition to the feedback and expert advice, this edition, as usual, is based an actual classification of three quarters of a million current books in the Decimal Classification Division of the Library of Congress since 1996.
    Changes DDC22 is the second edition prepared by Joan S. Mitchell who took over as editor in 1993. It carries forward the policies and improvements started in DDC21, especially the onslaught an the Christian and western cultural blas in the schedules and tables. The plan for reducing Christian blas in 200 Religion, initiated in DDC21, has now been completed, with some additional provisions in 296 and 297. An outstanding change has been the abrogation of Table 7 Persons. The functions of Table 7 are now filled by using T1-08 and whatever notation is appropriate from 011-999. There are at least six places in the tables and 12 places in the schedules where the use of T7 was prescribed; what good the abolition of T7 has produced is not clear. In fact, it does make number building in some cases a bit circuitous, especially while using Table 3C. It has also resulted in the reuse of many DDC 21 numbers with new meanings. However, some numbers remain the same e.g., Social customs of artists 390.47 (both in DDC21 and DDC22). A few numbers have also become shorter in length. In compliance with the recommendations of D'Elia's survey, all works relating to directories of travel facilities such as hotels, lodges, Motels, inns, have been shifted to 910.46 and to 913/919 whereas 647.94 continues to be in place for general information about hotels. A common practice in previous editions, that is full class or extensive revisions (phoenix schedules), appear to have been discontinued in the preparation of DDC22. But minor changes are numerous. There are more than one thousand relocations and discontiuations of class numbers. Some 40 numbers have been reused. ... However, all these changes are not those projected as slated changes for DDC22 in the DDC21 (1996), namely in 520 Astronomy, 355-359 Military science, 636-639 Animal husbandry and 690 Buildings. Obviously the switch over to the DDC 22 will put less strain an libraries. There has been considerable improvement in the manual, now shifted to volume 1 of the print edition (pp. 1-182). Notes in the manual have been shortened by removing redundant information and by dividing them into smaller sections. Some information from the manual has been transferred to the schedules and tables, in the form of notes. The manual is now clearer and easier to read. Flow Charts, built-in numbers, and see also references should help classifiers achieve greater consistency. The relative index has been beefed up. With its 928 pages, it is 333 pages longer than the previous one, including new built-in numbers and many additional terms. The entry vocabulary is wide-based and current. DDC 22, the first edition of this millennium, has kept pace with the fast changing information environment to map and organize it squarely. To quote our friends at OCLC: knowledge is a big world, and they have organized it."
    Object
    DDC-22

Authors

Types

  • a 636
  • m 85
  • el 53
  • s 34
  • b 25
  • x 2
  • i 1
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications