Search (259 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.06 
    0.06102201 = product of:
  0.12204402 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  2. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.06 
    0.06102201 = product of:
  0.12204402 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001) 0.06 
    0.06102201 = product of:
  0.12204402 = sum of:
    0.10059083 = weight(_text_:policy in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10059083 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
    0.021453189 = product of:
      0.042906377 = sum of:
        0.042906377 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042906377 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
    Date
    22. 1.2007 20:46:57
  4. Danskin, A.: ¬A declaration of inter-dependence (1996) 0.05 
    0.050806046 = product of:
  0.20322418 = sum of:
    0.20322418 = weight(_text_:policy in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20322418 = score(doc=7192,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.83778644 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The British Library and the Library of Congress have reinforced their mutual committment to the efficient exchange of high quality bibliographic data by a number of cooperative programmes of which the Cataloguing Policy Convergence Agreement is one example. Sets out the reasons why cataloguing policy differences still exist
  5. Graham, C.: Rethinking national policy for cataloging microform reproductions (1986) 0.05 
    0.049779553 = product of:
  0.19911821 = sum of:
    0.19911821 = weight(_text_:policy in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19911821 = score(doc=371,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.82085973 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Current national cataloging policy requires the creation of unique cataloging records for an original publication and each of its microfilm reproductions. Such redundant entries are difficult to decipher and expensive to produce and maintain. The case of serial publications is most urgent, especially due to the proliferation of preservation microfilming efforts and union list projects. The master record concept used in the United States Newspaper Project offers a viable alternative method. Librarians should lobby to have the single record approach adopted as national policy.
  6. Read, J.: Cataloguing without tears : managing knowledge in the information society (2003) 0.04 
    0.043829456 = product of:
  0.08765891 = sum of:
    0.057480477 = weight(_text_:policy in 4509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057480477 = score(doc=4509,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.23696178 = fieldWeight in 4509, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4509)
    0.030178435 = product of:
      0.06035687 = sum of:
        0.06035687 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 4509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06035687 = score(doc=4509,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            0.24281834 = fieldWeight in 4509, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Key Features - Relates theory to practice and is written in an easy-to-read style - Includes guidance an subject cataloguing as well as descriptive cataloguing - Covers the use of ISBD and Dublin Core in descriptive cataloguing, rather than being tied exclusively to using AACR - Covers the principles of subject cataloguing, a topic which most non-librarians believe to be an integral part of cataloguing - Not only does the book describe the hows of cataloguing but goes a stage further by explaining why one might want to catalogue a particular item in a certain way The Author Jane Read has over 13 years' experience in academic libraries. She works as a cataloguing officer for The Higher Education Academy. Readership Librarians and informational professionals responsible for cataloguing materials (of any format). Knowledge managers will also find the book of interest. Contents Why bother to catalogue - what is a catalogue for, anticipating user needs, convincing your boss it is important What to catalogue -writing a cataloguing policy, what a catalogue record contains, the politics of cataloguing Who should catalogue - how long does it take to catalogue a book, skill sets needed, appropriate levels of staffing, organising time How to catalogue and not reinvent the wherl - choosing a records management system, international standards (AACR/MARC, ISBD, Dublin Core), subject cataloguing, and authority control Is it a book, is it a journal - distinguishing between formats, the'awkward squad', loose-leaf files, websites and skeletons What's a strange attractor? Cataloguing subjects you know nothing about -finding the right subject headings, verifying your information ki an ne lit pas le francais: unkriown languages and how to deal with them - what language is it, transcribing non-Roman alphabets, understanding the subject Special cases - rare books and archival collections, children's books, electronic media Resources for cataloguers - reference books, online discussion lists, conferences, bibliography
  7. Beaney, S.: Towards a policy for cataloguing CD-ROMs and other electronic media : Part 1 (1997) 0.04 
    0.0359253 = product of:
  0.1437012 = sum of:
    0.1437012 = weight(_text_:policy in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1437012 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.5924045 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  8. Tennis, J.T.: Is there a new bbliography? (2011) 0.03 
    0.033740517 = product of:
  0.13496207 = sum of:
    0.13496207 = product of:
      0.26992413 = sum of:
        0.26992413 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26992413 = score(doc=1888,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04524064 = queryNorm
            1.0859166 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the position claiming that the contemporary technological, socio-political, and socio-economic environment gives us pause to consider the core theory and practices of bibliography, combining bibliography of the work (in library and information science), bibliography of the text (in textual studies and scholarly editing), and bibliography of the artifact (in book history and now digital forensics), and calls for collaborative multidisciplinary research at the intersection of these fields to ask, is there a new bibliography?
  9. Parent, I.: IFLA Section on Cataloguing: "Why in the World?" (2000) 0.03 
    0.031828046 = product of:
  0.12731218 = sum of:
    0.12731218 = sum of:
      0.0905353 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0905353 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.3642275 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
      0.036776893 = weight(_text_:22 in 188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036776893 = score(doc=188,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 188, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Bibliographic Control Division of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) consists of three sections: bibliography, cataloguing, and classification. The cataloguing section, which focuses on descriptive cataloguing, is one of the oldest within IFLA, having been founded in 1935 as the IFLA Committee on Uniform Cataloguing Rules. It became the Committee on Cataloguing in 1970. The committee played a key role in planning and convening the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles held in Paris in 1961 and the International Meeting of Cataloguing Experts held in Copenhagen in 1969. The Copenhagen conference provided the impetus to develop the International Standard Bibliographic Descriptions (ISBD). The Committee on Cataloguing established a systematic process for the revision of the ISBDs. The cataloguing section focuses on traditional cataloguing standards and on the impact of electronic resources and technology on these standards. The section has initiated several projects at the international level to facilitate access to information.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. RDA Toolkit (1) (2017) 0.03 
    0.031112222 = product of:
  0.12444889 = sum of:
    0.12444889 = weight(_text_:policy in 3996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12444889 = score(doc=3996,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.5130373 = fieldWeight in 3996, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3996)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Am 14. Februar 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/development/February2017release> erschienen. Das Release enthält im englischen Text alle Änderungen aus dem Fast-Track-Verfahren RSC/Sec/6<http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RSC-Sec-6.pdf>. Ebenso enthalten sind die Updates der LC-PCC PS (Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements) und der MLA Best Practices. Neu aufgenommen wurden die Policy Statements der Library and Archives Canada in Kooperation mit der Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec. Diese sind sowohl im Register als auch im Text über ein Icon (dunkel violett) mit den Buchstaben LAC/BAC-BAnQ ansteuerbar. Ab sofort ist es möglich sich auch die Policy Statements in einer zweisprachigen Ansicht anzeigen zu lassen, dazu wurde die Funktion Select Language und Dual View in der Symbolliste unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen" eingefügt. Im deutschen Text wurden ausschließlich Änderungen an den Anwendungsrichtlinien für den deutschsprachigen Raum (D-A-CH) eingearbeitet. Die dazugehörige Übersicht (Kurz- bzw. Langversion) finden Sie im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg>. Mitte April 2017 wird das nächste Release des RDA Toolkit erscheinen, eingearbeitet werden die verabschiedeten Proposals, die im November 2016 vom RDA Steering Committee (RSC) beschlossen wurden. Die Umsetzung der Änderungen in der deutschen Übersetzung aus den Fast-Track-Dokumenten RSC/Sec/4 und RSC/Sec/5 und RSC/Sec/6 sind für den August 2017 geplant.
  11. Studwell, W.E.: ¬The Library of Congress's policy on cataloging microform reproductions and photocopies : a half way measure (1991) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  12. Bagley, S.: Towards a policy for cataloguing CD-ROMs and other electronic media : Part 2 (1997) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 6398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=6398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 6398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6398)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Leresche, F.: ¬La normalisation du catalogage en France (1989) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reviews the organisation of the work of cataloguing standardisation in France and in standards published or in preparation. French standards follow IFLA reommendations on rules for bibliographic descriptions and headings. Standardisation of formats is less developed; however MARC is gaininig ground as a national exchange format, whilst USMARC is also used by university and public libraries. French policy on cataloguing standards aims both to promote international exchange of biblio-graphic recordswhile respecting national access requirements, and to simplify cataloguing by promoting the use of medium-level bibliographic records.
  14. Danskin, A.: Better, faster, cheaper cataloguing! (1995) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=3815,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports the activities of the Program for Cooperative Cataloguing (PCC) Task Group of Name versus Subject, charged with reviewing policies for the content designation and formulation of entries with characteristics common to both names and subjects. The Task Group consusted of representatives from the National Library of Canada, the British Library, the Library of Congress and the art library community, and its objective is to make cooperative cataloguing better, faster and cheaper by streamlining policy and promoting common standards
  15. Fattig, K.; Block, R.: Cataloging Internet resources : policy, procedures, and practice (1997) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Heller, J.R.: Original cataloging at the New York Chiropractic College Media Resources Library (1990) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article is about the conceptual framework of the original cataloging process that is used to catalog the audiovisual a materials at the New York Chiropractic College Media Resources Library. The cataloging norms serve as the conceptual underpinnings to the Cataloging Policy Manual of the New York Chiropractic College Media Resources Library. The paper describes the use of the various cataloging standards and policies that are used as well as the use and assignment of the National Library of Medicine classification to ensure access to the audiovisual collection.
  18. Lubetzky, S.: Cataloging rules and principles : a critique of the A.L.A. rules for entry and a proposed design for their revision (1953) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 2278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=2278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 2278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2278)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Issue
    Prepared for the Board on Cataloging Policy and Research of the A.L.A. Division of Cataloging and Classification.
  19. Kuhagen, J.: RDA content in multiple languages : a new standard not only for libraries (2016) 0.03 
    0.028740238 = product of:
  0.11496095 = sum of:
    0.11496095 = weight(_text_:policy in 2955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11496095 = score(doc=2955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24257277 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04524064 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 2955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2955)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    A summary of the presence of RDA content in languages other than English in RDA Toolkit, in the RDA Registry, in the RIMMF data editor, and as separate translations is given. Translation policy is explained and the benefits of translation on the content of RDA are noted.
  20. Madison, O.M.A.: ¬The IFLA Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records : international standards for bibliographic control (2000) 0.03 
    0.026523374 = product of:
  0.106093496 = sum of:
    0.106093496 = sum of:
      0.075446084 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.075446084 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.248568 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
      0.030647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.030647412 = score(doc=187,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15842502 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04524064 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 187, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=187)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The formal charge for the IFLA study involving international bibliography standards was to delineate the functions that are performed by the bibliographic record with respect to various media, applications, and user needs. The method used was the entity relationship analysis technique. Three groups of entities that are the key objects of interest to users of bibliographic records were defined. The primary group contains four entities: work, expression, manifestation, and item. The second group includes entities responsible for the intellectual or artistic content, production, or ownership of entities in the first group. The third group includes entities that represent concepts, objects, events, and places. In the study we identified the attributes associated with each entity and the relationships that are most important to users. The attributes and relationships were mapped to the functional requirements for bibliographic records that were defined in terms of four user tasks: to find, identify, select, and obtain. Basic requirements for national bibliographic records were recommended based on the entity analysis. The recommendations of the study are compared with two standards, AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) and the Dublin Core, to place them into pragmatic context. The results of the study are being used in the review of the complete set of ISBDs as the initial benchmark in determining data elements for each format.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 209
  • d 44
  • f 2
  • i 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 238
  • b 17
  • m 14
  • s 8
  • el 7
  • n 2
  • ? 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications