Search (246 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Tait, J.A.: Authors and titles : an analytical study of the author concept in codes of cataloguing rules in the English language, from that of the British Museum in 1841 to the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules 1967 (1969) 0.13 
    0.12745352 = product of:
  0.3186338 = sum of:
    0.169641 = weight(_text_:great in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.169641 = score(doc=2161,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.7038474 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
    0.14899279 = product of:
      0.29798558 = sum of:
        0.29798558 = weight(_text_:britain in 2161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29798558 = score(doc=2161,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3194365 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.9328476 = fieldWeight in 2161, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2161)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    LCSH
    Descriptive cataloging / Great Britain / Rules / History
    Subject
    Descriptive cataloging / Great Britain / Rules / History
  2. Gilbert, J.: AACR2 headings for local churches and parishes in Great Britain (1997) 0.11 
    0.11265405 = product of:
  0.28163514 = sum of:
    0.14994287 = weight(_text_:great in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14994287 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.62211907 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
    0.13169226 = product of:
      0.26338452 = sum of:
        0.26338452 = weight(_text_:britain in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26338452 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3194365 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.8245286 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
  3. Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997) 0.09 
    0.09148935 = product of:
  0.22872338 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
    0.1199543 = weight(_text_:great in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1199543 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    The PICS, an initiative of W3C, is a technology that supports the association of descriptive labels with Web resources. By providing a single common transport syntax for metadata, PICS will support the growth of metadata systems (including library cataloguing) that are interoperable and widely supported in Web information systems. Within the PICS framework, a great diversity of resource description models can be implemented, from simple rating schemes to complex data content standards
  4. Crook, M.: Barbara Tillett discusses cataloging rules and conceptual models (1996) 0.05 
    0.046188258 = product of:
  0.11547064 = sum of:
    0.095172934 = weight(_text_:policy in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.095172934 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
    0.020297704 = product of:
      0.04059541 = sum of:
        0.04059541 = weight(_text_:22 in 7683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04059541 = score(doc=7683,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7683, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7683)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The chief of cataloguing policy and support office at the LoC presents her views on the usefulness of conceptual modelling in determining future directions for cataloguing and the MARC format. After describing the evolution of bibliographic processes, suggests usign the entity-relationship conceptual model to step back from how we record information today and start thinking about what information really means and why we provide it. Argues that now is the time to reexamine the basic principles which underpin Anglo-American cataloguing codes and that MARC formats should be looked at to see how they can evolve towards a future, improved structure for communicating bibliographic and authority information
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 1996, no.220, S.20-22
  5. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.05 
    0.046188258 = product of:
  0.11547064 = sum of:
    0.095172934 = weight(_text_:policy in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.095172934 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
    0.020297704 = product of:
      0.04059541 = sum of:
        0.04059541 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04059541 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. ChaPudhry, A.S.; Periasamy, M.: ¬A study of current practices of selected libraries in cataloguing electronic journals (2001) 0.05 
    0.046188258 = product of:
  0.11547064 = sum of:
    0.095172934 = weight(_text_:policy in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.095172934 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.4146831 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
    0.020297704 = product of:
      0.04059541 = sum of:
        0.04059541 = weight(_text_:22 in 746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04059541 = score(doc=746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=746)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    MARC records and online policy documents of selected libraries were reviewed to study the approaches taken by libraries worldwide to catalogue electronic journals. In general, libraries catalogue those electronic journals that are subscribed by them on priority basis. Most of them annotate the e-journal to the print record, some prefer to catalogue them separately, while the majority of the libraries adopt both approaches. While most of the libraries studied prefer full record, cataloguing e-journals separately with a brief record (at least containing MARC fields 245, 500, and 856) that identifies and locates the resource seems to be the best practice.
    Date
    22. 1.2007 20:46:57
  7. Bowen, J.: FRBR : coming soon to your library? (2005) 0.04 
    0.042945504 = product of:
  0.10736376 = sum of:
    0.08996573 = weight(_text_:great in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08996573 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
    0.017398031 = product of:
      0.034796063 = sum of:
        0.034796063 = weight(_text_:22 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034796063 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) data model holds great potential for improving access to library resources, but may not affect all libraries in the same way. The Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules), assisted by the work of its Format Variation Working Group, is exploring ways to incorporate FRBR into the next edition of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules to facilitate collocation at the level of the FRBR entity expression. Several library system vendors are also adding FRBR-based functionality to their systems. A combination of these two approaches to FRBR can provide significant benefits to users. Most FRBR entities and attributes are already present in library catalog records, and the influence of FRBR can also be seen in existing library activities. FRBR is thus not something totally foreign, but a fresh, more rigorous way of thinking about what libraries already do that provides a basis for designing new ways to improve users' access to library resources.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Ellero, N.P.: Panning for gold : utility of the World Wide Web for metadata and authority control in special collections (2002) 0.04 
    0.042945504 = product of:
  0.10736376 = sum of:
    0.08996573 = weight(_text_:great in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08996573 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24101958 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.37327147 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
    0.017398031 = product of:
      0.034796063 = sum of:
        0.034796063 = weight(_text_:22 in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034796063 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14989214 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042803947 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This article describes the use of the World Wide Web as a valuable name authority resource and tool for special collections analytic-level cataloging and the specific goal of fully discovering the names of people who lived in the past as well as those from the present. Current tools and initiatives such as the Name Authority Component of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (NACO) and the Library of Congress Name Authority File have a specific mission and are partially helpful. Web resources encompassing special collections are often intricate and require global and enhanced resources to continue what have been the guiding principles, tradition, and value of cataloging: to discover works via many points of entry; to find works by or about the same person, topic, or title; and to continue the great cataloging legacies of standards and cooperation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Danskin, A.: ¬A declaration of inter-dependence (1996) 0.04 
    0.038455676 = product of:
  0.19227837 = sum of:
    0.19227837 = weight(_text_:policy in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19227837 = score(doc=7192,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.83778644 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The British Library and the Library of Congress have reinforced their mutual committment to the efficient exchange of high quality bibliographic data by a number of cooperative programmes of which the Cataloguing Policy Convergence Agreement is one example. Sets out the reasons why cataloguing policy differences still exist
  10. Graham, C.: Rethinking national policy for cataloging microform reproductions (1986) 0.04 
    0.037678715 = product of:
  0.18839356 = sum of:
    0.18839356 = weight(_text_:policy in 371) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18839356 = score(doc=371,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.82085973 = fieldWeight in 371, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=371)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Current national cataloging policy requires the creation of unique cataloging records for an original publication and each of its microfilm reproductions. Such redundant entries are difficult to decipher and expensive to produce and maintain. The case of serial publications is most urgent, especially due to the proliferation of preservation microfilming efforts and union list projects. The master record concept used in the United States Newspaper Project offers a viable alternative method. Librarians should lobby to have the single record approach adopted as national policy.
  11. Beaney, S.: Towards a policy for cataloguing CD-ROMs and other electronic media : Part 1 (1997) 0.03 
    0.02719227 = product of:
  0.13596135 = sum of:
    0.13596135 = weight(_text_:policy in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13596135 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.5924045 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. RDA Toolkit (1) (2017) 0.02 
    0.023549197 = product of:
  0.11774598 = sum of:
    0.11774598 = weight(_text_:policy in 3996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11774598 = score(doc=3996,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.5130373 = fieldWeight in 3996, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3996)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Am 14. Februar 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/development/February2017release> erschienen. Das Release enthält im englischen Text alle Änderungen aus dem Fast-Track-Verfahren RSC/Sec/6<http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RSC-Sec-6.pdf>. Ebenso enthalten sind die Updates der LC-PCC PS (Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements) und der MLA Best Practices. Neu aufgenommen wurden die Policy Statements der Library and Archives Canada in Kooperation mit der Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec. Diese sind sowohl im Register als auch im Text über ein Icon (dunkel violett) mit den Buchstaben LAC/BAC-BAnQ ansteuerbar. Ab sofort ist es möglich sich auch die Policy Statements in einer zweisprachigen Ansicht anzeigen zu lassen, dazu wurde die Funktion Select Language und Dual View in der Symbolliste unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen" eingefügt. Im deutschen Text wurden ausschließlich Änderungen an den Anwendungsrichtlinien für den deutschsprachigen Raum (D-A-CH) eingearbeitet. Die dazugehörige Übersicht (Kurz- bzw. Langversion) finden Sie im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg>. Mitte April 2017 wird das nächste Release des RDA Toolkit erscheinen, eingearbeitet werden die verabschiedeten Proposals, die im November 2016 vom RDA Steering Committee (RSC) beschlossen wurden. Die Umsetzung der Änderungen in der deutschen Übersetzung aus den Fast-Track-Dokumenten RSC/Sec/4 und RSC/Sec/5 und RSC/Sec/6 sind für den August 2017 geplant.
  13. Studwell, W.E.: ¬The Library of Congress's policy on cataloging microform reproductions and photocopies : a half way measure (1991) 0.02 
    0.021753816 = product of:
  0.108769074 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 3662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=3662,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 3662, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3662)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  14. Bagley, S.: Towards a policy for cataloguing CD-ROMs and other electronic media : Part 2 (1997) 0.02 
    0.021753816 = product of:
  0.108769074 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 6398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=6398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 6398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6398)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  15. Leresche, F.: ¬La normalisation du catalogage en France (1989) 0.02 
    0.021753816 = product of:
  0.108769074 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reviews the organisation of the work of cataloguing standardisation in France and in standards published or in preparation. French standards follow IFLA reommendations on rules for bibliographic descriptions and headings. Standardisation of formats is less developed; however MARC is gaininig ground as a national exchange format, whilst USMARC is also used by university and public libraries. French policy on cataloguing standards aims both to promote international exchange of biblio-graphic recordswhile respecting national access requirements, and to simplify cataloguing by promoting the use of medium-level bibliographic records.
  16. Danskin, A.: Better, faster, cheaper cataloguing! (1995) 0.02 
    0.021753816 = product of:
  0.108769074 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 3815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=3815,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 3815, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3815)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Reports the activities of the Program for Cooperative Cataloguing (PCC) Task Group of Name versus Subject, charged with reviewing policies for the content designation and formulation of entries with characteristics common to both names and subjects. The Task Group consusted of representatives from the National Library of Canada, the British Library, the Library of Congress and the art library community, and its objective is to make cooperative cataloguing better, faster and cheaper by streamlining policy and promoting common standards
  17. Fattig, K.; Block, R.: Cataloging Internet resources : policy, procedures, and practice (1997) 0.02 
    0.021753816 = product of:
  0.108769074 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  18. Heller, J.R.: Original cataloging at the New York Chiropractic College Media Resources Library (1990) 0.02 
    0.021753816 = product of:
  0.108769074 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    This article is about the conceptual framework of the original cataloging process that is used to catalog the audiovisual a materials at the New York Chiropractic College Media Resources Library. The cataloging norms serve as the conceptual underpinnings to the Cataloging Policy Manual of the New York Chiropractic College Media Resources Library. The paper describes the use of the various cataloging standards and policies that are used as well as the use and assignment of the National Library of Medicine classification to ensure access to the audiovisual collection.
  19. Lubetzky, S.: Cataloging rules and principles : a critique of the A.L.A. rules for entry and a proposed design for their revision (1953) 0.02 
    0.021753816 = product of:
  0.108769074 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 2278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=2278,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 2278, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2278)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Issue
    Prepared for the Board on Cataloging Policy and Research of the A.L.A. Division of Cataloging and Classification.
  20. Kuhagen, J.: RDA content in multiple languages : a new standard not only for libraries (2016) 0.02 
    0.021753816 = product of:
  0.108769074 = sum of:
    0.108769074 = weight(_text_:policy in 2955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.108769074 = score(doc=2955,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22950763 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042803947 = queryNorm
        0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 2955, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2955)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A summary of the presence of RDA content in languages other than English in RDA Toolkit, in the RDA Registry, in the RIMMF data editor, and as separate translations is given. Translation policy is explained and the benefits of translation on the content of RDA are noted.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 203
  • d 38
  • i 2
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 224
  • b 15
  • m 15
  • el 6
  • s 6
  • n 3
  • ? 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications