Search (227 results, page 1 of 12)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.31
    0.31199768 = product of:
      0.72799456 = sum of:
        0.10399922 = product of:
          0.31199765 = sum of:
            0.31199765 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.31199765 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.31199765 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31199765 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.31199765 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.31199765 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.25
    0.24959815 = product of:
      0.5823957 = sum of:
        0.08319938 = product of:
          0.24959813 = sum of:
            0.24959813 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24959813 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.24959813 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24959813 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.24959813 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24959813 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.16
    0.15599884 = product of:
      0.36399728 = sum of:
        0.05199961 = product of:
          0.15599883 = sum of:
            0.15599883 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15599883 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15599883 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15599883 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.15599883 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15599883 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33308288 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (2002) 0.05
    0.05468566 = product of:
      0.1913998 = sum of:
        0.08824192 = weight(_text_:policy in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08824192 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21065493 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.41889322 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
        0.10315788 = sum of:
          0.065518856 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065518856 = score(doc=236,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039287858 = queryNorm
              0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
          0.037639026 = weight(_text_:22 in 236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037639026 = score(doc=236,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13757938 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039287858 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 236, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=236)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Decimal Classification Editorial Policy Committee (EPC) held its Meeting 117 at the Library Dec. 3-5, 2001, with chair Andrea Stamm (Northwestern University) presiding. Through its actions at this meeting, significant progress was made toward publication of DDC unabridged Edition 22 in mid-2003 and Abridged Edition 14 in early 2004. For Edition 22, the committee approved the revisions to two major segments of the classification: Table 2 through 55 Iran (the first half of the geographic area table) and 900 History and geography. EPC approved updates to several parts of the classification it had already considered: 004-006 Data processing, Computer science; 340 Law; 370 Education; 510 Mathematics; 610 Medicine; Table 3 issues concerning treatment of scientific and technical themes, with folklore, arts, and printing ramifications at 398.2 - 398.3, 704.94, and 758; Table 5 and Table 6 Ethnic Groups and Languages (portions concerning American native peoples and languages); and tourism issues at 647.9 and 790. Reports on the results of testing the approved 200 Religion and 305-306 Social groups schedules were received, as was a progress report on revision work for the manual being done by Ross Trotter (British Library, retired). Revisions for Abridged Edition 14 that received committee approval included 010 Bibliography; 070 Journalism; 150 Psychology; 370 Education; 380 Commerce, communications, and transportation; 621 Applied physics; 624 Civil engineering; and 629.8 Automatic control engineering. At the meeting the committee received print versions of _DC&_ numbers 4 and 5. Primarily for the use of Dewey translators, these cumulations list changes, substantive and cosmetic, to DDC Edition 21 and Abridged Edition 13 for the period October 1999 - December 2001. EPC will hold its Meeting 118 at the Library May 15-17, 2002.
  5. Bourdon, F.; Landry, P.: Best practices for subject access to national bibliographies : interim report by the Working Group on Guidelines for Subject Access by National Bibliographic Agencies (2007) 0.05
    0.048400544 = product of:
      0.1694019 = sum of:
        0.123538695 = weight(_text_:policy in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.123538695 = score(doc=698,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21065493 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
        0.0458632 = product of:
          0.0917264 = sum of:
            0.0917264 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0917264 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                0.4249321 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The working group to establish guidelines for subject access by national bibliographic agencies was set up in 2005 in order to analyse the question of subject access and propose key elements for an indexing policy for national bibliographies. The group's mandate is to put forward recommendations based on best practices for subject access to national bibliographies. The group is presently assessing the elements which should be included in an indexing policy and will present an initial version of its recommendations in 2008.
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich: WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 73RD IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 19-23 August 2007, Durban, South Africa. - 89 - Bibliography with National Libraries and Classification and Indexing
  6. Hawking, S.: This is the most dangerous time for our planet (2016) 0.03
    0.034250766 = product of:
      0.11987768 = sum of:
        0.03440649 = weight(_text_:great in 3273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03440649 = score(doc=3273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22122125 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.15552977 = fieldWeight in 3273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3273)
        0.08547119 = weight(_text_:britain in 3273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08547119 = score(doc=3273,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.29319668 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.29151487 = fieldWeight in 3273, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.462781 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3273)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    "As a theoretical physicist based in Cambridge, I have lived my life in an extraordinarily privileged bubble. Cambridge is an unusual town, centered around one of the world's great universities. Within that town, the scientific community which I became part of in my twenties is even more rarefied. And within that scientific community, the small group of international theoretical physicists with whom I have spent my working life might sometimes be tempted to regard themselves as the pinnacle. Add to this, the celebrity that has come with my books, and the isolation imposed by my illness, I feel as though my ivory tower is getting taller. So the recent apparent rejection of the elite in both America and Britain is surely aimed at me, as much as anyone. Whatever we might think about the decision by the British electorate to reject membership of the European Union, and by the American public to embrace Donald Trump as their next President, there is no doubt in the minds of commentators that this was a cry of anger by people who felt that they had been abandoned by their leaders. It was, everyone seems to agree, the moment that the forgotten spoke, finding their voice to reject the advice and guidance of experts and the elite everywhere.
    I am no exception to this rule. I warned before the Brexit vote that it would damage scientific research in Britain, that a vote to leave would be a step backward, and the electorate, or at least a sufficiently significant proportion of it, took no more notice of me than any of the other political leaders, trade unionists, artists, scientists, businessmen and celebrities who all gave the same unheeded advice to the rest of the country. What matters now however, far more than the choices made by these two electorates, is how the elites react. Should we, in turn, reject these votes as outpourings of crude populism that fail to take account of the facts, and attempt to circumvent or circumscribe the choices that they represent? I would argue that this would be a terrible mistake. The concerns underlying these votes about the economic consequences of globalisation and accelerating technological change are absolutely understandable. The automation of factories has already decimated jobs in traditional manufacturing, the rise of AI is likely to extend this job destruction deep into the middle classes, with only the most caring, creative or supervisory roles remaining.
  7. Svensson, L.G.; Jahns, Y.: PDF, CSV, RSS and other Acronyms : redefining the bibliographic services in the German National Library (2010) 0.03
    0.034039278 = product of:
      0.119137466 = sum of:
        0.062396463 = weight(_text_:policy in 3970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062396463 = score(doc=3970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21065493 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.29620224 = fieldWeight in 3970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3970)
        0.056741 = product of:
          0.113482 = sum of:
            0.113482 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 3970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113482 = score(doc=3970,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                0.52571714 = fieldWeight in 3970, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    In January 2010, the German National Library discontinued the print version of the national bibliography and replaced it with an online journal. This was the first step in a longer process of redefining the National Library's bibliographic services, leaving the field of traditional media - e. g. paper or CD-ROM databases - and focusing on publishing its data over the WWW. A new business model was set up - all web resources are now published in an extra bibliography series and the bibliographic data are freely available. Step by step the prices of the other bibliographic data will be also reduced. In the second stage of the project, the focus is on value-added services based on the National Library's catalogue. The main purpose is to introduce alerting services based on the user's search criteria offering different access methods such as RSS feeds, integration with e. g. Zotero, or export of the bibliographic data as a CSV or PDF file. Current standards of cataloguing remain a guide line to offer high-value end-user retrieval but they will be supplemented by automated indexing procedures to find & browse the growing number of documents. A transparent cataloguing policy and wellarranged selection menus are aimed.
    Content
    Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 91. Bibliography.
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.03
    0.029473681 = product of:
      0.20631576 = sum of:
        0.20631576 = sum of:
          0.13103771 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13103771 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039287858 = queryNorm
              0.6070458 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.07527805 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07527805 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13757938 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039287858 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Arranged according to subjects the bibliography lists 79 references,mostly with terse abstracts.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  9. Paskin, N.: DOI: a 2003 progress report (2003) 0.03
    0.02624189 = product of:
      0.09184661 = sum of:
        0.04367752 = weight(_text_:policy in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04367752 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21065493 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.20734155 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
        0.048169088 = weight(_text_:great in 1203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048169088 = score(doc=1203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22122125 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.21774168 = fieldWeight in 1203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1203)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The International DOI Foundation (IDF) recently published the third edition of its DOI Handbook, which sets the scene for DOI's expansion into much wider applications. Edition 3 is not simply an updated user guide. A great deal has happened in the underlying technologies and in the practical deployment and development of DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) since the last edition was published a year ago. Much of the program of technical work foreseen at the inception of DOIs has now been completed. The initial simple implementation of DOI as a persistent name linked to redirection continues to grow, with approaching ten million DOIs assigned from several hundred organisations through a number of Registration Agencies in USA, Europe, and Australasia, supporting large scale business uses. Implementations of more sophisticated applications (offering associated services) have been developing well but on a smaller scale: a framework for building these has been completed as part of the latest release and promises to stimulate a new wave of growth. From its original starting point in text publishing, there has been gradual embrace by a number of communities: these include national libraries (a consortium of national libraries recently joined the IDF); government documentation (with the appointment of TSO The Stationery Office in the UK as a DOI agency and the announced intention of the EC Office of Publications to use DOIs); non-English language markets (France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Korea). However implementations in non-text sectors have been far slower to develop, though several are now under discussion. The DOI community can point to several significant achievements over the past few years: * A practical successful open implementation of naming objects, treating content as information objects, not simply packets of bits; * The IDF's role in co-sponsoring, championing, and now implementing the <indecs>T framework as a semantic tool for structured metadata - an essential step for treating content as information in Semantic-Web-like applications; * A template for building advanced applications, connecting resolution and metadata technologies, and offering hooks to web services and similar applications; * The development of a policy framework that allows multiple communities autonomy; * The practical implementation of DOIs with emerging related standards such as the OpenURL framework in contextual linking.
  10. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.02
    0.022493048 = product of:
      0.078725666 = sum of:
        0.037437875 = weight(_text_:policy in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037437875 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21065493 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.17772134 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.04128779 = weight(_text_:great in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04128779 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22122125 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.18663573 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  11. Somers, J.: Torching the modern-day library of Alexandria : somewhere at Google there is a database containing 25 million books and nobody is allowed to read them. (2017) 0.02
    0.018770374 = product of:
      0.06569631 = sum of:
        0.055050384 = weight(_text_:great in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055050384 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22122125 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
        0.010645924 = product of:
          0.021291848 = sum of:
            0.021291848 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021291848 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13757938 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    You were going to get one-click access to the full text of nearly every book that's ever been published. Books still in print you'd have to pay for, but everything else-a collection slated to grow larger than the holdings at the Library of Congress, Harvard, the University of Michigan, at any of the great national libraries of Europe-would have been available for free at terminals that were going to be placed in every local library that wanted one. At the terminal you were going to be able to search tens of millions of books and read every page of any book you found. You'd be able to highlight passages and make annotations and share them; for the first time, you'd be able to pinpoint an idea somewhere inside the vastness of the printed record, and send somebody straight to it with a link. Books would become as instantly available, searchable, copy-pasteable-as alive in the digital world-as web pages. It was to be the realization of a long-held dream. "The universal library has been talked about for millennia," Richard Ovenden, the head of Oxford's Bodleian Libraries, has said. "It was possible to think in the Renaissance that you might be able to amass the whole of published knowledge in a single room or a single institution." In the spring of 2011, it seemed we'd amassed it in a terminal small enough to fit on a desk. "This is a watershed event and can serve as a catalyst for the reinvention of education, research, and intellectual life," one eager observer wrote at the time. On March 22 of that year, however, the legal agreement that would have unlocked a century's worth of books and peppered the country with access terminals to a universal library was rejected under Rule 23(e)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. When the library at Alexandria burned it was said to be an "international catastrophe." When the most significant humanities project of our time was dismantled in court, the scholars, archivists, and librarians who'd had a hand in its undoing breathed a sigh of relief, for they believed, at the time, that they had narrowly averted disaster.
  12. Z39.50 bibliography (1995-) 0.02
    0.018719673 = product of:
      0.13103771 = sum of:
        0.13103771 = product of:
          0.26207542 = sum of:
            0.26207542 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 7191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26207542 = score(doc=7191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                1.2140917 = fieldWeight in 7191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=7191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  13. Caseiro, D.: Automatic language identification bibliography : Last Update: 20 September 1999 (1999) 0.02
    0.018531535 = product of:
      0.12972073 = sum of:
        0.12972073 = product of:
          0.25944147 = sum of:
            0.25944147 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25944147 = score(doc=1842,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                1.2018895 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This bibliography lists research in Automatic Identification of Spoken Language.
  14. Balatti, D.: ¬The Canadian Nation Bibliography : 50 years of continuity and change (2001) 0.02
    0.018531535 = product of:
      0.12972073 = sum of:
        0.12972073 = product of:
          0.25944147 = sum of:
            0.25944147 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 6840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25944147 = score(doc=6840,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                1.2018895 = fieldWeight in 6840, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6840)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Object
    Canadian National Bibliography
  15. Hiemenz, B.M.; Kuberek, M.: Leitlinie? Grundsätze? Policy? Richtlinie? : Forschungsdaten-Policies an deutschen Universitäten (2018) 0.02
    0.018526947 = product of:
      0.12968862 = sum of:
        0.12968862 = weight(_text_:policy in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12968862 = score(doc=4346,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21065493 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.6156448 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die Anzahl der Forschungsdaten-Policies an deutschen Universitäten ist seit 2014 deutlich gestiegen und die Kurve geht kontinuierlich nach oben. Eine Besonderheit der deutschen Policies ist auf den ersten Blick ersichtlich: Es gibt keine einheitliche Bezeichnung - verwendet werden "Leitlinie", "Grundsätze", "Policy", "Richtlinie". Auch zeigen die Policies deutliche Unterschiede auf, was Umfang und Inhalte angeht. Um die Forschungsdaten-Policies an deutschen Universitäten weiter zu befördern, entwickelt die Technische Universität Berlin seit August 2017 im BMBF-Projekt "Modalitäten und Entwicklung institutioneller Forschungsdaten-Policies" entsprechende Handlungsanleitungen. Ziel der ersten Projektphase ist die Konzeptionierung und Erstellung eines "Baukastens" für institutionelle Forschungsdaten-Policies ("Policy-Kit"). Als methodischer Ansatz werden ForschungsdatenPolicies deutscher Hochschulen gesammelt und evaluiert und mit internationalen Empfehlungen zu Forschungsdaten-Policies abgeglichen. Die Ergebnisse werden in diesem Artikel vorgestellt.
  16. Zia, L.L.: Growing a national learning environments and resources network for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education : current issues and opportunities for the NSDL program (2001) 0.02
    0.015728682 = product of:
      0.11010077 = sum of:
        0.11010077 = weight(_text_:great in 1217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11010077 = score(doc=1217,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22122125 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 1217, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1217)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology Education Digital Library (NSDL) program seeks to create, develop, and sustain a national digital library supporting science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) education at all levels -- preK-12, undergraduate, graduate, and life-long learning. The resulting virtual institution is expected to catalyze and support continual improvements in the quality of science, mathematics, engineering, and technology (SMET) education in both formal and informal settings. The vision for this program has been explored through a series of workshops over the past several years and documented in accompanying reports and monographs. (See [1-7, 10, 12, and 13].) These efforts have led to a characterization of the digital library as a learning environments and resources network for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education, that is: * designed to meet the needs of learners, in both individual and collaborative settings; * constructed to enable dynamic use of a broad array of materials for learning primarily in digital format; and * managed actively to promote reliable anytime, anywhere access to quality collections and services, available both within and without the network. Underlying the NSDL program are several working assumptions. First, while there is currently no lack of "great piles of content" on the Web, there is an urgent need for "piles of great content". The difficulties in discovering and verifying the authority of appropriate Web-based material are certainly well known, yet there are many examples of learning resources of great promise available (particularly those exploiting the power of multiple media), with more added every day. The breadth and interconnectedness of the Web are simultaneously a great strength and shortcoming. Second, the "unit" or granularity of educational content can and will shrink, affording the opportunity for users to become creators and vice versa, as learning objects are reused, repackaged, and repurposed. To be sure, this scenario cannot take place without serious attention to intellectual property and digital rights management concerns. But new models and technologies are being explored (see a number of recent articles in the January issue of D-Lib Magazine). Third, there is a need for an "organizational infrastructure" that facilitates connections between distributed users and distributed content, as alluded to in the third bullet above. Finally, while much of the ongoing use of the library is envisioned to be "free" in the sense of the public good, there is an opportunity and a need to consider multiple alternative models of sustainability, particularly in the area of services offered by the digital library. More details about the NSDL program including information about proposal deadlines and current awards may be found at <http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/ehr/due/programs/nsdl>.
  17. RDA Toolkit (1) (2017) 0.02
    0.01543912 = product of:
      0.10807384 = sum of:
        0.10807384 = weight(_text_:policy in 3996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10807384 = score(doc=3996,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21065493 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.5130373 = fieldWeight in 3996, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3996)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Am 14. Februar 2017 ist das neue Release des RDA Toolkits<http://www.rdatoolkit.org/development/February2017release> erschienen. Das Release enthält im englischen Text alle Änderungen aus dem Fast-Track-Verfahren RSC/Sec/6<http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RSC-Sec-6.pdf>. Ebenso enthalten sind die Updates der LC-PCC PS (Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements) und der MLA Best Practices. Neu aufgenommen wurden die Policy Statements der Library and Archives Canada in Kooperation mit der Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec. Diese sind sowohl im Register als auch im Text über ein Icon (dunkel violett) mit den Buchstaben LAC/BAC-BAnQ ansteuerbar. Ab sofort ist es möglich sich auch die Policy Statements in einer zweisprachigen Ansicht anzeigen zu lassen, dazu wurde die Funktion Select Language und Dual View in der Symbolliste unter dem Reiter "Ressourcen" eingefügt. Im deutschen Text wurden ausschließlich Änderungen an den Anwendungsrichtlinien für den deutschsprachigen Raum (D-A-CH) eingearbeitet. Die dazugehörige Übersicht (Kurz- bzw. Langversion) finden Sie im RDA-Info-Wiki<https://wiki.dnb.de/x/1hLSBg>. Mitte April 2017 wird das nächste Release des RDA Toolkit erscheinen, eingearbeitet werden die verabschiedeten Proposals, die im November 2016 vom RDA Steering Committee (RSC) beschlossen wurden. Die Umsetzung der Änderungen in der deutschen Übersetzung aus den Fast-Track-Dokumenten RSC/Sec/4 und RSC/Sec/5 und RSC/Sec/6 sind für den August 2017 geplant.
  18. Andresoo, J.: ¬The national bibliography concept in a changing information environment (2001) 0.01
    0.01497574 = product of:
      0.104830176 = sum of:
        0.104830176 = product of:
          0.20966035 = sum of:
            0.20966035 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20966035 = score(doc=4485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.039287858 = queryNorm
                0.97127336 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  19. Open Knowledge Foundation: Prinzipien zu offenen bibliographischen Daten (2011) 0.01
    0.0147368405 = product of:
      0.10315788 = sum of:
        0.10315788 = sum of:
          0.065518856 = weight(_text_:bibliography in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065518856 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.21586132 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039287858 = queryNorm
              0.3035229 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.494352 = idf(docFreq=493, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
          0.037639026 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037639026 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.13757938 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.039287858 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2011 18:22:29
    Footnote
    Original unter: http://openbiblio.net/principles/ (Open Bibliography and Open Bibliographic Data)
  20. Kuhagen, J.: RDA content in multiple languages : a new standard not only for libraries (2016) 0.01
    0.0142620485 = product of:
      0.09983434 = sum of:
        0.09983434 = weight(_text_:policy in 2955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09983434 = score(doc=2955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21065493 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.039287858 = queryNorm
            0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 2955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2955)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of the presence of RDA content in languages other than English in RDA Toolkit, in the RDA Registry, in the RIMMF data editor, and as separate translations is given. Translation policy is explained and the benefits of translation on the content of RDA are noted.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 129
  • d 92
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 99
  • i 10
  • b 6
  • m 6
  • r 4
  • n 3
  • p 3
  • s 3
  • x 1
  • More… Less…