-
Peereboom, M.: DutchESS : Dutch Electronic Subject Service - a Dutch national collaborative effort (2000)
0.06
0.058147304 = product of:
0.11629461 = sum of:
0.11629461 = sum of:
0.05971017 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05971017 = score(doc=4869,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 4869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056584436 = score(doc=4869,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4869, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4869)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article gives an overview of the design and organisation of DutchESS, a Dutch information subject gateway created as a national collaborative effort of the National Library and a number of academic libraries. The combined centralised and distributed model of DutchESS is discussed, as well as its selection policy, its metadata format, classification scheme and retrieval options. Also some options for future collaboration on an international level are explored
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:39:23
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Bouidghaghen, O.; Tamine, L.: Spatio-temporal based personalization for mobile search (2012)
0.05
0.052885264 = product of:
0.10577053 = sum of:
0.10577053 = sum of:
0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0633322 = score(doc=108,freq=8.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243833 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The explosion of the information available on the Internet has made traditional information retrieval systems, characterized by one size fits all approaches, less effective. Indeed, users are overwhelmed by the information delivered by such systems in response to their queries, particularly when the latter are ambiguous. In order to tackle this problem, the state-of-the-art reveals that there is a growing interest towards contextual information retrieval (CIR) which relies on various sources of evidence issued from the user's search background and environment, in order to improve the retrieval accuracy. This chapter focuses on mobile context, highlights challenges they present for IR, and gives an overview of CIR approaches applied in this environment. Then, the authors present an approach to personalize search results for mobile users by exploiting both cognitive and spatio-temporal contexts. The experimental evaluation undertaken in front of Yahoo search shows that the approach improves the quality of top search result lists and enhances search result precision.
- Date
- 20. 4.2012 13:19:22
- Source
- Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998)
0.05
0.05087889 = product of:
0.10175778 = sum of:
0.10175778 = sum of:
0.0522464 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0522464 = score(doc=2186,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04951138 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
- Date
- 25.12.1998 19:22:51
-
Wiley, D.L.: Beyond information retrieval : ways to provide content in context (1998)
0.05
0.05087889 = product of:
0.10175778 = sum of:
0.10175778 = sum of:
0.0522464 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0522464 = score(doc=3647,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 3647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04951138 = score(doc=3647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3647)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The days of the traditional abstracting and indexing services are waning, as abstracts and bibliographic data become commodities. However, there are tremedous opportunities for those organizations willing to look beyond the status quo to the new possibilities enabled by the latest wave of advanced technologies. Those who own content need to focus on the delivery mechanisms and new markets that technology can provide. Features like automatic extraction of key concepts or names, collaborative filtering to help with trend analysis, and visualization techniques can take information past the retrieval stage and into the management area
- Source
- Database. 21(1998) no.4, S.18-22
-
Altmann, O.; Pöhl, S.: Information Retrieval im Internet : bekannte Suchdienste und ihre Eigenschaften (1997)
0.05
0.049402952 = product of:
0.098805904 = sum of:
0.098805904 = sum of:
0.042221468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042221468 = score(doc=205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=205)
0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056584436 = score(doc=205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.18-22
-
Amato, G.; Rabitti, F.; Savino, P.: Multimedia document search on the Web (1998)
0.05
0.049402952 = product of:
0.098805904 = sum of:
0.098805904 = sum of:
0.042221468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042221468 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056584436 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a multimedia model which describes the various multimedia components, their structure and their relationships with a pre-defined taxonomy of concepts, in order to support search engine information retrieval process
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000)
0.05
0.049402952 = product of:
0.098805904 = sum of:
0.098805904 = sum of:
0.042221468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042221468 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056584436 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:38:24
-
Schüler, P.: Wertes Wissen : Knowledge Management vermeidet Datenfriedhöfe (2001)
0.05
0.049402952 = product of:
0.098805904 = sum of:
0.098805904 = sum of:
0.042221468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042221468 = score(doc=6815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6815)
0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 6815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056584436 = score(doc=6815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6815)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Wer ohne spezielle Vorkenntnisse schnell in einem Thema Fuß fassen will, ist auf intelligente Recherchierhilfen angewiesen. Gurus der künstlichen Intelligenz kennen schon langm Wege, die Datenwelt besser als mit Schlagwort-Suchmaschinen nach Inhalten zu durchforsten - nur in der Praxis war davon wenig zu sehen. Aktuelle Software zum Content-Retrieval will die scheinbare Utopie verwirklichen
- Date
- 8.11.2001 19:58:22
-
Mukherjea, S.; Hirata, K.; Hara, Y.: Towards a multimedia World-Wide Web information retrieval engine (1997)
0.04
0.04361048 = product of:
0.08722096 = sum of:
0.08722096 = sum of:
0.04478263 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04478263 = score(doc=2678,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 2678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243833 = score(doc=2678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes a search engine that integrate text and image search. 1 or more Web site can be indexed for both textual and image information, allowing the user to search based on keywords or images or both. Another problem with the current search engines is that they show the results as pages of scrolled lists; this is not very user-friendly. The search engine allows the user to visualise to results in various ways. Explains the indexing and searching techniques of the search engine and highlights several features of the querying interface to make the retrieval process more efficient. Use examples to show the usefulness of the technology
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Bertelmann, R.; Rusch-Feja, D.: Informationsretrieval im Internet : Surfen, Browsen, Suchen - mit einem Überblick über strukturierte Informationsangebote (1997)
0.04
0.043227583 = product of:
0.08645517 = sum of:
0.08645517 = sum of:
0.036943786 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036943786 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04951138 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Das gezielte Suchen im Internet findet in erster Linie mit Hilfe der Suchmaschinen statt. Daneben gibt es aber bereits eine Fülle von strukturierten Informationsangeboten, aufbereiteten Listen und Sammelstellen, die als Clearinghouse, Subject Gateway, Subject Tree oder Resource Pages bezeichnet werden. Solche intellektuell erstellten Übersichten geben in der Regel bereits Hinweise zu Inhalt und fachlichem Niveau der Quelle. Da die Art und Weise der Aufbereitung bei den Sammelstellen sehr unterschiedlich funktioniert, ist die Kenntnis ihrer Erschließungskriterien für ein erfolgreiches Retrieval unverzichtbar
- Date
- 9. 7.2000 11:31:22
-
Kurzke, C.; Galle, M.; Bathelt, M.: WebAssistant : a user profile specific information retrieval assistant (1998)
0.04
0.043227583 = product of:
0.08645517 = sum of:
0.08645517 = sum of:
0.036943786 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036943786 = score(doc=3559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3559)
0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 3559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04951138 = score(doc=3559,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3559, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3559)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998)
0.04
0.043227583 = product of:
0.08645517 = sum of:
0.08645517 = sum of:
0.036943786 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036943786 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04951138 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Kanaeva, Z.: Ranking: Google und CiteSeer (2005)
0.04
0.043227583 = product of:
0.08645517 = sum of:
0.08645517 = sum of:
0.036943786 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036943786 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04951138 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des klassischen Information Retrieval wurden verschiedene Verfahren für das Ranking sowie die Suche in einer homogenen strukturlosen Dokumentenmenge entwickelt. Die Erfolge der Suchmaschine Google haben gezeigt dass die Suche in einer zwar inhomogenen aber zusammenhängenden Dokumentenmenge wie dem Internet unter Berücksichtigung der Dokumentenverbindungen (Links) sehr effektiv sein kann. Unter den von der Suchmaschine Google realisierten Konzepten ist ein Verfahren zum Ranking von Suchergebnissen (PageRank), das in diesem Artikel kurz erklärt wird. Darüber hinaus wird auf die Konzepte eines Systems namens CiteSeer eingegangen, welches automatisch bibliographische Angaben indexiert (engl. Autonomous Citation Indexing, ACI). Letzteres erzeugt aus einer Menge von nicht vernetzten wissenschaftlichen Dokumenten eine zusammenhängende Dokumentenmenge und ermöglicht den Einsatz von Banking-Verfahren, die auf den von Google genutzten Verfahren basieren.
- Date
- 20. 3.2005 16:23:22
-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.04
0.041457675 = product of:
0.08291535 = sum of:
0.08291535 = product of:
0.24874605 = sum of:
0.24874605 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24874605 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44259444 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
-
Garcés, P.J.; Olivas, J.A.; Romero, F.P.: Concept-matching IR systems versus word-matching information retrieval systems : considering fuzzy interrelations for indexing Web pages (2006)
0.04
0.040535677 = product of:
0.081071354 = sum of:
0.081071354 = sum of:
0.045706082 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045706082 = score(doc=5288,freq=6.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
0.035365272 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035365272 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article presents a semantic-based Web retrieval system that is capable of retrieving the Web pages that are conceptually related to the implicit concepts of the query. The concept of concept is managed from a fuzzy point of view by means of semantic areas. In this context, the proposed system improves most search engines that are based on matching words. The key of the system is to use a new version of the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy-Based Concept Representation Model (FIS-CRM) to extract and represent the concepts contained in both the Web pages and the user query. This model, which was integrated into other tools such as the Fuzzy Interrelations and Synonymy based Searcher (FISS) metasearcher and the fz-mail system, considers the fuzzy synonymy and the fuzzy generality interrelations as a means of representing word interrelations (stored in a fuzzy synonymy dictionary and ontologies). The new version of the model, which is based on the study of the cooccurrences of synonyms, integrates a soft method for disambiguating word senses. This method also considers the context of the word to be disambiguated and the thematic ontologies and sets of synonyms stored in the dictionary.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:14:12
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Topic Section on Soft Approaches to Information Retrieval and Information Access on the Web
-
Herrera-Viedma, E.; Pasi, G.: Soft approaches to information retrieval and information access on the Web : an introduction to the special topic section (2006)
0.04
0.040001374 = product of:
0.08000275 = sum of:
0.08000275 = sum of:
0.051710527 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051710527 = score(doc=5285,freq=12.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.32745665 = fieldWeight in 5285, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5285)
0.028292218 = weight(_text_:22 in 5285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028292218 = score(doc=5285,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5285, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5285)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The World Wide Web is a popular and interactive medium used to collect, disseminate, and access an increasingly huge amount of information, which constitutes the mainstay of the so-called information and knowledge society. Because of its spectacular growth, related to both Web resources (pages, sites, and services) and number of users, the Web is nowadays the main information repository and provides some automatic systems for locating, accessing, and retrieving information. However, an open and crucial question remains: how to provide fast and effective retrieval of the information relevant to specific users' needs. This is a very hard and complex task, since it is pervaded with subjectivity, vagueness, and uncertainty. The expression soft computing refers to techniques and methodologies that work synergistically with the aim of providing flexible information processing tolerant of imprecision, vagueness, partial truth, and approximation. So, soft computing represents a good candidate to design effective systems for information access and retrieval on the Web. One of the most representative tools of soft computing is fuzzy set theory. This special topic section collects research articles witnessing some recent advances in improving the processes of information access and retrieval on the Web by using soft computing tools, and in particular, by using fuzzy sets and/or integrating them with other soft computing tools. In this introductory article, we first review the problem of Web retrieval and the concept of soft computing technology. We then briefly introduce the articles in this section and conclude by highlighting some future research directions that could benefit from the use of soft computing technologies.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:59:33
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Topic Section on Soft Approaches to Information Retrieval and Information Access on the Web
-
Place, E.: Internationale Zusammenarbeit bei Internet Subject Gateways (1999)
0.04
0.037052214 = product of:
0.07410443 = sum of:
0.07410443 = sum of:
0.0316661 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0316661 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243833 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2002 19:35:09
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Ardo, A.; Lundberg, S.: ¬A regional distributed WWW search and indexing service : the DESIRE way (1998)
0.04
0.037052214 = product of:
0.07410443 = sum of:
0.07410443 = sum of:
0.0316661 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0316661 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243833 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Fluhr, C.: Crosslingual access to photo databases (2012)
0.04
0.037052214 = product of:
0.07410443 = sum of:
0.07410443 = sum of:
0.0316661 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0316661 = score(doc=93,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 93) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243833 = score(doc=93,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 93, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=93)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 4.2012 14:25:22
- Source
- Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
-
Chen, L.-C.: Next generation search engine for the result clustering technology (2012)
0.04
0.037052214 = product of:
0.07410443 = sum of:
0.07410443 = sum of:
0.0316661 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0316661 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04243833 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 4.2012 15:22:11
- Source
- Next generation search engines: advanced models for information retrieval. Eds.: C. Jouis, u.a
