Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Saracevic, T."
  1. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.03
    0.03372939 = product of:
      0.06745878 = sum of:
        0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035812456 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
        0.031646326 = product of:
          0.06329265 = sum of:
            0.06329265 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06329265 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol. 20
  2. Saracevic, T.: Effects of inconsistent relevance judgments on information retrieval test results : a historical perspective (2008) 0.02
    0.02291517 = product of:
      0.04583034 = sum of:
        0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017906228 = score(doc=5585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
        0.027924111 = product of:
          0.055848222 = sum of:
            0.055848222 = weight(_text_:history in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055848222 = score(doc=5585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The main objective of information retrieval (IR) systems is to retrieve information or information objects relevant to user requests and possible needs. In IR tests, retrieval effectiveness is established by comparing IR systems retrievals (systems relevance) with users' or user surrogates' assessments (user relevance), where user relevance is treated as the gold standard for performance evaluation. Relevance is a human notion, and establishing relevance by humans is fraught with a number of problems-inconsistency in judgment being one of them. The aim of this critical review is to explore the relationship between relevance on the one hand and testing of IR systems and procedures on the other. Critics of IR tests raised the issue of validity of the IR tests because they were based on relevance judgments that are inconsistent. This review traces and synthesizes experimental studies dealing with (1) inconsistency of relevance judgments by people, (2) effects of such inconsistency on results of IR tests and (3) reasons for retrieval failures. A historical context for these studies and for IR testing is provided including an assessment of Lancaster's (1969) evaluation of MEDLARS and its unique place in the history of IR evaluation.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'The Influence of F. W. Lancaster on Information Science and on Libraries', das als Festschrift für F.W. Lancaster deklariert ist.
  3. Saracevic, T.: ¬The concept of 'relevance' in information science : a historical review (1970) 0.02
    0.020258585 = product of:
      0.08103434 = sum of:
        0.08103434 = weight(_text_:science in 2010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08103434 = score(doc=2010,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 2010, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2010)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Introduction to information science. Ed.: T. Saracevic
  4. Saracevic, T.: Charting the future of information science (1990) 0.02
    0.020258585 = product of:
      0.08103434 = sum of:
        0.08103434 = weight(_text_:science in 4078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08103434 = score(doc=4078,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 4078, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4078)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 16(1990) no.4, S.13
  5. Saracevic, T.: Information science (1999) 0.02
    0.017906228 = product of:
      0.07162491 = sum of:
        0.07162491 = weight(_text_:science in 4325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07162491 = score(doc=4325,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.5820636 = fieldWeight in 4325, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4325)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: The 50th Anniversary of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Pt.2: Paradigms, models, and models of information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.12, S.1051
  6. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science (1975) 0.02
    0.016015818 = product of:
      0.06406327 = sum of:
        0.06406327 = weight(_text_:science in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06406327 = score(doc=626,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.52061355 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vg. auch die Beiträge in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(2007) no.13, S.1915-1933 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance) und S.2126 - 2144 (Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 26(1975), S.321-343
  7. Saracevic, T.: Why is relevance still the basic notion in information science? (2015) 0.02
    0.015507249 = product of:
      0.062028997 = sum of:
        0.062028997 = weight(_text_:science in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062028997 = score(doc=2980,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  8. Saracevic, T.: Ciencia da informacao, origem, evolucao e relacoes (1996) 0.02
    0.015193939 = product of:
      0.060775757 = sum of:
        0.060775757 = weight(_text_:science in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060775757 = score(doc=811,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.49389738 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information science is best defined as a discipline in terms of the problems it addresses. Its origins date back to the scientific and technical revolution after the 2nd World War, and its development has been essentially characterised by interdisciplinarity. Librarianship, computer science, cognitive science and communication studies all share interests with infomation science, but with increasing emphasis on the information society and the information industry dictated by technological imparatives, information science is now at a critical point in its evolution. The problem it sets out to solve are not decreasing but changing, with the pressure to improve access to an ever increasing store of knowledge. The social need for information science is evident, whatever the name given to the knowledge and skills which it encompasses
    Content
    Translation of a presentation given at the International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science held at the University of Tampere in Aug 1991
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Information science: origin, evolution and relations
  9. Saracevic, T.: Information science (2009) 0.01
    0.014212629 = product of:
      0.056850515 = sum of:
        0.056850515 = weight(_text_:science in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056850515 = score(doc=3812,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.4619987 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this entry is to provide an overview of information science as a field or discipline, including a historical perspective to illustrate the events and forces that shaped it. Information science is a field of professional practice and scientific inquiry dealing with effective communication of information and information objects, particularly knowledge records, among humans in the context of social, organizational, and individual need for and use of information. Information science emerged in the aftermath of the Second World War, as did a number of other fields, addressing the problem of information explosion and using technology as a solution. Presently, information science deals with the same problems in the Web and digital environments. This entry covers problems addressed by information science, the intellectual structure of the field, and the description of main areas-information retrieval, human information behavior, metric studies, and digital libraries. This entry also includes an account of education related to information science and conclusions about major characteristics.
  10. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.2: users, questions, and effectiveness (1988) 0.01
    0.010743736 = product of:
      0.042974945 = sum of:
        0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 3258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042974945 = score(doc=3258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3258)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988) no.3, S.177-196
  11. Saracevic, T.; Kantor, P.: ¬A study of information seeking and retrieving : pt.3: searchers, searches, and overlap (1988) 0.01
    0.010743736 = product of:
      0.042974945 = sum of:
        0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 3259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042974945 = score(doc=3259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 3259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3259)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 39(1988) no.3, S.197-216
  12. Wolfram, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Vox populi : the public searching of the Web (2001) 0.01
    0.010743736 = product of:
      0.042974945 = sum of:
        0.042974945 = weight(_text_:science in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042974945 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.34923816 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.12, S.1073-1074
  13. Belkin, N.J.; Chang, S.J.; Downs, T.; Saracevic, T.; Zhao, S.: Taking account of user tasks, goals and behavior for the design of online public access catalogs (1990) 0.01
    0.008953114 = product of:
      0.035812456 = sum of:
        0.035812456 = weight(_text_:science in 5261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035812456 = score(doc=5261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.2910318 = fieldWeight in 5261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5261)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    ASIS'90: Information in the year 2000: from research to application. Proc. 33rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science
  14. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III : behavior and effects of relevance (2007) 0.01
    0.0077536246 = product of:
      0.031014498 = sum of:
        0.031014498 = weight(_text_:science in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031014498 = score(doc=798,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance is a, if not even the, key notion in information science in general and information retrieval in particular. This two-part critical review traces and synthesizes the scholarship on relevance over the past 30 years or so and provides an updated framework within which the still widely dissonant ideas and works about relevance might be interpreted and related. It is a continuation and update of a similar review that appeared in 1975 under the same title, considered here as being Part I. The present review is organized in two parts: Part II addresses the questions related to nature and manifestations of relevance, and Part III addresses questions related to relevance behavior and effects. In Part II, the nature of relevance is discussed in terms of meaning ascribed to relevance, theories used or proposed, and models that have been developed. The manifestations of relevance are classified as to several kinds of relevance that form an interdependent system of relevancies. In Part III, relevance behavior and effects are synthesized using experimental and observational works that incorporated data. In both parts, each section concludes with a summary that in effect provides an interpretation and synthesis of contemporary thinking on the topic treated or suggests hypotheses for future research. Analyses of some of the major trends that shape relevance work are offered in conclusions.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.2126-2144
  15. Saracevic, T.: Modelling interaction in information retrieval (IR) : a review and proposal (1996) 0.01
    0.0071624913 = product of:
      0.028649965 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 7443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=7443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 7443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7443)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
  16. Kantor, P.B.; Saracevic, T.: Quantitative study of the value of research libraries : a foundation for the evaluation of digital libraries (1999) 0.01
    0.0063308077 = product of:
      0.02532323 = sum of:
        0.02532323 = weight(_text_:science in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02532323 = score(doc=6711,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  17. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Sources and use of search terms in online searching (1992) 0.01
    0.0062671797 = product of:
      0.025068719 = sum of:
        0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025068719 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Pittsburgh, 26.-29.10.92. Ed.: D. Shaw
  18. Saracevic, T.: Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II : nature and manifestations of relevance (2007) 0.01
    0.0062029 = product of:
      0.0248116 = sum of:
        0.0248116 = weight(_text_:science in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0248116 = score(doc=612,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20163277 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Relevance is a, if not even the, key notion in information science in general and information retrieval in particular. This two-part critical review traces and synthesizes the scholarship on relevance over the past 30 years and provides an updated framework within which the still widely dissonant ideas and works about relevance might be interpreted and related. It is a continuation and update of a similar review that appeared in 1975 under the same title, considered here as being Part I. The present review is organized into two parts: Part II addresses the questions related to nature and manifestations of relevance, and Part III addresses questions related to relevance behavior and effects. In Part II, the nature of relevance is discussed in terms of meaning ascribed to relevance, theories used or proposed, and models that have been developed. The manifestations of relevance are classified as to several kinds of relevance that form an interdependent system of relevances. In Part III, relevance behavior and effects are synthesized using experimental and observational works that incorporate data. In both parts, each section concludes with a summary that in effect provides an interpretation and synthesis of contemporary thinking on the topic treated or suggests hypotheses for future research. Analyses of some of the major trends that shape relevance work are offered in conclusions.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.1915-1933
  19. Saracevic, T.; Mokros, H.; Su, L.: Nature of interaction between users and intermediaries in online searching : a qualitative analysis (1990) 0.01
    0.005371868 = product of:
      0.021487473 = sum of:
        0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021487473 = score(doc=4894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    ASIS'90: Information in the year 2000, from research to applications. Proc. of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Toronto, Canada, 4.-8.11.1990. Ed. by Diana Henderson
  20. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Dynamics of search term selection during mediated online searching (1993) 0.01
    0.005371868 = product of:
      0.021487473 = sum of:
        0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 7968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021487473 = score(doc=7968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 7968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7968)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Integrating technologies - converging professions: proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, OH, 24-28 October 1993. Ed.: S. Bonzi