Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Indexierungsstudien"
  1. Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996) 0.03
    0.026983513 = product of:
      0.053967025 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
        0.02531706 = product of:
          0.05063412 = sum of:
            0.05063412 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05063412 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
  2. Rowley, J.: ¬The controlled versus natural indexing languages debate revisited : a perspective on information retrieval practice and research (1994) 0.02
    0.02291517 = product of:
      0.04583034 = sum of:
        0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 7151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017906228 = score(doc=7151,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 7151, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7151)
        0.027924111 = product of:
          0.055848222 = sum of:
            0.055848222 = weight(_text_:history in 7151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055848222 = score(doc=7151,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21731828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.25698814 = fieldWeight in 7151, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.6519823 = idf(docFreq=1146, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7151)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article revisits the debate concerning controlled and natural indexing languages, as used in searching the databases of the online hosts, in-house information retrieval systems, online public access catalogues and databases stored on CD-ROM. The debate was first formulated in the early days of information retrieval more than a century ago but, despite significant advance in technology, remains unresolved. The article divides the history of the debate into four eras. Era one was characterised by the introduction of controlled vocabulary. Era two focused on comparisons between different indexing languages in order to assess which was best. Era three saw a number of case studies of limited generalisability and a general recognition that the best search performance can be achieved by the parallel use of the two types of indexing languages. The emphasis in Era four has been on the development of end-user-based systems, including online public access catalogues and databases on CD-ROM. Recent developments in the use of expert systems techniques to support the representation of meaning may lead to systems which offer significant support to the user in end-user searching. In the meantime, however, information retrieval in practice involves a mixture of natural and controlled indexing languages used to search a wide variety of different kinds of databases
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.2, S.108-119
  3. Morris, L.R.: ¬The frequency of use of Library of Congress Classification numbers and Dewey Decimal Classification numbers in the MARC file in the field of library science (1991) 0.01
    0.010855075 = product of:
      0.0434203 = sum of:
        0.0434203 = weight(_text_:science in 2308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0434203 = score(doc=2308,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.35285735 = fieldWeight in 2308, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2308)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The LCC and DDC systems were devised and updated by librarians who had and have no access to the eventual frequency of use of each number in those classification systems. 80% of the monographs in a MARC file of over 1.000.000 records are classified into 20% of the classification numbers in the field of library science and only 20% of the mongraphs are classified into 80% of the classification numbers in the field of library science. Classification of monographs coulld be made easier and performed more accurately if many of the little used and unused numbers were eliminated and many of the most crowded numbers were expanded. A number of examples are included
  4. Tonta, Y.: ¬A study of indexing consistency between Library of Congress and British Library catalogers (1991) 0.01
    0.0071624913 = product of:
      0.028649965 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing consistency between Library of Congress and British Library catalogers using the LCSH is compared.82 titles published in 1987 in the field of library and information science were identified for comparison, and for each title its LC subject headings, assigned by both LC and BL catalogers, were compared. By applying Hooper's 'consistency of a pair' equation, the average indexing consistency value was calculated for the 82 titles. The average indexing value between LC and BL catalogers is 16% for exact matches, and 36% for partial matches
  5. David, C.; Giroux, L.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lanteigne, D.: Indexing as problem solving : a cognitive approach to consistency (1995) 0.01
    0.0071624913 = product of:
      0.028649965 = sum of:
        0.028649965 = weight(_text_:science in 3833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028649965 = score(doc=3833,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3833, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3833)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Forging new partnerships in information: converging technologies. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'95, Chicago, IL, 9-12 October 1995. Ed.: T. Kinney
  6. Hersh, W.R.; Hickam, D.H.: ¬A comparison of two methods for indexing and retrieval from a full-text medical database (1992) 0.01
    0.0062671797 = product of:
      0.025068719 = sum of:
        0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 4526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025068719 = score(doc=4526,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 4526, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4526)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Pittsburgh, 26.-29.10.92. Ed.: D. Shaw
  7. Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1994) 0.01
    0.0062671797 = product of:
      0.025068719 = sum of:
        0.025068719 = weight(_text_:science in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025068719 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.589-599
  8. Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990) 0.01
    0.0055381064 = product of:
      0.022152426 = sum of:
        0.022152426 = product of:
          0.04430485 = sum of:
            0.04430485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04430485 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16358867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0467152 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
  9. Larson, R.R.: Experiments in automatic Library of Congress Classification (1992) 0.01
    0.005371868 = product of:
      0.021487473 = sum of:
        0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 1054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021487473 = score(doc=1054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1054)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992), S.130-148
  10. David, C.; Giroux, L.; Bertrand-Gastaldy, S.; Lanteigne, D.: Indexing as problem solving : a cognitive approach to consistency (1995) 0.01
    0.005371868 = product of:
      0.021487473 = sum of:
        0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021487473 = score(doc=3609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Connectedness: information, systems, people, organizations. Proceedings of CAIS/ACSI 95, the proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science. Ed. by Hope A. Olson and Denis B. Ward
  11. Harter, S.P.; Cheng, Y.-R.: Colinked descriptors : improving vocabulary selection for end-user searching (1996) 0.01
    0.005371868 = product of:
      0.021487473 = sum of:
        0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 4216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021487473 = score(doc=4216,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4216, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4216)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.311-325
  12. Braam, R.R.; Bruil, J.: Quality of indexing information : authors' views on indexing of their articles in chemical abstracts online CA-file (1992) 0.01
    0.005371868 = product of:
      0.021487473 = sum of:
        0.021487473 = weight(_text_:science in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021487473 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 18(1992) no.5, S.399-408
  13. Keen, E.M.: Designing and testing an interactive ranked retrieval system for professional searchers (1994) 0.00
    0.004476557 = product of:
      0.017906228 = sum of:
        0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017906228 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 20(1994) no.6, S.389-398
  14. Ellis, D.; Furner, J.; Willett, P.: On the creation of hypertext links in full-text documents : measurement of retrieval effectiveness (1996) 0.00
    0.004476557 = product of:
      0.017906228 = sum of:
        0.017906228 = weight(_text_:science in 4214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017906228 = score(doc=4214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12305341 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0467152 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4214)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.287-300