Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995) 0.07
    0.06996349 = product of:
      0.20989047 = sum of:
        0.10768172 = weight(_text_:services in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10768172 = score(doc=2616,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.6490128 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
        0.10220875 = sum of:
          0.05322573 = weight(_text_:resources in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05322573 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045191888 = queryNorm
              0.32264733 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.048983015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048983015 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045191888 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a survey of ARL (Ass. of Research Libraries) members in the USA in 1994, which sought to find out the electronic reference services that are offered by these libraries and how the services affect reference staff, the expectations of users, and user instruction. The services covered include CD-ROM, intermediary online searching, end user online (e.g. FirstSearch), tape loaded databases and user access to the Internet, including electronic mail facilities. Highlights the additional workload the provision of these services involves, and the sometimes unrealistic expectations of users especially with regard to Internet resources
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  2. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.06
    0.057862546 = product of:
      0.17358764 = sum of:
        0.047110755 = weight(_text_:services in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047110755 = score(doc=5170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
        0.12647688 = sum of:
          0.06586348 = weight(_text_:resources in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06586348 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045191888 = queryNorm
              0.39925572 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.060613394 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060613394 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045191888 = queryNorm
              0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a survey of all academic members of the Association of Research Libraries in the 4th quarter of 1997 which examined how academic libraries incorporate electronic information sources into their reference activities and the effects on libraries services. There was a response rate of 68 per cent, Compares results surveys carried out in 1991 and 1994. The survey covered: numbers of computers access options (intermediary, end user online, CD-ROM locally loaded databases or those accessible through the library catalogue and the Internet. There is a trend away from print resources, particularly indexing and abstracting materials, and away from CD-ROM LANs and local loading of databases towards remote online resources
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  3. Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995) 0.04
    0.039248876 = product of:
      0.11774662 = sum of:
        0.09325511 = weight(_text_:services in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09325511 = score(doc=2612,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.5620616 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
        0.024491508 = product of:
          0.048983015 = sum of:
            0.048983015 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048983015 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191888 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the variety of search services supporting library reference functions offered by the RLG in the USA. The best known of these is RLIN, the massive bibliographic database and related services originally developed for shared cataloguing. In the last few years RLG has added CitaDel, an online search system that provides access to indexing/abstracting databases; and Zephyr, a Z39.50 server that amkes the RLIN and CitaDel databases searchable through a library's online catalogue. RLG also offers document delivery connections, including Ariel and Internet based document delivery software, for a full complement of online reference support for academic and public libraries
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  4. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008) 0.02
    0.016761195 = product of:
      0.05028358 = sum of:
        0.03365054 = weight(_text_:services in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03365054 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
        0.016633041 = product of:
          0.033266082 = sum of:
            0.033266082 = weight(_text_:resources in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033266082 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191888 = queryNorm
                0.20165458 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article is an edited version of a report commissioned by the British Library and JISC to identify how the specialist researchers of the future (those born after 1993) are likely to access and interact with digital resources in five to ten years' time. The purpose is to investigate the impact of digital transition on the information behaviour of the Google Generation and to guide library and information services to anticipate and react to any new or emerging behaviours in the most effective way. Design/methodology/approach - The study was virtually longitudinal and is based on a number of extensive reviews of related literature, survey data mining and a deep log analysis of a British Library and a JISC web site intended for younger people. Findings - The study shows that much of the impact of ICTs on the young has been overestimated. The study claims that although young people demonstrate an apparent ease and familiarity with computers, they rely heavily on search engines, view rather than read and do not possess the critical and analytical skills to assess the information that they find on the web. Originality/value - The paper reports on a study that overturns the common assumption that the "Google generation" is the most web-literate.
  5. Tenopir, C.: Electronic reference options : tracking the changes (1995) 0.02
    0.015863016 = product of:
      0.09517809 = sum of:
        0.09517809 = weight(_text_:services in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09517809 = score(doc=2609,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.5736517 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a 1994 survey of the academic library memebers of the Association of Research Libraries, USA, to discover what types of electronic reference services they offer and how these services affect reference librarians' jobs and user and staff training. This survey was a follow up to an earlier survey in 1991
  6. Tenopir, C.: Linking to full texts (1998) 0.02
    0.015542518 = product of:
      0.09325511 = sum of:
        0.09325511 = weight(_text_:services in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09325511 = score(doc=2262,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.5620616 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the links which major online indexing and bibliographic services are providing from article citations to the corresponding electronic full text. Services covered include OCLC's FirstSearch and its Electronic Collections Online, Ovid, PubMed and UMI/ProQuest Direct. Discusses the value of links to electronic full text vis a vis direct searching of the full text, arguing for the superiority of the former and stressing that indexing services and bibliographic databases have a strong future for this reason
  7. Tenopir, C.: Will online vendors survive? (1998) 0.01
    0.012690413 = product of:
      0.076142475 = sum of:
        0.076142475 = weight(_text_:services in 1815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076142475 = score(doc=1815,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.45892134 = fieldWeight in 1815, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1815)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Looks to the future of traditional online services, in light of the rising use of the WWW, which brings authors or publishers and readers directly together, without the intermediary role played by online vendors. Gives examples of changes in ownership of online services in the last half of 1997, and notes that the changes all suggest that online vendors must nkow their best markets and stick to them. Concludes that many online vendors will survive but in ne configurations and often with new owners
  8. Tenopir, C.: Full-text retrieval : systems and files (1994) 0.01
    0.008973477 = product of:
      0.05384086 = sum of:
        0.05384086 = weight(_text_:services in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05384086 = score(doc=2424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the development of full text databases, encompassing: types of commercially available full text databases; online systems for full text databases; CD-ROM databases for full text databases; full text databases on magnetic discs or tapes; creation of full text databases; searching and display requirements for full text searching and software. Concludes that bibliographic information services without full text support solve only half of the retrieval problems
  9. Wang, P.; Hawk, W.B.; Tenopir, C.: Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources : an exploratory study using a holistic approach (2000) 0.01
    0.0066532167 = product of:
      0.0399193 = sum of:
        0.0399193 = product of:
          0.0798386 = sum of:
            0.0798386 = weight(_text_:resources in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0798386 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191888 = queryNorm
                0.483971 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  10. Nicholas, D.; Huntington, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of big deals : case study OhioLINK (2006) 0.01
    0.0056084236 = product of:
      0.03365054 = sum of:
        0.03365054 = weight(_text_:services in 5605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03365054 = score(doc=5605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 5605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5605)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project funded by the US Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original "big deal", provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journal for more than 600,000 people in the state of Ohio. The purpose of the paper is not only to present findings from the deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, but, arguably more importantly, to try test a new method of analysing online information user behaviour - deep log analysis. Design/methodology/approach - The raw server logs were obtained for the period June 2004 to December 2004. For this exploratory study one month (October) of the on-campus usage logs and seven months of the off-campus transaction logs were analysed. Findings - During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. The paper presents a number of usage analyses including: number of journals used, titles of journals used, use over time, a returnee analysis and a special analysis of subject, date and method of access. Practical implications - The research findings help libraries evaluate the efficiency of big deal and one-stop shopping for scholarly journals and also investigate their users' information seeking behaviours. Originality/value - The research is a part of efforts to test the applications of a new methodology, deep log analysis, for use and user studies. It also represents the most substantial independent analysis of, possibly, the most important and significant of the journal big deals ever conducted.
  11. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006) 0.01
    0.0056084236 = product of:
      0.03365054 = sum of:
        0.03365054 = weight(_text_:services in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03365054 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16591617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045191888 = queryNorm
            0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project, funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original Big Deal, provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journals for more than 600,000 people; for the purposes of the analysis, the raw logs were obtained from OhioLINK for the period June 2004 to December 2004. During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. This article provides an analysis of the age of material that users consulted. From a methodological point of view OhioLINK offered an attractive platform to conduct age of publication usage studies because it is one of the oldest e-journal libraries and thus offered a relatively long archive and stable platform to conduct the studies. The project sought to determine whether the subject, the search approach adopted, and the type of journal item viewed (contents page, abstract, full-text article, etc.) was a factor in regard to the age of articles used.
  12. Tenopir, C.: Electronic publishing : research issues for academic librarians and users (2003) 0.00
    0.0047045345 = product of:
      0.028227206 = sum of:
        0.028227206 = product of:
          0.056454413 = sum of:
            0.056454413 = weight(_text_:resources in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056454413 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191888 = queryNorm
                0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Increased reliance on electronic resources requires examination of the roles of librarians in several key ways. This paper addresses the need for further research into three important areas of electronic publishing. How is the change to digital information sources affecting the scholarly work of college and university students? Previous research shows that students rely on Web and online resources and ask for less help from librarians. We do not know, however, how these changes will affect the learning and scholarly work of college and university students. Research is also needed to determine how the differences between separate article and full journal databases affect the way research is done. What are the implications for scholarship of decisions being made about what publishers publish and what librarians purchase? Finally, are librarians--as intermediaries to the search process--still necessary in a digital age? Online systems are designed to be used independently but that may not always yield the best results.
  13. Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016) 0.00
    0.0047045345 = product of:
      0.028227206 = sum of:
        0.028227206 = product of:
          0.056454413 = sum of:
            0.056454413 = weight(_text_:resources in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056454413 = score(doc=3113,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16496566 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191888 = queryNorm
                0.34221917 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.650338 = idf(docFreq=3122, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.
  14. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.00
    0.0035716784 = product of:
      0.02143007 = sum of:
        0.02143007 = product of:
          0.04286014 = sum of:
            0.04286014 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04286014 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191888 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  15. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.00
    0.002551199 = product of:
      0.015307193 = sum of:
        0.015307193 = product of:
          0.030614385 = sum of:
            0.030614385 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030614385 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1582543 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045191888 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37