-
Schreiber, M.: Uncertainties and ambiguities in percentiles and how to avoid them (2013)
0.05
0.05381118 = product of:
0.10762236 = sum of:
0.10762236 = sum of:
0.051189464 = weight(_text_:society in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051189464 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.29479095 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.0564329 = weight(_text_:22 in 675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0564329 = score(doc=675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18232337 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:52:05
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.640-643
-
Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009)
0.01
0.012797366 = product of:
0.025594732 = sum of:
0.025594732 = product of:
0.051189464 = sum of:
0.051189464 = weight(_text_:society in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051189464 = score(doc=3313,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.29479095 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.169-174
-
Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies in the highly cited publications indicator (2013)
0.01
0.012797366 = product of:
0.025594732 = sum of:
0.025594732 = product of:
0.051189464 = sum of:
0.051189464 = weight(_text_:society in 815) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051189464 = score(doc=815,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.29479095 = fieldWeight in 815, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=815)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.6, S.1298-1302
-
Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013)
0.01
0.012797366 = product of:
0.025594732 = sum of:
0.025594732 = product of:
0.051189464 = sum of:
0.051189464 = weight(_text_:society in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051189464 = score(doc=1113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.29479095 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2396-2399
-
Schreiber, M.: ¬A case study of the modified Hirsch index hm accounting for multiple coauthors (2009)
0.01
0.0111976955 = product of:
0.022395391 = sum of:
0.022395391 = product of:
0.044790782 = sum of:
0.044790782 = weight(_text_:society in 2858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790782 = score(doc=2858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.25794208 = fieldWeight in 2858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2858)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1274-1282
-
Schreiber, M.: Empirical evidence for the relevance of fractional scoring in the calculation of percentile rank scores (2013)
0.01
0.0111976955 = product of:
0.022395391 = sum of:
0.022395391 = product of:
0.044790782 = sum of:
0.044790782 = weight(_text_:society in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044790782 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.25794208 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.861-867
-
Schreiber, M.: Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index (2009)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=3125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.10, S.2145-2150
-
Waltman, L.; Schreiber, M.: On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators (2013)
0.01
0.009598024 = product of:
0.019196048 = sum of:
0.019196048 = product of:
0.038392097 = sum of:
0.038392097 = weight(_text_:society in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038392097 = score(doc=616,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.22109321 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.372-379
-
Schreiber, M.: ¬An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index (2008)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1513-1522
-
Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2062-2073