Search (17 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Tenopir, C.; Levine, K.; Allard, S.; Christian, L.; Volentine, R.; Boehm, R.; Nichols, F.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Herman, E.; Watkinson, A.: Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age : results of an international questionnaire (2016) 0.03
    0.030143319 = product of:
      0.075358294 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
        0.04837222 = weight(_text_:social in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04837222 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    An international survey of over 3,600 researchers examined how trustworthiness and quality are determined for making decisions on scholarly reading, citing, and publishing and how scholars perceive changes in trust with new forms of scholarly communication. Although differences in determining trustworthiness and authority of scholarly resources exist among age groups and fields of study, traditional methods and criteria remain important across the board. Peer review is considered the most important factor for determining the quality and trustworthiness of research. Researchers continue to read abstracts, check content for sound arguments and credible data, and rely on journal rankings when deciding whether to trust scholarly resources in reading, citing, or publishing. Social media outlets and open access publications are still often not trusted, although many researchers believe that open access has positive implications for research, especially if the open access journals are peer reviewed.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.10, S.2344-2361
  2. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Edwards, S.; Wu, L.: Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns : the paradox of control (2009) 0.03
    0.02511943 = product of:
      0.062798575 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 2960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=2960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 2960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2960)
        0.04031018 = weight(_text_:social in 2960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04031018 = score(doc=2960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 2960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2960)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - By tracking the information-seeking and reading patterns of science, technology, medical and social science faculty members from 1977 to the present, this paper seeks to examine how faculty members locate, obtain, read, and use scholarly articles and how this has changed with the widespread availability of electronic journals and journal alternatives. Design/methodology/approach - Data were gathered using questionnaire surveys of university faculty and other researchers periodically since 1977. Many questions used the critical incident of the last article reading to allow analysis of the characteristics of readings in addition to characteristics of readers. Findings - The paper finds that the average number of readings per year per science faculty member continues to increase, while the average time spent per reading is decreasing. Electronic articles now account for the majority of readings, though most readings are still printed on paper for final reading. Scientists report reading a higher proportion of older articles from a wider range of journal titles and more articles from library e-collections. Articles are read for many purposes and readings are valuable to those purposes. Originality/value - The paper draws on data collected in a consistent way over 30 years. It provides a unique look at how electronic journals and other developments have influenced changes in reading behavior over three decades. The use of critical incidence provides evidence of the value of reading in addition to reading patterns.
  3. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.02
    0.018938866 = product of:
      0.047347162 = sum of:
        0.031803396 = weight(_text_:technology in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031803396 = score(doc=2735,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.23268649 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
        0.015543767 = product of:
          0.031087535 = sum of:
            0.031087535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031087535 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This exploratory study examines how design engineers and technical professionals (hereafter referred to as engineers) in innovative high-tech firms in the United States and India use information in their daily work activities including research, development, and management. The researchers used naturalistic observation to conduct a series of daylong workplace observations with 103 engineers engaged in product design and testing in four U.S.- and two India-based firms. A key finding is that engineers spend about one fourth of their day engaged in some type of information event, which was somewhat lower than the percentage identified in previous research. The explanation may be rooted in the significant change in the information environment and corporate expectations in the last 15 years, which is the time of the original study. Searching technology has improved, making searching less time consuming, and engineers are choosing the Internet as a primary source even though information may not be as focused, as timely, or as authoritative. The study extends our understanding of the engineering workplace, and the information environment in the workplace, and provides information useful for improving methods for accessing and using information, which could ultimately lead to better job performance, facilitate innovation, and encourage economic growth.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.443-454
  4. Tenopir, C.: Full text databases (1984) 0.01
    0.014392574 = product of:
      0.07196287 = sum of:
        0.07196287 = weight(_text_:technology in 398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07196287 = score(doc=398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=398)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 19(1984), S.215-246
  5. Tenopir, C.: Online databases : taking online interaction for granted (1997) 0.01
    0.012899259 = product of:
      0.06449629 = sum of:
        0.06449629 = weight(_text_:social in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06449629 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers some of the human factors in online interaction and Internet use. Discusses the following: users' need for help from libraries and librarians, given the difficulties people continue to have in accessing and using networked information; the challenge of user demands for speedy delivery of information and documents; the trend towards 'humanizing the net' through chat rooms and social agent interfaces (such as Microsoft's Bob); and the problems for libraries of users using the Internet for trivial or pornographic purposes
  6. Tenopir, C.; Ro, J.S.: Full text databases (1990) 0.01
    0.012593503 = product of:
      0.06296752 = sum of:
        0.06296752 = weight(_text_:technology in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06296752 = score(doc=1916,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information technology and libraries. 10(1991) S.156-157 (E. Kanter)
  7. Tenopir, C.; Lundeen, G.: Managing your information : how to design and create a textual database on your microcomputer (1988) 0.01
    0.01079443 = product of:
      0.05397215 = sum of:
        0.05397215 = weight(_text_:technology in 3208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05397215 = score(doc=3208,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.39488205 = fieldWeight in 3208, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3208)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Series
    Applications in information management and technology series
  8. Tenopir, C.: Plagued by our own successes (1998) 0.01
    0.007196287 = product of:
      0.035981435 = sum of:
        0.035981435 = weight(_text_:technology in 2191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035981435 = score(doc=2191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 2191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2191)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a survey of electronic reference sources and their impact on the work of reference librarians. Reference librarians in university libraries in the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) in the USA were asked to comment on how the library's use of such sources has changed over the past 2 to 3 years and how the work of reference staff has changed. The themes highlighted by the survey include changes in user instructions; the impact of technology; the rising expectations of users; and 'technostress'
  9. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.0061550178 = product of:
      0.030775089 = sum of:
        0.030775089 = product of:
          0.061550178 = sum of:
            0.061550178 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061550178 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  10. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Boyce, P.; Grayson, M.; Paulson, K.-L.: Relying an electronic journals : reading patterns of astronomers (2005) 0.01
    0.005397215 = product of:
      0.026986076 = sum of:
        0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026986076 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.8, S.786-802
  11. Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995) 0.00
    0.0049740053 = product of:
      0.024870027 = sum of:
        0.024870027 = product of:
          0.049740054 = sum of:
            0.049740054 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049740054 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  12. Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995) 0.00
    0.0049740053 = product of:
      0.024870027 = sum of:
        0.024870027 = product of:
          0.049740054 = sum of:
            0.049740054 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049740054 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  13. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006) 0.00
    0.0044976794 = product of:
      0.022488397 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=214)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1840-1851
  14. Sandusky, R.J.; Tenopir, C.: Finding and using journal-article components : impacts of disaggregation on teaching and research practice (2008) 0.00
    0.0044976794 = product of:
      0.022488397 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 1723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=1723,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1723, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1723)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.6, S.970-982
  15. Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008) 0.00
    0.0044976794 = product of:
      0.022488397 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1393-1408
  16. Douglass, K.; Allard, S.; Tenopir, C.; Wu, L.W.; Frame, M.: Managing scientific data as public assets : data sharing practices and policies among full-time government employees (2014) 0.00
    0.0044976794 = product of:
      0.022488397 = sum of:
        0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022488397 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04589033 = queryNorm
            0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.251-262
  17. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.00
    0.0043522543 = product of:
      0.021761272 = sum of:
        0.021761272 = product of:
          0.043522544 = sum of:
            0.043522544 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043522544 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04589033 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28