-
Martin, W.J.: ¬The information society (1995)
0.30
0.29651013 = product of:
0.4941835 = sum of:
0.06360679 = weight(_text_:technology in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06360679 = score(doc=1201,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46537298 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.16124073 = weight(_text_:social in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16124073 = score(doc=1201,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.88113874 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.269336 = sum of:
0.2071609 = weight(_text_:aspects in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2071609 = score(doc=1201,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.9987592 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.06217507 = weight(_text_:22 in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06217507 = score(doc=1201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 15. 7.2002 14:22:55
- LCSH
- Technology / Social aspects
Information storage and retrieval systems / Social aspects
- Subject
- Technology / Social aspects
Information storage and retrieval systems / Social aspects
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.15
0.1504173 = product of:
0.2506955 = sum of:
0.07196287 = weight(_text_:technology in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07196287 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.5265094 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.12899259 = weight(_text_:social in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12899259 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.704911 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.049740054 = product of:
0.09948011 = sum of:
0.09948011 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09948011 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019)
0.14
0.1360539 = product of:
0.34013474 = sum of:
0.085033685 = product of:
0.25510105 = sum of:
0.25510105 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25510105 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25510105 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25510105 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
-
McGarry, K.: ¬The changing context of information : an introductory analysis (1993)
0.12
0.11737319 = product of:
0.19562198 = sum of:
0.03148376 = weight(_text_:technology in 773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03148376 = score(doc=773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=773)
0.11286851 = weight(_text_:social in 773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11286851 = score(doc=773,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.6167971 = fieldWeight in 773, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=773)
0.051269706 = product of:
0.10253941 = sum of:
0.10253941 = weight(_text_:aspects in 773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10253941 = score(doc=773,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.4943606 = fieldWeight in 773, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=773)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The 2nd ed. of this introductory work gives an account of the new methods of thinking about information. The author examines the importance of the social and cultural context in analysing the meaning and relevance of information for the indivudual and society. He explores the interaction between communications technology, human information processing, the representation of information and the attendant problems of storage and transmission. The social implications of knowledge engineering are also discussed, together with the ethics of information and its relevance to the information professional of the next century
- LCSH
- Information science / Social aspects
- Subject
- Information science / Social aspects
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.10
0.09718136 = product of:
0.24295339 = sum of:
0.060738347 = product of:
0.18221503 = sum of:
0.18221503 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18221503 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18221503 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18221503 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.10
0.09718136 = product of:
0.24295339 = sum of:
0.060738347 = product of:
0.18221503 = sum of:
0.18221503 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18221503 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18221503 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18221503 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38905874 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Berman, Y.; Phillips, D.: Information and social quality (2001)
0.08
0.08175119 = product of:
0.20437798 = sum of:
0.16043252 = weight(_text_:social in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16043252 = score(doc=703,freq=22.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.87672204 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
0.04394546 = product of:
0.08789092 = sum of:
0.08789092 = weight(_text_:aspects in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08789092 = score(doc=703,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.42373765 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper introduces the concept of 'social quality' as a measure of quality-of-life and it sets out a framework for identifying social indicators of the relationship between information and social quality. Social quality has four elements: socio - economic security, social inclusion, social cohesion and empowerment. Illustrative indicators are identified at both national (Demos) and community (Ethnos) level for four different aspects of each social quality element: input, process, outcome and impact. Then the distribution of information and social quality between Demos and Ethnos levels is investigated. It is concluded that usable indicators of all aspects of each element of social quality can be identified and that analysis of informational social quality at Demos and Ethnos level can add to knowledge about information provision and policy, particularly with reference to minority and marginal communities.
-
Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006)
0.08
0.07904047 = product of:
0.1317341 = sum of:
0.044524755 = weight(_text_:technology in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044524755 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.32576108 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.056434255 = weight(_text_:social in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056434255 = score(doc=2746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.030775089 = product of:
0.061550178 = sum of:
0.061550178 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061550178 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Fundamental forms of information, as well as the term information itself, are defined and developed for the purposes of information science/studies. Concepts of natural and represented information (taking an unconventional sense of representation), encoded and embodied information, as well as experienced, enacted, expressed, embedded, recorded, and trace information are elaborated. The utility of these terms for the discipline is illustrated with examples from the study of information-seeking behavior and of information genres. Distinctions between the information and curatorial sciences with respect to their social (and informational) objects of study are briefly outlined.
- Content
- Vgl. Erwiderung: Hjoerland, B.: The controversy over the concept of information: a rejoinder to Professor Bates. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.643.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:15:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.1033-1045
-
Floridi, L.: ¬Die 4. Revolution : wie die Infosphäre unser Leben verändert (2015)
0.08
0.078822725 = product of:
0.1313712 = sum of:
0.025442718 = weight(_text_:technology in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025442718 = score(doc=3561,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.1861492 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
0.06449629 = weight(_text_:social in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06449629 = score(doc=3561,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.3524555 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
0.04143218 = product of:
0.08286436 = sum of:
0.08286436 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08286436 = score(doc=3561,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.39950368 = fieldWeight in 3561, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3561)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- LCSH
- Information technology ; Social aspects
Internet / Social aspects
- Subject
- Information technology ; Social aspects
Internet / Social aspects
-
Ma, L.: Meanings of information : the assumptions and research consequences of three foundational LIS theories (2012)
0.07
0.07450271 = product of:
0.12417117 = sum of:
0.03148376 = weight(_text_:technology in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03148376 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.056434255 = weight(_text_:social in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056434255 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.036253158 = product of:
0.072506316 = sum of:
0.072506316 = weight(_text_:aspects in 232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.072506316 = score(doc=232,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.3495657 = fieldWeight in 232, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=232)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- This article addresses the question "what is information?" by comparing the meaning of the term "information" and epistemological assumptions of three theories in library and information science: the "Shannon-Weaver model," Brookes' interpretation of Popper's World 3, and the Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom model. It shows that the term "information" in these theories refers to empirical entities or events and is conceptualized as having causal powers upon human minds. It is argued that the epistemological assumptions have led to the negligence of the cultural and social aspects of the constitution of information (i.e., how something is considered to be and not to be information) and the unquestioned nature of science in research methodologies.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.716-723
-
Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021)
0.07
0.06842835 = product of:
0.114047244 = sum of:
0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026986076 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.068408646 = weight(_text_:social in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.068408646 = score(doc=351,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.3738355 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.01865252 = product of:
0.03730504 = sum of:
0.03730504 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03730504 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- While there are calls for new paradigms within the profession, there are also existing subgenres that fit this bill if they would be fully acknowledged. This essay argues that underrepresented and otherwise marginalized scholars have already produced significant work within social, cultural, and community-oriented paradigms; social justice and advocacy; and, diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work has not been sufficiently valued or promoted. Furthermore, the surrounding structural conditions have resulted in the dismissal, violently reviewed and rejected, and erased work of underrepresented scholars, and the stigmatization and delegitimization of their work. These scholars are "outsiders-within-LIS." By identifying the outsiders-within-LIS through the frame of standpoint theories, the authors are suggesting that a new paradigm does not need to be created; rather, an existing paradigm needs to be recognized and reprioritized. This reprioritized paradigm of critical sociocultural work has and will continue to creatively enrich and expand the field and decolonize LIS curricula.
- Date
- 18. 9.2021 13:22:27
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1285-1294
-
Westbrook, L.: Information myths and intimate partner violence : sources, contexts, and consequences (2009)
0.07
0.06580757 = product of:
0.10967928 = sum of:
0.03148376 = weight(_text_:technology in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03148376 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
0.056434255 = weight(_text_:social in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056434255 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.30839854 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
0.021761272 = product of:
0.043522544 = sum of:
0.043522544 = weight(_text_:22 in 2790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043522544 = score(doc=2790,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16070013 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2790, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2790)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Survivors of intimate partner violence face more than information gaps; many face powerful barriers in the form of information myths. Triangulating data from in-depth interviews and community bulletin board postings, this study incorporates insights from survivors, police, and shelter staff to begin mapping the information landscape through which survivors move. An unanticipated feature of that landscape is a set of 28 compelling information myths that prevent some survivors from making effective use of the social, legal, economic, and support resources available to them. This analysis of the sources, contexts, and consequences of these information myths is the first step in devising strategies to counter their ill effects.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:16:44
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.826-836
-
Brookes, B.C.: ¬The foundations of information science : pt.2: quantitative aspects: classes of things and the challenge of human individuality (1980)
0.06
0.064215735 = product of:
0.16053933 = sum of:
0.09774701 = weight(_text_:social in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09774701 = score(doc=3254,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.53416204 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
0.062792316 = product of:
0.12558463 = sum of:
0.12558463 = weight(_text_:aspects in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12558463 = score(doc=3254,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.60546565 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- An outline history describes how man has extended the process of objectivization from everyday practicalities to modern science. Modern techniques of quantification awaited the adoption of the Hindu-Arab numerals and the creation of a calculus for their use. It is argued that the use of these numerals has provided analytical instruments which, though ideally adapted to the exploration and exploitation of the physical world, fail to capture important aspects of the individuality of response within groups which humans display in their social behaviour. New quantitative techniques more sensitive to these aspects are therefore needed in the social sciences. A numerical example is used to illustrate how frequency-rank statistics make fuller use of empirical information in the social sciences than conventional statistics which, by using classes, discards information related to individuality
-
Twidale, M.B.; Nichols, D.M.; Lueg, C.P.: Everyone everywhere : a distributed and embedded paradigm for usability (2021)
0.06
0.06385946 = product of:
0.10643243 = sum of:
0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026986076 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.04837222 = weight(_text_:social in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04837222 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.26434162 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.031074135 = product of:
0.06214827 = sum of:
0.06214827 = weight(_text_:aspects in 238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06214827 = score(doc=238,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.29962775 = fieldWeight in 238, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=238)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- We present a new paradigm to address the persistence of difficulties that people have in accessing and using information. Our idea consists of two main aspects: engaging wider society with usability and distributing the topic across disciplines. We claim that bad usability is a social justice issue. Primarily, we propose that usability should become the subject of widespread activism across society, enabling more people to realize that their usability problems are not due to inadequacies in themselves but in current designs. People should be encouraged and enabled to complain about their experiences with an expectation of improvements. We also propose that the current restriction of this topic to certain disciplinary units is overly narrow and that instead there should be radical embedding of usability concepts across many different fields and settings. We believe that the usability of information systems is core to information science and that information scientists should resume their historic role as heralds and pioneers of human-computer interaction.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1272-1284
-
Worrall, A.; Cappello, A.; Osolen, R.: ¬The importance of socio-emotional considerations in online communities, social informatics, and information science (2021)
0.06
0.057367574 = product of:
0.14341894 = sum of:
0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022488397 = score(doc=354,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
0.120930545 = weight(_text_:social in 354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.120930545 = score(doc=354,freq=18.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.66085404 = fieldWeight in 354, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=354)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Alongside cognitive and social phenomena, many scholars have examined emotional and affective considerations in information science, but a potential emotional or affective paradigm has not coalesced to the extent of the social or cognitive paradigms. We argue information science research should integrate the social paradigm, as offered by social informatics, with affective and emotional considerations: a socio-emotional paradigm. A review of existing literature and findings from users' motivations to participate on the Academia section of the Stack Exchange social questioning-and-answering site make our case. We uncovered tensions between the intended information-centric focus of the community and users who believed social, emotional, and affective considerations needed to be foregrounded, speaking to online communities acting as boundary objects, with the "fit" for one user or community not always the same as for another. An integrated socio-emotional paradigm shows much strength for social informatics and information science research, including uncovering hidden concerns and differences in values, as in our study. Affective and emotional research, often bubbling under in information science, should rise to the surface is not so much a paradigm shift but an integration of social, emotional, and affective considerations into a socio-emotional paradigm.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.10, S.1247-1260
-
O'Connor, C.; Weatherall, J.O.: ¬The misinformation age : how false ideas spread (2019)
0.06
0.05677062 = product of:
0.14192654 = sum of:
0.09013632 = weight(_text_:social in 5818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09013632 = score(doc=5818,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.49257156 = fieldWeight in 5818, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5818)
0.051790226 = product of:
0.10358045 = sum of:
0.10358045 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10358045 = score(doc=5818,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.4993796 = fieldWeight in 5818, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5818)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The social dynamics of alternative facts: why what you believe depends on who you know. Why should we care about having true beliefs? And why do demonstrably false beliefs persist and spread despite bad, even fatal, consequences for the people who hold them? Philosophers of science Cailin OConnor and James Weatherall argue that social factors, rather than individual psychology, are whats essential to understanding the spread and persistence of false beliefs. It might seem that theres an obvious reason that true beliefs matter: false beliefs will hurt you. But if thats right, then why is it (apparently) irrelevant to many people whether they believe true things or not? The Misinformation Age, written for a political era riven by fake news, alternative facts, and disputes over the validity of everything from climate change to the size of inauguration crowds, shows convincingly that what you believe depends on who you know. If social forces explain the persistence of false belief, we must understand how those forces work in order to fight misinformation effectively.
- LCSH
- Errors / Social aspects
Errors / Psychological aspects
- Subject
- Errors / Social aspects
Errors / Psychological aspects
-
Hill, M.W.: ¬The impact of information on society : an examination of its nature, value and usage (1999)
0.05
0.05243192 = product of:
0.1310798 = sum of:
0.07981009 = weight(_text_:social in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07981009 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.43614143 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
0.051269706 = product of:
0.10253941 = sum of:
0.10253941 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10253941 = score(doc=5934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.4943606 = fieldWeight in 5934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- LCSH
- Information resources / Social aspects
- Subject
- Information resources / Social aspects
-
Kolleck, B.: Computer information and human knowledge : new thinking and old critique (1993)
0.05
0.05087719 = product of:
0.12719297 = sum of:
0.035981435 = weight(_text_:technology in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035981435 = score(doc=7241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.091211535 = weight(_text_:social in 7241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091211535 = score(doc=7241,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.49844736 = fieldWeight in 7241, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7241)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Controversies in modern ideas in social work directly reflect controversies in attitudes toward computer applications. Fundamental to modern problems with technology is the persisting dispute between 2 philosophical traditions. On one side there is the formal and technically oriented thinking: on the other the reflexive, dialectical and hermeneutical approach. The reappearance of the conflict in actual discussion is described considering data storage, formal methodology and the social impact of computer use
-
Nascimento, D.M.; Marteleto, R.M.: Social field, domains of knowledge and informational practice (2008)
0.05
0.049853798 = product of:
0.1246345 = sum of:
0.098739386 = weight(_text_:social in 1896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.098739386 = score(doc=1896,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.5395851 = fieldWeight in 1896, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1896)
0.025895113 = product of:
0.051790226 = sum of:
0.051790226 = weight(_text_:aspects in 1896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051790226 = score(doc=1896,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.2496898 = fieldWeight in 1896, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1896)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to understand the information phenomenon through the means of informational practice - the way of acting that gives identity to a group - in a social field and knowledge domain. Design/methodology/approach - By relating Pierre Bourdieu's sociology of culture to the domain analysis approach of Birger Hjørland, the intention was to achieve a comprehensive interpretation of the structure which generates the discourse communities and, also, of the social structure from which they are derived. All of these form the conditions for understanding the efforts, objectives and interests of the actors in the social field that causes them to develop determined informational practices. The field of architecture was elected for analysis. Findings - The conclusions show that both the products and subjects of a domain of knowledge, inserted in social fields, are expressions of their informational practice. Research limitations/implications - The authors believe the theoretical model based on Bourdieu and Hjørland's concepts, here built to analyze the architecture domain, may be used to analyze other domains. Originality/value - Domain analysis is employed as an approach to the study of the information aspects but here supported by the sociological concepts of Bourdieu. Thus, it is possible to understand what, how and why the informational practices are constituted inside a domain of knowledge, and, fundamentally, interpret the historical, cultural, and social dimensions that influence the construction of information.
-
Capurro, R.; Hjoerland, B.: ¬The concept of information (2002)
0.04
0.04386721 = product of:
0.07311202 = sum of:
0.02337063 = weight(_text_:technology in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02337063 = score(doc=5079,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.17098896 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
0.034204323 = weight(_text_:social in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034204323 = score(doc=5079,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.18691775 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
0.015537067 = product of:
0.031074135 = sum of:
0.031074135 = weight(_text_:aspects in 5079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031074135 = score(doc=5079,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20741826 = queryWeight, product of:
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.04589033 = queryNorm
0.14981388 = fieldWeight in 5079, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.5198684 = idf(docFreq=1308, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5079)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- The concept of information as we use it in everyday English, in the sense of knowledge communicated, plays a central role in contemporary society. The development and widespread use of computer networks since the end of World War II, and the emergence of information science as a discipline in the 1950s, are evidence of this focus. Although knowledge and its communication are basic phenomena of every human society, it is the rise of information technology and its global impacts that characterize ours as an information society. It is commonplace to consider information as a basic condition for economic development together with capital, labor, and raw material; but what makes information especially significant at present is its digital nature. The impact of information technology an the natural and social sciences in particular has made this everyday notion a highly controversial concept. Claude Shannon's (1948) "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" is a landmark work, referring to the common use of information with its semantic and pragmatic dimensions, while at the same time redefining the concept within an engineering framework. The fact that the concept of knowledge communication has been designated by the word information seems, prima facie, a linguistic happenstance. For a science like information science (IS), it is of course important how fundamental terms are defined; and in IS, as in other fields, the question of how to define information is often raised. This chapter is an attempt to review the status of the concept of information in IS, with reference also to interdisciplinary trends. In scientific discourse, theoretical concepts are not true or false elements or glimpses of some element of reality; rather, they are constructions designed to do a job in the best possible way. Different conceptions of fundamental terms like information are thus more or less fruitful, depending an the theories (and in the end, the practical actions) they are expected to support. In the opening section, we discuss the problem of defining terms from the perspective of the philosophy of science. The history of a word provides us with anecdotes that are tangential to the concept itself. But in our case, the use of the word information points to a specific perspective from which the concept of knowledge communication has been defined. This perspective includes such characteristics as novelty and relevante; i.e., it refers to the process of knowledge transformation, and particularly to selection and interpretation within a specific context. The discussion leads to the questions of why and when this meaning was designated with the word information. We will explore this history, and we believe that our results may help readers better understand the complexity of the concept with regard to its scientific definitions.
Discussions about the concept of information in other disciplines are very important for IS because many theories and approaches in IS have their origins elsewhere (see the section "Information as an Interdisciplinary Concept" in this chapter). The epistemological concept of information brings into play nonhuman information processes, particularly in physics and biology. And vice versa: the psychic and sociological processes of selection and interpretation may be considered using objective parameters, leaving aside the semantic dimension, or more precisely, by considering objective or situational parameters of interpretation. This concept can be illustrated also in physical terms with regard to release mechanisms, as we suggest. Our overview of the concept of information in the natural sciences as well as in the humanities and social sciences cannot hope to be comprehensive. In most cases, we can refer only to fragments of theories. However, the reader may wish to follow the leads provided in the bibliography. Readers interested primarily in information science may derive most benefit from the section an "Information in Information Science," in which we offer a detailed explanation of diverse views and theories of information within our field; supplementing the recent ARIST chapter by Cornelius (2002). We show that the introduction of the concept of information circa 1950 to the domain of special librarianship and documentation has in itself had serious consequences for the types of knowledge and theories developed in our field. The important question is not only what meaning we give the term in IS, but also how it relates to other basic terms, such as documents, texts, and knowledge. Starting with an objectivist view from the world of information theory and cybernetics, information science has turned to the phenomena of relevance and interpretation as basic aspects of the concept of information. This change is in no way a turn to a subjectivist theory, but an appraisal of different perspectives that may determine in a particular context what is being considered as informative, be it a "thing" (Buckland, 1991b) or a document. Different concepts of information within information science reflect tensions between a subjective and an objective approach. The concept of interpretation or selection may be considered to be the bridge between these two poles. It is important, however, to consider the different professions involved with the interpretation and selection of knowledge. The most important thing in IS (as in information policy) is to consider information as a constitutive forte in society and, thus, recognize the teleological nature of information systems and services (Braman, 1989).
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 37(2003), S.343-411
