-
Mining the metadata quarries : Special section (2003)
0.03
0.027561722 = product of:
0.082685165 = sum of:
0.082685165 = product of:
0.124027744 = sum of:
0.076375045 = weight(_text_:network in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076375045 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 1248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047652703 = score(doc=1248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1248)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Einleitung zu den Beiträgen: GUENTHER, R. et al.: New metadata standards for digital resources: MODS and METS; GREENBERG, J.: Metadata generation: processes, people and tools; TENNIS, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability: Dublin Core audience element; JUN, W.: A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurs and metadata in a digital library
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.11-28
-
Sutton, S.A.; Golder, D.: Achievement Standards Network (ASN) : an application profile for mapping K-12 educational resources to achievement (2008)
0.03
0.025872445 = product of:
0.07761733 = sum of:
0.07761733 = product of:
0.11642599 = sum of:
0.081007965 = weight(_text_:network in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081007965 = score(doc=2636,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
0.035418026 = weight(_text_:22 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035418026 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper describes metadata development of an application profile for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Achievement Standards Network (ASN) in the United States. The ASN is a national repository of machine-readable achievement standards modeled in RDF that shape teaching and learning in the various states. We describe the nature of the ASN metadata and the various uses to which that metadata is applied including the alignment of the standards of one state to those of another and the correlation of those standards to educational resources in support of resource discovery and retrieval.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Jun, W.: ¬A knowledge network constructed by integrating classification, thesaurus and metadata in a digital library (2003)
0.02
0.02226698 = product of:
0.06680094 = sum of:
0.06680094 = product of:
0.1002014 = sum of:
0.076375045 = weight(_text_:network in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076375045 = score(doc=1254,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.023826351 = weight(_text_:29 in 1254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023826351 = score(doc=1254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 1254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1254)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Knowledge management in digital libraries is a universal problem. Keyword-based searching is applied everywhere no matter whether the resources are indexed databases or full-text Web pages. In keyword matching, the valuable content description and indexing of the metadata, such as the subject descriptors and the classification notations, are merely treated as common keywords to be matched with the user query. Without the support of vocabulary control tools, such as classification systems and thesauri, the intelligent labor of content analysis, description and indexing in metadata production are seriously wasted. New retrieval paradigms are needed to exploit the potential of the metadata resources. Could classification and thesauri, which contain the condensed intelligence of generations of librarians, be used in a digital library to organize the networked information, especially metadata, to facilitate their usability and change the digital library into a knowledge management environment? To examine that question, we designed and implemented a new paradigm that incorporates a classification system, a thesaurus and metadata. The classification and the thesaurus are merged into a concept network, and the metadata are distributed into the nodes of the concept network according to their subjects. The abstract concept node instantiated with the related metadata records becomes a knowledge node. A coherent and consistent knowledge network is thus formed. It is not only a framework for resource organization but also a structure for knowledge navigation, retrieval and learning. We have built an experimental system based on the Chinese Classification and Thesaurus, which is the most comprehensive and authoritative in China, and we have incorporated more than 5000 bibliographic records in the computing domain from the Peking University Library. The result is encouraging. In this article, we review the tools, the architecture and the implementation of our experimental system, which is called Vision.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.24-28
-
White, H.: Examining scientific vocabulary : mapping controlled vocabularies with free text keywords (2013)
0.02
0.02108372 = product of:
0.06325116 = sum of:
0.06325116 = product of:
0.09487674 = sum of:
0.047652703 = weight(_text_:29 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047652703 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.047224034 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047224034 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:09:22
-
Cantara, L.: METS: the metadata encoding and transmission standard (2005)
0.02
0.020671291 = product of:
0.062013872 = sum of:
0.062013872 = product of:
0.093020804 = sum of:
0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057281278 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 5727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035739526 = score(doc=5727,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5727, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5727)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) is a data communication standard for encoding descriptive, administrative, and structural metadata regarding objects within a digital library, expressed using the XML Schema Language of the World Wide Web Consortium. An initiative of the Digital Library Federation, METS is under development by an international editorial board and is maintained in the Network Development and MARC Standards Office of the Library of Congress. Designed in conformance with the Open Archival Information System (OAIS) Reference Model, a METS document encapsulates digital objects and metadata as Information Packages for transmitting and/or exchanging digital objects to and from digital repositories, disseminating digital objects via the Web, and archiving digital objects for long-term preservation and access. This paper presents an introduction to the METS standard and through illustrated examples, demonstrates how to build a METS document.
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 19:11:46
-
Wisser, K.: ¬The errors of our ways : using metadata quality research to understand common error patterns in the application of name headings (2014)
0.02
0.020671291 = product of:
0.062013872 = sum of:
0.062013872 = product of:
0.093020804 = sum of:
0.057281278 = weight(_text_:network in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057281278 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.29521978 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
0.035739526 = weight(_text_:29 in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035739526 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Using data culled during a metadata quality research project for the Social Network and Archival Context (SNAC) project, this article discusses common errors and problems in the use of standardized languages, specifically unambiguous names for persons and corporate bodies. Errors such as misspelling, qualifiers, format, and miss-encoding point to several areas where quality control measures can improve aggregation of data. Results from a large data set indicate that there are predictable problems that can be retrospectively corrected before aggregation. This research looked specifically at name formation and expression in metadata records, but the errors detected could be extended to other controlled vocabularies as well.
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997)
0.02
0.018448254 = product of:
0.05534476 = sum of:
0.05534476 = product of:
0.08301714 = sum of:
0.041696113 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041696113 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.04132103 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04132103 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1147-1156
-
Tennis, J.T.: Data collection for controlled vocabulary interoperability : Dublin core audience element (2003)
0.02
0.017226078 = product of:
0.051678233 = sum of:
0.051678233 = product of:
0.077517346 = sum of:
0.047734402 = weight(_text_:network in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047734402 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.2460165 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.029782942 = weight(_text_:29 in 1253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029782942 = score(doc=1253,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1253, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1253)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper outlines the assumptions, process and results of a pilot study of issues of interoperability among a set of seven existing controlled vocabulary schemes that make statements about the audience of an educational resource. The notion of audience for the study was defined in terms of the semantics of the Dublin Core metadata element of the same name: "A category of user for whom the resource is intended." The study used a data collection technique, card sorting, to see how nonexpert users sorted terms in the seven vocabularies into relationships and what their thought processes were in sorting these terms. The need for controlled vocabulary interoperability is a pressing concern for the education community as well as many others. In particular, the current study was informed by the need of the Dublin Core Education Working Group (www.dublin core.org/groups/education/) to explore the possibility of a high-level switching language in an application profile for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) audience element. An abundance of educational resources exists, many of which are available in the networked environment. Yet, theie are various conceptualizations of the domain in the form of different controlled vocabularies that limit access. Controlled vocabulary interoperability would allow these different conceptualizations to remain intact, thereby serving local needs while allowing users to navigate across collections and exploiting the intellectual network of resources available.
- Source
- Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 29(2003) no.2, S.20-23
-
Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008)
0.02
0.015092259 = product of:
0.045276776 = sum of:
0.045276776 = product of:
0.067915164 = sum of:
0.047254648 = weight(_text_:network in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047254648 = score(doc=2668,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.24354391 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.020660516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020660516 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
-
Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999)
0.01
0.011130813 = product of:
0.033392437 = sum of:
0.033392437 = product of:
0.10017731 = sum of:
0.10017731 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10017731 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 30. 3.2002 19:45:22
- Source
- Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
-
Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000)
0.01
0.01049423 = product of:
0.03148269 = sum of:
0.03148269 = product of:
0.09444807 = sum of:
0.09444807 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09444807 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 16. 7.2000 20:58:22
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.01049423 = product of:
0.03148269 = sum of:
0.03148269 = product of:
0.09444807 = sum of:
0.09444807 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09444807 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
Granger, S.: Metadata and digital preservation : a plea for cross-interest collaboration (2000)
0.01
0.009265803 = product of:
0.027797408 = sum of:
0.027797408 = product of:
0.083392225 = sum of:
0.083392225 = weight(_text_:29 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083392225 = score(doc=4900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Vine. 2000, no.117, S.24-29
-
Siripan, P.: Metadata and trends of cataloguing in Thai libraries (2000)
0.01
0.009265803 = product of:
0.027797408 = sum of:
0.027797408 = product of:
0.083392225 = sum of:
0.083392225 = weight(_text_:29 in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083392225 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15326229 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.2, S.33-35
-
Fidler, B.; Acker, A.: Metadata, infrastructure, and computer-mediated communication in historical perspective (2017)
0.01
0.00918649 = product of:
0.02755947 = sum of:
0.02755947 = product of:
0.08267841 = sum of:
0.08267841 = weight(_text_:network in 3346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08267841 = score(doc=3346,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.42611307 = fieldWeight in 3346, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3346)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this paper we describe the creation and use of metadata on the early Arpanet as part of normal network function. By using the Arpanet Host-Host Protocol and its sockets as an entry point for studying the generation of metadata, we show that the development and function of key Arpanet infrastructure can be studied by examining the creation and stabilization of metadata. More specifically, we use the Host-Host Protocol's sockets as an example of something that, at the level of the network, functions as both network infrastructure and metadata simultaneously. By presenting the function of sockets in tandem with an overview of the Host-Host Protocol, we argue for the further integrated study of infrastructure and metadata. Finally, we reintroduce the concept of infradata to refer specifically to data that locate data throughout an infrastructure and are required by the infrastructure to function, separating them from established and stabilized standards. We argue for the future application of infradata as a concept for the study of histories and political economies of networks, bridging the largely library and information science (LIS) study of metadata with the largely science and technology studies (STS) domain of infrastructure.
-
Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001)
0.01
0.009182452 = product of:
0.027547356 = sum of:
0.027547356 = product of:
0.08264206 = sum of:
0.08264206 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08264206 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 28. 3.2002 9:22:34
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications (2004)
0.01
0.009182452 = product of:
0.027547356 = sum of:
0.027547356 = product of:
0.08264206 = sum of:
0.08264206 = weight(_text_:22 in 7196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08264206 = score(doc=7196,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7196, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7196)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1
-
MARC and metadata : METS, MODS, and MARCXML: current and future implications part 2 (2004)
0.01
0.009182452 = product of:
0.027547356 = sum of:
0.027547356 = product of:
0.08264206 = sum of:
0.08264206 = weight(_text_:22 in 2841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08264206 = score(doc=2841,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15257138 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2841, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2841)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2
-
Hert, C.A.; Denn, S.O.; Gillman, D.W.; Oh, J.S.; Pattuelli, M.C.; Hernandez, N.: Investigating and modeling metadata use to support information architecture development in the statistical knowledge network (2007)
0.01
0.009000885 = product of:
0.027002655 = sum of:
0.027002655 = product of:
0.081007965 = sum of:
0.081007965 = weight(_text_:network in 422) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081007965 = score(doc=422,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.41750383 = fieldWeight in 422, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=422)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Metadata and an appropriate metadata model are nontrivial components of information architecture conceptualization and implementation, particularly when disparate and dispersed systems are integrated. Metadata availability can enhance retrieval processes, improve information organization and navigation, and support management of digital objects. To support these activities efficiently, metadata need to be modeled appropriately for the tasks. The authors' work focuses on how to understand and model metadata requirements to support the work of end users of an integrative statistical knowledge network (SKN). They report on a series of user studies. These studies provide an understanding of metadata elements necessary for a variety of user-oriented tasks, related business rules associated with the use of these elements, and their relationship to other perspectives on metadata model development. This work demonstrates the importance of the user perspective in this type of design activity and provides a set of strategies by which the results of user studies can be systematically utilized to support that design.
-
Dempsey, L.: Metadata (1997)
0.01
0.008486116 = product of:
0.025458349 = sum of:
0.025458349 = product of:
0.076375045 = sum of:
0.076375045 = weight(_text_:network in 46) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076375045 = score(doc=46,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19402927 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.043569047 = queryNorm
0.3936264 = fieldWeight in 46, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4533744 = idf(docFreq=1398, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=46)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The term 'metadata' is becoming commonly used to refer to a variety of types of data which describe other data. A familiar example is bibliographic data, which describes a book or a serial article. Suggests that a routine definiton might be: 'metadata is data which describes attributes of a resource'. Gives some examples before looking at the Dublic Core, a simple response to the challenge of describing a wide range of network resources
