Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Beziehungen verbale / systematische Erschließung"
  1. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.12
    0.11690521 = product of:
      0.23381042 = sum of:
        0.056899026 = product of:
          0.17069708 = sum of:
            0.17069708 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17069708 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.006214318 = weight(_text_:in in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006214318 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.10626988 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.17069708 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17069708 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.36446604 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Vorgestellt wird die Konstruktion eines thematisch geordneten Thesaurus auf Basis der Sachschlagwörter der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) unter Nutzung der darin enthaltenen DDC-Notationen. Oberste Ordnungsebene dieses Thesaurus werden die DDC-Sachgruppen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek. Die Konstruktion des Thesaurus erfolgt regelbasiert unter der Nutzung von Linked Data Prinzipien in einem SPARQL Prozessor. Der Thesaurus dient der automatisierten Gewinnung von Metadaten aus wissenschaftlichen Publikationen mittels eines computerlinguistischen Extraktors. Hierzu werden digitale Volltexte verarbeitet. Dieser ermittelt die gefundenen Schlagwörter über Vergleich der Zeichenfolgen Benennungen im Thesaurus, ordnet die Treffer nach Relevanz im Text und gibt die zugeordne-ten Sachgruppen rangordnend zurück. Die grundlegende Annahme dabei ist, dass die gesuchte Sachgruppe unter den oberen Rängen zurückgegeben wird. In einem dreistufigen Verfahren wird die Leistungsfähigkeit des Verfahrens validiert. Hierzu wird zunächst anhand von Metadaten und Erkenntnissen einer Kurzautopsie ein Goldstandard aus Dokumenten erstellt, die im Online-Katalog der DNB abrufbar sind. Die Dokumente vertei-len sich über 14 der Sachgruppen mit einer Losgröße von jeweils 50 Dokumenten. Sämtliche Dokumente werden mit dem Extraktor erschlossen und die Ergebnisse der Kategorisierung do-kumentiert. Schließlich wird die sich daraus ergebende Retrievalleistung sowohl für eine harte (binäre) Kategorisierung als auch eine rangordnende Rückgabe der Sachgruppen beurteilt.
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  2. Scott, D.S.: Subject classification and natural-language processing for retrieval in large databases (1989) 0.04
    0.04421734 = product of:
      0.13265201 = sum of:
        0.012177527 = weight(_text_:in in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012177527 = score(doc=967,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
        0.12047449 = weight(_text_:great in 967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12047449 = score(doc=967,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24206476 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.49769527 = fieldWeight in 967, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=967)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    New forms of man-machine interaction are becoming available that have great power for the delivery of information. But the scales of speed and capacity on which the computing machines operate demand new thoughts as to how information can be stored and retrieved. The objective of the discussion in this paper is to argue for a combination of natural-language processing and subject classification to be able to meet the demands
    Source
    Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
  3. Unesco thesaurus : a structured list of descriptors for indexing and retrieving literature in the fields of education, science, social and human science, culture and communication and information (1995) 0.04
    0.03928422 = product of:
      0.11785266 = sum of:
        0.012428636 = weight(_text_:in in 7325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012428636 = score(doc=7325,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 7325, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7325)
        0.105424024 = weight(_text_:education in 7325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105424024 = score(doc=7325,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.520524 = fieldWeight in 7325, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7325)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 20(1996) no.2, S.108 (A. McCarthy); Journal of librarianship and information science 29(1997) no.3, S.165-166 (A. Gilchrist)
  4. Unesco thesaurus : a structured list of descriptors for indexing and retrieving literature in the fields of education, science, social science, culture and communication (1977) 0.03
    0.030456638 = product of:
      0.09136991 = sum of:
        0.007030698 = weight(_text_:in in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007030698 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
        0.08433922 = weight(_text_:education in 6424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08433922 = score(doc=6424,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.4164192 = fieldWeight in 6424, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6424)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
  5. Aitchison, J.: ¬A classification as a source for a thesaurus : the bibliographic classification of H.E. Bliss as a source of thesaurus terms and structure (1986) 0.02
    0.02357053 = product of:
      0.07071159 = sum of:
        0.007457182 = weight(_text_:in in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007457182 = score(doc=1569,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.12752387 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
        0.06325441 = weight(_text_:education in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06325441 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2025344 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.3123144 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7112455 = idf(docFreq=1080, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The second edition of the Bibliographic Classidication of H.E. Bliss (BC2), being prepared under the editorship of Jack Mills, Vanda Broughton and others, is a rich source of structure and terminology for thesauri covering different subject fields. The new edition employs facet analysis and is thesaurus-compatible. A number of facet-based thesauri have drawn upon Bliss for terms and relationships. In two of these thesauri the Bliss Classification was the source of both systematic and alphabetical displays. The DHSS-DATA thesaurus, published by the United Kingdom Department of Health and Social Security, provides controlled terms and Bliss class numbers for indexing and searching the DHSS-DATA database. The ECOT thesaurus (Educational courses and occupations thesaurus) prepared for the Department of Education and Science, uses the software sedigned for the British Standards Institution ROOT thesaurus to genearte an alphabetical display from the systematic display derived from the Bliss schedules. Problems, benefits, and future prospects of Bliss-based thesaurus construction are discussed
    Footnote
    Ähnlich auch in: Ranganathan's philosophy: assessment, impact and relevance
  6. Karg, H.: Mapping Dewey and subject authorities : CrissCross (2007) 0.02
    0.015164334 = product of:
      0.045493003 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
        0.034946956 = product of:
          0.06989391 = sum of:
            0.06989391 = weight(_text_:22 in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06989391 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  7. Root thesaurus. Pt.1.2 (1985) 0.01
    0.005824493 = product of:
      0.034946956 = sum of:
        0.034946956 = product of:
          0.06989391 = sum of:
            0.06989391 = weight(_text_:22 in 467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06989391 = score(doc=467,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15054214 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042989567 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 467, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2007 14:22:43
  8. Vickery, B.C.: Classificatory principles in natural language indexing systems (1976) 0.00
    0.002900015 = product of:
      0.01740009 = sum of:
        0.01740009 = weight(_text_:in in 1276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01740009 = score(doc=1276,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.29755569 = fieldWeight in 1276, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1276)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Classification in the 1970s: a second look. Rev. ed. Ed.: A. Maltby
  9. Green, R.: Making visible hidden relationships in the Dewey Decimal Classification : how relative index terms relate to DDC classes (2008) 0.00
    0.0027127159 = product of:
      0.016276294 = sum of:
        0.016276294 = weight(_text_:in in 2236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016276294 = score(doc=2236,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.27833787 = fieldWeight in 2236, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2236)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Relative Index (RI) terms in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system correspond to concepts that either approximate the whole of the class they index or that are in standing room there. DDC conventions and shallow natural language processing are used to determine automatically whether specific RI terms approximate the whole of or are in standing room in the classes they index. Approximately three-quarters of all RI terms are processed by the techniques described.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.11
    Source
    Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
  10. Frâncu, V.: Harmonizing a universal classification system with an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus : advantages and limitations (2000) 0.00
    0.0025369849 = product of:
      0.015221909 = sum of:
        0.015221909 = weight(_text_:in in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015221909 = score(doc=108,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.260307 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The case under consideration is a project of building an interdisciplinary multilingual thesaurus (Romanian-English-French) starting from a list of indexing terms based on an abridged version of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). The resulting thesaurus is intended for public libraries for both indexing and searching purposes in bibliographic databases covering a wide range of topics but with a fairly low level of specificity. The problems encountered in such an approach fall into two groups: 1) concordance or compatibility problems in terms of the indexing languages considered (between a classification system and a thesaurus); 2) equivalence and, hence, translatability problems in terms of the natural languages involved. Additionally, the question of ambiguity given the co-occurrence of terms in more than one class, will be discussed with reference to homographs and polysemantic words. In a thesaurus with such a wide coverage yet with a low specificity level, the method adopted in the thesaurus construction was to provide as many lead-in terms as possible and post them up to the closest in meaning broader term in order to improve the recall ratio
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  11. Wilson, T.D.: ¬The work of the British Classification Research Group (1972) 0.00
    0.0024857274 = product of:
      0.014914364 = sum of:
        0.014914364 = weight(_text_:in in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014914364 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Series
    Contributions in librarianship and information science; 3
    Source
    Subject retrieval in the seventies: new directions. Proc. of an int. symp. ... College Park, 14.-15.5.1971. Ed.: H.H. Wellisch u.a
  12. Panzer, M.: DDC in Germany : Recent Developments and Current Activities (2007) 0.00
    0.0024857274 = product of:
      0.014914364 = sum of:
        0.014914364 = weight(_text_:in in 98) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014914364 = score(doc=98,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 98, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=98)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Vortrag auf dem ALA Midwinter Meeting im Januar 2007 in Seattle.
  13. Gödert, W.: Komplementarität bei der Klassenbildung in der klassifikatorischen und verbalen Sacherschließung (1985) 0.00
    0.0024857274 = product of:
      0.014914364 = sum of:
        0.014914364 = weight(_text_:in in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014914364 = score(doc=3304,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.25504774 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Anwendungen in der Klassifikation. I. Proc. 8. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 10.4.-13.4.1984
  14. Austin, D.: ¬The CRG research into a freely faceted scheme (1976) 0.00
    0.0023435662 = product of:
      0.014061396 = sum of:
        0.014061396 = weight(_text_:in in 116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014061396 = score(doc=116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=116)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Classification in the 1970s. Rev. ed
  15. Frâncu, V.: ¬A universal classification system going through changes (2001) 0.00
    0.0020714393 = product of:
      0.012428636 = sum of:
        0.012428636 = weight(_text_:in in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012428636 = score(doc=1593,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21253976 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In the early 1990s, indexing with classification codes from the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) in an academic library, going from traditional to automated routines in any and all its activities, suddenly proved insufficient. Under the circumstances of online searching, the possibilities offered by the new OPAC looked much more attractive to indexers and searchers alike. Therefore, a quick shift to indexing with UDC and keywords instead of UDC numbers alone was made. Currency, precision and, more importantly, user-friendliness were strong advantages offered by keyword indexing and searching. But the larger the dictionary of keywords, the more problematic the consequences an information scattering, given the lack of control an terms. The present paper describes the advantages of the UDC in indexing by presenting some of the devices it is provided with: subdivision by analogy, common and special auxiliaries, use of synthesis, and use of connecting symbols. The solution of indexing with both UDC notation and words from a thesaurus based an UDC was prompted by some other characteristics of the schedules: a semi-faceted classification system, hierarchical organisation, richness in terminology and consistency and control of notation. The methodology used in building the thesaurus is conceived according to the international standards (ISO 2788 and 5964) to which some principles have been added, giving the specific approach of harmonising a classification structure with that of a thesaurus. Compatibility and translatability issues are also considered and some problems arising from them are treated in detail. Most of the problems discussed are illustrated with examples.
    Source
    Advances in classification research, vol.10: proceedings of the 10th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop. Ed.: Albrechtsen, H. u. J.E. Mai
  16. Dehnhard, H.: Probleme einer simultanen Bearbeitung alphabetischer und systematischer Sachkataloge mit Hilfe der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung (1968) 0.00
    0.0020506203 = product of:
      0.012303721 = sum of:
        0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012303721 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Elektronische Datenverarbeitung in der Universitätsbibliothek Bochum. Hrsg.: G. Pflug
  17. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschliessung (2005) 0.00
    0.0020506203 = product of:
      0.012303721 = sum of:
        0.012303721 = weight(_text_:in in 2183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012303721 = score(doc=2183,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2183, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2183)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    "Unsere Sitzung fand diesmal am 13. 9. 2005 in Bozen im Rahmen der ODOK statt. Es waren daher auch viele interessierte Südtiroler und italienische Sacherschließungskollegen/-innen zu Gast. Eine der beiden Konferenzsprachen war Englisch, und so konnten wir Mehrsprachigkeit, das Thema unserer Sitzung und der beiden Gastvorträge, gleich selbst praktizieren. Patrice LANDRY, der Leiter der Sacherschließung an derSLB in Bern, der seit kurzem den Vorsitz der IFLA-Sektion "Classification and Indexing" und der Arbeitsgruppe "Guidelines for subject access for national bibliographic agencies" übernommen hatte, referierte über den jüngsten Stand des Projekts MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects) und ließ uns am Nachmittag in seinem Workshop hinter die Kulissen der bereits mit echten Titeldaten operierenden Suchoberfläche blicken. Er zeigte die verschiedenen Recherche- und Editier-Funktionen im Management Linking System und brachte Beispiele für die kooperative Bearbeitung an einigen Datensätzen der bisher bereits miteinander verzahnten Normdateien SWD, LCSH und RAMEAU. Schließlich eröffnete er Ausblicke auf die künftige Einbindung weiterer Sprachen, etwa des Italienischen durch den Soggetario und auf die Anreicherung der Daten, etwa mit DDC-Notationen durch die Nähe zum DDB-Projekt "CrissCross". Federica PARADISI, die in der Sacherschließungsabteilung der BNC in Florenz sowohl für die italienische Übersetzung der DDC und deren Anwendung in ganz Italien als auch für die Überarbeitung des seit 1956 existierenden italienischen Wortschatzes für die verbale Erschließung und für dessen Aufbereitung zu einer modernen, bald auch elektronischen Normdatei zuständig ist und an der Erstellung der italienischen Nationalbibliografie mitwirkt, hat zuletzt gemeinsam mit Anna Lucarelli den Prototyp des "Nuovo Soggetario" erarbeitet und stellte dieses umfangreiche Projekt vor. Der von ihr skizzierte Zeitplan gibt Anlass zur Hoffnung, dass MACS für die Auffindung beschlagworteter Literatur in Bibliothekskatalogen schon in einem Jahr um einen sprachlichen Zugang reicher sein könnte. Beide Gastreferenten/-innen standen dem Auditorium im Anschluss an die Präsentationen für Fragen zur Verfügung, und die neuen fachlichen Kontakte vertieften sich in den Pausengesprächen noch mehr. Vor der Führung durch die Dewey-Ausstellung im Lichthof der UB Bozen demonstrierte Margit SANDNER zum Abschluss dieses multilingualen Sacherschließungsnachmittags mit einigen Beispielen in deutscherSprache die Suchfunktionen in den beiden Webversionen von DDC Deutsch MelvilSearch (für OPACs) und MelvilClass (für das Klassifizieren) und kündigte an, dass ab Oktober bis Jahresende kostenlose Testaccounts vergeben werden. Wer daran interessiert ist, diese deutschsprachigen Webtools bereits auszuprobieren, wendet sich am besten direkt an Herrn Dr. Lars Svensson in Der Deutschen Bibliothek in Frankfurt: svensson@dbf.ddb.de. Die ab Jänner 2006 gültigen Lizenzbedingungen für "Melvil" entnehmen Sie bitte: http//www.ddc-deutsch.de/licence-melvil.html Noch zwei aktuelle Hinweise: - Informationstag der Arbeitsstelle für Standardisierung (DDB) über aktuelle Tendenzen in Sachen Regelwerke f. Formal- und Sacherschließung, Formate, Normdateien und Datentausch am 15. November in Wien. - Aufsatz über die Zukunft der SWD von Esther Scheven (BD 2005, H. 6, S. 748-773), in dem u. a. auch auf unsere seinerzeitige KofSE-Studie: Schlagwort "Benutzerforschung" ... (VÖB-Mitt. 1997, H. 3-4, S. 28-49) rekurriert wird."
  18. Raghavan, K.S.: ¬The general theory of classification as the basis for structuring of subject headings (1985(?)) 0.00
    0.002029588 = product of:
      0.012177527 = sum of:
        0.012177527 = weight(_text_:in in 1830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012177527 = score(doc=1830,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1830, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1830)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Defines the basic functions of surrogate files in information retrieval. Exemplifies the categories enunciated in the general theory of classification developed in India. Defines the principles for structuring the concepts. Formulates set of general postulates pertaining to the structure of compound subjects. On the basis of these, outlines a procedure for structuring of subject headings. Demonstrates the application of procedure through examples
  19. Himanka, J.; Kautto, V.: Translation of the Finnish abridged edition of UDC into general Finnish subject headings (1992) 0.00
    0.0017758894 = product of:
      0.010655336 = sum of:
        0.010655336 = weight(_text_:in in 3943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010655336 = score(doc=3943,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 3943, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3943)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines a method of converting assigned UDC numbers into subject headings. The method consists of 2 phases: a dictionary is created that maps UDC numbers to subject headings; and this dictionary is then mechanically applied to convert the bibliographic databases. Tests 15 different UDC classes and records translation success and problems encountered. Closely examines problems encountered in each part and describes 3 main types of UDC classes: the synthetic; the shallow enumerative; and the deep enumerative. Findings show that the time spent in the first phase is tolerable. Considers the initial question of translatability of the whole UDC in the light of the results
  20. Austin, D.: Citation order and linguistic structure (1976) 0.00
    0.0017576744 = product of:
      0.010546046 = sum of:
        0.010546046 = weight(_text_:in in 2804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010546046 = score(doc=2804,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058476754 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042989567 = queryNorm
            0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2804, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2804)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    The variety of librarianship. Essays in honor of J. W. Metcalfe. Ed. by W. Boyd Rayward