-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.28
0.28225923 = product of:
0.49395365 = sum of:
0.064395666 = product of:
0.193187 = sum of:
0.193187 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.193187 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.193187 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.043183967 = weight(_text_:management in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043183967 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.193187 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.27
0.26699966 = product of:
0.4672494 = sum of:
0.064395666 = product of:
0.193187 = sum of:
0.193187 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.193187 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.193187 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.193187 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.193187 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.016479723 = product of:
0.032959446 = sum of:
0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032959446 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.26
0.25758266 = product of:
0.60102624 = sum of:
0.08586089 = product of:
0.25758266 = sum of:
0.25758266 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25758266 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25758266 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25758266 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.25758266 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25758266 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.23
0.22538485 = product of:
0.525898 = sum of:
0.07512829 = product of:
0.22538485 = sum of:
0.22538485 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22538485 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.22538485 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22538485 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.22538485 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22538485 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.16
0.16098918 = product of:
0.3756414 = sum of:
0.05366306 = product of:
0.16098918 = sum of:
0.16098918 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16098918 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16098918 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.16098918 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16098918 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Rademaker, C.A.: ¬The classification of plants in the United States Patent Classification System (2000)
0.15
0.1516581 = product of:
0.5308033 = sum of:
0.22558065 = weight(_text_:united in 6200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22558065 = score(doc=6200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.9917372 = fieldWeight in 6200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6200)
0.30522266 = sum of:
0.2173308 = weight(_text_:states in 6200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2173308 = score(doc=6200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.97343355 = fieldWeight in 6200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6200)
0.08789186 = weight(_text_:22 in 6200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08789186 = score(doc=6200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6200)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- World patent information. 22(2000), S.301-307
-
Rademaker, C.A.: ¬The classification of ornamental designs in the United States Patent Classification System (2000)
0.15
0.1516581 = product of:
0.5308033 = sum of:
0.22558065 = weight(_text_:united in 6308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22558065 = score(doc=6308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.9917372 = fieldWeight in 6308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6308)
0.30522266 = sum of:
0.2173308 = weight(_text_:states in 6308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2173308 = score(doc=6308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.97343355 = fieldWeight in 6308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6308)
0.08789186 = weight(_text_:22 in 6308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08789186 = score(doc=6308,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6308, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6308)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- World patent information. 22(2000), S.123-133
-
Revised UDC tables (2001)
0.13
0.13360967 = product of:
0.3117559 = sum of:
0.061071347 = weight(_text_:management in 7628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061071347 = score(doc=7628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 7628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7628)
0.16918549 = weight(_text_:united in 7628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16918549 = score(doc=7628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.7438029 = fieldWeight in 7628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7628)
0.08149905 = product of:
0.1629981 = sum of:
0.1629981 = weight(_text_:states in 7628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1629981 = score(doc=7628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.7300752 = fieldWeight in 7628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7628)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Contains among others new or revised tables for religion, management, United States and South-America
-
Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005)
0.13
0.12879133 = product of:
0.30051312 = sum of:
0.042930447 = product of:
0.12879133 = sum of:
0.12879133 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12879133 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.12879133 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12879133 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.12879133 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12879133 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34373808 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
-
Elichirigoity, F.; Malone, C.K.: Measuring the new economy : industrial classification and open source software production (2005)
0.12
0.120828524 = product of:
0.28193322 = sum of:
0.15659094 = weight(_text_:industry in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15659094 = score(doc=5039,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.66592443 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084592745 = score(doc=5039,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
0.040749524 = product of:
0.08149905 = sum of:
0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08149905 = score(doc=5039,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This paper analyzes the way in which the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) handles the categorization of open source software production, foregrounding theoretical and political aspects of knowledge organization. NAICS is the industry classification seheme used by the governments of Canada, Mexico and the United States to carry out their respective economic censuses. NAICS is considered a rational system that uses the underlying economic principle of similar production processes as the basis for its classes. For the Information Sector of the economy, as formulated in NAICS, a key production process is the acquisition and defense of copyright. With open source, copyleft licensing eliminates copyright acquisition and protection as major production processes, suggesting that the open source software industry warrants a separate NAICS category. More importantly, our analysis suggests that NAICS cannot be understood as a taxonomy of objective economic activity but is instead a politically and historically contingent system of data classification.
-
Auletta, K: Googled : the end of the world as we know it (2009)
0.12
0.11636442 = product of:
0.27151698 = sum of:
0.10439395 = weight(_text_:industry in 1991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10439395 = score(doc=1991,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.4439496 = fieldWeight in 1991, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1991)
0.112790324 = weight(_text_:united in 1991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112790324 = score(doc=1991,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.4958686 = fieldWeight in 1991, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1991)
0.0543327 = product of:
0.1086654 = sum of:
0.1086654 = weight(_text_:states in 1991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1086654 = score(doc=1991,freq=8.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.48671678 = fieldWeight in 1991, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- There are companies that create waves and those that ride or are drowned by them. This is a ride on the Google wave, and the fullest account of how it formed and crashed into traditional media businesses. With unprecedented access to Google's founders and executives, as well as to those in media who are struggling to keep their heads above water, Ken Auletta reveals how the industry is being disrupted and redefined. On one level Auletta uses Google as a stand-in for the digital revolution as a whole - and goes inside Google's closed door meetings, introducing Google's notoriously private founders, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, as well as those who work with - and against - them. In "Googled", the reader discovers the 'secret sauce' of the company's success and why the worlds of 'new' and 'old' media often communicate as if residents of different planets. It may send chills down traditionalists' spines, but it's a crucial roadmap to the future of media business: the Google story may well be the canary in the coal mine. "Googled" is candid, objective and authoritative - based on extensive research including in-house at Google HQ. Crucially, it's not just a history or reportage: it's forward-looking. This book is ahead of the curve and, unlike any other Google books, which tend to have been near-histories, somewhat starstruck, to be now out of date or which fail to look at the full synthesis of business and technology.
- LCSH
- Internet industry / United States
Web search engines / United States / History
- Subject
- Internet industry / United States
Web search engines / United States / History
-
Heide, L.: Punched-card systems and the early information explosion, 1880-1945 (2009)
0.10
0.10347433 = product of:
0.24144009 = sum of:
0.020357117 = weight(_text_:management in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020357117 = score(doc=3345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
0.14920756 = weight(_text_:united in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14920756 = score(doc=3345,freq=14.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.6559725 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
0.07187541 = product of:
0.14375082 = sum of:
0.14375082 = weight(_text_:states in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14375082 = score(doc=3345,freq=14.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.6438658 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- At a time when Internet use is closely tracked and social networking sites supply data for targeted advertising, Lars Heide presents the first academic study of the invention that fueled today's information revolution: the punched card. Early punched cards were first developed to process the United States census in 1890. They were soon used to calculate invoices and to issue pay slips. As demand for more sophisticated systems and reading machines increased in both the United States and Europe, punched cards were no longer a simple data-processing tool. Insurance companies, public utilities, businesses, and governments all used them to keep detailed records of their customers, competitors, employees, citizens, and enemies. The United States used punched-card registers in the late 1930s to pay roughly 21 million Americans their Social Security pensions; Vichy France used similar technologies in an attempt to mobilize an army against the occupying German forces; Germans in 1941 developed several punched-card registers to make the war effort more effective. Heide's analysis of these three major punched-card systems, as well as the impact of the invention on Great Britain, illustrates how industrial nations established administrative systems that enabled them to locate and control their citizens, for better or for worse. Heide's comparative study of the development of punched-card systems in the United States, Great Britain, France, and Germany explores how different cultures collected personal and financial data and how they adapted to new technologies. He examines this history for both its business and technological implications in today's information-dependent society. "Punched-Card Systems in the Early Information Explosion, 1880-1945" will interest students and scholars from a wide range of disciplines, including the history of technology, computer science, business history, and management and organizational studies.
- Content
- Inhalt: Punched cards and the 1890 United States census -- New users, new machines -- U.S. challengers to Hollerith -- The rise of international business machines -- Decline of punched cards for European census processing -- Punched cards for general statistics in Europe -- Different roads to European punched-card bookkeeping -- Keeping tabs on society with punched cards.
- LCSH
- Information technology / United States
- Subject
- Information technology / United States
-
Bartolo, L.M.; Trimble, A.M.: Heterogeneous structures project database : vocabulary mapping within a multidisciplinary, multiinstitutional research group (2000)
0.10
0.098794065 = product of:
0.1728896 = sum of:
0.074582644 = weight(_text_:industry in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074582644 = score(doc=89,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.3171729 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.025190646 = weight(_text_:management in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025190646 = score(doc=89,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.18433036 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.049345765 = weight(_text_:united in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049345765 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.2169425 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.023770556 = product of:
0.04754111 = sum of:
0.04754111 = weight(_text_:states in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04754111 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.21293859 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- This paper will explore the information processes and work situations of interdisciplinary scientists. The analysis focuses on information exchange between intellectual domains. In this paper we will discuss the problem of determining a useful level of subject specificity for vocabulary mapping in the building of Entry Vocabulary Modules (EVM's). We tested the sensitivity of our association dictionary building method to two subdomains for two domains within an existing database. The ALCOM/NIST Heterogeneous Structures Database (http://hsp.kent.edu) is an online information system involving chemists and physicists from university research centers, government agencies, and industry in the ALCOM/NIST Heterogeneous Structures Project. We selected journal articles from the database as the training data sets at the subdomain levels and found that the notion of subdomain is useful The concepts, design and implementation of vocabulary mapping in the Heterogeneous Structures Project can provide a "bridge" to help researchers shift their efforts away from their core specialization to the peripheral domains that infuse their interdisciplinary work.The Center for Advanced Liquid Crystalline Optical Materials (ALCOM) is one of 25 NSF Science and Technology Centers and represents the largest concentration of liquid crystal research in the United States. One of five major ALCOM research projects, the Heterogeneous Structures Project involves: university physicists, chemists, and mathematicians from ALCOM (Kent State University, Case Western Reserve University, The University of Akron) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA); national laboratories at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and industrial partners at General Motors. Researchers investigate the process of phase separation, which produces heterogeneous liquid crystalline materials, in order to understand the relationship between morphology and bulk physical properties. The project goal is to design and fabricate heterogeneous structures with desired optical and physical properties. The goal of the information management work within the Heterogeneous Structures Project is to develop an information gateway to facilitate scientific partnerships among multi-institutional, multidisciplinary research teams in the area of liquid crystal research. Research conducted by Michael Buckland and others at the School of Information Management and Systems, University of California at Berkeley, produced a method of providing links between different metadata vocabularies, such as categorization codes, classification numbers, and index and thesaurus terms. The procedure renders a "natural language" index to metadata vocabularies called an Entry Vocabulary Module. A metadata vocabulary called a "training set" is derived from highly ranked journals in the field. The first stage is the creation of an Entry Vocabulary Module, a dictionary of associations between lexical terms found in titles, authors, and the metadata vocaulary such as the cateogry codes, classification numbers, or thesaurus terms. A probability ratio statistic is used as a measure of association. As a second step the dictionary is used to predict which of the metadata terms best represent the topic in the researcher's terms. The Heterogeneous Structures Database exploits the collaborative creation and rapid transfer of knowledge between academia, government, and industry through organization and retrieval within an online environment. The Database is the first stage of a multi-phase online information system to encompass and interconnect the major research projects in ALCOM. The long-term project, the Basic and Applied Liquid Crystal Research Database, will make available a comprehensive formal and informal knowledge base of basic and applied research in liquid crystal science
-
Lee-Smeltzer, K.-H. (Janet): Cataloging in three academic libraries: operations, trends, and perspectives (2000)
0.10
0.098394394 = product of:
0.22958691 = sum of:
0.030535674 = weight(_text_:management in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030535674 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084592745 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.114458494 = sum of:
0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08149905 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032959446 = score(doc=5386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5386)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This article describes the cataloging operations and management in three medium-sized academic libraries - Oregon State University, University of Houston, and Colorado State University. It provides an overview of the staffing and organizational structure of the cataloging department in each library. Faced with similar challenges from constantly changing environments brought about by technology and institutional pressure to achieve more with less, library technical services in these three libraries, cataloging in particular, are developing some common strategies for coping. These trends include: (1) changing the roles and responsibilities of both professional and support staff (2) designing workflow around library systems and limited personnel resources, (3) mainstreaming government documents cataloging and processing into technical services, (4) using technology to increase cataloging efficiency, and (5) dealing with bibliographic control of current electronic resources and moving into digitization and metadata arenas.
- Date
- 27. 7.2006 18:22:11
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Managing cataloging and the organization of information: philosophies, practices and challenges at the onset of the 21st century. Part II: Specialized and academic libraries in the United States"
-
Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005)
0.10
0.098394394 = product of:
0.22958691 = sum of:
0.030535674 = weight(_text_:management in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030535674 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.084592745 = weight(_text_:united in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084592745 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.37190145 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.114458494 = sum of:
0.08149905 = weight(_text_:states in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08149905 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.3650376 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.032959446 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032959446 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Falasco, L.: United States Patent Classification : system organization (2002)
0.10
0.095498875 = product of:
0.33424604 = sum of:
0.22558065 = weight(_text_:united in 6192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22558065 = score(doc=6192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.9917372 = fieldWeight in 6192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6192)
0.1086654 = product of:
0.2173308 = sum of:
0.2173308 = weight(_text_:states in 6192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2173308 = score(doc=6192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.97343355 = fieldWeight in 6192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
-
Elichirigoity, F.; Knott Malone, C.: Representing the global economy : the North American Industry Classification System (2003)
0.10
0.09538619 = product of:
0.22256778 = sum of:
0.10439395 = weight(_text_:industry in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10439395 = score(doc=2739,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2351482 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.4439496 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
0.0797548 = weight(_text_:united in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0797548 = score(doc=2739,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.35063204 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
0.03841902 = product of:
0.07683804 = sum of:
0.07683804 = weight(_text_:states in 2739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07683804 = score(doc=2739,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.34416074 = fieldWeight in 2739, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2739)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The recent transformation of separate economic classification schemes in Canada, Mexico, and the United States into a single North American system makes it possible to collect and organize data across these nations' boundaries. In reconstructing the development of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) as it coincided with the creation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), we foreground the fundamental roles of economic theory and political context. Although it remains to be seen how effective NAICS will be as a component of an information infrastructure designed to support a new regime of production and consumption, it is clear that the system makes possible the transnational data collection and analysis that will shape future understanding of the NAFTA-generated space of economic activity. 1. Background of NAICS In the past decade, the United States govemment transformed its industrial classification scheme for the organization of economic data from a purely national to a supranational endeavor involving Canada and Mexico. The change coincided with the three countries' signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and reflected their interest in facilitating the integration of businessrelated knowledge across national boundaries in the new NAFTA-generated spaces of production. The result is the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), which divides the economy into twenty broad "Sectors" designated by two-digit class numbers and then into finer distinctions down to the five-digit level for transnational comparability and down to the six-digit level for country-specific data. NAICS replaces the U.S. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC), Canada's Standard Industrial Classification, and Mexico's Clasificación Mexicana de Actividades y Productos.
-
Choo, C.W.: Perspectives on managing knowledge in organizations (2003)
0.09
0.089115806 = product of:
0.20793688 = sum of:
0.061704237 = weight(_text_:management in 5519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061704237 = score(doc=5519,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13666032 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 5519, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5519)
0.09869153 = weight(_text_:united in 5519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09869153 = score(doc=5519,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.433885 = fieldWeight in 5519, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5519)
0.04754111 = product of:
0.09508222 = sum of:
0.09508222 = weight(_text_:states in 5519) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09508222 = score(doc=5519,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 5519, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5519)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This paper compares two influential attempts at presenting a comprehensive framework of knowledge management. For each perspective the author examines theoretical foundations, highlights conceptual elements and themes, and discusses the role of information and information management. Ikujiro Nonaka and Hirotaka Takeuchi analyze the dynamics of knowledge creation, particularly the importance of tacit knowledge and its conversion into explicit knowledge. Thomas H. Davenport and Lawrence Prusak focus on the design of organizational processes that enable knowledge generation, codification, and transfer. It is suggested that, to a degree, the concepts and practices of each model reflect the national cultures of their authors - Japan and the United States.
- Theme
- Information Resources Management
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002)
0.09
0.08699247 = product of:
0.30447364 = sum of:
0.17093875 = weight(_text_:united in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17093875 = score(doc=5479,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.7515109 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.13353491 = sum of:
0.09508222 = weight(_text_:states in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09508222 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.42587718 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.03845269 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03845269 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14198048 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the development of descriptive cataloging from 1830 to 1908 and focuses on the careers of Antonio Panizzi, Charles Coffin Jewett, and Charles Ammi Cutter and the development of the American Library Association (ALA) and the Library Association of the United Kingdom (LAUK). It analyzes the various rules and codes put forth by both Americans and British librarians and the eventual cooperation between the United States and the United Kingdom.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
-
Smith, A.: Digital collection development : who is doing what in the United States? (2001)
0.08
0.08356151 = product of:
0.29246527 = sum of:
0.19738306 = weight(_text_:united in 6950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19738306 = score(doc=6950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2274601 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.86777 = fieldWeight in 6950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6950)
0.09508222 = product of:
0.19016445 = sum of:
0.19016445 = weight(_text_:states in 6950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19016445 = score(doc=6950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22326207 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.04054466 = queryNorm
0.85175437 = fieldWeight in 6950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6950)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
