Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Albright, K."
  1. Albright, K.: Multidisciplinarity in information behavior : expanding boundaries or fragmentation of the field? (2010) 0.02
    0.024054427 = product of:
      0.060136065 = sum of:
        0.04505062 = weight(_text_:study in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04505062 = score(doc=5077,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1448085 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044537213 = queryNorm
            0.3111048 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
        0.015085445 = product of:
          0.03017089 = sum of:
            0.03017089 = weight(_text_:22 in 5077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03017089 = score(doc=5077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15596174 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044537213 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5077)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    How does information lead to changes in human behavior? Why have current information theories been inadequate to shed light on this and related questions? Library and Information Science (LIS) has arrived at a crucial juncture in its relatively brief theoretical history. In addition to the cognitive and physical perspectives in our study of information, a new paradigm has been suggested; the affective paradigm. This new perspective offers keys to unlocking questions about the nature of the interaction of human and information. In recent years we have developed deeper knowledge and deeper specializations, drawing together and combining knowledge from multiple fields in order to advance our own knowledge. The relationship between information needs and information seeking has been well studied. The ways in which people use information is not as well understood because of the complex nature of human behavior. Drawing from other fields that study human behavior, however, muddies the traditional boundaries of LIS, creating some possible discomfort as we trespass into lesser known intellectual territory. Pushing our boundaries also forces questions of our self-identity as a discipline. What constitutes Library and Information Science, either in whole or in part, becomes more difficult to define and can lead to greater fragmentation. Alternatively, the incorporation of multiple perspectives may be the defining core of what constitutes LIS. The focus of this talk is to look at LIS from the outside in, from a multidisciplinary perspective, in order to shed light on questions of how information can lead to changes in human behavior. Drawing from other fields of study, the impact of information on human behavior will be explored in light of what other fields may have to offer.
    Date
    16. 3.2019 17:32:22