Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bawden, D."
  1. Rowlands, I.; Bawden, D.: Building the digital library on solid research foundations (1999) 0.06
    0.057698686 = product of:
      0.11539737 = sum of:
        0.11539737 = sum of:
          0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06581766 = score(doc=730,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
          0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04957971 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The digital library is a socio-technical concept of great significance. It redefines the relationships between information providers and intermediaries and, potentially, transforms the way that services are delivered to users. This article, based on a British Library Research & Innovation Centre funded study, reviews current themes and directions in digital library research and scholarship. It locates the digital library in a simple work-oriented framework emphasising its social as well as its systems and informational dimensions. The article highlights differences in understanding of the digital library construct between the library and computer science communities and identifies some critical areas for further research.
    Date
    21. 1.2007 12:03:22
  2. Bawden, D.: Google and the universe of knowledge (2008) 0.02
    0.024789855 = product of:
      0.04957971 = sum of:
        0.04957971 = product of:
          0.09915942 = sum of:
            0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09915942 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 6.2008 16:22:20
  3. Bawden, D.: Information policy or knowledge policy? (1997) 0.01
    0.012394927 = product of:
      0.024789855 = sum of:
        0.024789855 = product of:
          0.04957971 = sum of:
            0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04957971 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands
  4. Bawden, D.: Encountering on the road to serendip? : Browsing in new information environments (2011) 0.01
    0.012394927 = product of:
      0.024789855 = sum of:
        0.024789855 = product of:
          0.04957971 = sum of:
            0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04957971 = score(doc=3361,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  5. Bawden, D.: Information as self-organized complexity : a unifying viewpoint (2007) 0.01
    0.009972882 = product of:
      0.019945765 = sum of:
        0.019945765 = product of:
          0.03989153 = sum of:
            0.03989153 = weight(_text_:research in 649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03989153 = score(doc=649,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2674672 = fieldWeight in 649, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Introduction. This short paper proposes that a unified concept of information as a form of self-organized complexity may be equally applicable to the physical, biological and human/social domains. This is seen as the evolutionary emergence of organized complexity in the physical universe, meaning in context in the biological domain, and understanding through knowledge in the human domain. Method.This study is based on analysis of literature from a wide range of disciplines. Conclusions.This perspective allows for the possibility that not only may the library/information sciences be able to draw insights from the natural sciences, but that library and information science research and scholarship may in turn contribute insights to these disciplines, normally thought of as more 'fundamental'.
    Source
    Information research. 12(2007) no.4, S
  6. Bawden, D.: Supporting truth and promoting understanding : knowledge Organization and the curation of the infosphere (2018) 0.01
    0.009402524 = product of:
      0.018805047 = sum of:
        0.018805047 = product of:
          0.037610095 = sum of:
            0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 1472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037610095 = score(doc=1472,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 1472, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  7. Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Global knowledge organization, "super-facets" and music : universal music classification in the digital age (2018) 0.01
    0.009402524 = product of:
      0.018805047 = sum of:
        0.018805047 = product of:
          0.037610095 = sum of:
            0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037610095 = score(doc=4746,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  8. Haider, J.; Bawden, D.: Conceptions of "information poverty" in LIS : a discourse analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.008310735 = product of:
      0.01662147 = sum of:
        0.01662147 = product of:
          0.03324294 = sum of:
            0.03324294 = weight(_text_:research in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03324294 = score(doc=607,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To provide an analysis of the notion of "information poverty" in library and information science (LIS) by investigating concepts, interests and strategies leading to its construction and thus to examine its role as a constitutive element of the professional discourse. Design/methodology/approach - Starting from a Foucauldian notion of discourse, "information poverty" is examined as a statement in its relation to other statements in order to highlight assumptions and factors contributing to its construction. The analysis is based on repeated and close reading of 35 English language articles published in LIS journals between 1995 and 2005. Findings - Four especially productive discursive procedures are identified: economic determinism, technological determinism and the "information society", historicising the "information poor", and the library profession's moral obligation and responsibility. Research limitations/implications - The material selection is linguistically and geographically biased. Most of the included articles originate in English-speaking countries. Therefore, results and findings are fully applicable only in an English language context. Originality/value - The focus on overlapping and at times conflicting discursive procedures, i.e. the results of alliances and connections between statements, highlights how the "information poor" emerge as a category in LIS as the product of institutionally contingent, professional discourse. By challenging often unquestioned underlying assumptions, this article is intended to contribute to a critical examination of LIS discourse, as well as to the analysis of the discourses of information, which dominate contemporary society. It is furthermore seen to add to the development of discourse analytical approaches in LIS research.
  9. Gorichanaz, T.; Furner, J.; Ma, L.; Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.; Dixon, D.; Herold, K.; Obelitz Søe, S.; Martens, B. Van der Veer; Floridi, L.: Information and design : book symposium on Luciano Floridi's The Logic of Information (2020) 0.01
    0.008310735 = product of:
      0.01662147 = sum of:
        0.01662147 = product of:
          0.03324294 = sum of:
            0.03324294 = weight(_text_:research in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03324294 = score(doc=5710,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss Luciano Floridi's 2019 book The Logic of Information: A Theory of Philosophy as Conceptual Design, the latest instalment in his philosophy of information (PI) tetralogy, particularly with respect to its implications for library and information studies (LIS). Design/methodology/approach Nine scholars with research interests in philosophy and LIS read and responded to the book, raising critical and heuristic questions in the spirit of scholarly dialogue. Floridi responded to these questions. Findings Floridi's PI, including this latest publication, is of interest to LIS scholars, and much insight can be gained by exploring this connection. It seems also that LIS has the potential to contribute to PI's further development in some respects. Research limitations/implications Floridi's PI work is technical philosophy for which many LIS scholars do not have the training or patience to engage with, yet doing so is rewarding. This suggests a role for translational work between philosophy and LIS. Originality/value The book symposium format, not yet seen in LIS, provides forum for sustained, multifaceted and generative dialogue around ideas.
  10. Lee, D.; Robinson, L.; Bawden, D.: Orthogonality, dependency, and music : an exploration of the relationships between music facets (2021) 0.01
    0.008310735 = product of:
      0.01662147 = sum of:
        0.01662147 = product of:
          0.03324294 = sum of:
            0.03324294 = weight(_text_:research in 212) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03324294 = score(doc=212,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 212, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=212)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The classification of Western art music is a complex area of knowledge organization, yet the reasons for those complexities have not been fully studied. This research dissects the concept of orthogonality, in particular regard to music classification. Orthogonality (antonym: dependency) means that one facet acts independently from another facet. Although orthogonality is an assumed quality of facets, it has attracted relatively little attention in knowledge organization discourse. This research utilizes bibliographic classification schemes, musicological writings, and musical works to analyze orthogonality in music classification. The relationships between the medium, form/genre, and function facets are unpicked and a strong dependency is found between these facets. Whether this orthogonality exists as a construct of faceted classification or stems from the domain knowledge is explored. Furthermore, the analysis initiates new thinking about the general concept of orthogonality. The idea of a spectrum of dependency is proposed. In addition, novel, orthogonality-derived phenomena are discussed-"dynamic facets" and "meta-dependency"-where the boundary between what is and is not a facet is blurred. The concluding model visualizes the chain of dependencies between music facets, ultimately showing how the lack of orthogonality plays a key role in the complexity and issues found in music classification.
  11. Wade, S.J.; Willett, P.; Bawden, D.: SIBRIS : the Sandwich Interactive Browsing and Ranking Information System (1989) 0.01
    0.008227208 = product of:
      0.016454415 = sum of:
        0.016454415 = product of:
          0.03290883 = sum of:
            0.03290883 = weight(_text_:research in 2828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03290883 = score(doc=2828,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 2828, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2828)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    SIBRIS (Sandwich Interactive Browsing and Ranking Information System) is an interactive text retrieval system which has been developed to support the browsing of library and product files at Pfizer Central Research, Sandwich, UK. Once an initial ranking has been produced, the system will allow the user to select any document displayed on the screen at any point during the browse and to use that as the basis for another search. Facilities have been included to enable the user to keep track of the browse and to facilitate backtracking, thus allowing the user to move away from the original query to wander in and out of different areas of interest.
  12. Bawden, D.: Users, user studies and human information behaviour : a three-decade perspective on Tom Wilson's "On user studies and information needs" (2006) 0.01
    0.007051893 = product of:
      0.014103786 = sum of:
        0.014103786 = product of:
          0.028207572 = sum of:
            0.028207572 = weight(_text_:research in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028207572 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review Wilson's (1981) seminal article, "On user studies and information needs" (Journal of Documentation, 1981, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 3-15) as part of a series celebrating the Journal's 60th anniversary. Design/methodology/approach - This paper adopts a literature-based conceptual analysis, taking Wilson's paper as the starting point, and evaluating the significance of, and later developments in, the issues dealt with in that article. Findings - Wilson's article has had a significant effect on the development of information science. It dealt with several fundamental issues, including the nature of information itself and of information need, models of information seeking and information behaviour, particularly those based on phenomenological or "whole life" concepts, appropriate research methods for these areas, and the nature of information science as an academic discipline. Originality/value - The paper provides a perspective on the development of information science over 30 years, with particular emphasis on the study of human information behaviour.
  13. Bawden, D.; Robinson, L.; Siddiqui, T.: "Potentialities or possibilities" : towards quantum information science? (2015) 0.01
    0.007051893 = product of:
      0.014103786 = sum of:
        0.014103786 = product of:
          0.028207572 = sum of:
            0.028207572 = weight(_text_:research in 1659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028207572 = score(doc=1659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 1659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The use of quantum concepts and formalisms in the information sciences is assessed through an analysis of published literature. Five categories are identified: use of loose analogies and metaphors between concepts in quantum physics and library/information science; use of quantum concepts and formalisms in information retrieval; use of quantum concepts and formalisms in studying meaning and concepts; quantum social science, in areas adjacent to information science; and the qualitative application of quantum concepts in the information disciplines. Quantum issues have led to demonstrable progress in information retrieval and semantic modelling, with less clear-cut progress elsewhere. Whether there may be a future "quantum turn" in the information sciences is debated, the implications of such a turn are considered, and a research agenda outlined.
  14. Brophy, J.; Bawden, D.: Is Google enough? : Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources (2005) 0.01
    0.005876578 = product of:
      0.011753156 = sum of:
        0.011753156 = product of:
          0.023506312 = sum of:
            0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023506312 = score(doc=648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=648)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of the study was to compare an internet search engine, Google, with appropriate library databases and systems, in order to assess the relative value, strengths and weaknesses of the two sorts of system. Design/methodology/approach - A case study approach was used, with detailed analysis and failure checking of results. The performance of the two systems was assessed in terms of coverage, unique records, precision, and quality and accessibility of results. A novel form of relevance assessment, based on the work of Saracevic and others was devised. Findings - Google is superior for coverage and accessibility. Library systems are superior for quality of results. Precision is similar for both systems. Good coverage requires use of both, as both have many unique items. Improving the skills of the searcher is likely to give better results from the library systems, but not from Google. Research limitations/implications - Only four case studies were included. These were limited to the kind of queries likely to be searched by university students. Library resources were limited to those in two UK academic libraries. Only the basic Google web search functionality was used, and only the top ten records examined. Practical implications - The results offer guidance for those providing support and training for use of these retrieval systems, and also provide evidence for debates on the "Google phenomenon". Originality/value - This is one of the few studies which provide evidence on the relative performance of internet search engines and library databases, and the only one to conduct such in-depth case studies. The method for the assessment of relevance is novel.