-
Berti, Jr., D.W.; Lima, G.; Maculan, B.; Soergel, D.: Computer-assisted checking of conceptual relationships in a large thesaurus (2018)
0.05
0.04713631 = product of:
0.09427262 = sum of:
0.09427262 = sum of:
0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037610095 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.056662526 = weight(_text_:22 in 4721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056662526 = score(doc=4721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4721)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 1.2019 19:04:22
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Fidel, R.; Soergel, D.: Factors affecting online bibliographic retrieval : a conceptual framework for research (1983)
0.02
0.018805047 = product of:
0.037610095 = sum of:
0.037610095 = product of:
0.07522019 = sum of:
0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07522019 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.504341 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014)
0.02
0.017529076 = product of:
0.035058152 = sum of:
0.035058152 = product of:
0.070116304 = sum of:
0.070116304 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070116304 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-32
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Soergel, D.: Software support for thesaurus construction and display (1994)
0.02
0.016454415 = product of:
0.03290883 = sum of:
0.03290883 = product of:
0.06581766 = sum of:
0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 8890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06581766 = score(doc=8890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 8890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 5th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 16, 1994, Alexandria, VA. Ed.: R. Fidel u.a
-
Soergel, D.: Framework for data element standardization (1995)
0.02
0.016454415 = product of:
0.03290883 = sum of:
0.03290883 = product of:
0.06581766 = sum of:
0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 4574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06581766 = score(doc=4574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 4574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Proceedings of the 6th ASIS SIG/CR Classification Research Workshop, Oct. 8, 1995, Chicago, IL. Ed.: R.P. Schwartz et al
-
Soergel, D.: Data structure and software support for for integrated thesauri (1996)
0.01
0.014103786 = product of:
0.028207572 = sum of:
0.028207572 = product of:
0.056415144 = sum of:
0.056415144 = weight(_text_:research in 6052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056415144 = score(doc=6052,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.37825575 = fieldWeight in 6052, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6052)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Compatibility and integration of order systems: Research Seminar Proceedings of the TIP/ISKO Meeting, Warsaw, 13-15 September 1995
-
Soergel, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance : the logical evidence (1997)
0.01
0.013297176 = product of:
0.026594352 = sum of:
0.026594352 = product of:
0.053188704 = sum of:
0.053188704 = weight(_text_:research in 578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053188704 = score(doc=578,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.35662293 = fieldWeight in 578, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=578)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist
-
Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006)
0.01
0.010624223 = product of:
0.021248447 = sum of:
0.021248447 = product of:
0.042496894 = sum of:
0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042496894 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:04:19
-
Ahn, J.-w.; Soergel, D.; Lin, X.; Zhang, M.: Mapping between ARTstor terms and the Getty Art and Architecture Thesaurus (2014)
0.01
0.010624223 = product of:
0.021248447 = sum of:
0.021248447 = product of:
0.042496894 = sum of:
0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042496894 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Balakrishnan, U.; Voß, J.; Soergel, D.: Towards integrated systems for KOS management, mapping, and access : Coli-conc and its collaborative computer-assisted KOS mapping tool Cocoda (2018)
0.01
0.009402524 = product of:
0.018805047 = sum of:
0.018805047 = product of:
0.037610095 = sum of:
0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 4825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037610095 = score(doc=4825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 4825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
-
Zhang, P.; Soergel, D.: Towards a comprehensive model of the cognitive process and mechanisms of individual sensemaking (2014)
0.01
0.00885352 = product of:
0.01770704 = sum of:
0.01770704 = product of:
0.03541408 = sum of:
0.03541408 = weight(_text_:22 in 1344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03541408 = score(doc=1344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:55:39
-
Soergel, D.: Unleashing the power of data through organization : structure and connections for meaning, learning and discovery (2015)
0.01
0.00885352 = product of:
0.01770704 = sum of:
0.01770704 = product of:
0.03541408 = sum of:
0.03541408 = weight(_text_:22 in 2376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03541408 = score(doc=2376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2376)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27.11.2015 20:52:22
-
Wang, P.; Soergel, D.: ¬A cognitive model of document use during a research project : Study I: Document selection (1998)
0.01
0.008310735 = product of:
0.01662147 = sum of:
0.01662147 = product of:
0.03324294 = sum of:
0.03324294 = weight(_text_:research in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03324294 = score(doc=443,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.22288933 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article proposes a model of document selection by real users of a bibliographic retrieval system. It reports on Part 1 of a longitudinal study of decision making on document use by academics during a actual research project. (Part 2 followed up the same users on how the selected documents were actually used in subsequent stages). The participants are 25 self-selected faculty and graduate students in Agricultural Economics. After a reference interview, the researcher conducted a search of DIALOG databases and prepared a printout. The users selected documents from this printout, They were asked to read and think aloud while selecting documents. There verbal reports were recorded and analyzed from a utiliy-theoretic perspective. The following model of the decision-making in the selection process emerged: document information lemenets (DIEs) in document records provide the information for judging the documents on 11 criteria (including topicality, orientation, quality, novelty, and authority); the criteria judgments are comninded in an assessment of document value along 5 dimensions (Epistemic, functional, conditional, social, and emotional values), leading to the use decision. This model accounts for the use of personal knowledge and decision strategies applied in the selection process. The model has implications for the design of an intelligent document selection assistant
-
Soergel, D.: Digital libraries and knowledge organization (2009)
0.01
0.005876578 = product of:
0.011753156 = sum of:
0.011753156 = product of:
0.023506312 = sum of:
0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 672) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023506312 = score(doc=672,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 672, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=672)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This chapter describes not so much what digital libraries are but what digital libraries with semantic support could and should be. It discusses the nature of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and how KOS can support digital library users. It projects a vision for designers to make and for users to demand better digital libraries. What is a digital library? The term \Digital Library" (DL) is used to refer to a range of systems, from digital object and metadata repositories, reference-linking systems, archives, and content management systems to complex systems that integrate advanced digital library services and support for research and practice communities. A DL may offer many technology-enabled functions and services that support users, both as information producers and as information users. Many of these functions appear in information systems that would not normally be considered digital libraries, making boundaries even more blurry. Instead of pursuing the hopeless quest of coming up with the definition of digital library, we present a framework that allows a clear and somewhat standardized description of any information system so that users can select the system(s) that best meet their requirements. Section 2 gives a broad outline for more detail see the DELOS DL Reference Model.
-
Golub, K.; Soergel, D.; Buchanan, G.; Tudhope, D.; Lykke, M.; Hiom, D.: ¬A framework for evaluating automatic indexing or classification in the context of retrieval (2016)
0.01
0.005876578 = product of:
0.011753156 = sum of:
0.011753156 = product of:
0.023506312 = sum of:
0.023506312 = weight(_text_:research in 3311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023506312 = score(doc=3311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.05227703 = queryNorm
0.15760657 = fieldWeight in 3311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3311)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Tools for automatic subject assignment help deal with scale and sustainability in creating and enriching metadata, establishing more connections across and between resources and enhancing consistency. Although some software vendors and experimental researchers claim the tools can replace manual subject indexing, hard scientific evidence of their performance in operating information environments is scarce. A major reason for this is that research is usually conducted in laboratory conditions, excluding the complexities of real-life systems and situations. The article reviews and discusses issues with existing evaluation approaches such as problems of aboutness and relevance assessments, implying the need to use more than a single "gold standard" method when evaluating indexing and retrieval, and proposes a comprehensive evaluation framework. The framework is informed by a systematic review of the literature on evaluation approaches: evaluating indexing quality directly through assessment by an evaluator or through comparison with a gold standard, evaluating the quality of computer-assisted indexing directly in the context of an indexing workflow, and evaluating indexing quality indirectly through analyzing retrieval performance.
