Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Notationen / Signaturen"
  1. Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000) 0.02
    0.024789855 = product of:
      0.04957971 = sum of:
        0.04957971 = product of:
          0.09915942 = sum of:
            0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09915942 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
  2. Körner, H.G.: Short and flexible generic codes for mechanized information retrieval (1965) 0.02
    0.016454415 = product of:
      0.03290883 = sum of:
        0.03290883 = product of:
          0.06581766 = sum of:
            0.06581766 = weight(_text_:research in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06581766 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.44129837 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Classification research. Proc. 2nd Int. Study Conf., Elsinore, 1964. Ed.: P. Atherton
  3. Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.01
    0.0141656315 = product of:
      0.028331263 = sum of:
        0.028331263 = product of:
          0.056662526 = sum of:
            0.056662526 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056662526 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
  4. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.01
    0.010624223 = product of:
      0.021248447 = sum of:
        0.021248447 = product of:
          0.042496894 = sum of:
            0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042496894 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14
  5. Drezek, G.: Call number relabelling project in an amalgamated university library : how and why we relabelled 170.000 items in three weeks and what good did it to us? (1993) 0.01
    0.009402524 = product of:
      0.018805047 = sum of:
        0.018805047 = product of:
          0.037610095 = sum of:
            0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037610095 = score(doc=3075,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Australian academic and research libraries. 24(1993) no.4, S.271-275
  6. Sukhmaneva, E.G.: ¬The problems of notation and faceted classification 0.01
    0.009402524 = product of:
      0.018805047 = sum of:
        0.018805047 = product of:
          0.037610095 = sum of:
            0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037610095 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Brings out the principles of faceted classification and its advantages with regard to multi-aspect indexing. Also considers the contributions of Dr. S.R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group (London) and others.
  7. Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005) 0.01
    0.0070828157 = product of:
      0.0141656315 = sum of:
        0.0141656315 = product of:
          0.028331263 = sum of:
            0.028331263 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028331263 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22