Search (54 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × type_ss:"b"
  1. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.05
    0.04713631 = product of:
      0.09427262 = sum of:
        0.09427262 = sum of:
          0.037610095 = weight(_text_:research in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037610095 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2521705 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.056662526 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056662526 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.04
    0.04124427 = product of:
      0.08248854 = sum of:
        0.08248854 = sum of:
          0.03290883 = weight(_text_:research in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03290883 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04957971 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research-they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.04
    0.04124427 = product of:
      0.08248854 = sum of:
        0.08248854 = sum of:
          0.03290883 = weight(_text_:research in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03290883 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04957971 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  4. Charbonneau, M.D.: Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries : are we there yet? (2005) 0.04
    0.04124427 = product of:
      0.08248854 = sum of:
        0.08248854 = sum of:
          0.03290883 = weight(_text_:research in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03290883 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
          0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04957971 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper examines existing library and personnel literature to determine whether any strides have been made among academic libraries in determining cataloging productivity benchmarks. The perceived importance of performance evaluations based on quantitative and qualitative standards is explored, as is the intended effect of established cataloging production norms. The pros and cons of cataloging benchmarks are analyzed from four different perspectives: library administration, library human resources, cataloging managers, and cataloging staff. The paper concludes that additional research is needed in order to determine whether established production cataloging benchmarks are feasible and meaningful within academic libraries.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Chambers, S.; Myall, C.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2007-8 (2010) 0.04
    0.04124427 = product of:
      0.08248854 = sum of:
        0.08248854 = sum of:
          0.03290883 = weight(_text_:research in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03290883 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.22064918 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
          0.04957971 = weight(_text_:22 in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04957971 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper surveys library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2007-8, indicating its extent and range in terms of types of literature, major subject areas, and themes. The paper reviews pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of bibliographic control, general cataloging standards and texts, Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), cataloging varied resources, metadata and cataloging in the Web world, classification and subject access, questions of diversity and diverse perspectives, additional reports of practice and research, catalogers' education and careers, keeping current through columns and blogs, and cataloging history.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Leysen, J.M.; Boydston, J.M.K.: Supply and demand for catalogers : present and future (2005) 0.04
    0.035352234 = product of:
      0.07070447 = sum of:
        0.07070447 = sum of:
          0.028207572 = weight(_text_:research in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028207572 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
          0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042496894 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents results from a fall 2003 survey of heads of cataloging at Association of Research Libraries United States academic libraries. The survey focused on the current number of professional catalogers and their responsibilities as well as future projections for demand for catalogers and thoughts about their roles. The study found that the numbers of professional catalogers are remaining constant or decreasing, and approximately one-third are projected to retire in the next decade. In addition, the role of the professional cataloger is perceived as continuing to evolve toward more cataloging-related activities and management and less direct cataloging. Most respondents predicted the professional cataloger has a role in the future and felt prepared for that future. Some respondents suggested that metadata cataloging would be a growing role in that future. This paper concludes with additional questions about the future of professional catalogers and cataloging.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Miller, D.; Olson, T.; Layne, S.S.: Promoting research and best practices in subject reference structures : a decade of work by the subject analysis committee (2005) 0.04
    0.035352234 = product of:
      0.07070447 = sum of:
        0.07070447 = sum of:
          0.028207572 = weight(_text_:research in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028207572 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
          0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042496894 = score(doc=123,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Lundy, M.W.: Evidence of application of the DCRB core standard in WorldCat and RLIN (2006) 0.04
    0.035352234 = product of:
      0.07070447 = sum of:
        0.07070447 = sum of:
          0.028207572 = weight(_text_:research in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028207572 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
          0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 1087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042496894 = score(doc=1087,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1087, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Core Standard for Rare Books, known as the DCRB Core standard, was approved by the Program for Cooperative Cataloging for use beginning in January 1999. Comparable to the core standards for other types of materials, the DCRB Core standard provides requirements for an intermediate level of bibliographic description for the cataloging of rare books. While the Core Standard for Books seems to have found a place in general cataloging practice, the DCRB Core standard appears to have met with resistance among rare book cataloging practitioners. This study investigates the extent to which such resistance exists by examining all of the DCRB Core records in the OCLC (Online Computer Library Center) Online Union Catalog (WorldCat) and the Research Libraries Croup Union Catalog (RLIN) databases that were created during the standard's first five years. The study analyzes the content of the records for adherence to the standard and investigates the ways in which the flexibility of the standard and cataloger's judgment augmented many records with more than the mandatory elements of description and access.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Lee, S.; Jacob, E.K.: ¬An integrated approach to metadata interoperability : construction of a conceptual structure between MARC and FRBR (2011) 0.04
    0.035352234 = product of:
      0.07070447 = sum of:
        0.07070447 = sum of:
          0.028207572 = weight(_text_:research in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028207572 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.18912788 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
          0.042496894 = weight(_text_:22 in 302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042496894 = score(doc=302,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05227703 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 302, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=302)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) is currently the most broadly used bibliographic standard for encoding and exchanging bibliographic data. However, MARC may not fully support representation of the dynamic nature and semantics of digital resources because of its rigid and single-layered linear structure. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model, which is designed to overcome the problems of MARC, does not provide sufficient data elements and adopts a predetermined hierarchy. A flexible structure for bibliographic data with detailed data elements is needed. Integrating MARC format with the hierarchical structure of FRBR is one approach to meet this need. The purpose of this research is to propose an approach that can facilitate interoperability between MARC and FRBR by providing a conceptual structure that can function as a mediator between MARC data elements and FRBR attributes.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Filk, C.: Online, Internet und Digitalkultur : eine Bibliographie zur jüngsten Diskussion um die Informationsgesellschaft (1996) 0.04
    0.035058152 = product of:
      0.070116304 = sum of:
        0.070116304 = product of:
          0.14023261 = sum of:
            0.14023261 = weight(_text_:22 in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14023261 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 9.1997 19:22:27
    Source
    Rundfunk und Geschichte. 22(1996) H.2/3, S.184-193
  11. Metz, A.: Community service : a bibliography (1996) 0.03
    0.028331263 = product of:
      0.056662526 = sum of:
        0.056662526 = product of:
          0.11332505 = sum of:
            0.11332505 = weight(_text_:22 in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11332505 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    17.10.1996 14:22:33
  12. Albers, C.: Zeitungen in Bibliotheken : Aufsätze, Monographien und Rezensionen aus den Jahren 2002-2003. Mit Nachträgen für die Jahre 1980-2001 (2004) 0.03
    0.025041535 = product of:
      0.05008307 = sum of:
        0.05008307 = product of:
          0.10016614 = sum of:
            0.10016614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10016614 = score(doc=4,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 4, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:32:22
  13. Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005) 0.02
    0.024789855 = product of:
      0.04957971 = sum of:
        0.04957971 = product of:
          0.09915942 = sum of:
            0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09915942 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Jones, E.: ¬The FRBR model as applied to continuing resources (2005) 0.02
    0.024789855 = product of:
      0.04957971 = sum of:
        0.04957971 = product of:
          0.09915942 = sum of:
            0.09915942 = weight(_text_:22 in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09915942 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Bibliografia nazionale italiana : 1(1958) - 36(1993) ungeteilt; 39(1996), 1-12 (gedruckte Ausg. + Diskette) (1996-) 0.02
    0.021248447 = product of:
      0.042496894 = sum of:
        0.042496894 = product of:
          0.08499379 = sum of:
            0.08499379 = weight(_text_:22 in 635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08499379 = score(doc=635,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 635, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=635)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.1998 11:23:22
  16. Conway, M. O'Hara: Research in cataloging and classification : methods and issues - a selective, annotated bibliography (1994) 0.02
    0.021024682 = product of:
      0.042049363 = sum of:
        0.042049363 = product of:
          0.08409873 = sum of:
            0.08409873 = weight(_text_:research in 1021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08409873 = score(doc=1021,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.5638704 = fieldWeight in 1021, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This selective bibliography, prepared for the Jun 1993 ALCTS CCS preconference on research in cataloging and classification, is intended for the librarian with little or no experience conducting research. Its aim is to acquaint the librarian with 'a few good books' (and one article) on research methods and statistics; to offer selections 'from the literature' that suggest potentially fruitful areas for research in cataloging and classification; and to assist the librarian in successfully communicating his or her findings to the library community
  17. Bibliography of papers on classification and allied subjects (1956) 0.02
    0.018805047 = product of:
      0.037610095 = sum of:
        0.037610095 = product of:
          0.07522019 = sum of:
            0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07522019 = score(doc=294,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.504341 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Classification Research Group
  18. Efthimiadis, E.N.; Mitev, N.N.: ¬A classified bibliography on online public access catalogues (1987) 0.02
    0.018805047 = product of:
      0.037610095 = sum of:
        0.037610095 = product of:
          0.07522019 = sum of:
            0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07522019 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.504341 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Series
    British Library research paper; 23
  19. Stevens, N.D.: Postcard based research : a representative bibliography (1995) 0.02
    0.018805047 = product of:
      0.037610095 = sum of:
        0.037610095 = product of:
          0.07522019 = sum of:
            0.07522019 = weight(_text_:research in 5689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07522019 = score(doc=5689,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1491455 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.504341 = fieldWeight in 5689, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.8529835 = idf(docFreq=6931, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5689)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Picture postcards constitute an important body of visual information that can support major scholarly research. In the past 2 decades a small, but important, new body of research has emerged that relies on the information contained on, an conveyed by, postcards. Presents an annotated bibliography of a representative sample of postcard based research. Annotations focus on the way in which the author used postcards as a key resources in the investigation of a particular subject and/or the merhodology that was applied to the examination of postcards
  20. Bezzel, I. (Red.): Verzeichnis der im deutschen Sprachkreis erschienenen Drucke des 16. Jahrhunderts: VD16 : Abt.1: Verfasser, Körperschaften, Anonyma (1983-95) 0.02
    0.01770704 = product of:
      0.03541408 = sum of:
        0.03541408 = product of:
          0.07082816 = sum of:
            0.07082816 = weight(_text_:22 in 5319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07082816 = score(doc=5319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18306525 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05227703 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    Bd.1-22

Languages

  • e 46
  • d 6
  • m 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types