Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Vakkari, P."
  1. Pennanen, M.; Vakkari, P.: Students' conceptual structure, search process, and outcome while preparing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.02
    0.019909104 = product of:
      0.05972731 = sum of:
        0.05972731 = sum of:
          0.017754918 = weight(_text_:of in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.017754918 = score(doc=1682,freq=18.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                  18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
          0.041972395 = weight(_text_:22 in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041972395 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article focuses an analysing students' information needs in terms of conceptual understanding of the topic they propose to study and its consequences for the search process and outcome. The research subjects were 22 undergraduates of psychology attending a seminar for preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. They were asked to make searches in the PsycINFO database for their task in the beginning and end of the seminar. A pre- and postsearch interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded, as were the transaction logs. The results show that during the preparation of research proposals different features of the students' conceptual structure were connected to the search success. Students' ability to cover their conceptual construct by query terms was the major feature affecting search success during the whole process. In the beginning also the number of concepts and the proportion of subconcepts in the construct contributed indirectly via search tactics to retrieving partly useful references. Students' ability to extract new query terms from retrieved items improved search results.
    Date
    19. 6.2003 17:22:33
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.759-770
  2. Vakkari, P.; Pennanen, M.; Serola, S.: Changes of search terms and tactics while writing a research proposal : a longitudinal case study (2003) 0.02
    0.017533492 = product of:
      0.052600473 = sum of:
        0.052600473 = sum of:
          0.022921504 = weight(_text_:of in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022921504 = score(doc=1073,freq=30.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.33457235 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                  30.0 = termFreq=30.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
          0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 1073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029678967 = score(doc=1073,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1073, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1073)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The study analyses how students' growing understanding of the topic and search experience were related to their choice of search tactics and terms while preparing a research proposal for a small empirical study. In addition to that, the findings of the study are used to test Vakkari's (2001) theory of task-based IR. The research subjects were 22 students of psychology attending a seminar for preparing the proposal. They made a search for their task in PsychINFO database at the beginning and end of the seminar. Data were collected in several ways. A pre- and post-search interview was conducted in both sessions. The students were asked to think aloud in the sessions. This was recorded as were the transaction logs. The results show that search experience was slightly related to the change of facets. Although the students' vocabulary of the topic grew generating an increased use of specific terms between the sessions, their use of search tactics and operators remained fairly constant. There was no correlation between the terms and tactics used and the total number of useful references found. By comparing these results with the findings of relevant earlier studies the conclusion was drawn that domain knowledge has an impact on searching assuming that users have a sufficient command of the system used. This implies that the tested theory of task-based IR is valid on condition that the searchers are experienced. It is suggested that the theory should be enriched by including search experience in its scope.
  3. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.02
    0.017274415 = product of:
      0.051823243 = sum of:
        0.051823243 = sum of:
          0.022144277 = weight(_text_:of in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.022144277 = score(doc=998,freq=28.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                  28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029678967 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.7, S.811-827
  4. Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018) 0.01
    0.014304235 = product of:
      0.042912703 = sum of:
        0.042912703 = sum of:
          0.013233736 = weight(_text_:of in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.013233736 = score(doc=4573,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19316542 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
          0.029678967 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029678967 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15341885 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.043811057 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores how user subject knowledge influences search task processes and outcomes, as well as how search behavior is influenced by subject-oriented information visualization (IV) tools. To enable integrated searches, the proposed WikiMap + integrates search functions and IV tools (i.e., a topic network and hierarchical topic tree) and gathers information from Wikipedia pages and Google Search results. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed interfaces, we design subject-oriented tasks and adopt extended evaluation measures. We recruited 48 novices and 48 knowledgeable users, that is, intermediates, for the evaluation. Our results show that novices using the proposed interface demonstrate better search performance than intermediates using Wikipedia. We therefore conclude that our tools help close the gap between novices and intermediates in information searches. The results also show that intermediates can take advantage of the search tool by leveraging the IV tools to browse subtopics, and formulate better queries with less effort. We conclude that embedding the IV and the search tools in the interface can result in different search behavior but improved task performance. We provide implications to design search systems to include IV features adapted to user levels of subject knowledge to help them achieve better task performance.
    Date
    9.12.2018 16:22:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.12, S.1428-1445
  5. Talja, S.; Vakkari, P.; Fry, J.; Wouters, P.: Impact of research cultures on the use of digital library resources (2007) 0.01
    0.0051254043 = product of:
      0.015376212 = sum of:
        0.015376212 = product of:
          0.030752424 = sum of:
            0.030752424 = weight(_text_:of in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030752424 = score(doc=590,freq=54.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.44887587 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                    54.0 = termFreq=54.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Currently, there exists little evidence concerning how various characteristics of research cultures are associated with patterns of use of electronic library resources. The present study addresses this gap by exploring how research-group membership, across-fields scattering of literature, and degree of establishment of research area are related to patterns of digital library use. The analytic dimensions are derived from Richard Whitley's ([1984]) theory of the social and intellectual organization of academic fields. The article represents a first attempt to operationalize Whitley's concepts in a large-scale study of e-resources use. The data used in the study were gathered in 2004 by the Finnish Electronic Library (FinElib) through a nationwide Web-based user questionnaire (N = 900). Membership in a research group significantly increased searching in journal databases, the importance of colleagues as sources of information about electronic articles and journals, and the use of alert services. A significant interaction effect was found between degree of across-fields scattering of relevant resources and degree of establishment of research fields. A high degree of across-fields scattering of relevant literature increased the number of journal databases used mainly in less established research areas whereas it influenced the use of journal databases less in established fields. This research contributes to our picture concerning the complex set of interacting factors influencing patterns of use of e-resources.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1674-1685
  6. Vakkari, P.: ¬A theory of the task-based information retrieval process : a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study (2001) 0.01
    0.0050218496 = product of:
      0.015065549 = sum of:
        0.015065549 = product of:
          0.030131098 = sum of:
            0.030131098 = weight(_text_:of in 4493) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030131098 = score(doc=4493,freq=36.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.43980673 = fieldWeight in 4493, product of:
                  6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                    36.0 = termFreq=36.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4493)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this article is threefold: (1) to give a summary of empirical results reported earlier on relations between students' problem stages in the course of writing their research proposals for a master's thesis and the information sought, choice of search terms and tactics and relevance assessments of the information found for that task; (2) to show how the findings of the study refine Kuhlthau's model of the information search process in the field of information retrieval (IR); and (3) to construe a tentative theory of a task-based IR process based on the supported hypotheses. The results of the empirical studies show that there is a close connection between the students' problem stages (mental model) in the task performance and the information sought, the search tactics used and the assessment of the relevance and utility of the information found. The corroborated hypotheses expand the ideas in Kuhlthau's model in the domain of IR. A theory of task-based information searching based on the empirical findings of the study is presented.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 57(2001) no.1, S.44-60
  7. Vakkari, P.: Perceived influence of the use of electronic information resources on scholarly work and publication productivity (2008) 0.00
    0.004428855 = product of:
      0.013286565 = sum of:
        0.013286565 = product of:
          0.02657313 = sum of:
            0.02657313 = weight(_text_:of in 1380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02657313 = score(doc=1380,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.38787308 = fieldWeight in 1380, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1380)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores how the use of electronic information resources has influenced scholars' opinion of their work, and how this is connected to their publication productivity. The data consist of a nationwide Web-based survey of the end-users of FinELib, the Finnish Electronic Library, at all universities in Finland. Scholars feel that the use of electronic literature has improved their work considerably in several ways. This influence can be differentiated into two dimensions. The first one is improved accessibility and availability of literature, and the second is more directly related to the content and quality of scholarly work. The perceived improved access is positively associated with the number of international publications produced, among doctoral students in particular. The more direct influence of e-resource use on the content of scholarly work is, however, not associated with publication productivity. The results seem to imply that investments in academic digital libraries are beneficial for the researchers and for the universities.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.602-612
  8. Serola, S.; Vakkari, P.: ¬The anticipated and assessed contribution of information types in references retrieved for preparing a research proposal (2005) 0.00
    0.004184875 = product of:
      0.012554625 = sum of:
        0.012554625 = product of:
          0.02510925 = sum of:
            0.02510925 = weight(_text_:of in 3328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02510925 = score(doc=3328,freq=36.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.36650562 = fieldWeight in 3328, product of:
                  6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                    36.0 = termFreq=36.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3328)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This small-scale empirical study focuses an students' anticipated and assessed contribution of references retrieved during the preparation of research proposals. It explores how the expected contribution of types of information before searches differs from the assessed contribution of relevant references found by the types of information. Twenty-two psychology undergraduates searched the PsychINFO database for references at the initial and end stages of a seminar for preparing proposals. Data about their subject knowledge, search goals, and utility assessments were collected using several methods. They were asked to predict and assess the utility of information types provided by relevant references for the proposals. At the beginning of the process, they found fewer general types of information and more specific types of information than they expected. However, the students tended to accept references according to their expectations. By the end of the process, the expected importance of general information types declined and the importance of specific information types increased. At the end of the task, students became more proficient at recognizing the utility and topicality of references. They also became more critical in accepting found information to match their expectations.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.4, S.373-381
  9. Vakkari, P.; Kuokkanen, M.: Theory growth in information science : applications of the theory of science to a theory of information seeking (1997) 0.00
    0.004142815 = product of:
      0.012428444 = sum of:
        0.012428444 = product of:
          0.024856888 = sum of:
            0.024856888 = weight(_text_:of in 4710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024856888 = score(doc=4710,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 4710, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study whose aim was to analyse theory growth in information science by using a case from information seeking studies. Scientific growth is identified with the growth of theories. Differentiates 3 contexts of theoretical work: unit theories, theoretical research programmes and metatheories. States that for analysis if theory growth, tools based on the current theory of science are needed. Introduces tools for the analysis of theory growth and theory reconstruction and applies them to analysis of a theory on information seeking
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 53(1997) no.5, S.497-519
  10. Vakkari, P.; Sormunen, E.: ¬The influence of relevance levels an the effectiveness of interactive information retrieval (2004) 0.00
    0.0041003237 = product of:
      0.01230097 = sum of:
        0.01230097 = product of:
          0.02460194 = sum of:
            0.02460194 = weight(_text_:of in 2884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02460194 = score(doc=2884,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 2884, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we focus an the effect of graded relevance an the results of interactive information retrieval (IR) experiments based an assigned search tasks in a test collection. A group of 26 subjects searched for four Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) topics using automatic and interactive query expansion based an relevance feedback. The TREC- and user-suggested pools of relevant documents were reassessed an a four-level relevance scale. The results show that the users could identify nearly all highly relevant documents and about half of the marginal ones. Users also selected a fair number of irrelevant documents for query expansion. The findings suggest that the effectiveness of query expansion is closely related to the searchers' success in retrieving and identifying highly relevant documents for feedback. The implications of the results an interpreting the findings of past experiments with liberal relevance thresholds are also discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.963-969
  11. Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: ¬The evolution of library and information science 1965-1985 : a content analysis of journal titles (1993) 0.00
    0.0039058835 = product of:
      0.01171765 = sum of:
        0.01171765 = product of:
          0.0234353 = sum of:
            0.0234353 = weight(_text_:of in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0234353 = score(doc=4649,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
  12. Eerola, J.; Vakkari, P.: How a general and a specific thesaurus cover expressions in patients' questions and physicians' answers (2008) 0.00
    0.003743066 = product of:
      0.0112291975 = sum of:
        0.0112291975 = product of:
          0.022458395 = sum of:
            0.022458395 = weight(_text_:of in 1732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022458395 = score(doc=1732,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 1732, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1732)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper sets out to examine the degree to which General Finnish Thesaurus (GFT) and FinMeSH cover various semantic expressions of medical concepts in patients' questions and physicians' answers concerning cardiovascular diseases. The former represents lay persons' information needs. Design/methodology/approach - A total of 50 question-answer pairs were collected in a medical web site. Concepts and their expressions (terms) with their semantic relations were identified in questions and answers. Findings - FinMeSH covered 65 per cent and GFT 41 per cent of all medical terms in texts. The expressions of patients and physicians matched better with FinMeSH than GFT regardless of the type of expression. The difference in favour of FinMeSH was typically about 25 per cent-units. Originality/value - The low fit with users' vocabularies makes GFT a poor tool for supporting searching, whereas the relatively high fit of FinMeSH suggests that it is a reasonable tool in assisting searching. Conclusions concerning the bridging of these two thesauri are discussed.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.1, S.131-142
  13. Tuomaala, O.; Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: Evolution of library and information science, 1965-2005 : content analysis of journal articles (2014) 0.00
    0.0036907129 = product of:
      0.011072138 = sum of:
        0.011072138 = product of:
          0.022144277 = sum of:
            0.022144277 = weight(_text_:of in 1309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022144277 = score(doc=1309,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 1309, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1309)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article first analyzes library and information science (LIS) research articles published in core LIS journals in 2005. It also examines the development of LIS from 1965 to 2005 in light of comparable data sets for 1965, 1985, and 2005. In both cases, the authors report (a) how the research articles are distributed by topic and (b) what approaches, research strategies, and methods were applied in the articles. In 2005, the largest research areas in LIS by this measure were information storage and retrieval, scientific communication, library and information-service activities, and information seeking. The same research areas constituted the quantitative core of LIS in the previous years since 1965. Information retrieval has been the most popular area of research over the years. The proportion of research on library and information-service activities decreased after 1985, but the popularity of information seeking and of scientific communication grew during the period studied. The viewpoint of research has shifted from library and information organizations to end users and development of systems for the latter. The proportion of empirical research strategies was high and rose over time, with the survey method being the single most important method. However, attention to evaluation and experiments increased considerably after 1985. Conceptual research strategies and system analysis, description, and design were quite popular, but declining. The most significant changes from 1965 to 2005 are the decreasing interest in library and information-service activities and the growth of research into information seeking and scientific communication.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.7, S.1446-1462
  14. Järvelin, K.; Vakkari, P.: LIS research across 50 years: content analysis of journal articles : offering an information-centric conception of memes (2022) 0.00
    0.00355646 = product of:
      0.0106693795 = sum of:
        0.0106693795 = product of:
          0.021338759 = sum of:
            0.021338759 = weight(_text_:of in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021338759 = score(doc=949,freq=26.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.31146988 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
                  5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                    26.0 = termFreq=26.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper analyses the research in Library and Information Science (LIS) and reports on (1) the status of LIS research in 2015 and (2) on the evolution of LIS research longitudinally from 1965 to 2015. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a quantitative intellectual content analysis of articles published in 30+ scholarly LIS journals, following the design by Tuomaala et al. (2014). In the content analysis, we classify articles along eight dimensions covering topical content and methodology. Findings The topical findings indicate that the earlier strong LIS emphasis on L&I services has declined notably, while scientific and professional communication has become the most popular topic. Information storage and retrieval has given up its earlier strong position towards the end of the years analyzed. Individuals are increasingly the units of observation. End-user's and developer's viewpoints have strengthened at the cost of intermediaries' viewpoint. LIS research is methodologically increasingly scattered since survey, scientometric methods, experiment, case studies and qualitative studies have all gained in popularity. Consequently, LIS may have become more versatile in the analysis of its research objects during the years analyzed. Originality/value Among quantitative intellectual content analyses of LIS research, the study is unique in its scope: length of analysis period (50 years), width (8 dimensions covering topical content and methodology) and depth (the annual batch of 30+ scholarly journals).
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 78(2022) no.7, S.65-88
  15. Vakkari, P.; Jones, S.; MacFarlane, A.; Sormunen, E.: Query exhaustivity, relevance feedback and search success in automatic and interactive query expansion (2004) 0.00
    0.0035509837 = product of:
      0.010652951 = sum of:
        0.010652951 = product of:
          0.021305902 = sum of:
            0.021305902 = weight(_text_:of in 4435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021305902 = score(doc=4435,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 4435, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study explored how the expression of search facets and relevance feedback (RF) by users was related to search success in interactive and automatic query expansion in the course of the search process. Search success was measured both in the number of relevant documents retrieved, whether identified by users or not. Research design consisted of 26 users searching for four TREC topics in Okapi IR system, half of the searchers using interactive and half automatic query expansion based on RF. The search logs were recorded, and the users filled in questionnaires for each topic concerning various features of searching. The results showed that the exhaustivity of the query was the most significant predictor of search success. Interactive expansion led to better search success than automatic expansion if all retrieved relevant items were counted, but there was no difference between the methods if only those items recognised relevant by users were observed. The analysis showed that the difference was facilitated by the liberal relevance criterion used in TREC not favouring highly relevant documents in evaluation.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 60(2004) no.2, S.109-127
  16. Huuskonen, S.; Vakkari, P.: Students' search process and outcome in Medline in writing an essay for a class on evidence-based medicine (2008) 0.00
    0.0034396404 = product of:
      0.010318921 = sum of:
        0.010318921 = product of:
          0.020637842 = sum of:
            0.020637842 = weight(_text_:of in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020637842 = score(doc=1891,freq=38.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.30123898 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
                  6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
                    38.0 = termFreq=38.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this study is to explore to which extent searching by medical students in Medline produces information items useful for writing an essay measured by precision and relative recall as perceived by the students, the proportion of cited items, and their utilization on four dimensions of the essay writing task evaluated by external assessors. It also aims to study interrelations of search process and outcome. Design/methodology/approach - The study subjects were 42 third year medical students attending a class on Diagnostic and therapy. Searching in Medline was a part of their assignment of essay writing. The data consist of students' printed logs of Medline searches, students' assessments of the usefulness of the references retrieved, a questionnaire concerning the search process, and evaluation scores of the essays given by the teachers of the class. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for answering the research questions. Findings - The paper finds that precision and relative recall were not associated with evaluation scores in three of the four dimensions assessed. Some of the process variables were associated with precision and with assessment scores in two of the four dimensions assessed. Citing rate was negatively associated with recall. It seems that precision and recall are only weakly, if at all, associated to the use of information in the documents retrieved for writing the essay. Precision and relative recall are not associated to the way information in the retrieved items is used for performing the task. Users evidently look for a sufficient number of documents containing enough information for progressing in their task. Precision and recall are not sufficient measures in evaluating IR systems, but they have to be completed by other measures indicating the impact of the system on users' task performance. Originality/value - The paper provides useful information on students' information search process.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 64(2008) no.2, S.287-303
  17. Numminen, P.; Vakkari, P.: Question types in public libraries' digital reference service in Finland : comparing 1999 and 2006 (2009) 0.00
    0.0033478998 = product of:
      0.010043699 = sum of:
        0.010043699 = product of:
          0.020087399 = sum of:
            0.020087399 = weight(_text_:of in 2850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020087399 = score(doc=2850,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2850, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2850)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This study analyzes to which degree the question types addressed to a digital reference service run by a consortium of public libraries have changed between the Years 1999 and 2006. The data consist of representative samples of reference questions to a Finnish Ask a Librarian digital reference service in the years studied. Questions were classified based on a taxonomy refining earlier major taxonomies. The proportion of ready reference questions had increased from 33 to 45% whereas the proportion of subject-based research questions had decreased from 57 to 47%. Among the former, fact-finding questions had especially increased, and among the latter, topical search questions had decreased. These changes in the popularity of question types are likely related to the way people are searching on the Internet. It is concluded that the Internet has somewhat reduced the traditional role of public libraries in mediated topical searching.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.6, S.1249-1257
  18. Mikkonen, A.; Vakkari, P.: Readers' interest criteria in fiction book search in library catalogs (2016) 0.00
    0.003271467 = product of:
      0.009814401 = sum of:
        0.009814401 = product of:
          0.019628802 = sum of:
            0.019628802 = weight(_text_:of in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019628802 = score(doc=3030,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate fiction readers' interest criteria when selecting novels in library catalogs for various search tasks. Design/methodology/approach - The data of the book selection behavior from 80 genuine fiction readers were collected using recorded interviews and conversations. The data were qualitatively analyzed. Reuter's categorization of the components of aesthetic relevance has contributed to the construction of interest dimensions. Findings - A five-dimension categorization of interest criteria is presented based on fiction readers' interpretations of the influential factors in fiction book selection in different search tasks. The findings revealed that readers apply the identified interest criteria in a flexible and multiphase way depending to the search task and the system used. The findings showed a context-related pattern in readers' fiction book selections. A combination of readers' search capacities, "behind the eyes" knowledge, affective factors and a well-functioning interaction with a system used results in a successful book selection. Originality/value - A five-dimension categorization of adult fiction readers' interest criteria was created based on their search behaviors in library catalogs. The results provide a systematic step toward a comprehensive understanding of readers' fiction book selection in digital environments.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 72(2016) no.4, S.696-715
  19. Vakkari, P.: Task-based information searching (2002) 0.00
    0.0031316737 = product of:
      0.009395021 = sum of:
        0.009395021 = product of:
          0.018790042 = sum of:
            0.018790042 = weight(_text_:of in 4288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018790042 = score(doc=4288,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4288, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The rationale for using information systems is to find information that helps us in our daily activities, be they tasks or interests. Systems are expected to support us in searching for and identifying useful information. Although the activities and tasks performed by humans generate information needs and searching, they have attracted little attention in studies of information searching. Such studies have concentrated an search tasks rather than the activities that trigger them. It is obvious that our understanding of information searching is only partial, if we are not able to connect aspects of searching to the related task. The expected contribution of information to the task is reflected in relevance assessments of the information items found, and in the search tactics and use of the system in general. Taking the task into account seems to be a necessary condition for understanding and explaining information searching, and, by extension, for effective systems design.
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 37(2003), S.413-464
  20. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.: Explanation in information seeking and retrieval (2005) 0.00
    0.0030562007 = product of:
      0.009168602 = sum of:
        0.009168602 = product of:
          0.018337203 = sum of:
            0.018337203 = weight(_text_:of in 643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018337203 = score(doc=643,freq=30.0), product of:
                0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043811057 = queryNorm
                0.26765788 = fieldWeight in 643, product of:
                  5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                    30.0 = termFreq=30.0
                  1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information Retrieval (IR) is a research area both within Computer Science and Information Science. It has by and large two communities: a Computer Science oriented experimental approach and a user-oriented Information Science approach with a Social Science background. The communities hold a critical stance towards each other (e.g., Ingwersen, 1996), the latter suspecting the realism of the former, and the former suspecting the usefulness of the latter. Within Information Science the study of information seeking (IS) also has a Social Science background. There is a lot of research in each of these particular areas of information seeking and retrieval (IS&R). However, the three communities do not really communicate with each other. Why is this, and could the relationships be otherwise? Do the communities in fact belong together? Or perhaps each community is better off forgetting about the existence of the other two? We feel that the relationships between the research areas have not been properly analyzed. One way to analyze the relationships is to examine what each research area is trying to find out: which phenomena are being explained and how. We believe that IS&R research would benefit from being analytic about its frameworks, models and theories, not just at the level of meta-theories, but also much more concretely at the level of study designs. Over the years there have been calls for more context in the study of IS&R. Work tasks as well as cultural activities/interests have been proposed as the proper context for information access. For example, Wersig (1973) conceptualized information needs from the tasks perspective. He argued that in order to learn about information needs and seeking, one needs to take into account the whole active professional role of the individuals being investigated. Byström and Järvelin (1995) analysed IS processes in the light of tasks of varying complexity. Ingwersen (1996) discussed the role of tasks and their descriptions and problematic situations from a cognitive perspective on IR. Most recently, Vakkari (2003) reviewed task-based IR and Järvelin and Ingwersen (2004) proposed the extension of IS&R research toward the task context. Therefore there is much support to the task context, but how should it be applied in IS&R?