-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.08
0.08066536 = product of:
0.18821916 = sum of:
0.036320645 = weight(_text_:management in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036320645 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.061792135 = weight(_text_:case in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061792135 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.34001783 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.09010638 = sum of:
0.05090278 = weight(_text_:studies in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05090278 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30860704 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.039203603 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039203603 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Content
- Automated support to indexing forms a continuum from computer support to clerical activities, quality control, intellectual activities and to full automatic indexing. Describes the current indexing environment and examines the need for automated support. Reports on case studies of various indexing services which are at different stages along the continuum. Describes academic and corporate research projects and commercial indexing software. Examines the future of related technologies and offers advice on how to get started on the continuum
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
-
Olason, S.C.: Let's get usable! : Usability studies for indexes (2000)
0.03
0.025673116 = product of:
0.1797118 = sum of:
0.1797118 = sum of:
0.11634921 = weight(_text_:studies in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11634921 = score(doc=882,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.70538753 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.06336259 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06336259 = score(doc=882,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The article discusses a series of usability studies on indexes from a systems engineering and human factors perspective. The purpose of these studies is to establish a set of user requirements that indexes need to satisfy. The results from the first set of studies are presented and suggestions made as to how these can be applied to improve the usability and quality of indexes.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.theindexer.org/files/22-2-olason.pdf.
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.2, S.91-95
-
Software for Indexing (2003)
0.02
0.02459618 = product of:
0.05739109 = sum of:
0.022467574 = weight(_text_:management in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022467574 = score(doc=2294,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.16125548 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.02206862 = weight(_text_:case in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02206862 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.121434934 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.012854894 = product of:
0.025709787 = sum of:
0.025709787 = weight(_text_:studies in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025709787 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.1558701 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Footnote
- Part 3, Online and Web Indexing Software, opens with a chapter in which the functionalities of HTML/Prep, HTML Indexer, and RoboHELP HTML Edition are compared. The following three chapters look at them individually. This section helps clarify the basic types of non-database web indexing - that used for back-of-the-book style indexes, and that used for online help indexes. The first chapter of Part 4, Database and image software, begins with a good discussion of what database indexing is, but falls to carry through with any listing of general characteristics, problems and attributes that should be considered when choosing database indexing software. It does include the results of an informal survey an the Yahoogroups database indexing site, as well as three short Gase studies an database indexing projects. The survey provides interesting information about freelancing, but it is not very useful if you are trying to gather information about different software. For example, the most common type of software used by those surveyed turns out to be word-processing software. This seems an odd/awkward choice, and it would have been helpful to know how and why the non-specialized software is being used. The survey serves as a snapshot of a particular segment of database indexing practice, but is not helpful if you are thinking about purchasing, adapting, or commissioning software. The three case studies give an idea of the complexity of database indexing and there is a helpful bibliography.
A chapter an image indexing starts with a useful discussion of the elements of bibliographic description needed for visual materials and of the variations in the functioning and naming of functions in different software packaltes. Sample features are discussed in light of four different software systems: MAVIS, Convera Screening Room, CONTENTdm, and Virage speech and pattern recognition programs. The chapter concludes with an overview of what one has to consider when choosing a system. The last chapter in this section is an oddball one an creating a back-ofthe-book index using Microsoft Excel. The author warns: "It is not pretty, and it is not recommended" (p.209). A curiosity, but it should have been included as a counterpoint in the first part, not as part of the database indexing section. The final section begins with an excellent article an voice recognition software (Dragon Naturally Speaking Preferred), followed by a look at "automatic indexing" through a critique of Sonar Bookends Automatic Indexing Generator. The final two chapters deal with Data Harmony's Machine Aided Indexer; one of them refers specifically to a news content indexing system. In terms of scope, this reviewer would have liked to see thesaurus management software included since thesaurus management and the integration of thesauri with database indexing software are common and time-consuming concerns. There are also a few editorial glitches, such as the placement of the oddball article and inconsistent uses of fonts and caps (eg: VIRAGE and Virage), but achieving consistency with this many authors is, indeed, a difficult task. More serious is the fact that the index is inconsistent. It reads as if authors submitted their own keywords which were then harmonized, so that the level of indexing varies by chapter. For example, there is an entry for "controlled vocabulary" (p.265) (singular) with one locator, no cross-references. There is an entry for "thesaurus software" (p.274) with two locators, plus a separate one for "Thesaurus Master" (p.274) with three locators. There are also references to thesauri/ controlled vocabularies/taxonomies that are not mentioned in the index (e.g., the section Thesaurus management an p.204). This is sad. All too often indexing texts have poor indexes, I suppose because we are as prone to having to work under time pressures as the rest of the authors and editors in the world. But a good index that meets basic criteria should be a highlight in any book related to indexing. Overall this is a useful, if uneven, collection of articles written over the past few years. Because of the great variation between articles both in subject and in approach, there is something for everyone. The collection will be interesting to anyone who wants to be aware of how indexing software works and what it can do. I also definitely recommend it for information science teaching collections since the explanations of the software carry implicit in them descriptions of how the indexing process itself is approached. However, the book's utility as a guide to purchasing choices is limited because of the unevenness; the vendor-written articles and testimonials are interesting and can certainly be helpful, but there are not nearly enough objective reviews. This is not a straight listing and comparison of software packaltes, but it deserves wide circulation since it presents an overall picture of the state of indexing software used by freelancers."
-
Craven, T.C.: Changing technologies: impact on information: the case of string indexing (1985)
0.02
0.020177025 = product of:
0.14123917 = sum of:
0.14123917 = weight(_text_:case in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14123917 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.7771836 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Kleinberg, I.: Making the case for professional indexers : where is the proof? (1993)
0.02
0.015132768 = product of:
0.105929375 = sum of:
0.105929375 = weight(_text_:case in 7766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.105929375 = score(doc=7766,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.5828877 = fieldWeight in 7766, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7766)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.01
0.014711247 = product of:
0.10297872 = sum of:
0.10297872 = sum of:
0.058174606 = weight(_text_:studies in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058174606 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.35269377 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.04480412 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04480412 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Bell, H.: On the indexability of butterflies (1992)
0.01
0.010088513 = product of:
0.07061958 = sum of:
0.07061958 = weight(_text_:case in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07061958 = score(doc=3847,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.3885918 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Most publishers, who are cost-conscious, and the majority of authors, who are creativity-conscious, oppos indexes for fiction. However, maintains, that there is a case to be made for the indexing of serious fiction, whose readers have the same needs for information retrieval with regard to characters, places and events, as readers of biographies and histories
-
Canganelli, P.: Sonar bookends : index generation (1994)
0.01
0.008894852 = product of:
0.062263966 = sum of:
0.062263966 = weight(_text_:management in 599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062263966 = score(doc=599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=599)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the Sonar Bookends software package designed to produce detailed full text indexes for inclusion with documents produced by word processing, desktop publishing or file management systems
-
Kascus, M.A.: Indexing, in theory and practice (1996)
0.01
0.008894852 = product of:
0.062263966 = sum of:
0.062263966 = weight(_text_:management in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062263966 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
-
Benson, E.; Dunn, L.R.: ¬The 'Routledge Encyclopedia' project : indexing tools and management techniques for large documents (1993)
0.01
0.007412377 = product of:
0.051886637 = sum of:
0.051886637 = weight(_text_:management in 6346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051886637 = score(doc=6346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 6346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6346)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.0064005884 = product of:
0.04480412 = sum of:
0.04480412 = product of:
0.08960824 = sum of:
0.08960824 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08960824 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.0064005884 = product of:
0.04480412 = sum of:
0.04480412 = product of:
0.08960824 = sum of:
0.08960824 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08960824 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.0064005884 = product of:
0.04480412 = sum of:
0.04480412 = product of:
0.08960824 = sum of:
0.08960824 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08960824 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.0064005884 = product of:
0.04480412 = sum of:
0.04480412 = product of:
0.08960824 = sum of:
0.08960824 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08960824 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14475311 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Indexing: providing access to information : looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, Alexandria, VA, May 1993 (1993)
0.01
0.00630532 = product of:
0.04413724 = sum of:
0.04413724 = weight(_text_:case in 8077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04413724 = score(doc=8077,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18173204 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.24286987 = fieldWeight in 8077, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3964143 = idf(docFreq=1480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8077)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: ZAFRAN, E.L. u. C. MacKAY: Keeping up with the times (& the deadlines): indexing at BNA (Bureau of National Affairs); PRESCHEL, B.M.: Delivering database information to the user: technology, media, content; MULHOLLAND, S.: Indexing and the challenge of change at PsycINFO; LOCKE, C.: Weaving the social fabric; WEINBERG, B.H.: Computer-assisted database indexing; HODGE, G.M.: Computer-assisted database indexing: the state of the art; HUMPHREY, S.M.: The MedIndEx prototype for computer-assisted MEDLINE database indexing; KOLL, M.B.: Automatic relevance ranking: a searcher's complement to indexing; ANDERSON, J.D.: Indexing standards: are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?; SHUTER, J.: Standards for indexes: where do the come from and what use are they?; COUSINS, G.: Professional indexing in Australia: first steps towards accreditation; McFADDEN, T.G.: I wonder who's indexing the Internet now?; WALLIS, E.: Indexing training and accreditation in UK; BELL, H.K.: Vive la difference! The survival of the softest; LIDDY, E.D. u. C.L. JÖRGENSEN: Reality check: book index characteristics that ficilitate information sccess; KLEINBERG, I.: Making the case for professional indexers: where is the proof?
-
Kumar, T.V.R.; Parameswaran, M.: Chain procedure and dictionary catalogue (1998)
0.01
0.0062329937 = product of:
0.043630954 = sum of:
0.043630954 = product of:
0.08726191 = sum of:
0.08726191 = weight(_text_:studies in 6205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08726191 = score(doc=6205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16494368 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.52904063 = fieldWeight in 6205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9902744 = idf(docFreq=2222, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 35(1998) no.4, S.241-246
-
Craven, T.C.: Adapting of string indexing systems for retrieval using proximity operators (1988)
0.01
0.0059299017 = product of:
0.04150931 = sum of:
0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04150931 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 24(1988), S.133-140
-
Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992)
0.01
0.0059299017 = product of:
0.04150931 = sum of:
0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04150931 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Information management and technology. 25(1992) no.3, S.120-122
-
Kaskus, M.A.: Indexing in theory and practice (1996)
0.01
0.0059299017 = product of:
0.04150931 = sum of:
0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 4448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04150931 = score(doc=4448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4448)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
-
Fayen, E.G.: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies : a revision of ANSI/NISO Z39.19 for the 21st century (2007)
0.01
0.0059299017 = product of:
0.04150931 = sum of:
0.04150931 = weight(_text_:management in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04150931 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13932906 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.041336425 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
