Search (361 results, page 1 of 19)

  • × theme_ss:"Information"
  1. Krause, P.J.; Clark, D.: Representing uncertain knowledge (1993) 0.12
    0.11770061 = product of:
      0.23540121 = sum of:
        0.169956 = weight(_text_:representation in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.169956 = score(doc=798,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.8626864 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
        0.06544521 = product of:
          0.19633561 = sum of:
            0.19633561 = weight(_text_:theory in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19633561 = score(doc=798,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                1.1026603 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    LCSH
    Uncertainty (Information theory)
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Subject
    Uncertainty (Information theory)
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
  2. Schneider, J.W.: Emerging frameworks and methods : The Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), The Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, July 21-25, 2002 (2002) 0.09
    0.086520806 = product of:
      0.17304161 = sum of:
        0.08011803 = weight(_text_:representation in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08011803 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.40667427 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
        0.092923574 = product of:
          0.13938536 = sum of:
            0.0925535 = weight(_text_:theory in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0925535 = score(doc=1857,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
            0.046831857 = weight(_text_:29 in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046831857 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Bericht über die Tagung und Kurzreferate zu den 18 Beiträgen (u.a. BELKIN, N.J.: A classification of interactions with information; INGWERSEN, P.: Cognitive perspectives of document representation; HJOERLAND, B.: Principia informatica: foundational theory of the concepts of information and principles of information services; TUOMINEN, K. u.a.: Discourse, cognition and reality: towards a social constructionist meta-theory for library and information science
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.231-234
  3. San Segundo, R.: ¬A new conception of representation of knowledge (2004) 0.08
    0.07608496 = product of:
      0.15216991 = sum of:
        0.14443482 = weight(_text_:representation in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14443482 = score(doc=3077,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.73314244 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
        0.0077350955 = product of:
          0.023205286 = sum of:
            0.023205286 = weight(_text_:22 in 3077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023205286 = score(doc=3077,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3077, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3077)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The new term Representation of knowledge, applied to the framework of electronic segments of information, with comprehension of new material support for information, and a review and total conceptualisation of the terminology which is being applied, entails a review of all traditional documentary practices. Therefore, a definition of the concept of Representation of knowledge is indispensable. The term representation has been used in westere cultural and intellectual tradition to refer to the diverse ways that a subject comprehends an object. Representation is a process which requires the structure of natural language and human memory whereby it is interwoven in a subject and in conscience. However, at the present time, the term Representation of knowledge is applied to the processing of electronic information, combined with the aim of emulating the human mind in such a way that one has endeavoured to transfer, with great difficulty, the complex structurality of the conceptual representation of human knowledge to new digital information technologies. Thus, nowadays, representation of knowledge has taken an diverse meanings and it has focussed, for the moment, an certain structures and conceptual hierarchies which carry and transfer information, and has initially been based an the current representation of knowledge using artificial intelligence. The traditional languages of documentation, also referred to as languages of representation, offer a structured representation of conceptual fields, symbols and terms of natural and notational language, and they are the pillars for the necessary correspondence between the object or text and its representation. These correspondences, connections and symbolisations will be established within the electronic framework by means of different models and of the "goal" domain, which will give rise to organisations, structures, maps, networks and levels, as new electronic documents are not compact units but segments of information. Thus, the new representation of knowledge refers to data, images, figures and symbolised, treated, processed and structured ideas which replace or refer to documents within the framework of technical processing and the recuperation of electronic information.
    Date
    2. 1.2005 18:22:25
  4. Hjoerland, B.: Information seeking and subject representation : an activity-theoretical approach to information science (1997) 0.07
    0.06826917 = product of:
      0.13653834 = sum of:
        0.120177045 = weight(_text_:representation in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.120177045 = score(doc=6963,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.6100114 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
        0.016361302 = product of:
          0.049083903 = sum of:
            0.049083903 = weight(_text_:theory in 6963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049083903 = score(doc=6963,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.27566507 = fieldWeight in 6963, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6963)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information science has for a long time been drawing on the knowledge produced in psychology and related fields. This is reasonable, for the central issue in information science concerns individual users navigating information spaces such as libraries, databases, and the Internet, Thus, informations seeking is the fundamental problem in information science, while other problems, such as document representation, are subordinate. This book proposes a general theory of information seeking as a theoretical basis for information science
    Content
    Introduction - information seeking and subject representation - subject searching and subject representation data - subject analysis and knowledge organization - the concept of subject or subject matter and basic epistemological positions - methodological consequences for information science - science, discipline, and subject field as a framework for information seeking - information needs and cognitive and scientific development
  5. McGuire, E.G.: Knowledge representation and construction in hypermedia environments (1996) 0.07
    0.06755954 = product of:
      0.13511908 = sum of:
        0.113304004 = weight(_text_:representation in 7272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113304004 = score(doc=7272,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.57512426 = fieldWeight in 7272, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7272)
        0.021815069 = product of:
          0.06544521 = sum of:
            0.06544521 = weight(_text_:theory in 7272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06544521 = score(doc=7272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 7272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7272)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Hypermedia information systems, because of their inherent qualities of nonlinearity and associative linking, offer the potential of facilitating enhanced knowledge representation and construction for users. These capabilities will be more fully realized if hypermedia information systems are developed and implemented based on constructivist learning theory. Examines the qualities of hypermedia systems that enable them to facilitate learning, discusses the background of current learning theories and provides a brief view of a possible hypermedia system based on constructivist learning principles that could be developed through the use of intellegent autonomous agents
  6. Albrechtsen, H.; Hjoerland, B.: Information seeking and knowledge organization : the presentation of a new book (1997) 0.07
    0.06610136 = product of:
      0.13220271 = sum of:
        0.099141 = weight(_text_:representation in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099141 = score(doc=310,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.50323373 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
        0.033061706 = product of:
          0.09918512 = sum of:
            0.09918512 = weight(_text_:theory in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09918512 = score(doc=310,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.55704355 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Recently, a new book on knowledge organization has been published by Greenwood Press. The title is 'Information seeking and subject representation: an activity-theoretical approach to information science'. This book presents a new general theory for information science and knowledge organization, based on a theory of information seeking. The author is Dr. Birger Hjørland, Royal School of Library and Information Science. In 1994, he presented his work on theory for KO at the 3rd International ISKO conference in Copenhagen. The book aims to provide both a new understanding for the foundations of information science and knowledge organization, and to provide new directions in research and teaching within these fields. KO (Hanne Albrechtsen) has interviewed Birger HjÝrland in Copenhagen about his views on knowledge organization and subject representation
  7. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.06
    0.059742644 = product of:
      0.11948529 = sum of:
        0.100147545 = weight(_text_:representation in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.100147545 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.50834286 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
        0.01933774 = product of:
          0.05801322 = sum of:
            0.05801322 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05801322 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
  8. Philosophy, computing and information science (2014) 0.06
    0.05642032 = product of:
      0.11284064 = sum of:
        0.08011803 = weight(_text_:representation in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08011803 = score(doc=3407,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.40667427 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
        0.032722604 = product of:
          0.09816781 = sum of:
            0.09816781 = weight(_text_:theory in 3407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09816781 = score(doc=3407,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.55133015 = fieldWeight in 3407, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3407)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Introduction: Philosophy's Relevance in Computing and Information Science - Ruth Hagengruber and Uwe V.Riss Part I: Philosophy of Computing and Information 1 The Fourth Revolution in our Self-Understanding - Luciano Floridi -- 2 Information Transfer as a Metaphor - Jakob Krebs -- 3 With Aristotle towards a Differentiated Concept of Information? - Uwe Voigt -- 4 The Influence of Philosophy on the Understanding of Computing and Information - Klaus Fuchs-Kittowski -- Part II: Complexity and System Theory 5 The Emergence of Self-Conscious Systems: From Symbolic AI to Embodied Robotics - Klaus Mainzer -- 6 Artificial Intelligence as a New Metaphysical Project - Aziz F. Zambak Part III: Ontology 7 The Relevance of Philosophical Ontology to Information and Computer Science - Barry Smith -- 8 Ontology, its Origins and its Meaning in Information Science - Jens Kohne -- 9 Smart Questions: Steps towards an Ontology of Questions and Answers - Ludwig Jaskolla and Matthias Rugel Part IV: Knowledge Representation 10 Sophisticated Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Requires Philosophy - Selmer Bringsjord, Micah Clark and Joshua Taylor -- 11 On Frames and Theory-Elements of Structuralism Holger Andreas -- 12 Ontological Complexity and Human Culture David J. Saab and Frederico Fonseca Part V: Action Theory 13 Knowledge and Action between Abstraction and Concretion - Uwe V.Riss -- 14 Action-Directing Construction of Reality in Product Creation Using Social Software: Employing Philosophy to Solve Real-World Problems - Kai Holzweifiig and Jens Krüger -- 15 An Action-Theory-Based Treatment ofTemporal Individuals - Tillmann Pross -- 16 Four Rules for Classifying Social Entities - Ludger Jansen Part VI: Info-Computationalism 17 Info-Computationalism and Philosophical Aspects of Research in Information Sciences - Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic -- 18 Pancomputationalism: Theory or Metaphor ? - Vincent C. Mutter Part VII: Ethics 19 The Importance of the Sources of Professional Obligations - Francis C. Dane
    LCSH
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Knowledge, Theory of
    Subject
    Knowledge representation (Information theory)
    Knowledge, Theory of
  9. Andersen, J.; Christensen, F.S.: Wittgenstein and indexing theory (2001) 0.05
    0.05468948 = product of:
      0.10937896 = sum of:
        0.070815004 = weight(_text_:representation in 1590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070815004 = score(doc=1590,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.35945266 = fieldWeight in 1590, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1590)
        0.03856396 = product of:
          0.11569187 = sum of:
            0.11569187 = weight(_text_:theory in 1590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11569187 = score(doc=1590,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.6497488 = fieldWeight in 1590, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1590)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper considers indexing an activity that deals with linguistic entities. It rests an the assumption that a theory of indexing should be based an a philosophy of language, because indexing is concerned with the linguistic representation of meaning. The paper consists of four sections: It begins with some basic considerations an the nature of indexing and the requirements for a theory an this; it is followed by a short review of the use of Wittgenstein's philosophy in LIS-literature; next is an analysis of Wittgenstein's work Philosophical Investigations; finally, we deduce a theory of indexing from this philosophy. Considering an indexing theory a theory of meaning entails that, for the purpose of retrieval, indexing is a representation of meaning. Therefore, an indexing theory is concerned with how words are used in the linguistic context. Furthermore, the indexing process is a communicative process containing an interpretative element. Through the philosophy of the later Wittgenstein, it is shown that language and meaning are publicly constituted entities. Since they form the basis of indexing, a theory hereof must take into account that no single actor can define the meaning of documents. Rather this is decided by the social, historical and linguistic context in which the document is produced, distributed and exchanged. Indexing must clarify and reflect these contexts.
  10. Knowledge, concepts and categories (1997) 0.05
    0.04834298 = product of:
      0.09668596 = sum of:
        0.084978 = weight(_text_:representation in 1977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084978 = score(doc=1977,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.4313432 = fieldWeight in 1977, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1977)
        0.011707964 = product of:
          0.035123892 = sum of:
            0.035123892 = weight(_text_:29 in 1977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035123892 = score(doc=1977,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1977, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1977)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Kapitel: (1) HEIT, E.: Knowledge and concept learning (2) HAHN, U. u. N. CHATER: Concepts and similarity (3) MURPHY, G.L. u. M.E. LASSALINE: Hierarchical structure in concepts and the basic level of categorization (4) HAMPTON, J.: Conceptual combination (5) SMITH, L.B. u. L.K. SAMUELSON; Perceiving and remembering: category stability, variability and development (6) SHANKS, D.R.: Distributed representations and implicit knowledge: a brief introduction (7) KNOWLTON, B.: Declarative and nondeclarative knowledge: insights from cognitive neurosciences (8) GOSCHKE, T.: Implicit learning and unconscious knowledge: mental representation, computational mechanisms, and brain structures (9) WHITTLESEA, B.W.A.: The representation of general and particular knowledge (10) LAMBERTS, K.: Process models of categorization (11) BUSEMEYER, J.R. u.a.: Learning functional relations based on experience with input-output pairs by humans and artificial neural networks (12) STORMS, G. u. P. DeBOECK: Formal models for intra-categorial structure that can be used for data analysis
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
  11. Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information (2006) 0.04
    0.04462333 = product of:
      0.08924666 = sum of:
        0.07010327 = weight(_text_:representation in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07010327 = score(doc=2746,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.35583997 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
        0.019143386 = product of:
          0.057430156 = sum of:
            0.057430156 = weight(_text_:22 in 2746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057430156 = score(doc=2746,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2746, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2746)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Fundamental forms of information, as well as the term information itself, are defined and developed for the purposes of information science/studies. Concepts of natural and represented information (taking an unconventional sense of representation), encoded and embodied information, as well as experienced, enacted, expressed, embedded, recorded, and trace information are elaborated. The utility of these terms for the discipline is illustrated with examples from the study of information-seeking behavior and of information genres. Distinctions between the information and curatorial sciences with respect to their social (and informational) objects of study are briefly outlined.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 18:15:22
  12. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.04
    0.043580078 = product of:
      0.087160155 = sum of:
        0.056672662 = product of:
          0.17001799 = sum of:
            0.17001799 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17001799 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36301607 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.030487489 = product of:
          0.09146246 = sum of:
            0.09146246 = weight(_text_:theory in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09146246 = score(doc=76,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.5136716 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  13. Perry, M.: Process, representation and taskworld : Distributed cognition and the organisation of information (1999) 0.04
    0.038671307 = product of:
      0.077342615 = sum of:
        0.050073773 = weight(_text_:representation in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050073773 = score(doc=269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
        0.027268838 = product of:
          0.08180651 = sum of:
            0.08180651 = weight(_text_:theory in 269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08180651 = score(doc=269,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.4594418 = fieldWeight in 269, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=269)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper shows a technique for examining information within its context, drawing together threads from anthropology, sociology, psychology, and organisational theory. As stated in the call for papers, the formalisation of `things' `into formation' is a partial, precarious and political activity. On the other hand, when applied appropriately, this process can also be a powerful means of achieving an understanding about a setting, albeit with a particular perspective. One such approach is presented here of looking at this idea of `information' as both the product of an analysis, and its use in an organising capacity. There is an applied need for providing rich descriptions of action in real world settings both in the development of work-appropriate technology, and to support organisational change. This requirement has lead to, and been informed by, the development of theoretical frameworks to organise this information. Amongst others, these include ethnomethodology, situation theory, actor network theory and activity theory. A relatively new framework that allows researchers to organise task related information about activity and context is distributed cognition (Hutchins, 1995a,b), developed specifically to analyse and provide resources for redesigning systems (Rogers & Ellis, 1994) by examining their information processing characteristics.
  14. Frohmann, B.: Knowledge and power in information science : toward a discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint (1995) 0.04
    0.03684464 = product of:
      0.07368928 = sum of:
        0.050073773 = weight(_text_:representation in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050073773 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.25417143 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
        0.023615506 = product of:
          0.07084651 = sum of:
            0.07084651 = weight(_text_:theory in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07084651 = score(doc=2711,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.39788827 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint in library and information science (LIS) identifies seven discursive strategies which constitute information as a commodity, and persons as surveyable information consumers, within market economy conditions. These strategies are (a) universality of theory, (b) referentiality and reification of 'images', (c) internationalization of representation, (d) insistence upon knowledge, (e) constitution of the information scientists as an expert in image negotiation, (f) radical individualism and erasure of the social dimension of theory, and (g) instrumental reasons, rules by efficiency, standardization, predictibility,a nd determination of effects. The discourse is guided troughout by a yearning for natural-scientific theory. The effect of the cognitiv viewpoint's discoursive strategy is to anable knowledge acquisition of information processes only when users' and generators 'images' are constituted as objectively given natural scientif entites, and to disable knowledge of the same processes when considered as products of social practices. By its constitution of users as free creators of images, of the information scientist as an expert in image interpretation and delivery, and of databases as repositories of unmediated models of the world, the cognitive viewpoint performs ideological labour for modern capitalist image markets
  15. Verdi, M.P.; Kulhavy, R.W.; Stock, W.A.; Rittscho, K.A.; Savenye, W.: Why maps improve memory for text : the influence of structural information on working-memory operations (1993) 0.04
    0.03584558 = product of:
      0.07169116 = sum of:
        0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060088523 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
        0.011602643 = product of:
          0.034807928 = sum of:
            0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034807928 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In order to test how associated verbal and spatial stimuli are processed in memory, undergraduates studied a reference map as either an intact unit or as a series of individual features, and read a text containing facts related to map features. In Addition, the map was presented either before or after reading the text. Seeing the intact map prior to the text led to better recall of both map information and facts from the text. These results support a dual coding modell, where stimuli such as maps possess a retrieval advantage because they allow simultaneous representation in working memory. This advantage occurs because information from the map can be used to cue retrieval of associated verbal facts, without exceeding the processing constraints of the memorial system
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:18:18
  16. Fujiwara, Y.; Gotoda, H.: Representation model for relativity of concepts (1995) 0.04
    0.03584558 = product of:
      0.07169116 = sum of:
        0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060088523 = score(doc=2994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
        0.011602643 = product of:
          0.034807928 = sum of:
            0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034807928 = score(doc=2994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.1, S.22-30
  17. Representation and exchange of knowledge as a basis of information processes : Proc. of the 5th Int. Research Forum in Information Science (IRFIS 5), Heidelberg, 5.-7.9.1983 (1984) 0.04
    0.035051636 = product of:
      0.14020655 = sum of:
        0.14020655 = weight(_text_:representation in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14020655 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.71167994 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  18. Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge representation : logical, philosophical, and computational foundations (2000) 0.04
    0.035051636 = product of:
      0.14020655 = sum of:
        0.14020655 = weight(_text_:representation in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14020655 = score(doc=4360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.71167994 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  19. Gopinath, M.A.; Das, P.: Classification and representation of knowledge (1997) 0.03
    0.034692124 = product of:
      0.1387685 = sum of:
        0.1387685 = weight(_text_:representation in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1387685 = score(doc=462,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042818543 = queryNorm
            0.7043805 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the various purposes of knowledge representation including the understanding of texts, cognitive research, expert system development and information retrieval. Analyses the relationship of classification to knowledge, including the role of cluster analysis. Examines the problems of knowledge representation and the solution offered through proper classification
  20. ¬The mathematical theory of information (2002) 0.03
    0.03337214 = product of:
      0.13348857 = sum of:
        0.13348857 = product of:
          0.20023285 = sum of:
            0.14169303 = weight(_text_:theory in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14169303 = score(doc=189,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.79577655 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
            0.058539823 = weight(_text_:29 in 189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058539823 = score(doc=189,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042818543 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 189, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=189)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mathematical Intelligencer 29(2007) no.1, S.64-65 (C.S. Calude)
    LCSH
    Information theory
    Subject
    Information theory

Languages

Types

  • a 285
  • m 65
  • s 11
  • el 10
  • ? 2
  • fi 1
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications