Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

0.14147852 = product of:
  0.28295705 = sum of:
    0.07073926 = product of:
      0.21221778 = sum of:
        0.21221778 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21221778 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.21221778 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21221778 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.123620175 = product of:
  0.24724035 = sum of:
    0.047159508 = product of:
      0.14147852 = sum of:
        0.14147852 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14147852 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.20008084 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20008084 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.094319016 = product of:
  0.18863803 = sum of:
    0.047159508 = product of:
      0.14147852 = sum of:
        0.14147852 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14147852 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.14147852 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14147852 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3775996 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

0.03473157 = product of:
  0.13892628 = sum of:
    0.13892628 = weight(_text_:technological in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13892628 = score(doc=5732,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.58705115 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Recent technological developments have increased the use of machine learning to solve many problems, including many in information retrieval. Multimedia information retrieval as a problem represents a significant challenge to machine learning as a technological solution, but some problems can still be addressed by using appropriate AI techniques. We review the technological developments and provide a perspective on the use of machine learning in conjunction with knowledge organization to address multimedia IR needs. The semantic gap in multimedia IR remains a significant problem in the field, and solutions to them are many years off. However, new technological developments allow the use of knowledge organization and machine learning in multimedia search systems and services. Specifically, we argue that, the improvement of detection of some classes of lowlevel features in images music and video can be used in conjunction with knowledge organization to tag or label multimedia content for better retrieval performance. We provide an overview of the use of knowledge organization schemes in machine learning and make recommendations to information professionals on the use of this technology with knowledge organization techniques to solve multimedia IR problems. We introduce a five-step process model that extracts features from multimedia objects (Step 1) from both knowledge organization (Step 1a) and machine learning (Step 1b), merging them together (Step 2) to create an index of those multimedia objects (Step 3). We also overview further steps in creating an application to utilize the multimedia objects (Step 4) and maintaining and updating the database of features on those objects (Step 5).

0.027785257 = product of:
  0.111141026 = sum of:
    0.111141026 = weight(_text_:technological in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.111141026 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.46964094 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

0.024625178 = product of:
  0.09850071 = sum of:
    0.09850071 = product of:
      0.19700143 = sum of:
        0.19700143 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19700143 = score(doc=4319,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.6505546 = fieldWeight in 4319, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Innovations and Advanced Techniques in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering includes a set of rigorously reviewed world-class manuscripts addressing and detailing state-of-the-art research projects in the areas of Computer Science, Software Engineering, Computer Engineering, and Systems Engineering and Sciences. Innovations and Advanced Techniques in Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering includes selected papers form the conference proceedings of the International Conference on Systems, Computing Sciences and Software Engineering (SCSS 2007) which was part of the International Joint Conferences on Computer, Information and Systems Sciences and Engineering (CISSE 2007).

0.020838942 = product of:
  0.08335577 = sum of:
    0.08335577 = weight(_text_:technological in 5703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08335577 = score(doc=5703,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.3522307 = fieldWeight in 5703, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5703)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper poses three questions regarding the planned development of the Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) towards W3C Recommendation status. Firstly, what is the fundamental purpose and therefore scope of SKOS? Secondly, which key software components depend on SKOS, and how do they interact? Thirdly, what is the wider technological and social context in which SKOS is likely to be applied and how might this influence design goals? Some tentative conclusions are drawn and in particular it is suggested that the scope of SKOS be restricted to the formal representation of controlled structured vocabularies intended for use within retrieval applications. However, the main purpose of this paper is to articulate the assumptions that have motivated the design of SKOS, so that these may be reviewed prior to a rigorous standardization initiative.

0.020838942 = product of:
  0.08335577 = sum of:
    0.08335577 = weight(_text_:technological in 3378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08335577 = score(doc=3378,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.3522307 = fieldWeight in 3378, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3378)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Digital libraries have become commodity in the current world of Internet. More and more information is produced, and more and more non-digital information is being rendered available. The new, more user friendly, community-oriented technologies used throughout the Internet are raising the bar of expectations. Digital libraries cannot stand still with their technologies; if not for the sake of handling rapidly growing amount and diversity of information, they must provide for better user experience matching and overgrowing standards set by the industry. The next generation of digital libraries combine technological solutions, such as P2P, SOA, or Grid, with recent research on semantics and social networks. These solutions are put into practice to answer a variety of requirements imposed on digital libraries.

0.017365785 = product of:
  0.06946314 = sum of:
    0.06946314 = weight(_text_:technological in 5204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06946314 = score(doc=5204,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.29352558 = fieldWeight in 5204, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5204)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This book describes proven methodologies for developing semantic applications: software applications which explicitly or implicitly uses the semantics (i.e., the meaning) of a domain terminology in order to improve usability, correctness, and completeness. An example is semantic search, where synonyms and related terms are used for enriching the results of a simple text-based search. Ontologies, thesauri or controlled vocabularies are the centerpiece of semantic applications. The book includes technological and architectural best practices for corporate use.

0.01719125 = product of:
  0.068765 = sum of:
    0.068765 = weight(_text_:technological in 5460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068765 = score(doc=5460,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.2905755 = fieldWeight in 5460, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5460)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to identify and explain the role of individual learning and development in acquiring tacit knowledge in the context of the inexorable and intense continuous change (technological and otherwise) that characterizes our society today, and also to investigate the software (SW) sector, which is at the core of contemporary continuous change and is a paradigm of effective and intrinsic knowledge sharing (KS). This makes the SW sector unique and different from others where KS is so hard to implement. Design/methodology/approach The study employed an inductive qualitative approach based on a multi-case study approach, composed of three successful SW companies in China. These companies are representative of the fabric of the sector, namely a small- and medium-sized enterprise, a large private company and a large state-owned enterprise. The fieldwork included 44 participants who were interviewed using a semi-structured script. The interview data were coded and interpreted following the Straussian grounded theory pattern of open coding, axial coding and selective coding. The process of interviewing was stopped when theoretical saturation was achieved after a careful process of theoretical sampling.
Findings The findings of this research suggest that individual learning and development are deemed to be the fundamental feature for professional success and survival in the continuously changing environment of the SW industry today. However, individual learning was described by the participants as much more than a mere individual process. It involves a collective and participatory effort within the organization and the sector as a whole, and a KS process that transcends organizational, cultural and national borders. Individuals in particular are mostly motivated by the pressing need to face and adapt to the dynamic and changeable environments of today's digital society that is led by the sector. Software practitioners are continuously in need of learning, refreshing and accumulating tacit knowledge, partly because it is required by their companies, but also due to a sound awareness of continuous technical and technological changes that seem only to increase with the advances of information technology. This led to a clear theoretical understanding that the continuous change that faces the sector has led to individual acquisition of culture and somatic knowledge that in turn lay the foundation for not only the awareness of the need for continuous individual professional development but also for the creation of habitus related to KS and continuous learning. Originality/value The study reported in this paper shows that there is a theoretical link between the existence of conducive organizational and sector-wide somatic and cultural knowledge, and the success of KS practices that lead to individual learning and development. Therefore, the theory proposed suggests that somatic and cultural knowledge are crucial drivers for the creation of habitus of individual tacit knowledge acquisition. The paper further proposes a habitus-driven individual development (HDID) Theoretical Model that can be of use to both academics and practitioners interested in fostering and developing processes of KS and individual development in knowledge-intensive organizations.

0.017060824 = product of:
  0.068243295 = sum of:
    0.068243295 = product of:
      0.13648659 = sum of:
        0.13648659 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13648659 = score(doc=4318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.45071742 = fieldWeight in 4318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Innovations and advanced techniques in systems, computing sciences and software engineering. Ed.: K. Elleithy

0.017060824 = product of:
  0.068243295 = sum of:
    0.068243295 = product of:
      0.13648659 = sum of:
        0.13648659 = weight(_text_:innovations in 1142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13648659 = score(doc=1142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.45071742 = fieldWeight in 1142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1142)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

We provide a brief, non-technical introduction to the text mining methodology known as "topic modeling." We summarize the theory and background of the method and discuss what kinds of things are found by topic models. Using a text corpus comprised of the eight articles from the special issue of Poetics on the subject of topic models, we run a topic model on these articles, both as a way to introduce the methodology and also to help summarize some of the ways in which social and cultural scientists are using topic models. We review some of the critiques and debates over the use of the method and finally, we link these developments back to some of the original innovations in the field of content analysis that were pioneered by Harold D. Lasswell and colleagues during and just after World War II.

0.014217352 = product of:
  0.056869406 = sum of:
    0.056869406 = product of:
      0.11373881 = sum of:
        0.11373881 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11373881 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.37559783 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.

0.013892628 = product of:
  0.055570513 = sum of:
    0.055570513 = weight(_text_:technological in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055570513 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23665106 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0445387 = queryNorm
        0.23482047 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.3133807 = idf(docFreq=591, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Currently, techniques for content description and query processing in Information Retrieval (IR) are based on keywords, and therefore provide limited capabilities to capture the conceptualizations associated with user needs and contents. Aiming to solve the limitations of keyword-based models, the idea of conceptual search, understood as searching by meanings rather than literal strings, has been the focus of a wide body of research in the IR field. More recently, it has been used as a prototypical scenario (or even envisioned as a potential "killer app") in the Semantic Web (SW) vision, since its emergence in the late nineties. However, current approaches to semantic search developed in the SW area have not yet taken full advantage of the acquired knowledge, accumulated experience, and technological sophistication achieved through several decades of work in the IR field. Starting from this position, this work investigates the definition of an ontology-based IR model, oriented to the exploitation of domain Knowledge Bases to support semantic search capabilities in large document repositories, stressing on the one hand the use of fully fledged ontologies in the semantic-based perspective, and on the other hand the consideration of unstructured content as the target search space. The major contribution of this work is an innovative, comprehensive semantic search model, which extends the classic IR model, addresses the challenges of the massive and heterogeneous Web environment, and integrates the benefits of both keyword and semantic-based search. Additional contributions include: an innovative rank fusion technique that minimizes the undesired effects of knowledge sparseness on the yet juvenile SW, and the creation of a large-scale evaluation benchmark, based on TREC IR evaluation standards, which allows a rigorous comparison between IR and SW approaches. Conducted experiments show that our semantic search model obtained comparable and better performance results (in terms of MAP and P@10 values) than the best TREC automatic system.

0.011373882 = product of:
  0.04549553 = sum of:
    0.04549553 = product of:
      0.09099106 = sum of:
        0.09099106 = weight(_text_:innovations in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09099106 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30282074 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.30047828 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7990475 = idf(docFreq=133, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.

0.007542974 = product of:
  0.030171895 = sum of:
    0.030171895 = product of:
      0.06034379 = sum of:
        0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06034379 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Pages

S.11-22

0.007542974 = product of:
  0.030171895 = sum of:
    0.030171895 = product of:
      0.06034379 = sum of:
        0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 5576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06034379 = score(doc=5576,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5576, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5576)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

13.12.2017 14:17:22

0.007542974 = product of:
  0.030171895 = sum of:
    0.030171895 = product of:
      0.06034379 = sum of:
        0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06034379 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

26.12.2011 13:22:07

0.007542974 = product of:
  0.030171895 = sum of:
    0.030171895 = product of:
      0.06034379 = sum of:
        0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06034379 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

30. 5.2010 16:22:35

0.007542974 = product of:
  0.030171895 = sum of:
    0.030171895 = product of:
      0.06034379 = sum of:
        0.06034379 = weight(_text_:22 in 4523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06034379 = score(doc=4523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15596694 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0445387 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 2018, H.1, S.22-27