Search (179 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.24
    0.23705119 = product of:
      0.31606826 = sum of:
        0.075580016 = product of:
          0.22674005 = sum of:
            0.22674005 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22674005 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22674005 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22674005 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4034391 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.013748205 = weight(_text_:information in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013748205 = score(doc=2918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  2. Cox, R.J.: Access in the digital information age and the archival mission : the United States (1998) 0.03
    0.0339073 = product of:
      0.0678146 = sum of:
        0.022683382 = weight(_text_:information in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022683382 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
        0.04513122 = product of:
          0.09026244 = sum of:
            0.09026244 = weight(_text_:22 in 3177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09026244 = score(doc=3177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    2. 3.1999 9:22:24
  3. Rosman, G.; Meer, K.v.d.; Sol, H.G.: ¬The design of document information systems (1996) 0.03
    0.032320708 = product of:
      0.064641416 = sum of:
        0.03240483 = weight(_text_:information in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03240483 = score(doc=7750,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
        0.032236587 = product of:
          0.064473175 = sum of:
            0.064473175 = weight(_text_:22 in 7750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064473175 = score(doc=7750,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 7750, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7750)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the costs and benefits of documents information systems (involving text and images) and some design methodological aspects that arise from the documentary nature of the data. Reports details of a case study involving a specific document information system introduced at Press Ltd, a company in the Netherlands
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.4, S.287-297
  4. Smith, C.D.: Implementation of imaging technology for recordkeeping at the World Bank (1997) 0.03
    0.02766542 = product of:
      0.05533084 = sum of:
        0.022683382 = weight(_text_:information in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022683382 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
        0.032647457 = product of:
          0.065294914 = sum of:
            0.065294914 = weight(_text_:technology in 195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065294914 = score(doc=195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.46069574 = fieldWeight in 195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1997) no.5, S.25-29
  5. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.03
    0.027575132 = product of:
      0.055150263 = sum of:
        0.022913676 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022913676 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.032236587 = product of:
          0.064473175 = sum of:
            0.064473175 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064473175 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  6. Hare, C.E.; McLeaod, J.; King, L.A.: Continuing professional development for the information discipline of records management : pt.1: context and initial indications of current activities (1996) 0.03
    0.026286453 = product of:
      0.052572906 = sum of:
        0.030007293 = weight(_text_:information in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030007293 = score(doc=5049,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
        0.02256561 = product of:
          0.04513122 = sum of:
            0.04513122 = weight(_text_:22 in 5049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04513122 = score(doc=5049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the newly emerging information discipline of records management, focusing on its current status in the UK where it is represented by a range of sector specific and general organizations for information professionals. While records management involves some skills and knowledge which are different from those already mastered by library and information professionals, there are significant overlaps in terms of cataloguing, classification, indexing, identifying and meeting user needs and the challenge of dealing with information in electronic form. Concludes that, in the changing and sometimes shrinking market of of some of the more traditional library sectors, records management may offer the opportunity for information professionals to develop or shift their career path while remaining within the discipline of information management
    Source
    Librarian career development. 4(1996) no.2, S.22-27
  7. Boyle, J.: ¬A blueprint for managing documents (1997) 0.03
    0.0260862 = product of:
      0.1043448 = sum of:
        0.1043448 = sum of:
          0.05276626 = weight(_text_:technology in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05276626 = score(doc=814,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
          0.05157854 = weight(_text_:22 in 814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05157854 = score(doc=814,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 814, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=814)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Electronic document management systems are a collection of 3 complementary technologies: the repository, the workflow engine and the searching-and-indexing technology. The document repository stores, controls and manages documents. Workflow can eliminate the dead time a document spends in transition between works and integrates with the repository and electronic mail system. Search and indexing technology enables more efficient searching than standard full text technologies by configuring searches to specific attributes. Discusses how the technologies can be combined to manage a WWW site and offers advice on choosing an appropriate solution
    Source
    Byte. 22(1997) no.5, S.75-76,78,80
  8. Economics of digital information : collection, storage and delivery (1997) 0.03
    0.02569151 = product of:
      0.05138302 = sum of:
        0.028063409 = weight(_text_:information in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028063409 = score(doc=3859,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
        0.02331961 = product of:
          0.04663922 = sum of:
            0.04663922 = weight(_text_:technology in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04663922 = score(doc=3859,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Journal of librarianship and information science 30(1998) no.4, S.272 (T. Hayward); Multimedia information and technology 24(1998) no.4, S.277 (A. u. S. Timms)
  9. Valentine, I.: Document management and workflow systems : how they research the SME and workgroup (1997) 0.03
    0.025321774 = product of:
      0.05064355 = sum of:
        0.018330941 = weight(_text_:information in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018330941 = score(doc=808,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
        0.032312606 = product of:
          0.06462521 = sum of:
            0.06462521 = weight(_text_:technology in 808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06462521 = score(doc=808,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.45597056 = fieldWeight in 808, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the practicalities of introducing document management and workflow technology, based on commercially available software products, in a small-to-medium sized business. Produces a workflow model for a hypothetical organization to purchase goods or services associated with its business and examines the enabling technology, and set up costs. There are no generic solutions. Each process needs to be evaluated to determine the automation needs
    Source
    Information management and technology. 30(1997) no.3, S.117-121
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  10. Medien-Informationsmanagement : Archivarische, dokumentarische, betriebswirtschaftliche, rechtliche und Berufsbild-Aspekte ; [Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar und Folgetagung 2001 in Köln] (2003) 0.02
    0.024425376 = product of:
      0.048850752 = sum of:
        0.00972145 = weight(_text_:information in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00972145 = score(doc=1833,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
        0.039129302 = sum of:
          0.019787349 = weight(_text_:technology in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019787349 = score(doc=1833,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.1396119 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
          0.019341951 = weight(_text_:22 in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019341951 = score(doc=1833,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047586527 = queryNorm
              0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Als in den siebziger Jahren des vergangenen Jahrhunderts immer häufiger die Bezeichnung Informationsmanager für Leute propagiert wurde, die bis dahin als Dokumentare firmierten, wurde dies in den etablierten Kreisen der Archivare und Bibliothekare gelegentlich belächelt und als Zeichen einer Identitätskrise oder jedenfalls einer Verunsicherung des damit überschriebenen Berufsbilds gewertet. Für den Berufsstand der Medienarchivare/Mediendokumentare, die sich seit 1960 in der Fachgruppe 7 des Vereins, später Verbands deutscher Archivare (VdA) organisieren, gehörte diese Verortung im Zeichen neuer inhaltlicher Herausforderungen (Informationsflut) und Technologien (EDV) allerdings schon früh zu den Selbstverständlichkeiten des Berufsalltags. "Halt, ohne uns geht es nicht!" lautete die Überschrift eines Artikels im Verbandsorgan "Info 7", der sich mit der Einrichtung von immer mächtigeren Leitungsnetzen und immer schnelleren Datenautobahnen beschäftigte. Information, Informationsgesellschaft: diese Begriffe wurden damals fast nur im technischen Sinne verstanden. Die informatisierte, nicht die informierte Gesellschaft stand im Vordergrund - was wiederum Kritiker auf den Plan rief, von Joseph Weizenbaum in den USA bis hin zu den Informations-Ökologen in Bremen. Bei den nationalen, manchmal auch nur regionalen Projekten und Modellversuchen mit Datenautobahnen - auch beim frühen Btx - war nie so recht deutlich geworden, welche Inhalte in welcher Gestalt durch diese Netze und Straßen gejagt werden sollten und wer diese Inhalte eigentlich selektieren, portionieren, positionieren, kurz: managen sollte. Spätestens mit dem World Wide Web sind diese Projekte denn auch obsolet geworden, jedenfalls was die Hardware und Software anging. Geblieben ist das Thema Inhalte (neudeutsch: Content). Und - immer drängender im nicht nur technischen Verständnis - das Thema Informationsmanagement. MedienInformationsManagement war die Frühjahrstagung der Fachgruppe 7 im Jahr 2000 in Weimar überschrieben, und auch die Folgetagung 2001 in Köln, die der multimedialen Produktion einen dokumentarischen Pragmatismus gegenüber stellte, handelte vom Geschäftsfeld Content und von Content-Management-Systemen. Die in diesem 6. Band der Reihe Beiträge zur Mediendokumentation versammelten Vorträge und Diskussionsbeiträge auf diesen beiden Tagungen beleuchten das Titel-Thema aus den verschiedensten Blickwinkeln: archivarischen, dokumentarischen, kaufmännischen, berufsständischen und juristischen. Deutlich wird dabei, daß die Berufsbezeichnung Medienarchivarln/Mediendokumentarln ziemlich genau für all das steht, was heute mit sog. alten wie neuen Medien im organisatorischen, d.h. ordnenden und vermittelnden Sinne geschieht. Im besonderen Maße trifft dies auf das Internet und die aus ihm geborenen Intranets zu. Beide bedürfen genauso der ordnenden Hand, die sich an den alten Medien, an Buch, Zeitung, Tonträger, Film etc. geschult hat, denn sie leben zu großen Teilen davon. Daß das Internet gleichwohl ein Medium sui generis ist und die alten Informationsberufe vor ganz neue Herausforderungen stellt - auch das durchzieht die Beiträge von Weimar und Köln.
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge (Dokumentarische Aspekte): Günter Perers/Volker Gaese: Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von Gr+J (Weimar 2000) Thomas Gerick: Finden statt suchen. Knowledge Retrieval in Wissensbanken. Mit organisiertem Wissen zu mehr Erfolg (Weimar 2000) Winfried Gödert: Aufbereitung und Rezeption von Information (Weimar 2000) Elisabeth Damen: Klassifikation als Ordnungssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (Köln 2001) Clemens Schlenkrich: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit - Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (Köln 2001) Josef Wandeler: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof'? - Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (Köln 200 1)
    Date
    11. 5.2008 19:49:22
    LCSH
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
    Subject
    Information technology / Management / Congresses
  11. Martin, P.; Vaillant, S.: ¬Le records management : Concept nouveau? Pratique ancienne? (1998) 0.02
    0.023976084 = product of:
      0.047952168 = sum of:
        0.016039573 = weight(_text_:information in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016039573 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
        0.031912595 = product of:
          0.06382519 = sum of:
            0.06382519 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06382519 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Records management has appeared lately in France to designate the management of organizational documents and electronic data an enterprise must retain as proof of its activities and transactions. An international standard is under discussion to address issues concerned with retention. At the same time, some information professionals are finding themselves increasingly involved with active company records, since the role of records manager requires skills found in the professions of archivists, information scientist and quality controller. Presents examples which pose the question, is records management in fact a new profession or simply a new form of a familiar job?
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    31.12.1998 15:32:22
  12. Bikson, T.K.; Law, S.A.: Electronic information media and records management methods : a survey of practices in UN organizations (1993) 0.02
    0.023819726 = product of:
      0.047639452 = sum of:
        0.028983762 = weight(_text_:information in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028983762 = score(doc=983,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
        0.01865569 = product of:
          0.03731138 = sum of:
            0.03731138 = weight(_text_:technology in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03731138 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on an investigation of electronic records management practices emerging within UN organizations as the use of electronic information and communication technologies grows. A survey examined: the role of telex, facsimile and electronic mail in organizational information handling systems; the properties of computer-based information exchange among organizations that have introduced electronic mail; associated technology options and constraints as well as standards that have been adopted or are being considered: policies, guidelines, training programmes, and plans UN organizations are implementing with respect to electronic records management issues
    Source
    Information society. 9(1993) no.2, S.125-144
  13. Cory, K.A.; Hessler, D.W.: Imaging the archives : now is the time (1993) 0.02
    0.022637269 = product of:
      0.045274537 = sum of:
        0.012961932 = weight(_text_:information in 7820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012961932 = score(doc=7820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7820)
        0.032312606 = product of:
          0.06462521 = sum of:
            0.06462521 = weight(_text_:technology in 7820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06462521 = score(doc=7820,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.45597056 = fieldWeight in 7820, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Archivists and librarians who convert their holdings to electronic format can, by using imaging technology, secure the safety of the original documents while creating substantially greater opportunities for using the information contained therein. A brief introduction to document imaging technology is followed by an identification of 6 advantages of imaging technology for archives. Lists 8 common objections to the technique and addresses data security issues in the context of improved services
  14. Hendley, T.: Planning and implementing an integrated document management system : a checklist of points to consider (1995) 0.02
    0.022357035 = product of:
      0.04471407 = sum of:
        0.018330941 = weight(_text_:information in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018330941 = score(doc=1995,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
        0.02638313 = product of:
          0.05276626 = sum of:
            0.05276626 = weight(_text_:technology in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05276626 = score(doc=1995,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.3722984 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Offers a checklist of points to consider when installing a document management system discussing each issue in turn: scoping the project; strategic issues (business process reengineering, information technology review, document and records management review); options for meeting objectives review; functional requirements defintion; technical requirements definition; and cost benefit analysis. Once these issues have been considered an operational requirement or invitation to tender should be drawn up for producement, as well as evaluation criteria for the responses
    Source
    Information management and technology. 28(1995) no.2, S.63-66
  15. McLeod, J.; Hare, C.H.; Webster, B.: Records management today (1998) 0.02
    0.022060106 = product of:
      0.04412021 = sum of:
        0.018330941 = weight(_text_:information in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018330941 = score(doc=3627,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
        0.02578927 = product of:
          0.05157854 = sum of:
            0.05157854 = weight(_text_:22 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05157854 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the challenges associated with records management in an electronic environment. These include: the impact of professionalization; the explosion of information created and disseminated in electronic form; increased personal responsibility and the creation of ethical codes regulating the coduct of records managers; commitment to and recognition by society at large; and the need to redefine the skills and knowledge required to fulfil the new role of records manager
    Date
    15. 5.1999 20:22:49
    Source
    Managing information. 5(1998) no.7, S.23,25-26
  16. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.02
    0.021104999 = product of:
      0.042209998 = sum of:
        0.019644385 = weight(_text_:information in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019644385 = score(doc=758,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
        0.02256561 = product of:
          0.04513122 = sum of:
            0.04513122 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04513122 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
  17. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.02
    0.021104999 = product of:
      0.042209998 = sum of:
        0.019644385 = weight(_text_:information in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019644385 = score(doc=760,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
        0.02256561 = product of:
          0.04513122 = sum of:
            0.04513122 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04513122 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16663991 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Library and Information Science
  18. Barry, R.E.: Electronic document records management systems (1994) 0.02
    0.020553209 = product of:
      0.041106418 = sum of:
        0.022450726 = weight(_text_:information in 1787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022450726 = score(doc=1787,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 1787, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1787)
        0.01865569 = product of:
          0.03731138 = sum of:
            0.03731138 = weight(_text_:technology in 1787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03731138 = score(doc=1787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 1787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1787)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines approaches to and information management tools for thinking about, identifying and articulating functional requirements for electronic dcuments and records management systems. Discusses a management framework and state transition analysis, an information engineering approach. The framework auggests a method for conveniently organising functional requirements according to life cycle stages through which documents pass and to the work domains in which documents are used
    Source
    Information management and technology. 27(1994) no.6, S.251-256
  19. Meer, K. van der: Document information systems (2009) 0.02
    0.019856151 = product of:
      0.039712302 = sum of:
        0.025720537 = weight(_text_:information in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025720537 = score(doc=3771,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
        0.013991767 = product of:
          0.027983533 = sum of:
            0.027983533 = weight(_text_:technology in 3771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027983533 = score(doc=3771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3771)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    From characteristics of information, documents and document information systems (document IS), motives to use document IS are described. A few cases are presented. The functional aspects of document IS are described, derived from ISO standard 15489 on records management and the Sarbanes-Oxley law, and made operational in MoReq and DoD standard 5015.2. Explicit attention is given to related subjects from a viewpoint of document management: information sharing (workflow, knowledge management), and interoperability of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools; authenticity because of the possible evidential value of documents; and digital longevity because of the possible long-time function of archival documents. The technical aspects answer functional demands; important information science standards, and standard components for 12 characteristics of document IS are described, among others ODMA, the XML family, OAIS, and metadata schemes. The design methodological aspects answer functional demands and technical possibilities. Models are introduced and the way of working of, e.g., a digitization project is described.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  20. Barry, R.E.: Managing organizations with electronic records (1993) 0.02
    0.019761011 = product of:
      0.039522022 = sum of:
        0.016202414 = weight(_text_:information in 6254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016202414 = score(doc=6254,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.083537094 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047586527 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 6254, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6254)
        0.02331961 = product of:
          0.04663922 = sum of:
            0.04663922 = weight(_text_:technology in 6254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04663922 = score(doc=6254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1417311 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047586527 = queryNorm
                0.32906836 = fieldWeight in 6254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Information management and technology. 26(1993) no.3, S.115-121,142

Years

Languages

  • e 113
  • d 58
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 148
  • m 16
  • x 8
  • s 6
  • r 3
  • More… Less…