-
Weinberg, B.H.: Can you recommend a good book on indexing? (1998)
0.13
0.13418928 = product of:
0.26837856 = sum of:
0.011980709 = weight(_text_:information in 7142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011980709 = score(doc=7142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7142)
0.17304136 = weight(_text_:united in 7142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17304136 = score(doc=7142,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.7012641 = fieldWeight in 7142, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7142)
0.08335648 = product of:
0.16671295 = sum of:
0.16671295 = weight(_text_:states in 7142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16671295 = score(doc=7142,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.6883215 = fieldWeight in 7142, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7142)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today
- LCSH
- Indexing / United States / Book reviews
- Subject
- Indexing / United States / Book reviews
-
Marie, J.S.: Medical indexing in the United States (2007)
0.12
0.12080085 = product of:
0.2416017 = sum of:
0.014975886 = weight(_text_:information in 743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014975886 = score(doc=743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=743)
0.1529484 = weight(_text_:united in 743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1529484 = score(doc=743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.61983573 = fieldWeight in 743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=743)
0.07367742 = product of:
0.14735484 = sum of:
0.14735484 = weight(_text_:states in 743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14735484 = score(doc=743,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.608396 = fieldWeight in 743, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=743)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.421-423
-
Luhn, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature (1985)
0.05
0.047072202 = product of:
0.094144404 = sum of:
0.014825371 = weight(_text_:information in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014825371 = score(doc=3638,freq=16.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
0.05353194 = weight(_text_:united in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05353194 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24675635 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.2169425 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.6101127 = idf(docFreq=439, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
0.025787095 = product of:
0.05157419 = sum of:
0.05157419 = weight(_text_:states in 3638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05157419 = score(doc=3638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24220218 = queryWeight, product of:
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.21293859 = fieldWeight in 3638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.506572 = idf(docFreq=487, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3638)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Abstract
- In the optimistic 1960s the potential of the computer seemed limitless. The realization of this potential in the area of information retrieval and dissemination owes much to the creative mind of Hans Peter Luhn. A pioneer of information science, he had a mind and an imagination that could transcend the state of the art. Luhn was born in Germany, where he studied technology, physics, and accounting. He came to the United States in 1924 and in 1941, at the age of 45, he joined IBM. In the course of his twenty-year tenure at IBM, he was issued over eighty patents; at one time he held more than any other IBM employee. Luhn is credited with originating KWIC indexes, computer selective dissemination systems (SDI), computer coding schemes, and statistical techniques for automatic indexing and abstracting. Also attributed to him is the first modern use of the word "thesaurus." The selection that follows modestly presents the idea of a Keyword in Context (KWIC) index. This is the idea of automatically identifying significant or "key" words and highlighting them in context. The context in question was normally a title. Though title term or catchword indexing had been practiced for over one hundred years, the implementation of the idea in mechanized systems in the 1960s was not trivial. It required programming the computer to recognize word boundaries and then developing a means for automatically differentiating significant from nonsignificant words. Spaces were used to demarcate word boundaries and a stop list, consisting of articles, conjunctions, prepositions, auxiliary verbs, some adjectives, and some very common words, was used to differentiate significant from nonsignificant words. A difficulty with any automatic indexing limited to extracting single words from texts is the semantic indeterminancy of the extracted character strings. To disambiguate these, Luhn adopted the concordance idea, proposing to display them in the context of their titles. Specifying the meaning of an index term by couching it in "context," anticipated the later development of string index languages such as PRECIS (PREserved Context Index System). Although the selection that follows is quite short, it presents, in addition to the idea of KWIC, what at the time were two innovative ideas. One is the distinction between the dissemination and the retrieval of information, in regard to which Luhn makes a point sometimes overlooked by modern critics of KWIC. This is that different purposes require different kinds of indexes; an index that is used to disseminate information for current awareness need not be as "perfect" as one used for retrospective information retrieval. The need to alert researchers to current information quickly, and the somewhat transitory character of this information, make KWIC, albeit quick and dirty, a costeffective alternative for dissemination indexes. The second harbinger idea is a method of uniquely identifying documents for retrieval using an identification code comprising the initial characters from a document's author, title, and - interestingly - year of publication. Luhn's mind was fertile indeed and he is aptly called a pioneer of information science.
-
Craven, T.C.: ¬An online index entry format based on multiple search terms (1987)
0.02
0.018119995 = product of:
0.10871997 = sum of:
0.10871997 = weight(_text_:networks in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10871997 = score(doc=438,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20804176 = queryWeight, product of:
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.52258724 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- A new approach to generate string index entries from concept networks is discussed: terms from multi-term search specifications are cited near the beginning of the entry, while an articulated entry structure indicative of concept relations is retained.
-
Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999)
0.02
0.01790886 = product of:
0.053726576 = sum of:
0.017971063 = weight(_text_:information in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017971063 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.035755515 = product of:
0.07151103 = sum of:
0.07151103 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07151103 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today / American Society of Indexers
-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.01
0.011939241 = product of:
0.03581772 = sum of:
0.011980709 = weight(_text_:information in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011980709 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.023837011 = product of:
0.047674023 = sum of:
0.047674023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047674023 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
- Source
- Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
-
Rooney, P.: How I reused my own index (2007)
0.01
0.011939241 = product of:
0.03581772 = sum of:
0.011980709 = weight(_text_:information in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011980709 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.023837011 = product of:
0.047674023 = sum of:
0.047674023 = weight(_text_:22 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047674023 = score(doc=737,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Date
- 8.12.2007 18:41:22
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.394-398
-
Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992)
0.01
0.011894252 = product of:
0.035682756 = sum of:
0.014825371 = weight(_text_:information in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014825371 = score(doc=7288,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.020857384 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04171477 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
- Imprint
- Philadelphia, PA : National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services
-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007)
0.01
0.011894252 = product of:
0.035682756 = sum of:
0.014825371 = weight(_text_:information in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014825371 = score(doc=749,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0772133 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.020857384 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04171477 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
- Date
- 8.12.2007 19:25:22
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.8, S.441-444
-
Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000)
0.01
0.007945671 = product of:
0.047674023 = sum of:
0.047674023 = product of:
0.095348045 = sum of:
0.095348045 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095348045 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
-
Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001)
0.01
0.007945671 = product of:
0.047674023 = sum of:
0.047674023 = product of:
0.095348045 = sum of:
0.095348045 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095348045 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.01
0.007945671 = product of:
0.047674023 = sum of:
0.047674023 = product of:
0.095348045 = sum of:
0.095348045 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095348045 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.01
0.007945671 = product of:
0.047674023 = sum of:
0.047674023 = product of:
0.095348045 = sum of:
0.095348045 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.095348045 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.01
0.006952462 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = product of:
0.08342954 = sum of:
0.08342954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08342954 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.01
0.006952462 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = product of:
0.08342954 = sum of:
0.08342954 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08342954 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001)
0.01
0.006952462 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = product of:
0.08342954 = sum of:
0.08342954 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08342954 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
-
Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000)
0.01
0.006952462 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = product of:
0.08342954 = sum of:
0.08342954 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08342954 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.01
0.006952462 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = product of:
0.08342954 = sum of:
0.08342954 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08342954 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000)
0.01
0.006952462 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = product of:
0.08342954 = sum of:
0.08342954 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08342954 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
-
Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001)
0.01
0.006952462 = product of:
0.04171477 = sum of:
0.04171477 = product of:
0.08342954 = sum of:
0.08342954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08342954 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1540252 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043984205 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
