-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.11
0.10725776 = product of:
0.2681444 = sum of:
0.15033525 = weight(_text_:readable in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15033525 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2768342 = queryWeight, product of:
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.5430516 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.1439276 = idf(docFreq=257, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.11780915 = sum of:
0.06897106 = weight(_text_:data in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06897106 = score(doc=4431,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.48408815 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.04883809 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04883809 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A method is outlined which would permit a large number of libraries of all types to use centralised cataloguing facilities without the need for their own automatic data processing equipment and outlay. The method is seen as an alternative to the OCLC on-line data bank, and permits the ordering of printed catalogue cards by machine-readable but hand-prepared data cards, such as the loan cards which readers at the Münster library are at present required to complete. The proposed sequence of ordering is set out in 11 stages
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Spicher, K.M.: ¬The development of the MARC format (1996)
0.03
0.033195842 = product of:
0.0829896 = sum of:
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=5574,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.03017484 = product of:
0.06034968 = sum of:
0.06034968 = weight(_text_:data in 5574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06034968 = score(doc=5574,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.42357713 = fieldWeight in 5574, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5574)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The use of computerized cataloguing data requires a commitment on the part of libraries to the standardization of data elements and record formats. Early computerized formats were initiated by several research libraries to serve the needs of particular university systems. In developing MARC, the LoC drew on the experiences of these libraries in establishing a standard acceptable to the research library community for the interchange of bibliographic data. Discusses early computerized formats influencing MARC, the origins of the MARC Pilot Project, and design factors influencing the evolution of the format through MARC2. Research was based on primary sources documenting the early history of MARC, including unpublished documents in the LoC archives
-
Creider, L.S.: ¬A comparison of the Paris Principles and the International Cataloguing Principles (2009)
0.03
0.032107983 = product of:
0.080269955 = sum of:
0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060359728 = score(doc=2985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
0.01991023 = product of:
0.03982046 = sum of:
0.03982046 = weight(_text_:data in 2985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03982046 = score(doc=2985,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2794884 = fieldWeight in 2985, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2985)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- After more than forty-five years of cataloging experience with the Paris Principles and their impact on the international sharing of bibliographic data, the process of replacing them with a wider and deeper set of International Cataloguing Principles is nearing completion. This paper compares the scope, technological context, process of decision-making, conceptual framework, and amount of change involved in the adoption of the two different statements.
-
Buizza, P.: Bibliographic control and authority control from Paris principles to the present (2004)
0.03
0.031581532 = product of:
0.07895383 = sum of:
0.06402116 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06402116 = score(doc=5667,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3649729 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.014932672 = product of:
0.029865343 = sum of:
0.029865343 = weight(_text_:data in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029865343 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Forty years ago the ICCP in Paris laid the foundations of international co-operation in descriptive cataloging without explicitly speaking of authority control. Some of the factors in the evolution of authority control are the development of catalogs (from card catalog to local automation, to today's OPAC on the Web) and services provided by libraries (from individual service to local users to system networks, to the World Wide Web), as well as international agreements on cataloging (from Paris Principles to the UBC programme, to the report on Mandatory data elements for internationally shared resource authority records). This evolution progressed from the principle of uniform heading to the definition of authority entries and records, and from the responsibility of national bibliographic agencies for the form of the names of their own authors to be shared internationally to the concept of authorized equivalent heading. Some issues of the present state are the persisting differences among national rules and the aim of respecting both local culture and language and international readability.
-
Understanding FRBR : what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (2007)
0.03
0.031385478 = product of:
0.07846369 = sum of:
0.067904696 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067904696 = score(doc=1675,freq=18.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3871122 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
0.0105589945 = product of:
0.021117989 = sum of:
0.021117989 = weight(_text_:data in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021117989 = score(doc=1675,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.14822112 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- An overview of the FRBR model, and how it can improve access to information through the helpful organization of metadata records. What is FRBR, and why is everyone talking about it? Is it really going to revolutionize cataloguing? And if so, what form will it take? This book is written for librarians, bibliographic systems designers, library and information science faculty and students, and anyone else who is interested in learning about the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and how following the FRBR model can improve access to information through helpful organization of the metadata records that are surrogates for information resources. Serials, art, music, moving images, maps, and archival materials are just a few of the formats covered. Not for catalogers only!
- Content
- 1. An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) - Arlene G. Taylor (1-20) 2. An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) - Glenn E. Patton (21-28) 3. Understanding the Relationship between FRBR and FRAD - Glenn E. Patton (29-34) 4. FRBR and the History of Cataloging - William Denton (35-58) 5. The Impact of Research on the Development of FRBR - Edward T. O'Neill (59-72) 6. Bibliographic Families and Superworks - Richard P. Smiraglia (73-86) 7. FRBR and RDA (Resource Description and Access) - Barbara B. Tillett (87-96) 8. FRBR and Archival Materials - Alexander C. Thurman (97-102) 9. FRBR and Works of Art, Architecture, and Material Culture - Murtha Baca and Sherman Clarke (103-110) 10. FRBR and Cartographic Materials - Mary Lynette Larsgaard (111-116) 11. FRBR and Moving Image Materials - Martha M. Yee (117-130) 12. FRBR and Music - Sherry L. Vellucci (131-152) 13. FRBR and Serials - Steven C. Shadle (153-174)
- Footnote
- Resonanz: "Arlene Taylor and her compadres don't even try to teach you how to construct a hierarchical record. Instead, they direct their efforts toward showcasing what's possible when digital technology and traditional cataloging practice meet. This is the future of cataloging." - Library Media Connection "The emergence of this textbook is testimony to the breadth and depth of work done to date. It documents much of that work, and provides a good basic introduction to FRBR that is broadly understandable... The relational concepts within FRBR are complicated and can be challenging. This book does a good job of illuminating them in a straightforward manner. It also describes how the application of the FRBR concepts could improve our systems of bibliographic access in very specific ways... For those of us that really want or need to be able to predict the impact that FRBR will have on our work, this is an accessible explanation of the current state of the art. As such it is a real contribution to our understanding." - TechKNOW "Understanding FRBR... features chapters contributed by leading authorities in the cataloging field... It offers a basic introduction to FRBR, discussions about FRBR, FRAD (functional requirements for authority data), and RDA (resource description and access), and the issues involved in using FRBR in nontraditional library settings such as with cartographic materials and music. Both books are well illustrated and include numerous bibliographical resources.' [Reviewed in conjuntion with FRBR: A Guide for the Perplexed]." - Library Journal "Taylor and her contributors cover FRBR and introduce the reader to FRAD as well... All chapters conclude with current and useful references to further reading and more information." - Booklist "Understanding FRBR is clearly written, well illustrated (many of the concepts are clarified by very helpful diagrams), and well indexed; additionally, chapters feature extensive bibliographies, many of which provide URLs to the IFLA groups' documents. While it may seem that this book is of interest only to catalogers, the application of FRBR will change the structure of catalog and the systems used to store and display it; therefore, it is an important text for systems librarians, reference librarians, and anybody else interested in the future of the organization and display of bibliographic information." - College & Research Libraries "Understanding FRBR is a useful and timely book that brings together recent developments in FRBR and offers several assessments of it." - Technicalities "No cataloguer, bibliographic systems designer or library and information science lecturers and students should be without this book. It is a useful resource in acquiring an understanding of what FRBR is about and how it will change the way in which cataloguers will think about cataloguing in future." - The Electronic Library
- RSWK
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Aufsatzsammlung
- Subject
- Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Aufsatzsammlung
-
Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : on an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017)
0.03
0.030975739 = product of:
0.077439345 = sum of:
0.06748423 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06748423 = score(doc=4141,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3847152 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
0.009955115 = product of:
0.01991023 = sum of:
0.01991023 = weight(_text_:data in 4141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01991023 = score(doc=4141,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 4141, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4141)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data-modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid-1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early twentiethcentury British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911-1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can be classified. These he first divided into "accidental" and "inseparable" attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition-level and copy-level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into "physical" and "non-physical" attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstract hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity-the book-whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
-
Dousa, T.M.: E. Wyndham Hulme's classification of the attributes of books : On an early model of a core bibliographical entity (2017)
0.03
0.028125936 = product of:
0.07031484 = sum of:
0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060359728 = score(doc=3859,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
0.009955115 = product of:
0.01991023 = sum of:
0.01991023 = weight(_text_:data in 3859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01991023 = score(doc=3859,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14247625 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 3859, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3859)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Modelling bibliographical entities is a prominent activity within knowledge organization today. Current models of bibliographic entities, such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographical Records (FRBR) and the Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), take inspiration from data - modelling methods developed by computer scientists from the mid - 1970s on. Thus, it would seem that the modelling of bibliographic entities is an activity of very recent vintage. However, it is possible to find examples of bibliographical models from earlier periods of knowledge organization. The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to one such model, outlined by the early 20th - century British classification theorist E. Wyndham Hulme in his essay on "Principles of Book Classification" (1911 - 1912). There, Hulme set forth a classification of various attributes by which books can conceivably be classified. These he first divided into accidental and inseparable attributes. Accidental attributes were subdivided into edition - level and copy - level attributes and inseparable attitudes, into physical and non - physical attributes. Comparison of Hulme's classification of attributes with those of FRBR and BIBFRAME 2.0 reveals that the different classes of attributes in Hulme's classification correspond to groups of attributes associated with different bibliographical entities in those models. These later models assume the existence of different bibliographic entities in an abstraction hierarchy among which attributes are distributed, whereas Hulme posited only a single entity - the book - , whose various aspects he clustered into different classes of attributes. Thus, Hulme's model offers an interesting alternative to current assumptions about how to conceptualize the relationship between attributes and entities in the bibliographical universe.
-
Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic entities and their uses (2018)
0.02
0.015089932 = product of:
0.07544966 = sum of:
0.07544966 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07544966 = score(doc=5187,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 5187, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5187)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Dupuigrenet-Desroussilles, F.: ¬Les catalogues et le mythe de la bibliothèque universelle : du Moyen Age a nos jours (1997)
0.01
0.014938272 = product of:
0.074691355 = sum of:
0.074691355 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074691355 = score(doc=894,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Catalogues date back to the libraries of Babylon and Alexandria, and in the Middle Ages groups of colleges and monasteries created joint catalogues. The dream of universal bibliographic control based on a centralised joint catalogue advanced when the US Library of Congress began selling bibliographic records in 1901. This led to MARC in 1969, and increasing emphasis on standardisation resulted in the first ISBN in 1974
-
Gorman, M.: ¬The origins and making of the ISBD : a personal history, 1966-1978 (2014)
0.01
0.014938272 = product of:
0.074691355 = sum of:
0.074691355 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074691355 = score(doc=1995,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 1995, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1995)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- What follows are my memories of the events, starting almost five decades ago, that led to the International Standard for Bibliographic Description (ISBD)-still the most successful and widely used international cataloging standard in history. Many of the documents of the time were little more than ephemera (working papers and the like) and some are not now available to me. I have checked my recollections in all the documents to which I have access and apologize in advance for any errors of time or place. I also apologize for the, alas, unavoidable, given the nature of the essay, many repetitions of the words "I" and "me."
- Footnote
- Contribution in a special issue "ISBD: The Bibliographic Content Standard "
-
Thomas, S.E.: ¬The Program for Cooperative Cataloging : backstory and future potential (2020)
0.01
0.014938272 = product of:
0.074691355 = sum of:
0.074691355 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.074691355 = score(doc=124,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In 1988 the Library of Congress and eight library participants undertook a two-year pilot known as the National Coordinated Cataloging Program (NCCP) to increase the number of quality bibliographic records. Subsequently the Bibliographic Services Study Committee reviewed the pilot. Discussions held at the Library of Congress (LC) and in other fora resulted in the creation of the Cooperative Cataloging Council, and, ultimately, the establishment of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) in 1994. The conditions that contributed to a successful approach to shared cataloging are described. The article concludes with considerations for expanding the future effectiveness of the PCC.
-
Lubetzky, S.: Principles of cataloging (2001)
0.01
0.013068265 = product of:
0.06534132 = sum of:
0.06534132 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06534132 = score(doc=2627,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3724989 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This report constitutes Phase I of a two-part study; a Phase II report will discuss subject cataloging. Phase I is concerned with the materials of a library as individual records (or documents) and as representations of certain works by certain authors--that is, with descriptive, or bibliographic, cataloging. Discussed in the report are (1) the history, role, function, and oblectives .of the author-and-title catalog; (2) problems and principles of descriptive catalogng, including the use and function of "main entry, the principle of authorship, and the process and problems of cataloging print and nonprint materials; (3) organization of the catalog; and (4) potentialities of automation. The considerations inherent in bibliographic cataloging, such as the distinction between the "book" and the "work," are said to be so elemental that they are essential not only to the effective control of library's materials but also to that of the information contained in the materials. Because of the special concern with information, the author includes a discussion of the "Bibliographic Dimensions of Information Control," 'prepared in collaboration with Robert M. Hayes, which also appears in "American Documentation," VOl.201 July 1969, p. 247-252.
-
Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871)
0.01
0.0120868115 = product of:
0.06043406 = sum of:
0.06043406 = product of:
0.12086812 = sum of:
0.12086812 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12086812 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15778607 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2007 12:05:26
22. 7.2007 12:08:24
-
Mutula, S.M.; Tsvakai, M.: Historical perspectives of cataloguing and classification in Africa (2002)
0.01
0.012071946 = product of:
0.060359728 = sum of:
0.060359728 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060359728 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.34409973 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the historical perspectives of cataloguing and classification practices in Africa and looks at international cataloguing practices and their implications for African librarianship. The challenges facing libraries on the continent in the cataloguing and classification of Africana materials are discussed and some suggestions offered on how the situation may be improved. Efforts towards developments of bibliographic control in Africa are highlighted.
-
Tillett, B.B.: Catalog it once for all : a history of cooperative cataloging in the United States prior to 1967 (before MARC) (1993)
0.01
0.010562953 = product of:
0.052814763 = sum of:
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Librarians in the United States always seem to be trying to reduce their costs and share resources through various centralized or cooperative endeavors. Early cooperative cataloging efforts, prior to 1967 when the MARC format made its appearance and automation took off, clearly recognized the need to create a shared national resource of bibliographic records. Yet, the dreams of cataloging it once for all turned into nightmares over and over as many schemes were tried and failed. However, some schemes succeeded and millions of items were cataloged through these early efforts. The promise of our preliminary steps in cooperative cataloging during the pre-automation era sparked our imaginations and raised our hopes for the future.
-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: From bibliographic models to cataloguing rules : remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them (2009)
0.01
0.010562953 = product of:
0.052814763 = sum of:
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Denton, W.: FRBR and the history of cataloging (2007)
0.01
0.010562953 = product of:
0.052814763 = sum of:
0.052814763 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052814763 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- An explanation of where FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) comes from, given by a look at the work of librarians such as Panizzi, Cutter, Ranganathan, and Lubetzky, and an examination of four themes in the history of library cataloging: the use of axioms to explain the purpose of catalogs, the importance of user needs, the idea of the "work," and standardization and internationalization.
-
Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993)
0.01
0.009541911 = product of:
0.047709554 = sum of:
0.047709554 = product of:
0.14312866 = sum of:
0.14312866 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14312866 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.38200375 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
-
Russell, B.M.: Hidden wisdom and unseen treasure : revisiting cataloging in Medieval libraries (1998)
0.01
0.0090539595 = product of:
0.045269795 = sum of:
0.045269795 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045269795 = score(doc=4627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 4627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4627)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Scholars working in the field of mediaeval history and cultural history have recognized that understanding the cataloguing and accessioning of books is central to understanding the transmission of ideas. Unfortunately, general histories of libraries and even the library literature seem content to sketch out a chronological development of cataloguing in line with the 19th and 20th century view of library development, from a simple list to complex intellectual systems. In truth, however, those individuals responsible for cataloguing books in mediaeval libraries faced many of the same challenges as cataloguers today: how to organize information; how to serve local needs; and how to provide access to individual works within larger bibliographic formats. Summarizes recent scholarship in the history of the book that relates to library cataloguing, as well as providing parallels to the cooperative library environment of today
-
Takawashi, T.: Cataloging in Japan : relationship between Japanese and Western cataloging rules (2002)
0.01
0.0090539595 = product of:
0.045269795 = sum of:
0.045269795 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045269795 = score(doc=5490,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17541347 = queryWeight, product of:
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.04505818 = queryNorm
0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In 1943 the Japanese League of Young Librarians published Nippon Catalog Rules (NCR1942) based on ALA 1908, and adopted the author main-entry system for Japanese and Western materials. After World War II, the Japan Library Association (JLA) compiled and published NCR1952, based on ALA 1949 and LC 1949 but maintained the author main-entry system. The main-entry system was then replaced by an alternative heading method, which came to be known as the Description-Independent-System (DIS). NCR1965 adopted the main entry principle, which was based on the Paris Principles of 1961. NCR1977 was compiled and published by the JLA Cataloging Committee and based upon a "no-main-entry principle." Then in 1987, the Committee published the standard edition of the rules, which was completely compatible with the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD). NCR1987R was published in 1994 and NCR1987R01 in 2001, which included revised "Chapter 9: Computer Files," devised according to ISBD(ER).
