Search (56 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.26
    0.2630434 = product of:
      0.5260868 = sum of:
        0.07515526 = product of:
          0.22546576 = sum of:
            0.22546576 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22546576 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22546576 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22546576 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.22546576 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22546576 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  2. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.19
    0.18788813 = product of:
      0.37577626 = sum of:
        0.053682324 = product of:
          0.16104697 = sum of:
            0.16104697 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16104697 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16104697 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.16104697 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16104697 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3438615 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  3. Garcia Marco, F.J.: Compatibility & heterogeneity in knowledge organization : some reflections around a case study in the field of consumer information (2008) 0.02
    0.018738642 = product of:
      0.056215927 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
        0.013738036 = product of:
          0.027476072 = sum of:
            0.027476072 = weight(_text_:22 in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027476072 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    A case study in compatibility and heterogeneity of knowledge organization (KO) systems and processes is presented. It is based in the experience of the author in the field of information for consumer protection, a good example of the emerging transdisciplinary applied social sciences. The activities and knowledge organization problems and solutions of the Aragonian Consumers' Information and Documentation Centre are described and analyzed. Six assertions can be concluded: a) heterogeneity and compatibility are certainly an inherent problem in knowledge organization and also in practical domains; b) knowledge organization is also a social task, not only a lögical one; c) knowledge organization is affected by economical and efficiency considerations; d) knowledge organization is at the heart of Knowledge Management; e) identifying and maintaining the focus in interdisciplinary fields is a must; f the different knowledge organization tools of a institution must be considered as an integrated system, pursuing a unifying model.
    Date
    16. 3.2008 18:22:50
  4. García-Marco, F.-J.: Enhancing the visibility and relevance of thesauri in the Web : searching for a hub in the linked data environment (2016) 0.02
    0.016744237 = product of:
      0.10046542 = sum of:
        0.10046542 = weight(_text_:great in 2916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10046542 = score(doc=2916,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.43990463 = fieldWeight in 2916, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2916)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
  5. Zapounidou, S.; Sfakakis, M.; Papatheodorou, C.: Mapping derivative relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME 2 (2019) 0.02
    0.01657595 = product of:
      0.09945569 = sum of:
        0.09945569 = weight(_text_:great in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09945569 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.43548337 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic interoperability between Resource Description and Access (RDA) and BIBFRAME models is of great interest to the library community. In this context, this work investigates the mapping of core entities, inherent and derivative relationships from RDA to BIBFRAME, and proposes mapping rules assessed using two gold datasets. Findings indicate that RDA core entities and inherent relationships can be successfully mapped to BIBFRAME using the bf:hasExpression property, while extending bf:hasExpression as transitive simplifies BIBFRAME representations. Moreover, mapping derivative relationships between RDA Expressions was successful with loss of specificity in non-translation cases. The mapping of derivative relationships between RDA Works produced "noisy" bf:hasDerivative occurrences in BIBFRAME.
  6. Krause, J.: Shell Model, Semantic Web and Web Information Retrieval (2006) 0.01
    0.011839963 = product of:
      0.07103977 = sum of:
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 6061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=6061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 6061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6061)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The middle of the 1990s are coined by the increased enthusiasm for the possibilities of the WWW, which has only recently deviated - at least in relation to scientific information - for the differentiated measuring of its advantages and disadvantages. Web Information Retrieval originated as a specialized discipline with great commercial significance (for an overview see Lewandowski 2005). Besides the new technological structure that enables the indexing and searching (in seconds) of unimaginable amounts of data worldwide, new assessment processes for the ranking of search results are being developed, which use the link structures of the Web. They are the main innovation with respect to the traditional "mother discipline" of Information Retrieval. From the beginning, link structures of Web pages are applied to commercial search engines in a wide array of variations. From the perspective of scientific information, link topology based approaches were in essence trying to solve a self-created problem: on the one hand, it quickly became clear that the openness of the Web led to an up-tonow unknown increase in available information, but this also caused the quality of the Web pages searched to become a problem - and with it the relevance of the results. The gatekeeper function of traditional information providers, which narrows down every user query to focus on high-quality sources was lacking. Therefore, the recognition of the "authoritativeness" of the Web pages by general search engines such as Google was one of the most important factors for their success.
  7. Kim, J.-M.; Shin, H.; Kim, H.-J.: Schema and constraints-based matching and merging of Topic Maps (2007) 0.01
    0.011839963 = product of:
      0.07103977 = sum of:
        0.07103977 = weight(_text_:great in 922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07103977 = score(doc=922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.31105953 = fieldWeight in 922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=922)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we propose a multi-strategic matching and merging approach to find correspondences between ontologies based on the syntactic or semantic characteristics and constraints of the Topic Maps. Our multi-strategic matching approach consists of a linguistic module and a Topic Map constraints-based module. A linguistic module computes similarities between concepts using morphological analysis, string normalization and tokenization and language-dependent heuristics. A Topic Map constraints-based module takes advantage of several Topic Maps-dependent techniques such as a topic property-based matching, a hierarchy-based matching, and an association-based matching. This is a composite matching procedure and need not generate a cross-pair of all topics from the ontologies because unmatched pairs of topics can be removed by characteristics and constraints of the Topic Maps. Merging between Topic Maps follows the matching operations. We set up the MERGE function to integrate two Topic Maps into a new Topic Map, which satisfies such merge requirements as entity preservation, property preservation, relation preservation, and conflict resolution. For our experiments, we used oriental philosophy ontologies, western philosophy ontologies, Yahoo western philosophy dictionary, and Wikipedia philosophy ontology as input ontologies. Our experiments show that the automatically generated matching results conform to the outputs generated manually by domain experts and can be of great benefit to the following merging operations.
  8. DC-2013: International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications : Online Proceedings (2013) 0.01
    0.009471971 = product of:
      0.05683182 = sum of:
        0.05683182 = weight(_text_:great in 1076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05683182 = score(doc=1076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22838 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24884763 = fieldWeight in 1076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6307793 = idf(docFreq=430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1076)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The collocated conferences for DC-2013 and iPRES-2013 in Lisbon attracted 392 participants from over 37 countries. In addition to the Tuesday through Thursday conference days comprised of peer-reviewed paper and special sessions, 223 participants attended pre-conference tutorials and 246 participated in post-conference workshops for the collocated events. The peer-reviewed papers and presentations are available on the conference website Presentation page (URLs above). In sum, it was a great conference. In addition to links to PDFs of papers, project reports and posters (and their associated presentations), the published proceedings include presentation PDFs for the following: KEYNOTES Darling, we need to talk - Gildas Illien TUTORIALS -- Ivan Herman: "Introduction to Linked Open Data (LOD)" -- Steven Miller: "Introduction to Ontology Concepts and Terminology" -- Kai Eckert: "Metadata Provenance" -- Daniel Garjio: "The W3C Provenance Ontology" SPECIAL SESSIONS -- "Application Profiles as an Alternative to OWL Ontologies" -- "Long-term Preservation and Governance of RDF Vocabularies (W3C Sponsored)" -- "Data Enrichment and Transformation in the LOD Context: Poor & Popular vs Rich & Lonely--Can't we achieve both?" -- "Why Schema.org?"
  9. Sieglerschmidt, J.: Convergence of internet services in the cultural heritage sector : the long way to common vocabularies, metadata formats, ontologies (2008) 0.01
    0.008495579 = product of:
      0.050973468 = sum of:
        0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 1686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050973468 = score(doc=1686,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 1686, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1686)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Since several years it has been observed that information offered by different knowledge producing institutions on the internet is more and more interlinked. This tendency will increase, because the fragmented information offers on the internet make the retrieval of information difficult as even impossible. At the same time the quantity of information offered on the internet grows exponentially in Europe - and elsewhere - due to many digitization projects. Insofar as funding institutions base the acceptance of projects on the observation of certain documentation standards the knowledge created will be retrievable and will remain so for a longer time. Otherwise the retrieval of information will become a matter of chance due to the limits of fragmented, knowledge producing social groups.
  10. Bellotto, A.; Bekesi, J.: Enriching metadata for a university repository by modelling and infrastructure : a new vocabulary server for Phaidra (2019) 0.01
    0.008495579 = product of:
      0.050973468 = sum of:
        0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 5693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050973468 = score(doc=5693,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 5693, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5693)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper illustrates an initial step towards the 'semantic enrichment' of University of Vienna's Phaidra repository as one of the valuable and up-to-date strategies able to enhance its role and usage. Firstly, a technical report points out the choice made in a local context, i.e. the deployment of the vocabulary server iQvoc instead of the formerly used SKOSMOS, explaining design decisions behind the current tool and additional features that the implementation required. Afterwards, some modelling characteristics of the local LOD controlled vocabulary are described according to SKOS documentation and best practices, highlighting which approaches can be pursued for rendering a LOD KOS available in the Web as well as issues that can be possibly encountered.
  11. Rocha Souza, R.; Lemos, D.: a comparative analysis : Knowledge organization systems for the representation of multimedia resources on the Web (2020) 0.01
    0.008495579 = product of:
      0.050973468 = sum of:
        0.050973468 = weight(_text_:documentation in 5993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050973468 = score(doc=5993,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.28863928 = fieldWeight in 5993, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5993)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The lack of standardization in the production, organization and dissemination of information in documentation centers and institutions alike, as a result from the digitization of collections and their availability on the internet has called for integration efforts. The sheer availability of multimedia content has fostered the development of many distinct and, most of the time, independent metadata standards for its description. This study aims at presenting and comparing the existing standards of metadata, vocabularies and ontologies for multimedia annotation and also tries to offer a synthetic overview of its main strengths and weaknesses, aiding efforts for semantic integration and enhancing the findability of available multimedia resources on the web. We also aim at unveiling the characteristics that could, should and are perhaps not being highlighted in the characterization of multimedia resources.
  12. Neumaier, S.: Data integration for open data on the Web (2017) 0.01
    0.007079649 = product of:
      0.04247789 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=3923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture we will discuss and introduce challenges of integrating openly available Web data and how to solve them. Firstly, while we will address this topic from the viewpoint of Semantic Web research, not all data is readily available as RDF or Linked Data, so we will give an introduction to different data formats prevalent on the Web, namely, standard formats for publishing and exchanging tabular, tree-shaped, and graph data. Secondly, not all Open Data is really completely open, so we will discuss and address issues around licences, terms of usage associated with Open Data, as well as documentation of data provenance. Thirdly, we will discuss issues connected with (meta-)data quality issues associated with Open Data on the Web and how Semantic Web techniques and vocabularies can be used to describe and remedy them. Fourth, we will address issues about searchability and integration of Open Data and discuss in how far semantic search can help to overcome these. We close with briefly summarizing further issues not covered explicitly herein, such as multi-linguality, temporal aspects (archiving, evolution, temporal querying), as well as how/whether OWL and RDFS reasoning on top of integrated open data could be help.
  13. Binding, C.; Gnoli, C.; Tudhope, D.: Migrating a complex classification scheme to the semantic web : expressing the Integrative Levels Classification using SKOS RDF (2021) 0.01
    0.007079649 = product of:
      0.04247789 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 77(2021) no.4, S.926-945
  14. Cheng, Y.-Y.; Xia, Y.: ¬A systematic review of methods for aligning, mapping, merging taxonomies in information sciences (2023) 0.01
    0.007079649 = product of:
      0.04247789 = sum of:
        0.04247789 = weight(_text_:documentation in 1029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04247789 = score(doc=1029,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.24053274 = fieldWeight in 1029, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1029)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 79(2023) no.?, S.xxx-xxx
  15. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.01
    0.006411083 = product of:
      0.0384665 = sum of:
        0.0384665 = product of:
          0.076933 = sum of:
            0.076933 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076933 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  16. Leiva-Mederos, A.; Senso, J.A.; Hidalgo-Delgado, Y.; Hipola, P.: Working framework of semantic interoperability for CRIS with heterogeneous data sources (2017) 0.01
    0.0056637186 = product of:
      0.03398231 = sum of:
        0.03398231 = weight(_text_:documentation in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03398231 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.19242619 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 73(2017) no.3, S.481-499
  17. Gracy, K.F.: Enriching and enhancing moving images with Linked Data : an exploration in the alignment of metadata models (2018) 0.01
    0.0056637186 = product of:
      0.03398231 = sum of:
        0.03398231 = weight(_text_:documentation in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03398231 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.19242619 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 74(2018) no.2, S.354-371
  18. Dini, L.: CACAO : multilingual access to bibliographic records (2007) 0.01
    0.0054952144 = product of:
      0.032971285 = sum of:
        0.032971285 = product of:
          0.06594257 = sum of:
            0.06594257 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06594257 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  19. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.01
    0.0054952144 = product of:
      0.032971285 = sum of:
        0.032971285 = product of:
          0.06594257 = sum of:
            0.06594257 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06594257 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14203148 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040559217 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  20. ISO 25964-2: Der Standard für die Interoperabilität von Thesauri (2013) 0.00
    0.0049557537 = product of:
      0.029734522 = sum of:
        0.029734522 = weight(_text_:documentation in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029734522 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1765992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040559217 = queryNorm
            0.16837291 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.354108 = idf(docFreq=1544, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    Der vollständige Titel von Teil 2 lautet "Information and documentation - Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies - Teil 2: Interoperability with other vocabularies". Wichtige Themen, die der Standard behandelt, sind Strukturmodelle für das Mapping, Richtlinien für Mappingtypen und der Umgang mit Präkombination, die besonders bei Klassifikationen, Taxonomien und Schlagwortsystemen vorkommt. Das primäre Augenmerk von ISO 25964 gilt den Thesauri, und mit Ausnahme von Terminologien existieren keine vergleichbaren Standards für die anderen Vokabulartypen. Statt zu versuchen, diese normativ darzustellen, behandelt Teil 2 ausschließlich die Interoperabilität zwischen ihnen und den Thesauri. Die Kapitel für die einzelnen Vokabulartypen decken jeweils folgende Sachverhalte ab: - Schlüsseleigenschaften des Vokabulars (deskriptiv, nicht normativ) - Semantische Komponenten/Beziehungen (deskriptiv, nicht normativ) Sofern anwendbar, Empfehlungen für das Mapping zwischen Vokabular und Thesaurus (normativ).

Languages

  • e 44
  • d 12

Types

  • a 41
  • el 13
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…