-
Nicholas, D.: Assessing information needs : tools and techniques (1996)
0.16
0.15523648 = product of:
0.31047297 = sum of:
0.31047297 = sum of:
0.24171291 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24171291 = score(doc=5941,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.86265934 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
0.06876006 = weight(_text_:22 in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876006 = score(doc=5941,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26. 2.2008 19:22:51
- LCSH
- Needs assessment
- Subject
- Needs assessment
-
Aghemo, A.: Come valutare il servizio di informazione (1993)
0.13
0.12767886 = product of:
0.2553577 = sum of:
0.2553577 = sum of:
0.20722568 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20722568 = score(doc=4413,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.7395764 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048132043 = score(doc=4413,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Library information service assessment studies can help the reference librarian to form an accurate judgement on the library's structure and organization in terms of: efficiency; effectiveness; and cost/benefit ratio. These 3 assessment criteria can be applied to the following areas: staff; users; user requests; answers provided; library information service potential; and collection and documentation resources. Each of these areas yields further sub-categories for evaluation. Data collection methods depend on the end purpose of the assessment study, but may include the issue of questionnaires to librarians and users, and non invasive observation of user activities. The studies can be unpopular, as they may result in cuts in staff or services
- Date
- 6. 4.1996 13:22:31
-
¬The reference assessment manual (1995)
0.12
0.11983845 = product of:
0.2396769 = sum of:
0.2396769 = sum of:
0.17091684 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17091684 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.60999227 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.06876006 = weight(_text_:22 in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06876006 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries. 57(1996) no.3, S.307-308 (M. Crist); Journal of academic librarianship 22(1996) no.4, S.314 (D. Ettinger)
-
Tillema, H.: Development of potential : realizing development centres in organizations (1996)
0.11
0.10943902 = product of:
0.21887805 = sum of:
0.21887805 = sum of:
0.177622 = weight(_text_:assessment in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.177622 = score(doc=911,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.63392264 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
0.041256037 = weight(_text_:22 in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041256037 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Are organizations interested in realizing the potential of their personnel? How far have they progressed in utilizing performance assessment instruments for developmental purposes? There is a growing need for redirecting organizations toward greater knowledge productivity, and using personnel's competencies in a knowledge productive way. Development centers haue the potential of analyzing and diagnosing relevant competencies of personnel while at the same time providing a match wich further development. It was studied, within a representative set of large Dutch organizations, already familiar with the concept of assessment centers, to what degree management conceptions and actual implementation conditions are present for the introduction of development centers. The advantages of development centers as a knowledgeproductive tool for assessment in organizations are elaborated.
- Source
- Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
-
Meadow, C.T.: ¬A proposed method of measuring the utility of individual information retrieval tools (1996)
0.11
0.10866555 = product of:
0.2173311 = sum of:
0.2173311 = sum of:
0.16919905 = weight(_text_:assessment in 6611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16919905 = score(doc=6611,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.6038616 = fieldWeight in 6611, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6611)
0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 6611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048132043 = score(doc=6611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Proposes a new method of evaluating information retrieval systems by concentrating on individual tools in the context of their use, rather than systems as a whole. A tool is a command, its menu or graphic interface equivalent, or a move or stratagem. A user would render an assessment of the relative success of a small part of a search, and every tool used in that part would be credited with a contribution to the result, whether positive or negative. The cumulative scores would provide an assessment of the overall utility of the tool
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.1, S.22-34
-
Bertot, J.C.; McClure, C.R.: Developing assessment techniques for statewide electronic networks (1996)
0.11
0.10866555 = product of:
0.2173311 = sum of:
0.2173311 = sum of:
0.16919905 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16919905 = score(doc=2173,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.6038616 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 2173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048132043 = score(doc=2173,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2173, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2173)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports on a study assessing statewide electronic network initiatives using the Maryland Sailor network as a case study. Aims to develop assessment techniques and indicators for the evaluation of statewide electronic networks. Defines key components of the statewide networked environment. Develops and operationalizes performance measures for networked information technologies and services provided through statewide networks. Explores several methods of evaluating statewide electronic networks. Identifies and discusses key issues and preliminary findings that affect the successful evaluation of statewide networked services
- Date
- 7.11.1998 20:27:22
-
Lovtsov, D.A.: Informatsionnye otsenki tekhnologicheskoi effektivnosti pererabotki informatsii (1997)
0.10
0.09587076 = product of:
0.19174153 = sum of:
0.19174153 = sum of:
0.13673347 = weight(_text_:assessment in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13673347 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.4879938 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05500805 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Assessment of the technological effectiveness of information processing
- Source
- Nauchno- Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya; Series 2. 1997, no.11, S.22-26
-
Ashton, J.: ONE: the final OPAC frontier (1998)
0.10
0.09587076 = product of:
0.19174153 = sum of:
0.19174153 = sum of:
0.13673347 = weight(_text_:assessment in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13673347 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.4879938 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
0.05500805 = weight(_text_:22 in 2588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05500805 = score(doc=2588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2588)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the European Commission's OPAC Network in Europe (ONE) project which attempts to make it simpler to search a number of major European OPACs crossing all frontiers via online interface. Explains how this is done and the British Library's involvement in it, assessment of the project and plans for the future
- Source
- Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.5-6
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.08
0.083886914 = product of:
0.16777383 = sum of:
0.16777383 = sum of:
0.11964179 = weight(_text_:assessment in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11964179 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.4269946 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.048132043 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048132043 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Chaudhry, A.S.; Ashoor, S: Functional performance of automated systems : a comparative study of HORIZON, INNOPAC and VTLS (1998)
0.07
0.071903065 = product of:
0.14380613 = sum of:
0.14380613 = sum of:
0.1025501 = weight(_text_:assessment in 3022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1025501 = score(doc=3022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 3022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3022)
0.041256037 = weight(_text_:22 in 3022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041256037 = score(doc=3022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17771997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3022)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Provides functional performance data drawn from an analysis of the capabilities and functionality of 3 major library automation systems: HORIZON, INNOPAC and Virginia Tech Library System (VTLS). The assessment was based on vendor input as well as on feedback from libraries of different types from different parts of the world. Objective criteria based on a numerical scoring scheme was used to assess system performance in 6 major functional areas: acquisition; cataloguing; circulation; OPAC; reference and information services; and serials control. The functional performance data is expected to be useful for libraries loking for new systems as well as those already computerised and interested in enhancing their present systems. In addition, data on the extent of the utilisation of system capabilities by libraries should also be of interest to system vendors
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 14:03:24
-
Battersby, R.: Teaching quality assessment : the role of the subject librarian (1996)
0.07
0.068366736 = product of:
0.13673347 = sum of:
0.13673347 = product of:
0.27346694 = sum of:
0.27346694 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27346694 = score(doc=5814,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.9759876 = fieldWeight in 5814, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5814)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Provides practical advice and guidance to subject librarians in UK academic libraries preparing for teaching quality assessment (TQA) visits. Suggests what action librarians should take prior to an assessment visit, including forms of departmental liaison. Provides a comprehensive checklist, arranged into six broad categories, of those issues which can be raised by assessors. Describes the author's recent experiences of TQA for science and engineering subjects at the University of Edinburgh. Indicates what action should be taken after the assessment visit.
-
Nohr, H.: Technology assessment : a challenge to knowledge organization? (1994)
0.06
0.06042823 = product of:
0.12085646 = sum of:
0.12085646 = product of:
0.24171291 = sum of:
0.24171291 = weight(_text_:assessment in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24171291 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.86265934 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The increasing technicalization of knowledge calls for a school of thought in technology assessment which occupies itself with the cognitive foundations of knowledge technology and the consequences and effects of the technicalization of knowledge. The present contribution hopes to stimulate ISKO into taking an interest in this problem field
-
Wolstenhome, E.F.: ¬The design, application and evaluation of a system dynamics based methodology for the assessment of computerised information systems (1992)
0.06
0.059820894 = product of:
0.11964179 = sum of:
0.11964179 = product of:
0.23928358 = sum of:
0.23928358 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23928358 = score(doc=4253,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.8539892 = fieldWeight in 4253, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4253)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the development, application and evaluation of a system dynamics based methodology for the assessment of computerised information systems (CIS) carried out as part of a joint research project between the University of Bradford Management Centre and Defense Research Agency (Military): Assessment methods based solely on the internal attributes of the CIS are inadequate. There is a need for assessment in terms of the contribution which the CIS makes to the overall performance of the host systemin which it will be implanted. Describes a methodology based on system dynamics which embodies this principle
-
Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Robertson, S.E.; Neilson, C.: Evaluation of online catalogues : an assessment of methods (1990)
0.06
0.059820894 = product of:
0.11964179 = sum of:
0.11964179 = product of:
0.23928358 = sum of:
0.23928358 = weight(_text_:assessment in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23928358 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.8539892 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Harding, J.; Martin, G.: Shareware database management software : an assessment of its usefulness to information officers in small voluntary sector organisations in the UK (1993)
0.06
0.059820894 = product of:
0.11964179 = sum of:
0.11964179 = product of:
0.23928358 = sum of:
0.23928358 = weight(_text_:assessment in 6886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23928358 = score(doc=6886,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.8539892 = fieldWeight in 6886, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6886)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Assessment and accountability in reference work (1992)
0.06
0.059207335 = product of:
0.11841467 = sum of:
0.11841467 = product of:
0.23682934 = sum of:
0.23682934 = weight(_text_:assessment in 7835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23682934 = score(doc=7835,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.84523016 = fieldWeight in 7835, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7835)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is a call for librarians to adopt performance measures and learn to work with the results so that assessment of reference services is not left to those who neither understand nor value libraries. This fascinating book explores a wealth of assessment methods that librarians can use to collect data and create standards that are valid, practical and useful in accounting for reference services. Some of the methodologies described include quantitative measures, qualitative measures, patron surveys, questionnaires, interviews, case studies, peer review, unobtrusive testing, and even updating the library's policies and procedures manual
-
Intner, S.S.; Futas, E.: ¬The role and impact of Library of Congress Classification on the assessment of women's studies collections (1996)
0.06
0.059207335 = product of:
0.11841467 = sum of:
0.11841467 = product of:
0.23682934 = sum of:
0.23682934 = weight(_text_:assessment in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23682934 = score(doc=6386,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.84523016 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Provides an assessment of the women's studies collection at Smith College Libraries, Northampton, MA, using both standard techniques and special instruments developed at the college. Discusses the nature of women's studies; LCC and women's studies; performing qualitative assessments of women's studies collection; and compiling and using bibliographies for assessment
-
Liddy, E.D.; Bishop, A.P.; Settel, B.: Index quality study : pt.2: publishers' survey and qualitative assessment (1991)
0.05
0.05127505 = product of:
0.1025501 = sum of:
0.1025501 = product of:
0.2051002 = sum of:
0.2051002 = weight(_text_:assessment in 7767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2051002 = score(doc=7767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.7319907 = fieldWeight in 7767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Barnett, G.A.; Danowski, J.A.; Richards, W.D.: Communication networks and network analysis : a current assessment (1993)
0.05
0.05127505 = product of:
0.1025501 = sum of:
0.1025501 = product of:
0.2051002 = sum of:
0.2051002 = weight(_text_:assessment in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2051002 = score(doc=833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.7319907 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Gillman, P.: Assessing database quality (1995)
0.05
0.05127505 = product of:
0.1025501 = sum of:
0.1025501 = product of:
0.2051002 = sum of:
0.2051002 = weight(_text_:assessment in 4085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2051002 = score(doc=4085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2801951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.050750602 = queryNorm
0.7319907 = fieldWeight in 4085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4085)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- There are 4 ways of assessing database quality; accuracy; standardization; completeness; and fitness-for-purpose. The latter is the most important assessment because it sets the context for the database in which the other elements can be defined
