Search (164 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Miksa, S.D.: ¬The challenges of change : a review of cataloging and classification literature, 2003-2004 (2007) 0.09
    0.091672644 = product of:
      0.13750896 = sum of:
        0.01990998 = weight(_text_:information in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01990998 = score(doc=266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.11759898 = sum of:
          0.061577436 = weight(_text_:services in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061577436 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.05602155 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602155 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews the enormous changes in cataloging and classification reflected in the literature of 2003 and 2004, and discusses major themes and issues. Traditional cataloging and classification tools have been re-vamped and new resources have emerged. Most notable themes are: the continuing influence of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Control (FRBR); the struggle to understand the ever-broadening concept of an "information entity"; steady developments in metadata-encoding standards; and the globalization of information systems, including multilinguistic challenges.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.1, S.51-68
  2. Budd, J.: Exploring categorization : undergraduate student searching and the evolution of catalogs (2007) 0.09
    0.087784976 = product of:
      0.13167746 = sum of:
        0.014078482 = weight(_text_:information in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014078482 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
        0.11759898 = sum of:
          0.061577436 = weight(_text_:services in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061577436 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
          0.05602155 = weight(_text_:22 in 256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602155 = score(doc=256,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 256, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=256)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Debate about the future of library catalogs and cataloging has been, and continues to be, featured in the literature of librarianship. Some research into the ways undergraduate students at one institution assign subjects to selected works provides insight into the cognitive elements of categorization. The design of catalogs can be informed by this research, as well as work currently being done on alternative means of organization, such as information systems ontologies.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.4, S.286-292
  3. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.08
    0.08259426 = product of:
      0.12389139 = sum of:
        0.018288486 = weight(_text_:information in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018288486 = score(doc=101,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
        0.105602905 = sum of:
          0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046183076 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
          0.05941983 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05941983 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.1, S.54-59
  4. Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996) 0.08
    0.08021356 = product of:
      0.12032034 = sum of:
        0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017421233 = score(doc=600,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
        0.10289911 = sum of:
          0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05388026 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article first compares and contrasts the essential, fundamental differences between traditional and digital information mediums. It then reexamines the role of the online public access catalog (OPAC), refines the definition of library's catalog, and advocates the addition of Internet resources within the OPAC. Next, the article describes the building of the Alex Catalog, a catalog of Internet resources in the in the form of MARC records. Finally, this article outlines a process of integrating the futher inclusion of other Internet resources into OPACs as well as some of the obstacles such a process manifests.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
  5. Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000) 0.05
    0.048999578 = product of:
      0.14699873 = sum of:
        0.14699873 = sum of:
          0.07697179 = weight(_text_:services in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07697179 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.405633 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
          0.070026934 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.070026934 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 44(2000) no.3, S.160-167
  6. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.04
    0.03919966 = product of:
      0.11759898 = sum of:
        0.11759898 = sum of:
          0.061577436 = weight(_text_:services in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061577436 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.05602155 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05602155 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 52(2008) no.3, S.148-163
  7. Crosnier, H. Le: Nouveaux besoins, nouveaux services, nouveaux catalogues (1997) 0.04
    0.03885614 = product of:
      0.05828421 = sum of:
        0.018288486 = weight(_text_:information in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018288486 = score(doc=918,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
        0.039995722 = product of:
          0.079991445 = sum of:
            0.079991445 = weight(_text_:services in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.079991445 = score(doc=918,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.42154622 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    For users, the catalogue is a tool to assist in satisfying information demands. Bibliographic databases raise the question of how to describe a document to facilitate retrieval. Information technology development have led to the creation of hypercatalogues, affording links to related material and other services. This necessitates improved descriptive cataloguing and also improved search interfaces to simplify user manipulation, along the lines of the Web. Given the massive output of electronic documents, the librarian's role is to select, prioritise and organise. The information society and its consequent economic consequences for the social organisation of knowledge raise the prospect of marginalisation of libraries. Catalogues enable access to knowledge as a public good, but this access must be democratic
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: New needs, new services, new catalogues
  8. Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future? : Access to information in the year 2006 (1982) 0.04
    0.037389334 = product of:
      0.056084 = sum of:
        0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017598102 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
        0.038485896 = product of:
          0.07697179 = sum of:
            0.07697179 = weight(_text_:services in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07697179 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.405633 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.122-135
  9. Fattahi, R.: Library cataloguing and abstracting and indexing services : reconciliation of principles in the online environment (1998) 0.04
    0.037013553 = product of:
      0.055520326 = sum of:
        0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017421233 = score(doc=2587,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
        0.03809909 = product of:
          0.07619818 = sum of:
            0.07619818 = weight(_text_:services in 2587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07619818 = score(doc=2587,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2587, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2587)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    With the ever-increasing developments in information technology and networks, end users of the online environment now have integrated access to a variety of bibliographic databases, mainly library catalogues and A&I services, from a single terminal. While such a facility influences users' expectations and preferences in the searching, retrieval and presentation of bibliographic information, it raises an important question as to whether different bibliographic practices can use a similar or compatible set of principles for creating bibliographic records and files. This paper is an attempt to identify areas of possible reconciliation and also address some of the implications of such an issue.
  10. Randall, N.B.: Spelling errors in the database : shadow or substance? (1999) 0.03
    0.034299705 = product of:
      0.10289911 = sum of:
        0.10289911 = sum of:
          0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05388026 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 43(1999) no.3, S.161-169
  11. Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2006) 0.03
    0.034299705 = product of:
      0.10289911 = sum of:
        0.10289911 = sum of:
          0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05388026 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=114,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 114, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=114)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 50(2006) no.1, S.xx-xx
  12. Cochrane, P.A.: 34th UIUC clinic highlights visualizing subject access (1997) 0.03
    0.034018442 = product of:
      0.05102766 = sum of:
        0.027936121 = weight(_text_:information in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027936121 = score(doc=377,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
        0.023091538 = product of:
          0.046183076 = sum of:
            0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046183076 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the 34th Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, held 2-4 Mar 1997 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The clinic was entitled 'Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources'. Summarizes the following individual sessions: Visual browsing for information retrieval; Hypostatizing data collections, especially bibliographic; Simultaneous searching of distributed information and subject repositories on the WWW; Information filtering from multiple sources; Thesauri in the full text world; The role of controlled vocabulary in visualizing document associations; Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval; Spatial abilities and visualizations; Using IODyne as an indexing tool; Knowledge structures for information visualizing; Visualizing digital libraries; what role for the OPAC?; How will we provide subject access in the Interspace of the 21st century?; Natural language processing based information retrieval; Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation; Using electronic services to become an interbetworked business; and Conference Wrap up
  13. Wesseling, M.G.: OCLC PICA : committed to libraries in Europe (2002) 0.03
    0.033611845 = product of:
      0.050417766 = sum of:
        0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012318673 = score(doc=929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=929)
        0.03809909 = product of:
          0.07619818 = sum of:
            0.07619818 = weight(_text_:services in 929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07619818 = score(doc=929,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 929, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=929)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The article discusses the role of OCLC PICA in the European information landscape. The cooperative wishes to position itself as a professional body among other individuals and organisations in the library profession. Based an 30 years of experience in two separate organisations OCLC and PICA have merged their European activities in order to better focus an Europe. The European library landscape is probably one of the most sophisticated as well as the most complicated in the world. The main part of the article discusses the creation of a pan-European service PiCarta in which an index is made available to different local and regional union catalogues and their services. It also touches the area of cooperative virtual reference services.
  14. Whitney , C.; Schiff, L.: ¬The Melvyl Recommender Project : developing library recommendation services (2006) 0.03
    0.031725906 = product of:
      0.047588855 = sum of:
        0.014932485 = weight(_text_:information in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014932485 = score(doc=1173,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
        0.032656368 = product of:
          0.065312736 = sum of:
            0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 1173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065312736 = score(doc=1173,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.344191 = fieldWeight in 1173, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1173)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Popular commercial on-line services such as Google, e-Bay, Amazon, and Netflix have evolved quickly over the last decade to help people find what they want, developing information retrieval strategies such as usefully ranked results, spelling correction, and recommender systems. Online library catalogs (OPACs), in contrast, have changed little and are notoriously difficult for patrons to use (University of California Libraries, 2005). Over the past year (June 2005 to the present), the Melvyl Recommender Project (California Digital Library, 2005) has been exploring methods and feasibility of closing the gap between features that library patrons want and have come to expect from information retrieval systems and what libraries are currently equipped to deliver. The project team conducted exploratory work in five topic areas: relevance ranking, auto-correction, use of a text-based discovery system, user interface strategies, and recommending. This article focuses specifically on the recommending portion of the project and potential extensions to that work.
  15. Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007) 0.03
    0.030515669 = product of:
      0.045773502 = sum of:
        0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012443737 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
        0.033329766 = product of:
          0.06665953 = sum of:
            0.06665953 = weight(_text_:services in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06665953 = score(doc=2525,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    There is evidence that many individuals and organizations in the library world do not support the work taking place to develop a next generation of the library cataloging rules. The authors describe the tensions existing between those advocating an incremental change to cataloging process and others who desire a bolder library entry into the digital era. Libraries have lost their place as primary information providers, surpassed by more agile (and in many cases wealthier) purveyors of digital information delivery services. Although libraries still manage materials that are not available elsewhere, the library's approach to user service and the user interface is not competing successfully against services like Amazon or Google. If libraries are to avoid further marginalization, they need to make a fundamental change in their approach to user services. The library's signature service, its catalog, uses rules for cataloging that are remnants of a long departed technology: the card catalog. Modifications to the rules, such as those proposed by the Resource Description and Access (RDA) development effort, can only keep us rooted firmly in the 20th, if not the 19th century. A more radical change is required that will contribute to the library of the future, re-imagined and integrated with the chosen workflow of its users.
  16. Howarth, L.C.: "Is there a catalog in your future?" : Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor (2010) 0.03
    0.029911466 = product of:
      0.0448672 = sum of:
        0.014078482 = weight(_text_:information in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014078482 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
        0.030788718 = product of:
          0.061577436 = sum of:
            0.061577436 = weight(_text_:services in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.061577436 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.3245064 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf: Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future?: Access to information in the year 2006. In: Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.122-135.
  17. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.03
    0.029745609 = product of:
      0.044618413 = sum of:
        0.023610333 = weight(_text_:information in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023610333 = score(doc=54,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
        0.02100808 = product of:
          0.04201616 = sum of:
            0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04201616 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Extensive literatures exist on information searching theory and techniques, as well as on the Bradford Distribution. This distribution, also known as "Bradford's Law of Scattering," tells us that information on a subject is dispersed in a characteristic and robust pattern that appears consistently across many different environments. This pattern may be expected to have important implications for information searching theory and techniques. Yet these two research literatures are rarely considered in relation to each other. It is the purpose of this article to distinguish three Bradford regions and speculate on the optimum searching techniques for each region. In the process, browsing, directed searching in databases, and the pursuit of various forms of links will all be considered. Implications of growth in size of a literature for optimal information organization and searching will also be addressed.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Source
    Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
  18. Altenhöner, R.; Frodl, C.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Pfeifer, B.; Oehlschläger, S.; Svensson, L.G.: Libraries beyond libraries : Integration, Innovation and Information for all Aus den Veranstaltungen der Sektionen Bibliografie, Katalogisierung, Klassifikation und Indexierung, Knowledge Management und Informationstechnologie sowie der Core Activity ICADS der IFLA Division III (Library Services) beim Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 77. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in San Juan, Puerto Rico (2011) 0.03
    0.029574241 = product of:
      0.04436136 = sum of:
        0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017421233 = score(doc=174,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
        0.02694013 = product of:
          0.05388026 = sum of:
            0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05388026 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  19. Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007) 0.03
    0.029399745 = product of:
      0.088199235 = sum of:
        0.088199235 = sum of:
          0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046183076 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
          0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04201616 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 51(2007) no.3, S.190-203
  20. Tarulli, L.; Spiteri, L.F.: Library catalogues of the future : a social space and collaborative tool? (2012) 0.03
    0.028085878 = product of:
      0.042128816 = sum of:
        0.008799051 = weight(_text_:information in 5565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008799051 = score(doc=5565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5565)
        0.033329766 = product of:
          0.06665953 = sum of:
            0.06665953 = weight(_text_:services in 5565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06665953 = score(doc=5565,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 5565, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5565)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Next-generation catalogues are providing opportunities for library professionals and users to interact, collaborate, and enhance core library functions. Technology, innovation, and creativity are all components that are merging to create a localized, online social space that brings our physical library services and experiences into an online environment. While patrons are comfortable creating user-generated information on commercial Web sites and social media Web sites, library professionals should be exploring alternative methods of use for these tools within the library setting. Can the library catalogue promote remote readers' advisory services and act as a localized "Google"? Will patrons or library professionals be the driving force behind user-generated content within our catalogues? How can cataloguers be sure that the integrity of their bibliographic records is protected while inviting additional data sources to display in our catalogues? As library catalogues bring our physical library services into the online environment, catalogues also begin to encroach or "mash-up" with other areas of librarianship that have not been part of a cataloguer's expertise. Using library catalogues beyond their traditional role as tools for discovery and access raises issues surrounding the expertise of library professionals and the benefits of collaboration between frontline and backroom staff.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 124
  • d 29
  • f 3
  • sp 3
  • a 1
  • chi 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 142
  • el 12
  • m 8
  • r 6
  • s 5
  • b 3
  • x 2
  • More… Less…