Search (4279 results, page 1 of 214)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Dunsire, G.; Nicholson, D.: Signposting the crossroads : terminology Web services and classification-based interoperability (2010) 0.10
    0.10138532 = product of:
      0.15207797 = sum of:
        0.015240406 = weight(_text_:information in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015240406 = score(doc=4066,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
        0.13683757 = sum of:
          0.10182411 = weight(_text_:services in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10182411 = score(doc=4066,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.536602 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 4066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=4066,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4066, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4066)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of this paper is the provision of terminology- and classification-based terminologies interoperability data via web services, initially using interoperability data based on the use of a Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) spine, but with an aim to explore other possibilities in time, including the use of other spines. The High-Level Thesaurus Project (HILT) Phase IV developed pilot web services based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS to deliver machine-readable terminology and crossterminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to enhance their subject search or browse services. It also developed an associated toolkit to help information services technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality within service interfaces. Several UK information services have created illustrative user interface enhancements using HILT functionality and these will demonstrate what is possible. HILT currently has the following subject schemes mounted and available: DDC, CAB, GCMD, HASSET, IPSV, LCSH, MeSH, NMR, SCAS, UNESCO, and AAT. It also has high level mappings between some of these schemes and DDC and some deeper pilot mappings available.
    Date
    6. 1.2011 19:22:48
  2. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.09
    0.09169047 = product of:
      0.1375357 = sum of:
        0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012318673 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
        0.12521704 = sum of:
          0.07619818 = weight(_text_:services in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07619818 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.40155616 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Research libraries are using batchloading to provide access to many resources that they would otherwise be unable to catalog given the staff and other resources available. To explore how such libraries are managing their batchloading activities, the authors conducted a survey of the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group member libraries. The survey addressed staffing, budgets, scope, workflow, management, quality standards, information technology support, collaborative efforts, and assessment of batchloading activities. The authors provide an analysis of the survey results along with suggestions for process improvements and future research.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 56(2012) no.3, S.155-170
  3. Lee, J.H.; Price, R.: User experience with commercial music services : an empirical exploration (2016) 0.08
    0.08481711 = product of:
      0.12722567 = sum of:
        0.015240406 = weight(_text_:information in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015240406 = score(doc=2845,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
        0.11198526 = sum of:
          0.07697179 = weight(_text_:services in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07697179 = score(doc=2845,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.405633 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=2845,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The music information retrieval (MIR) community has long understood the role of evaluation as a critical component for successful information retrieval systems. Over the past several years, it has also become evident that user-centered evaluation based on realistic tasks is essential for creating systems that are commercially marketable. Although user-oriented research has been increasing, the MIR field is still lacking in holistic, user-centered approaches to evaluating music services beyond measuring the performance of search or classification algorithms. In light of this need, we conducted a user study exploring how users evaluate their overall experience with existing popular commercial music services, asking about their interactions with the system as well as situational and personal characteristics. In this paper, we present a qualitative heuristic evaluation of commercial music services based on Jakob Nielsen's 10 usability heuristics for user interface design, and also discuss 8 additional criteria that may be used for the holistic evaluation of user experience in MIR systems. Finally, we recommend areas of future user research raised by trends and patterns that surfaced from this user study.
    Date
    17. 3.2016 19:22:15
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.800-811
  4. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.08
    0.081507586 = product of:
      0.122261375 = sum of:
        0.014932485 = weight(_text_:information in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014932485 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
        0.10732889 = sum of:
          0.065312736 = weight(_text_:services in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065312736 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.344191 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04201616 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1901-1916
  5. Ilik, V.; Storlien, J.; Olivarez, J.: Metadata makeover (2014) 0.08
    0.08021356 = product of:
      0.12032034 = sum of:
        0.017421233 = weight(_text_:information in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017421233 = score(doc=2606,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
        0.10289911 = sum of:
          0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05388026 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=2606,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2606, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2606)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become fluent in information technology such as web design skills, HyperText Markup Language (HTML), Cascading Stylesheets (CSS), eXensible Markup Language (XML), and programming languages. The knowledge gained from learning information technology can be used to experiment with methods of transforming one metadata schema into another using various software solutions. This paper will discuss the use of eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transformations (XSLT) for repurposing, editing, and reformatting metadata. Catalogers have the requisite skills for working with any metadata schema, and if they are excluded from metadata work, libraries are wasting a valuable human resource.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 58(2014) no.3, S.187-208
  6. Bodoff, D.; Raban, D.: Question types and intermediary elicitations (2016) 0.08
    0.077942275 = product of:
      0.11691341 = sum of:
        0.015240406 = weight(_text_:information in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015240406 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
        0.101673 = sum of:
          0.06665953 = weight(_text_:services in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06665953 = score(doc=2638,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the context of online question-answering services, an intermediary clarifies the user's needs by eliciting additional information. This research proposes that these elicitations will depend on the type of question. In particular, this research explores the relationship between three constructs: question types, elicitations, and the fee that is paid for the answer. These relationships are explored for a few different question typologies, including a new kind of question type that we call Identity. It is found that the kinds of clarifications that intermediaries elicit depend on the type of question in systematic ways. A practical implication is that interactive question-answering services-whether human or automated-can be steered to focus attention on the kinds of clarification that are evidently most needed for that question type. Further, it is found that certain question types, as well as the number of elicitations, are associated with higher fees. This means that it may be possible to define a pricing structure for question-answering services based on objective and predictable characteristics of the question, which would help to establish a rational market for this type of information service. The newly introduced Identity question type was found to be especially reliable in predicting elicitations and fees.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 11:58:25
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.2, S.289-304
  7. Mathiesen, K.: Human rights as a topic and guide for LIS research and practice (2015) 0.08
    0.07742357 = product of:
      0.11613536 = sum of:
        0.027936121 = weight(_text_:information in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027936121 = score(doc=2119,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
        0.088199235 = sum of:
          0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046183076 = score(doc=2119,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
          0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04201616 = score(doc=2119,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this global information age, accessing, disseminating, and controlling information is an increasingly important aspect of human life. Often, these interests are expressed in the language of human rights-for example, rights to expression, privacy, and intellectual property. As the discipline concerned with "facilitating the effective communication of desired information between human generator and human user" (Belkin, 1975, p. 22), library and information science (LIS) has a central role in facilitating communication about human rights and ensuring the respect for human rights in information services and systems. This paper surveys the literature at the intersection of LIS and human rights. To begin, an overview of human rights conventions and an introduction to human rights theory is provided. Then the intersections between LIS and human rights are considered. Three central areas of informational human rights-communication, privacy, and intellectual property-are discussed in detail. It is argued that communication rights in particular serve as a central linchpin in the system of human rights.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1305-1322
  8. Snow, K.; Hoffman, G.L.: What makes an effective cataloging course? : a study of the factors that promote learning (2015) 0.08
    0.07681186 = product of:
      0.11521778 = sum of:
        0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012318673 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
        0.10289911 = sum of:
          0.05388026 = weight(_text_:services in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05388026 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
          0.049018852 = weight(_text_:22 in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049018852 = score(doc=2609,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a research study, a survey of library and information science master's degree holders who have taken a beginning cataloging course, to identify the elements of a beginning cataloging course that help students to learn cataloging concepts and skills. The results suggest that cataloging practice (the hands-on creation of bibliographic records or catalog cards), the effectiveness of the instructor, a balance of theory and practice, and placing cataloging in a real-world context contribute to effective learning. However, more research is needed to determine how, and to what the extent, each element should be incorporated into beginning cataloging courses.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.4, S.187-199
  9. Vaughan, L.; Chen, Y.: Data mining from web search queries : a comparison of Google trends and Baidu index (2015) 0.08
    0.07607783 = product of:
      0.114116736 = sum of:
        0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012443737 = score(doc=1605,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
        0.101673 = sum of:
          0.06665953 = weight(_text_:services in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06665953 = score(doc=1605,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.3512885 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Numerous studies have explored the possibility of uncovering information from web search queries but few have examined the factors that affect web query data sources. We conducted a study that investigated this issue by comparing Google Trends and Baidu Index. Data from these two services are based on queries entered by users into Google and Baidu, two of the largest search engines in the world. We first compared the features and functions of the two services based on documents and extensive testing. We then carried out an empirical study that collected query volume data from the two sources. We found that data from both sources could be used to predict the quality of Chinese universities and companies. Despite the differences between the two services in terms of technology, such as differing methods of language processing, the search volume data from the two were highly correlated and combining the two data sources did not improve the predictive power of the data. However, there was a major difference between the two in terms of data availability. Baidu Index was able to provide more search volume data than Google Trends did. Our analysis showed that the disadvantage of Google Trends in this regard was due to Google's smaller user base in China. The implication of this finding goes beyond China. Google's user bases in many countries are smaller than that in China, so the search volume data related to those countries could result in the same issue as that related to China.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.1, S.13-22
  10. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.07
    0.072060645 = product of:
      0.10809097 = sum of:
        0.095772296 = product of:
          0.2873169 = sum of:
            0.2873169 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2873169 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43819162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.012318673 = weight(_text_:information in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012318673 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
    Theme
    Information
  11. Copeland, A.J.; Barreau, D.: Helping people to manage and share their digital information : a role for public libraries (2011) 0.07
    0.070991814 = product of:
      0.10648772 = sum of:
        0.018288486 = weight(_text_:information in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018288486 = score(doc=5583,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
        0.088199235 = sum of:
          0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046183076 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
          0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 5583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04201616 = score(doc=5583,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5583, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5583)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    As a cultural institution, the public library is charged with providing resources and services that fit the needs of a particular community and, if space and budgets allow, of serving as a resource and repository of the community's past. To fulfill its mission to the public, the library must attract that public by offering materials and providing opportunities for them to pursue their unique and varied interests and discover new things. By engaging individuals in the identification and preservation of their own personal, digital objects, it may be possible to increase awareness in, and commitment to, community repositories that reflect a community's diversity and that will serve all. A user education program that focuses on the importance of identifying and preserving the information and artifacts that are important, that addresses the technical aspects of preservation, and that creates awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with sharing personal information can result in a community repository that ultimately has more value for both the individual and the community.
    Date
    11.12.2019 17:47:22
  12. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.07
    0.06875448 = product of:
      0.10313172 = sum of:
        0.014932485 = weight(_text_:information in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014932485 = score(doc=2610,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
        0.088199235 = sum of:
          0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046183076 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
          0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04201616 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.3, S.120-129
  13. Alonso Lifante, M.P.; Molero Madrid, F.J.: Enhancing OPAC records : evaluating and fitting within cataloguing standards a new proposal of description parameters for historical astronomical resources (2015) 0.07
    0.06875448 = product of:
      0.10313172 = sum of:
        0.014932485 = weight(_text_:information in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014932485 = score(doc=2611,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
        0.088199235 = sum of:
          0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046183076 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
          0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04201616 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.4, S.140-161
  14. Hamari, J.; Sjöklint, M.; Ukkonen, A.: ¬The sharing economy : why people participate in collaborative consumption (2016) 0.07
    0.067922994 = product of:
      0.101884484 = sum of:
        0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 3110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012443737 = score(doc=3110,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3110, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3110)
        0.08944075 = sum of:
          0.054427277 = weight(_text_:services in 3110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054427277 = score(doc=3110,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 3110, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3110)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 3110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=3110,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3110, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3110)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Information and communications technologies (ICTs) have enabled the rise of so-called "Collaborative Consumption" (CC): the peer-to-peer-based activity of obtaining, giving, or sharing the access to goods and services, coordinated through community-based online services. CC has been expected to alleviate societal problems such as hyper-consumption, pollution, and poverty by lowering the cost of economic coordination within communities. However, beyond anecdotal evidence, there is a dearth of understanding why people participate in CC. Therefore, in this article we investigate people's motivations to participate in CC. The study employs survey data (N?=?168) gathered from people registered onto a CC site. The results show that participation in CC is motivated by many factors such as its sustainability, enjoyment of the activity as well as economic gains. An interesting detail in the result is that sustainability is not directly associated with participation unless it is at the same time also associated with positive attitudes towards CC. This suggests that sustainability might only be an important factor for those people for whom ecological consumption is important. Furthermore, the results suggest that in CC an attitude-behavior gap might exist; people perceive the activity positively and say good things about it, but this good attitude does not necessary translate into action.
    Date
    22. 8.2016 19:01:54
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.9, S.2047-2059
  15. Borgman, C.L.; Scharnhorst, A.; Golshan, M.S.: Digital data archives as knowledge infrastructures : mediating data sharing and reuse (2019) 0.07
    0.067922994 = product of:
      0.101884484 = sum of:
        0.012443737 = weight(_text_:information in 5325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012443737 = score(doc=5325,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5325, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5325)
        0.08944075 = sum of:
          0.054427277 = weight(_text_:services in 5325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054427277 = score(doc=5325,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.28682584 = fieldWeight in 5325, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5325)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 5325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=5325,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5325, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5325)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Digital archives are the preferred means for open access to research data. They play essential roles in knowledge infrastructures-robust networks of people, artifacts, and institutions-but little is known about how they mediate information exchange between stakeholders. We open the "black box" of data archives by studying DANS, the Data Archiving and Networked Services institute of The Netherlands, which manages 50+ years of data from the social sciences, humanities, and other domains. Our interviews, weblogs, ethnography, and document analyses reveal that a few large contributors provide a steady flow of content, but most are academic researchers who submit data sets infrequently and often restrict access to their files. Consumers are a diverse group that overlaps minimally with contributors. Archivists devote about half their time to aiding contributors with curation processes and half to assisting consumers. Given the diversity and infrequency of usage, human assistance in curation and search remains essential. DANS' knowledge infrastructure encompasses public and private stakeholders who contribute, consume, harvest, and serve their data-many of whom did not exist at the time the DANS collections originated-reinforcing the need for continuous investment in digital data archives as their communities, technologies, and services evolve.
    Date
    7. 7.2019 11:58:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.8, S.888-904
  16. Idrees, H.: Library classification systems and organization of Islamic knowledge (2012) 0.07
    0.06583873 = product of:
      0.098758094 = sum of:
        0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010558861 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
        0.088199235 = sum of:
          0.046183076 = weight(_text_:services in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046183076 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2433798 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
          0.04201616 = weight(_text_:22 in 2594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04201616 = score(doc=2594,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2594, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2594)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Standard library classification systems like Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), U.S. Library of Congress Classification (LCC), and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) are internationally known and widely used by libraries as the tools for organizing information. Charles Ammi Cutter's Expansive Classification (EC), James Duff Brown's Subject Classification (SC), Henry E. Bliss' Bibliographic Classification (BC), and S. R. Ranganathan's Colon Classification (CC) also are standard classification systems, but they are less commonly used compared to aforementioned three systems. All these systems are easy to use and convenient for most general collection libraries. However, these systems are not adequate for some special collections. Libraries with rich collections on Islam also face problems while using these systems, although such libraries often use expansions in the original systems for their collections. This paper examines this problem and presents a potential optimal solution. The author collected data, using a semistructured interview technique, from a representative sample of thirty libraries in eight countries with strong collections in Islam. These data were analyzed employing qualitative methods.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 56(2012) no.3, S.171-182
  17. Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011) 0.06
    0.06336837 = product of:
      0.095052555 = sum of:
        0.021553185 = weight(_text_:information in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021553185 = score(doc=4452,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
        0.07349937 = sum of:
          0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038485896 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Informational cities are prototypical cities of the knowledge society. If they are informational world cities, they are new centers of power. According to Manuel Castells (1989), in those cities space of flows (flows of money, power, and information) tend to override space of places. Information and communication technology infrastructures, cognitive infrastructures (as groundwork of knowledge cities and creative cities), and city-level knowledge management are of great importance. Digital libraries provide access to the global explicit knowledge. The informational city consists of creative clusters and spaces for personal contacts to stimulate sharing of implicit information. In such cities, we can observe job polarization in favor of well-trained employees. The corporate structure of informational cities is made up of financial services, knowledge-intensive high-tech industrial enterprises, companies of the information economy, and further creative and knowledge-intensive service enterprises. Weak location factors are facilities for culture, recreational activities, and consumption. Political willingness to create an informational city and e-governance activities are crucial aspects for the development of such cities. This conceptual article frames indicators which are able to mark the degree of "informativeness" of a city. Finally, based upon findings of network economy, we try to explain why certain cities master the transition to informational cities and others (lagging to relative insignificance) do not. The article connects findings of information science and of urbanistics and urban planning.
    Date
    3. 7.2011 19:22:49
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.963-986
  18. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.06
    0.061766263 = product of:
      0.09264939 = sum of:
        0.082090534 = product of:
          0.2462716 = sum of:
            0.2462716 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2462716 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43819162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05168566 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.010558861 = weight(_text_:information in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010558861 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  19. Li, L.; He, D.; Zhang, C.; Geng, L.; Zhang, K.: Characterizing peer-judged answer quality on academic Q&A sites : a cross-disciplinary case study on ResearchGate (2018) 0.06
    0.060731646 = product of:
      0.09109747 = sum of:
        0.017598102 = weight(_text_:information in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017598102 = score(doc=4637,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
        0.07349937 = sum of:
          0.038485896 = weight(_text_:services in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038485896 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.2028165 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
          0.035013467 = weight(_text_:22 in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035013467 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose Academic social (question and answer) Q&A sites are now utilised by millions of scholars and researchers for seeking and sharing discipline-specific information. However, little is known about the factors that can affect their votes on the quality of an answer, nor how the discipline might influence these factors. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach Using 1,021 answers collected over three disciplines (library and information services, history of art, and astrophysics) in ResearchGate, statistical analysis is performed to identify the characteristics of high-quality academic answers, and comparisons were made across the three disciplines. In particular, two major categories of characteristics of the answer provider and answer content were extracted and examined. Findings The results reveal that high-quality answers on academic social Q&A sites tend to possess two characteristics: first, they are provided by scholars with higher academic reputations (e.g. more followers, etc.); and second, they provide objective information (e.g. longer answer with fewer subjective opinions). However, the impact of these factors varies across disciplines, e.g., objectivity is more favourable in physics than in other disciplines. Originality/value The study is envisioned to help academic Q&A sites to select and recommend high-quality answers across different disciplines, especially in a cold-start scenario where the answer has not received enough judgements from peers.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 70(2018) no.3, S.269-287
  20. Jamali, H.R.; Shahbaztabar, P.: ¬The effects of internet filtering on users' information-seeking behaviour and emotions (2017) 0.06
    0.06011779 = product of:
      0.09017668 = sum of:
        0.018624082 = weight(_text_:information in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018624082 = score(doc=4052,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09073304 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05168566 = queryNorm
            0.20526241 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
        0.0715526 = sum of:
          0.043541823 = weight(_text_:services in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043541823 = score(doc=4052,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.18975723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.22946067 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
          0.028010774 = weight(_text_:22 in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028010774 = score(doc=4052,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18099438 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05168566 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between internet filtering, emotions and information-seeking behaviour. Design/methodology/approach In total, 15 postgraduate students at an Iranian university participated in the study which involved a questionnaire, search tasks with think aloud narratives, and interviews. Findings Internet content filtering results in some changes in the information-seeking behaviour of users. Users who face website blocking use a variety of methods to bypass filtering, mostly by using anti-filter software. Filtering encourages users to use channels such as social networking services to share resources and it increases the use of library material by some of the users. Users who face filtering during their search are more likely to visit more pages of results and click on more hits in the results, unlike users who do not experience filtering who rarely go past the first page. Blocking users' access to content stimulates their curiosity and they become more determined to access the content. In terms of the affective aspect, filtering causes several negative emotions (e.g. anger, disgust, sadness and anxiety) and the main reason for these emotions is not the inability to access information but the feeling of being controlled and not having freedom. Research limitations/implications The study was limited to a small number of postgraduate students in social sciences and not generalisable to all user groups. The implication is that in countries where filtering is used, libraries can play an important role in serving users and reducing users negative emotions, especially if libraries can take advantage of technologies such as social media for their services. Originality/value This is first study to address the effects of internet filtering on information-seeking behaviour and emotions. The study shows that internet filtering causes negative emotions and results in some changes in information-seeking behaviour.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.4, S.408-425

Languages

  • e 3583
  • d 660
  • a 2
  • f 2
  • i 2
  • es 1
  • hu 1
  • m 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 3859
  • el 262
  • m 262
  • s 85
  • x 54
  • r 18
  • b 6
  • n 5
  • i 3
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications