-
Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998)
0.16
0.15623623 = product of:
0.31247246 = sum of:
0.31247246 = sum of:
0.259443 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.259443 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.6846246 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053029433 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Within the looming threat of the combination of computer databases with monitoring and surveillance devices, attempts to define the notion of privacy and its parameters. Considers the ethical issues posed by databases, touching on disclosure to organizations of matters such as personal taxation and financial information or security surveillance. Highlights the increasing information imbalance between persons and organizations and suggests ways to improve autonomy
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:57:43
-
Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021)
0.08
0.081075944 = product of:
0.16215189 = sum of:
0.16215189 = product of:
0.32430378 = sum of:
0.32430378 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32430378 = score(doc=671,freq=8.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.8557808 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Algorithms influence every facet of modern life: criminal justice, education, housing, entertainment, elections, social media, news feeds, work... the list goes on. Delegating important decisions to machines, however, gives rise to deep moral concerns about responsibility, transparency, freedom, fairness, and democracy. Algorithms and Autonomy connects these concerns to the core human value of autonomy in the contexts of algorithmic teacher evaluation, risk assessment in criminal sentencing, predictive policing, background checks, news feeds, ride-sharing platforms, social media, and election interference. Using these case studies, the authors provide a better understanding of machine fairness and algorithmic transparency. They explain why interventions in algorithmic systems are necessary to ensure that algorithms are not used to control citizens' participation in politics and undercut democracy. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
- Content
- Inhalt: Introduction -- Autonomy, agency, and responsibility -- What can agents reasonably endorse? -- What we informationally owe each other -- Freedom, agency, and information technology -- Epistemic paternalism and social media -- Agency laundering and information technologies -- Democratic obligations and technological threats to legitimacy -- Conclusions and caveats
-
Kuhlen, R.: Informationsethik (2004)
0.03
0.028376581 = product of:
0.056753162 = sum of:
0.056753162 = product of:
0.113506325 = sum of:
0.113506325 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113506325 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.29952326 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Informationsethik ist Ethik von und für Menschen, deren Verhalten und Werte sich allerdings immer mehr in der Infosphere, in den Informationsumgebungen, entwickeln. Diese wiederum werden immer mehr von dem geprägt, was Telemediatisierung aller, auch und gerade der intellektuellen Lebenswelten genannt werden kann, also die Durchdringung dieser Lebenswelten mit Informations-, Kommunikations-, und Multi-/Hypermedia-Technologien. Daher kann in einem ersten Zugriff Informationsethik bestimmt werden als ein offenes Ensemble von Aussagen über normatives Verhalten gegenüber Wissen und Information, das sich in fortschreitend telemediatisierten Lebenswelten und in der Auseinandersetzung mit den in bisherigen Lebenswelten gültigen Werten und normativen Verhalten entwickelt. Die Abhängigkeit von dem Telemediatisierungsprozess könnte dazu verleiten, Informationsethik mit Computerethik oder Netzethik gleichzusetzen. Nicht alles, was am Thema Computer ethisch relevant sein könnte, sollte die Informationsethik für sich reklamieren - so wie die Informationswissenschaft ja auch einen spezifischeren Begriff von Information hat als die Informatik (vgl. Kap. A 1). Informationsethik ist Ethik in elektronischen Räumen. Das klingt spektakulär, ist aber doch keine Cyberethik, keine Ethik von epers(ons) (electronic personas), durch die in der virtuellen Realität z.B. Rechte und Pflichten von intelligenten Informationsassistenten (Cyborgs, Bots, Agenten) geregelt werden könnten. Solche Rechte von epers, wie z.B. "epers' rights include those of privacy, autonomy and anonymity" wurden und werden durchaus formuliert, so in einer ACM-Konferenz zum Thema Ethics in the Computer Age von 1995. Referenziert werden konnte diese Cyber-/Eper-Ethik auf die drei Asimovschen Gesetze für Roboter, die sich aber letztlich, anders als die Cyborgs and anders als die den Menschen ablösenden Maschinen von Hans Moravec, noch nicht von ihren Schöp fern, den Menschen, emanzipieren durften, sondern, im Sinne der ersten beiden Asimovschen Roboter-Gesetze, sich an den Interessen der Menschen auszurichten hatten. Erst dann, wenn diesen Interessen Genüge geleistet ist, dürften die Roboter auch an sich denken und Rechte und Freiheiten für sich reklamieren. Für Martha M. Smith in ihrem Information-Ethics-Artikel aus dem 32. Band der Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) ist Informationsethik "concerned with the ethical conflicts and issues that arise in the use of information, information technologies, and information systems", und zwar will sie dabei vor allem professionelle Aspekte angesprochen sehen, nicht Fragen persönlicher Ethik. Letztere können wir hier im Jahr 2004 nicht mehr so deutlich ausgrenzen, zumal die Bereiche professioneller Fachinformation und informationeller Alltagswelten auf den Publikumsmärkten durch die Telemediatisierung, durch die Ubiquität des Internet ineinander übergehen. Der Universalisierung der Informationsethik haben auch die drei UNESCO-INFOethics-Konferenzen (1997, 1990 und 2000) Rechnung getragen, bei denen das Ethos der Informationsspezialisten nur am Rande eine Rolle spielte. Vielmehr spiegelten die INFOethics-Themen die ethischen (und - im Sinne einer auf Aristoteles bezogenen Trias - zugleich die politischen und ökonomischen) Herausforderungen der (globalen) Informationsgesellschaft wider - die UNESCO bevorzugt eher den Plural und Wissensgesellschaften
-
Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004)
0.01
0.013257358 = product of:
0.026514716 = sum of:
0.026514716 = product of:
0.053029433 = sum of:
0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053029433 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
-
Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006)
0.01
0.013257358 = product of:
0.026514716 = sum of:
0.026514716 = product of:
0.053029433 = sum of:
0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053029433 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13.10.2006 10:22:03
-
O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998)
0.01
0.013257358 = product of:
0.026514716 = sum of:
0.026514716 = product of:
0.053029433 = sum of:
0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053029433 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 15:50:50
-
Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019)
0.01
0.013257358 = product of:
0.026514716 = sum of:
0.026514716 = product of:
0.053029433 = sum of:
0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053029433 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25.12.2019 14:19:22
-
Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993)
0.01
0.011600189 = product of:
0.023200378 = sum of:
0.023200378 = product of:
0.046400756 = sum of:
0.046400756 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046400756 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.1996 13:22:31
-
Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008)
0.01
0.011600189 = product of:
0.023200378 = sum of:
0.023200378 = product of:
0.046400756 = sum of:
0.046400756 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046400756 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17. 3.2008 15:17:22
-
Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008)
0.01
0.008285849 = product of:
0.016571699 = sum of:
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033143397 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 6.2008 12:22:41
-
Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012)
0.01
0.008285849 = product of:
0.016571699 = sum of:
0.016571699 = product of:
0.033143397 = sum of:
0.033143397 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033143397 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 9.2012 14:22:00
-
Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005)
0.01
0.00585898 = product of:
0.01171796 = sum of:
0.01171796 = product of:
0.02343592 = sum of:
0.02343592 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02343592 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Classification
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
- DDC
- 323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
-
"Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007)
0.01
0.0058000945 = product of:
0.011600189 = sum of:
0.011600189 = product of:
0.023200378 = sum of:
0.023200378 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023200378 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
-
"Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007)
0.00
0.0049715093 = product of:
0.009943019 = sum of:
0.009943019 = product of:
0.019886037 = sum of:
0.019886037 = weight(_text_:22 in 462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019886037 = score(doc=462,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.048925128 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 462, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=462)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
