Search (184 results, page 1 of 10)

0.08546436 = product of:
  0.12819654 = sum of:
    0.019966545 = weight(_text_:information in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019966545 = score(doc=3051,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
    0.108229995 = sum of:
      0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052049287 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
      0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.056180708 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0518325 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Examines the response of the UK Library and Information Council (LINC) to the British Library's consultation paper on the future of the BNB. LINC supports the continuation of the national bibliography in printed form, but is concerned about large areas of the national imprint not covered by it, and suggest that expansion of cooperative data supply should be explored. The current system could evolve into a controlled network of contributing agencies if the necessary legal, financial and quality control framework were established

Date

22. 2.1999 19:45:53

Source

Information management report. 1998, Jul, S.9-10

0.046833646 = product of:
  0.07025047 = sum of:
    0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02470734 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
    0.045543127 = product of:
      0.09108625 = sum of:
        0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 5572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09108625 = score(doc=5572,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.521365 = fieldWeight in 5572, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source

Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.3, S.369-381

0.035174027 = product of:
  0.05276104 = sum of:
    0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017648099 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
    0.035112944 = product of:
      0.07022589 = sum of:
        0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07022589 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

SIMON, H.R.: Introduction: why analyze bibliographies?; MARTYN, J.: Secondary services and the rising tide of paper; BROOKES, B.C.: Numerical methods of bibliographic analysis; THOMPSON, L.S.: The humanities: a state of the art report; BOTTLE, R.T.: Information obtainable from analyses of scientific bibliographies; SIMON, H.R.: Outlook: the analyses of bibliographies in the future

Source

Library trends. 22(1973), no.1

0.035029523 = product of:
  0.05254428 = sum of:
    0.024453925 = weight(_text_:information in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024453925 = score(doc=5092,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
    0.028090354 = product of:
      0.056180708 = sum of:
        0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056180708 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science

Source

Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.20-28

0.0334526 = product of:
  0.0501789 = sum of:
    0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017648099 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
    0.032530803 = product of:
      0.06506161 = sum of:
        0.06506161 = weight(_text_:management in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06506161 = score(doc=5743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source

Managing information. 3(1996) no.6, S.53-54

0.0328576 = product of:
  0.0492864 = sum of:
    0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02470734 = score(doc=75,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
    0.02457906 = product of:
      0.04915812 = sum of:
        0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04915812 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Describes the history and origins of the International Institute of Bibliography, founded in 1895 and which later became the FID. Outlines the work of Paul Otlet and his colleagues in developing the idea of universal bibliographic control through the Répertoire Bibliographique Universel and the emergence of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) as the means of its classifies arrangement. Stresses the key role played by this work in developing the main concepts of information science and documentation

Source

International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.2, S.3-15

0.032037936 = product of:
  0.0480569 = sum of:
    0.019966545 = weight(_text_:information in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019966545 = score(doc=3600,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
    0.028090354 = product of:
      0.056180708 = sum of:
        0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 3600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056180708 = score(doc=3600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3600)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Since its introduction as a library resource in 1984, the use of CD-ROM technology has proliferated among a multitude of vendors. In 1987, Ulrich's, a major supplier of serials information, jumped on the bandwagon when the entire data bases of Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory and Ulrich's Irregular Serials and Annuals become available on CD-ROM as Ulrich's Plus. The next year, Ebsco introduced The Serials Directory in CD-ROM version. Examines and compares these data base systems as reference tools.

Date

15. 1.1996 5:22:42

0.030726247 = product of:
  0.04608937 = sum of:
    0.027904097 = weight(_text_:information in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027904097 = score(doc=1685,freq=80.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.30666938 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
          8.944272 = tf(freq=80.0), with freq of:
            80.0 = termFreq=80.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
    0.018185273 = product of:
      0.036370546 = sum of:
        0.036370546 = weight(_text_:management in 1685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036370546 = score(doc=1685,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.20817994 = fieldWeight in 1685, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Subject classifications and thesauri have become more important than ever in the Web environment. Efforts made to organize information into subject classifications, or taxonomies, offer users the opportunity to substantially improve the effectiveness of their search and retrieval activities. This article continues earlier research an the development of a new definition of the field of information science and the creation of a "map" of the field showing subjects central to it and their relationships to those an the periphery. A case study describes the creation of a new classification structure (taxonomy) for the Information Science Abstracts (ISA) database, aiming to reflect and accommodate the rapid and continued technological and market changes affecting the information industry today and into the future. Based an a sample of some 3,000 ISA abstracts, two validation experiments were conducted by a three-member team comprising a database editor, a reference librarian, and an abstractor-indexer, who represent three of the major communities within the information science field. In the first experiment, the sample of abstracts was classified according to the proposed new taxonomy; alter analysis of the data and revision of the taxonomy, it was revalidated and fine tuned in a second experiment. Indexer consistency measures obtained in this study were significantly higher than those found in previous studies. The taxonomy resulting from this research employs the concepts, definition, and map of information science previously developed. It presents them in an organized hierarchical view of the field and thus makes a significant contribution to information science.

Content

Das System: 1. INFORMATION SCIENCE RESEARCH 1.1 Basic concepts, definitions, theories, methodologies, and applications 1.2 Properties, needs, quality, and value of information 1.3 Statistics, measurement Bibliometrics, citation analysis, scientometrics, informetrics 1.4 Information retrieval research Searching techniques (Boolean, fuzzy, natural language), the search process, precision/relevance, ranking/recall, searching models, query formulation, inverted files, updating, database structures 1.5 User behavior and uses of information systems Searcher tactics, information overload, user surveys, usability studies 1.6 Human-computer interface Human factors, ergonomics, design issues 1.7 Communication Editing, writing, linguistics, Internet authoring and design principles 1.8 Operations research/mathematics Modeling, Boolean logic, coding, systems analysis, algorithms, compression 1.9 History of information science, biographies
2. KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 2.1 Thesauri, authority lists Taxonomies, ontologies, semantic networks, nomenclatures, terminologies, vocabularies 2.2 Cataloging and classification Tagging, metatags, Dublin Core, DOIs, OPACs, MARC, AACR2, topic maps, cataloging processes and theories 2.3 Abstracting, indexing, reviewing Automatic indexing and abstracting 2.4 Standards and protocols NISO, Z39.5, XML, SGML, HTML, Open Archives Initiative (OAI), Encoded Archival Description (EAD), OpenURL, portable document format (PDF) 3. THE INFORMATION PROFESSION 3.1 Information professionals Intermediaries, searchers, reference librarians, information brokers, translators, educators, librarians and librarianship, mentoring, career outlook, future of the profession, professional ethics, skills and competencies 3.2 Organizations and societies 4. SOCIETAL ISSUES 4.1 Information ethics, plagiarism, credibility 4.2 Information literacy, lifelong learning 4.3 The Information Society Universal access and accessibility, technological and socioeconomic impacts of information, technology forecasts, information flows, futures scenarios, preservation 5. THE INFORMATION INDUSTRY 5.1 Information and knowledge management Knowledge transfer in organizations, business strategies 5.2 Markets and players Vendor profiles and Interviews, trends 5.3 Economics and pricing Business models, value chain 5.4 Marketing, e-commerce 6. PUBLISHING AND DISTRIBUTION 6.1 Print 6.2 Electronic E-journals, e-books 6.3 Secondary publishing Abstracting and indexing services, directories 6.4 Scholarly communication Peer review process, future of journals, dissertations, grey literature
7. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES 7.1 Internet World Wide Web, Invisible Web, Deep Web, search engines, browsers, hypermedia, Listservs, bulletin boards, portals, gateways, directories, pathfinders 7.2 Intranets, Web conferencing 7.3 Software Programming languages, operating systems, platforms 7.4 Hardware 7.5 Multimedia 7.6 Document management Imaging, scanning, text retrieval, digitization, records management, bookmarking, hypertext systems, preservation technologies, digitization, linking and electronic cross referencing, storage, digital rights management 7.7 AI, expert systems, intelligent agents Cybernetics, visualization and mapping, data mining, pattern and character recognition, search agents and robots 7.8 Telecommunications Networks, wireless and satellite information delivery, Palm Pilots and other PDAs, LANs and WANs 7.9 Security, access control, authentication, encryption Digital watermarking 7.10 Other B. ELECTRONIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND SERVICES 8.1 Information searching and retrieval systems and Services Bibliographie, numeric, and Image databases; descriptions of online Services 8.2 Customized information systems, alerting, current awareness 8.3 Document delivery systems and Services Interlibrary loan, resource sharing 8.4 Geographie information systems 9. SUBJECT-SPECIFIC SOURCES AND APPLICATIONS 9.1 Physical sciences Chemistry, physics, engineering, earth sciences, Computer science, energy, mathematics 9.2 Life sciences Medicine, biosciences, agriculture, environment 9.3 Social sciences, humanities, history, linguistics 9.4 Business Management, economics, companies 9.5 Law, political science, government Patents and trademarks, intellectual property, case law 9.6 News 9.7 Education, library and information science, ready reference 9.8 Other/multidisciplinary Biography and genealogy databases, encyclopedias, databases of theses and dissertations
10. LIBRARIES AND LIBRARY SERVICES 10.1 Library descriptions and types Special, government, academic, and public libraries, archives, museums, state and national libraries, depository libraries 10.2 Library Services 10.3 Library automation, operations, and strategic planning 10.4 Library consortia and networks, coalitions, cooperatives 10.5 Digital and virtual libraries, hybrid libraries 10.6 Education and training Distance learning, continuing education, bibliographic instruction library schools, courses and Curricula 11. GOVERNMENT AND LEGAL INFORMATION AND ISSUES 11.1 Intellectual property protection Copyright issues and implications, fair use, trademarks, patent law 11.2 Legislation, laws, and regulations (except Copyright) 11.3 Contracts and licensing 11.4 Liability issues Filtering, censorship, privacy 11.5 Sources of public information 11.6 Information policies and studies Security, encryption, privacy, freedom of information, censoring, national and other information policies 11.7 Systems and infrastructure Technology transfer

Issue

Pt.2: A new taxonomy for information science.

Object

Information Science Abstracts

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.8, S.771-781

0.028139224 = product of:
  0.042208835 = sum of:
    0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 6293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01411848 = score(doc=6293,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6293, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6293)
    0.028090354 = product of:
      0.056180708 = sum of:
        0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 6293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056180708 = score(doc=6293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source

Information today. 10(1993) no.2, S.22-23

0.028139224 = product of:
  0.042208835 = sum of:
    0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01411848 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
    0.028090354 = product of:
      0.056180708 = sum of:
        0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056180708 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Discusses plans for the retrospective conversion of the Union Catalogue of Books which holds stock locations for the British Library Document Supply Centre's collection of non-current monographs. This will be undertaken by Catalogue Bridge, managed by the National Bibliographic Service, and the conversion work involves 3 processes: creation of the search files; matching the search files against the databases and capturing all available records; and merging of local information with the captured records

Source

Select newsletter. 1998, no.22, Spring, S.3-4

0.026762083 = product of:
  0.040143125 = sum of:
    0.01411848 = weight(_text_:information in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01411848 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
    0.026024643 = product of:
      0.052049287 = sum of:
        0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052049287 = score(doc=659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

States that since 1980, UKOLN (the UK Office for Library and Information Networking) has been carrying out a survey to monitor the availability of bibliographic records in the BNB files on BLAISE. Looks at the survey and the new sources to be included in the extended survey. Presents a set of source profiles which have been prepared to accompany the results for each source and gives some comparisons of the features of different sources

Source

Library management. 18(1997) nos.3/4, S.112-123

0.025253214 = product of:
  0.03787982 = sum of:
    0.02161442 = weight(_text_:information in 980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02161442 = score(doc=980,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 980, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=980)
    0.016265402 = product of:
      0.032530803 = sum of:
        0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032530803 = score(doc=980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=980)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

A bibliography is traditionally characterized by the judgments, bounded by explicit selection criteria, made by a single compiler. Because these criteria concern the attributes ascribed to a work and the needs of readers, bibliographic work is largely conceptual even across technological eras and domains. Yet, the development of networked information services, made possible by WWW infrastructure, has enabled very large numbers of people to discover, organize, and publish information, including bibliographies. Indeed, bibliographies, or at least bibliography-like artifacts, are a common genre of website, often published by people without specialized skills in information organization who follow non-rigorous selection procedures. Nevertheless, even if the items from these lists are poorly selected and described, this publishing activity is fundamentally important because it structures information locally, creating a patchy network of secondary access points. In turn, these access points enable information discovery, the formation and development of communities of interest, the estimation of document relevance by search engines, and so on. In sum, this activity, and the enabling technical infrastructure, invites bibliographies to take on new interactive possibilities. The aim of this article is to extend the traditional view of bibliography to encompass collaborative possibilities for wide, or narrow, participation in the shaping of bibliographies and the selection of items. This is done by examining the nature of bibliography on the Web, by proposing a conceptual model that opens bibliography to participatory practices, and by discussing a case study where a team sought to develop a bibliography of electronic resources. This examination reveals splendid opportunities for expanding the notion of bibliography with participatory policies while remaining true to its ancient roots.

Source

Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.3, S.805-825

0.02462182 = product of:
  0.03693273 = sum of:
    0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01235367 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
    0.02457906 = product of:
      0.04915812 = sum of:
        0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04915812 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Date

1.11.2005 18:56:22

Footnote

Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.

0.023416823 = product of:
  0.035125233 = sum of:
    0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 3203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01235367 = score(doc=3203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3203)
    0.022771563 = product of:
      0.045543127 = sum of:
        0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 3203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045543127 = score(doc=3203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3203)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Source

Information management report. 1998, May, S.7

0.022435099 = product of:
  0.03365265 = sum of:
    0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0088240495 = score(doc=4399,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
    0.024828598 = product of:
      0.049657196 = sum of:
        0.049657196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049657196 = score(doc=4399,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4399, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4399)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

"Bibliographische Daten Um den Geltungsbereich der Prinzipien festzulegen, wird in diesem ersten Teil der zugrundeliegende Begriff bibliographischer Daten erläutert. Kerndaten Bibliographische Daten bestehen aus bibliographischen Beschreibungen. Eine bibliographische Beschreibung beschreibt eine bibliographische Ressource (Artikel, Monographie etc. - ob gedruckt oder elektronisch) zum Zwecke 1. der Identifikation der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. des Zeigens auf eine bestimmte Ressource in der Gesamtheit aller bibliographischer Ressourcen und 2. der Lokalisierung der beschriebenen Ressource, d.h. eines Hinweises, wo die beschriebene Ressource aufzufinden ist. Traditionellerweise erfüllte eine Beschreibung beide Zwecke gleichzeitig, indem sie Information lieferte über: Autor(en) und Herausgeber, Titel, Verlag, Veröffentlichungsdatum und -ort, Identifizierung des übergeordneten Werks (z.B. einer Zeitschrift), Seitenangaben. Im Web findet Identifikation statt mittels Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) wie z.B. URNs oder DOIs. Lokalisierung wird ermöglicht durch HTTP-URIs, die auch als Uniform Resource Locators (URLs) bezeichnet werden. Alle URIs für bibliographische Ressourcen fallen folglich unter den engen Begriff bibliographischer Daten. Sekundäre Daten Eine bibliographische Beschreibung kann andere Informationen enthalten, die unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen, beispielsweise Nicht-Web-Identifikatoren (ISBN, LCCN, OCLC etc.), Angaben zum Urheberrechtsstatus, administrative Daten und mehr; diese Daten können von Bibliotheken, Verlagen, Wissenschaftlern, Online-Communities für Buchliebhaber, sozialen Literaturverwaltungssystemen und Anderen produziert sein. Darüber hinaus produzieren Bibliotheken und verwandte Institutionen kontrollierte Vokabulare zum Zwecke der bibliographischen Beschreibung wie z. B. Personen- und Schlagwortnormdateien, Klassifikationen etc., die ebenfalls unter den Begriff bibliographischer Daten fallen."

Date

22. 3.2011 18:22:29

0.020071562 = product of:
  0.030107342 = sum of:
    0.01058886 = weight(_text_:information in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01058886 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
    0.019518482 = product of:
      0.039036963 = sum of:
        0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039036963 = score(doc=559,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The amount of scientific papers is growing together with the development of science itself; but, although there is an unprecedented availability of large citation indexes, some daily activities of researchers remain time-consuming and poorly supported. In this paper, we present Visual Bibliographies (VisualBib), a real-time visual platform, designed using a zz-structure-based model for linking metadata and a narrative, visual approach for showing bibliographies. VisualBib represents a usable, advanced, and visual tool, which simplifies the management of bibliographies, supports a core set of bibliographic tasks, and helps researchers during complex analyses on scientific bibliographies. We present the variety of metadata formats and visualization methods, proposing two use case scenarios. The maturity of the system implementation allowed us two studies, for evaluating both the effectiveness of VisualBib in providing answers to specific data analysis tasks and to support experienced users during real-life uses. The results of the evaluation are positive and describe an effective and usable platform.

Source

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.6, S.757-776

0.02002371 = product of:
  0.030035563 = sum of:
    0.01247909 = weight(_text_:information in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01247909 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
    0.017556472 = product of:
      0.035112944 = sum of:
        0.035112944 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035112944 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

More and more libraries are providing access to Web resources through OCLC's (Online Computer Resource Center) Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC) and, by extension, OCLC's WorldCat database. The ability to use a database to its maximum potential depends upon understanding what a database contains and the guidelines for its construction. This study examines the characteristics of Web resources in CORC in terms of their subject matter, the source of the content, publication patterns, and the units of information chosen for representation in the database. The majority of the 414 resources in the sample belonged to the social sciences. Academic libraries and government agencies contributed more than 90% of the records for resources in the sample. Using the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2d edition (AACR2) definitions for publication patterns that are part of the upcoming 2002 amendments reveals that nearly half of the sample fell into the category of integrating resources. Identifying units of representation of the resources described was more difficult. Existing definitions for Web units in development are not adequate to describe all of the resources in the sample. In addition, there is wide variability in the units of representation chosen for inclusion by the libraries contributing records, resulting in little predictability in what units of information might be found in the database.

Date

10. 9.2000 17:38:22

0.019198176 = product of:
  0.028797261 = sum of:
    0.01578494 = weight(_text_:information in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01578494 = score(doc=1523,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0518325 = queryNorm
        0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
    0.013012322 = product of:
      0.026024643 = sum of:
        0.026024643 = weight(_text_:management in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026024643 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Enthält die Kapitel: BOPP, R.E.: History and varieties of reference services; SUTTON, E.D. u. L.D. HOLT: The reference interview; DALRYMPLE, P.D.: Bibliographic control, organization of information, and search strategies; KLUEGEL, K.M.: Introduction to electronic reference services; KLUEGEL, K.M.: Trends in electronic reference services: opportunities and challenges; WILSON, L.A.: Instruction as a reference service; WOODARD, B.S.: Reference staff training and development; ALLEN, B.: Evaluation of reference services; KIBBEE, J.Z.: Organization and management of reference and information services; KING, D.N. u. R.E. RUBIN: A philosophy of service; SUTTON, E.D., F.J. JACOBSON u. L.E. HOLT: Reference services for specific populations; SMITH, L.C.: Selection and evaluation of reference sources; MILLER, S.: Directories; STENSTROM, P.F.: Almanacs, yearbooks, and handbooks; BOPP, R.E.: Biographical sources; FAIRCHILD, C.A.: Dictionaries; JACOBSON, F.F.: Encyclopedias; COBB, D.A.: Geographical sources; PENKA, C.B. u. M. LANDIS: Bibliographies and library catalogs; SMITH, L.C.: Indexes and abstracts; BEKIARES, S.E. u. M. MALLORY: Government documents and statistics sources;

LCSH

Information services

Subject

Information services

0.018726904 = product of:
  0.056180708 = sum of:
    0.056180708 = product of:
      0.112361416 = sum of:
        0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 1135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112361416 = score(doc=1135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1135)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

21. 9.1996 16:03:22

0.018726904 = product of:
  0.056180708 = sum of:
    0.056180708 = product of:
      0.112361416 = sum of:
        0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 3679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.112361416 = score(doc=3679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

22. 5.1999 18:14:05