Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formale Begriffsanalyse"
  1. Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000) 0.03
    0.028033193 = product of:
      0.042049788 = sum of:
        0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017470727 = score(doc=5095,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
        0.02457906 = product of:
          0.04915812 = sum of:
            0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04915812 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:47:06
  2. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung in der Wirtschaft (2002) 0.03
    0.026828196 = product of:
      0.040242292 = sum of:
        0.017470727 = weight(_text_:information in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017470727 = score(doc=547,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
        0.022771563 = product of:
          0.045543127 = sum of:
            0.045543127 = weight(_text_:management in 547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045543127 = score(doc=547,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 547, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=547)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.3, S.149-160
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  3. Kaytoue, M.; Kuznetsov, S.O.; Assaghir, Z.; Napoli, A.: Embedding tolerance relations in concept lattices : an application in information fusion (2010) 0.03
    0.025524303 = product of:
      0.038286455 = sum of:
        0.015283704 = weight(_text_:information in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015283704 = score(doc=4843,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
        0.023002753 = product of:
          0.046005506 = sum of:
            0.046005506 = weight(_text_:management in 4843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046005506 = score(doc=4843,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.2633291 = fieldWeight in 4843, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4843)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) is a well founded mathematical framework used for conceptual classication and knowledge management. Given a binary table describing a relation between objects and attributes, FCA consists in building a set of concepts organized by a subsumption relation within a concept lattice. Accordingly, FCA requires to transform complex data, e.g. numbers, intervals, graphs, into binary data leading to loss of information and poor interpretability of object classes. In this paper, we propose a pre-processing method producing binary data from complex data taking advantage of similarity between objects. As a result, the concept lattice is composed of classes being maximal sets of pairwise similar objects. This method is based on FCA and on a formalization of similarity as a tolerance relation (reexive and symmetric). It applies to complex object descriptions and especially here to interval data. Moreover, it can be applied to any kind of structured data for which a similarity can be dened (sequences, graphs, etc.). Finally, an application highlights that the resulting concept lattice plays an important role in information fusion problem, as illustrated with a real-world example in agronomy.
    Series
    Knowledge and data representation and management; no.7353
  4. Priss, U.: Faceted knowledge representation (1999) 0.02
    0.02462182 = product of:
      0.03693273 = sum of:
        0.01235367 = weight(_text_:information in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01235367 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
        0.02457906 = product of:
          0.04915812 = sum of:
            0.04915812 = weight(_text_:22 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04915812 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Faceted Knowledge Representation provides a formalism for implementing knowledge systems. The basic notions of faceted knowledge representation are "unit", "relation", "facet" and "interpretation". Units are atomic elements and can be abstract elements or refer to external objects in an application. Relations are sequences or matrices of 0 and 1's (binary matrices). Facets are relational structures that combine units and relations. Each facet represents an aspect or viewpoint of a knowledge system. Interpretations are mappings that can be used to translate between different representations. This paper introduces the basic notions of faceted knowledge representation. The formalism is applied here to an abstract modeling of a faceted thesaurus as used in information retrieval.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 17:30:31
  5. De Maio, C.; Fenza, G.; Loia, V.; Senatore, S.: Hierarchical web resources retrieval by exploiting Fuzzy Formal Concept Analysis (2012) 0.02
    0.022995595 = product of:
      0.03449339 = sum of:
        0.014974909 = weight(_text_:information in 2737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014974909 = score(doc=2737,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2737, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2737)
        0.019518482 = product of:
          0.039036963 = sum of:
            0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 2737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039036963 = score(doc=2737,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2737, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, knowledge structuring is assuming important roles in several real world applications such as decision support, cooperative problem solving, e-commerce, Semantic Web and, even in planning systems. Ontologies play an important role in supporting automated processes to access information and are at the core of new strategies for the development of knowledge-based systems. Yet, developing an ontology is a time-consuming task which often needs an accurate domain expertise to tackle structural and logical difficulties in the definition of concepts as well as conceivable relationships. This work presents an ontology-based retrieval approach, that supports data organization and visualization and provides a friendly navigation model. It exploits the fuzzy extension of the Formal Concept Analysis theory to elicit conceptualizations from datasets and generate a hierarchy-based representation of extracted knowledge. An intuitive graphical interface provides a multi-facets view of the built ontology. Through a transparent query-based retrieval, final users navigate across concepts, relations and population.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 48(2012) no.3, S.399-418
  6. Negm, E.; AbdelRahman, S.; Bahgat, R.: PREFCA: a portal retrieval engine based on formal concept analysis (2017) 0.02
    0.019198176 = product of:
      0.028797261 = sum of:
        0.01578494 = weight(_text_:information in 3291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01578494 = score(doc=3291,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 3291, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3291)
        0.013012322 = product of:
          0.026024643 = sum of:
            0.026024643 = weight(_text_:management in 3291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026024643 = score(doc=3291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 3291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The web is a network of linked sites whereby each site either forms a physical portal or a standalone page. In the former case, the portal presents an access point to its embedded web pages that coherently present a specific topic. In the latter case, there are millions of standalone web pages, that are scattered throughout the web, having the same topic and could be conceptually linked together to form virtual portals. Search engines have been developed to help users in reaching the adequate pages in an efficient and effective manner. All the known current search engine techniques rely on the web page as the basic atomic search unit. They ignore the conceptual links, that reveal the implicit web related meanings, among the retrieved pages. However, building a semantic model for the whole portal may contain more semantic information than a model of scattered individual pages. In addition, user queries can be poor and contain imprecise terms that do not reflect the real user intention. Consequently, retrieving the standalone individual pages that are directly related to the query may not satisfy the user's need. In this paper, we propose PREFCA, a Portal Retrieval Engine based on Formal Concept Analysis that relies on the portal as the main search unit. PREFCA consists of three phases: First, the information extraction phase that is concerned with extracting portal's semantic data. Second, the formal concept analysis phase that utilizes formal concept analysis to discover the conceptual links among portal and attributes. Finally, the information retrieval phase where we propose a portal ranking method to retrieve ranked pairs of portals and embedded pages. Additionally, we apply the network analysis rules to output some portal characteristics. We evaluated PREFCA using two data sets, namely the Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation 2010 and ClueWeb09 (category B) test data, for physical and virtual portals respectively. PREFCA proves higher F-measure accuracy, better Mean Average Precision ranking and comparable network analysis and efficiency results than other search engine approaches, namely Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), and BM25 techniques. As well, it gains high Mean Average Precision in comparison with learning to rank techniques. Moreover, PREFCA also gains better reach time than Carrot as a well-known topic-based search engine.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 53(2017) no.1, S.203-222
  7. Hereth, J.; Stumme, G.; Wille, R.; Wille, U.: Conceptual knowledge discovery and data analysis (2000) 0.02
    0.0167263 = product of:
      0.02508945 = sum of:
        0.0088240495 = weight(_text_:information in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0088240495 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
        0.016265402 = product of:
          0.032530803 = sum of:
            0.032530803 = weight(_text_:management in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032530803 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we discuss Conceptual Knowledge Discovery in Databases (CKDD) in its connection with Data Analysis. Our approach is based on Formal Concept Analysis, a mathematical theory which has been developed and proven useful during the last 20 years. Formal Concept Analysis has led to a theory of conceptual information systems which has been applied by using the management system TOSCANA in a wide range of domains. In this paper, we use such an application in database marketing to demonstrate how methods and procedures of CKDD can be applied in Data Analysis. In particular, we show the interplay and integration of data mining and data analysis techniques based on Formal Concept Analysis. The main concern of this paper is to explain how the transition from data to knowledge can be supported by a TOSCANA system. To clarify the transition steps we discuss their correspondence to the five levels of knowledge representation established by R. Brachman and to the steps of empirically grounded theory building proposed by A. Strauss and J. Corbin
  8. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.02
    0.016558193 = product of:
      0.024837289 = sum of:
        0.008735363 = weight(_text_:information in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008735363 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.0960027 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
        0.016101927 = product of:
          0.032203853 = sum of:
            0.032203853 = weight(_text_:management in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032203853 = score(doc=5089,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.18433036 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
  9. Priss, U.: Formal concept analysis in information science (2006) 0.01
    0.01331103 = product of:
      0.03993309 = sum of:
        0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 4305) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03993309 = score(doc=4305,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 4305, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4305)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 40(2006), S.xxx-xxx
  10. Prediger, S.: Kontextuelle Urteilslogik mit Begriffsgraphen : Ein Beitrag zur Restrukturierung der mathematischen Logik (1998) 0.01
    0.0117043145 = product of:
      0.035112944 = sum of:
        0.035112944 = product of:
          0.07022589 = sum of:
            0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 3142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07022589 = score(doc=3142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 2.2008 15:58:22
  11. Neuss, C.; Kent, R.E.: Conceptual analysis of resource meta-information (1995) 0.01
    0.01152769 = product of:
      0.03458307 = sum of:
        0.03458307 = weight(_text_:information in 2204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03458307 = score(doc=2204,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 2204, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2204)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    With the continuously growing amount of Internet accessible information resources, locating relevant information in the WWW becomes increasingly difficult. Recent developments provide scalable mechanisms for maintaing indexes of network accessible information. In order to implement sophisticated retrieval engines, a means of automatic analysis and classification of document meta information has to be found. Proposes the use of methods from the mathematical theory of concept analysis to analyze and interactively explore the information space defined by wide area resource discovery services
  12. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.01
    0.009363452 = product of:
      0.028090354 = sum of:
        0.028090354 = product of:
          0.056180708 = sum of:
            0.056180708 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056180708 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81
  13. Sedelow, S.Y.; Sedelow, W.A.: Thesauri and concept-lattice semantic nets (1994) 0.01
    0.008674881 = product of:
      0.026024643 = sum of:
        0.026024643 = product of:
          0.052049287 = sum of:
            0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 7733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052049287 = score(doc=7733,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 7733, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7733)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  14. Kent, R.E.: Implications and rules in thesauri (1994) 0.01
    0.008674881 = product of:
      0.026024643 = sum of:
        0.026024643 = product of:
          0.052049287 = sum of:
            0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 3457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052049287 = score(doc=3457,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 3457, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3457)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  15. Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge representation : logical, philosophical, and computational foundations (2000) 0.01
    0.0082357805 = product of:
      0.02470734 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=4360,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Information
  16. Kumar, C.A.; Radvansky, M.; Annapurna, J.: Analysis of Vector Space Model, Latent Semantic Indexing and Formal Concept Analysis for information retrieval (2012) 0.01
    0.0082357805 = product of:
      0.02470734 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 2710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=2710,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2710, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2710)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), a variant of classical Vector Space Model (VSM), is an Information Retrieval (IR) model that attempts to capture the latent semantic relationship between the data items. Mathematical lattices, under the framework of Formal Concept Analysis (FCA), represent conceptual hierarchies in data and retrieve the information. However both LSI and FCA uses the data represented in form of matrices. The objective of this paper is to systematically analyze VSM, LSI and FCA for the task of IR using the standard and real life datasets.
    Source
    Cybernetics and information technologies. 12(2012) no.1, S.34-48
  17. Priss, U.: Lattice-based information retrieval (2000) 0.01
    0.007132395 = product of:
      0.021397185 = sum of:
        0.021397185 = weight(_text_:information in 6055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021397185 = score(doc=6055,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 6055, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6055)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    A lattice-based model for information retrieval was suggested in the 1960's but has been seen as a theoretical possibility hard to practically apply ever since. This paper attempts to revive the lattice model and demonstrate its applicability in an information retrieval system, FalR, that incorporates a graphical representation of a faceted thesaurus. It shows how Boolean queries can be lattice-theoretically related to the concepts of the thesaurus and visualized within the thesaurus display. An advantage of FaIR is that it allows for a high level of transparency of the system, which can be controlled by the user
  18. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Datensysteme als Werkzeuge der Wissenskommunikation (1992) 0.01
    0.0070592402 = product of:
      0.02117772 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 8826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=8826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 8826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Theme
    Information
  19. Wille, R.; Wachter, C.: Begriffsanalyse von Dokumenten (1992) 0.01
    0.0070592402 = product of:
      0.02117772 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information und Dokumentation in den 90er Jahren: neue Herausforderung, neue Technologien. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1991, Universität Ulm, 30.9.-2.10.1991. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  20. Scheich, P.; Skorsky, M.; Vogt, F.; Wachter, C.; Wille, R.: Conceptual data systems (1993) 0.01
    0.0070592402 = product of:
      0.02117772 = sum of:
        0.02117772 = weight(_text_:information in 5262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02117772 = score(doc=5262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5262)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Information and classification: concepts, methods and applications. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, University of Dortmund, April 1-3, 1992. Ed.: O. Opitz u.a