-
Munzner, T.: Interactive visualization of large graphs and networks (2000)
0.02
0.024772175 = product of:
0.12386087 = sum of:
0.12386087 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 4746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12386087 = score(doc=4746,freq=4.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.43236023 = fieldWeight in 4746, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4746)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Many real-world domains can be represented as large node-link graphs: backbone Internet routers connect with 70,000 other hosts, mid-sized Web servers handle between 20,000 and 200,000 hyperlinked documents, and dictionaries contain millions of words defined in terms of each other. Computational manipulation of such large graphs is common, but previous tools for graph visualization have been limited to datasets of a few thousand nodes. Visual depictions of graphs and networks are external representations that exploit human visual processing to reduce the cognitive load of many tasks that require understanding of global or local structure. We assert that the two key advantages of computer-based systems for information visualization over traditional paper-based visual exposition are interactivity and scalability. We also argue that designing visualization software by taking the characteristics of a target user's task domain into account leads to systems that are more effective and scale to larger datasets than previous work. This thesis contains a detailed analysis of three specialized systems for the interactive exploration of large graphs, relating the intended tasks to the spatial layout and visual encoding choices. We present two novel algorithms for specialized layout and drawing that use quite different visual metaphors. The H3 system for visualizing the hyperlink structures of web sites scales to datasets of over 100,000 nodes by using a carefully chosen spanning tree as the layout backbone, 3D hyperbolic geometry for a Focus+Context view, and provides a fluid interactive experience through guaranteed frame rate drawing. The Constellation system features a highly specialized 2D layout intended to spatially encode domain-specific information for computational linguists checking the plausibility of a large semantic network created from dictionaries. The Planet Multicast system for displaying the tunnel topology of the Internet's multicast backbone provides a literal 3D geographic layout of arcs on a globe to help MBone maintainers find misconfigured long-distance tunnels. Each of these three systems provides a very different view of the graph structure, and we evaluate their efficacy for the intended task. We generalize these findings in our analysis of the importance of interactivity and specialization for graph visualization systems that are effective and scalable.
-
Visual thesaurus (2005)
0.02
0.017516574 = product of:
0.087582864 = sum of:
0.087582864 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 1292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087582864 = score(doc=1292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.30572486 = fieldWeight in 1292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1292)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Traditional print reference guides often have two methods of finding information: an order (alphabetical for dictionaries and encyclopedias, by subject hierarchy in the case of thesauri) and indices (ordered lists, with a more complete listing of words and concepts, which refers back to original content from the main body of the book). A user of such traditional print reference guides who is looking for information will either browse through the ordered information in the main body of the reference book, or scan through the indices to find what is necessary. The advent of the computer allows for much more rapid electronic searches of the same information, and for multiple layers of indices. Users can either search through information by entering a keyword, or users can browse through the information through an outline index, which represents the information contained in the main body of the data. There are two traditional user interfaces for such applications. First, the user may type text into a search field and in response, a list of results is returned to the user. The user then selects a returned entry and may page through the resulting information. Alternatively, the user may choose from a list of words from an index. For example, software thesaurus applications, in which a user attempts to find synonyms, antonyms, homonyms, etc. for a selected word, are usually implemented using the conventional search and presentation techniques discussed above. The presentation of results only allows for a one-dimensional order of data at any one time. In addition, only a limited number of results can be shown at once, and selecting a result inevitably leads to another page-if the result is not satisfactory, the users must search again. Finally, it is difficult to present information about the manner in which the search results are related, or to present quantitative information about the results without causing confusion. Therefore, there exists a need for a multidimensional graphical display of information, in particular with respect to information relating to the meaning of words and their relationships to other words. There further exists a need to present large amounts of information in a way that can be manipulated by the user, without the user losing his place. And there exists a need for more fluid, intuitive and powerful thesaurus functionality that invites the exploration of language.
-
Dushay, N.: Visualizing bibliographic metadata : a virtual (book) spine viewer (2004)
0.01
0.01313743 = product of:
0.06568715 = sum of:
0.06568715 = weight(_text_:dictionaries in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06568715 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2864761 = queryWeight, product of:
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.22929364 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.9177637 = idf(docFreq=118, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- When our experience of information discovery is mediated by a computer, we neither move ourselves nor the monitor. We have only the computer's monitor to view, and the keyboard and/or mouse to manipulate what is displayed there. Computer interfaces often reduce our ability to get a sense of the contents of a library: we don't perceive the scope of the library: its breadth, (the quantity of materials/information), its density (how full the shelves are, how thorough the collection is for individual topics), or the general audience for the materials (e.g., whether the materials are appropriate for middle school students, college professors, etc.). Additionally, many computer interfaces for information discovery require users to scroll through long lists, to click numerous navigational links and to read a lot of text to find the exact text they want to read. Text features of resources are almost always presented alphabetically, and the number of items in these alphabetical lists sometimes can be very long. Alphabetical ordering is certainly an improvement over no ordering, but it generally has no bearing on features with an inherent non-alphabetical ordering (e.g., dates of historical events), nor does it necessarily group similar items together. Alphabetical ordering of resources is analogous to one of the most familiar complaints about dictionaries: sometimes you need to know how to spell a word in order to look up its correct spelling in the dictionary. Some have used technology to replicate the appearance of physical libraries, presenting rooms of bookcases and shelves of book spines in virtual 3D environments. This approach presents a problem, as few book spines can be displayed legibly on a monitor screen. This article examines the role of book spines, call numbers, and other traditional organizational and information discovery concepts, and integrates this knowledge with information visualization techniques to show how computers and monitors can meet or exceed similar information discovery methods. The goal is to tap the unique potentials of current information visualization approaches in order to improve information discovery, offer new services, and most important of all, improve user satisfaction. We need to capitalize on what computers do well while bearing in mind their limitations. The intent is to design GUIs to optimize utility and provide a positive experience for the user.
-
Haller, S.H.M.: Mappingverfahren zur Wissensorganisation (2002)
0.01
0.005610709 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05610709 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 30. 5.2010 16:22:35
-
Platis, N. et al.: Visualization of uncertainty in tag clouds (2016)
0.01
0.005610709 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = product of:
0.05610709 = sum of:
0.05610709 = weight(_text_:22 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05610709 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Börner, K.: Atlas of knowledge : anyone can map (2015)
0.00
0.0047608446 = product of:
0.023804223 = sum of:
0.023804223 = product of:
0.047608446 = sum of:
0.047608446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047608446 = score(doc=3355,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 16:54:03
22. 1.2017 17:10:56
-
Trunk, D.: Semantische Netze in Informationssystemen : Verbesserung der Suche durch Interaktion und Visualisierung (2005)
0.00
0.0039274963 = product of:
0.01963748 = sum of:
0.01963748 = product of:
0.03927496 = sum of:
0.03927496 = weight(_text_:22 in 2500) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03927496 = score(doc=2500,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2500, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2500)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 30. 1.2007 18:22:41
-
Palm, F.: QVIZ : Query and context based visualization of time-spatial cultural dynamics (2007)
0.00
0.0033664254 = product of:
0.016832126 = sum of:
0.016832126 = product of:
0.033664253 = sum of:
0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664253 = score(doc=1289,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1289, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1289)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
-
Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Handbuch : Effektiv informieren und kommunizieren mit Multimedia (2001)
0.00
0.0033664254 = product of:
0.016832126 = sum of:
0.016832126 = product of:
0.033664253 = sum of:
0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664253 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 14:35:21
-
Osinska, V.; Bala, P.: New methods for visualization and improvement of classification schemes : the case of computer science (2010)
0.00
0.0033664254 = product of:
0.016832126 = sum of:
0.016832126 = product of:
0.033664253 = sum of:
0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664253 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 19:36:46
-
Jäger-Dengler-Harles, I.: Informationsvisualisierung und Retrieval im Fokus der Infromationspraxis (2013)
0.00
0.0033664254 = product of:
0.016832126 = sum of:
0.016832126 = product of:
0.033664253 = sum of:
0.033664253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664253 = score(doc=1709,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1709, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1709)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 4. 2.2015 9:22:39
-
Thissen, F.: Screen-Design-Manual : Communicating Effectively Through Multimedia (2003)
0.00
0.0028053545 = product of:
0.014026772 = sum of:
0.014026772 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = weight(_text_:22 in 1397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028053544 = score(doc=1397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 14:29:25
-
Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006)
0.00
0.0028053545 = product of:
0.014026772 = sum of:
0.014026772 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028053544 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 16:11:05
-
Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016)
0.00
0.0028053545 = product of:
0.014026772 = sum of:
0.014026772 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028053544 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Wu, I.-C.; Vakkari, P.: Effects of subject-oriented visualization tools on search by novices and intermediates (2018)
0.00
0.0028053545 = product of:
0.014026772 = sum of:
0.014026772 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = weight(_text_:22 in 4573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028053544 = score(doc=4573,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4573, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4573)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 9.12.2018 16:22:25
-
Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018)
0.00
0.0028053545 = product of:
0.014026772 = sum of:
0.014026772 = product of:
0.028053544 = sum of:
0.028053544 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028053544 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 21.12.2018 17:22:13
-
Spero, S.: LCSH is to thesaurus as doorbell is to mammal : visualizing structural problems in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (2008)
0.00
0.0022442837 = product of:
0.011221418 = sum of:
0.011221418 = product of:
0.022442836 = sum of:
0.022442836 = weight(_text_:22 in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022442836 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Batorowska, H.; Kaminska-Czubala, B.: Information retrieval support : visualisation of the information space of a document (2014)
0.00
0.0022442837 = product of:
0.011221418 = sum of:
0.011221418 = product of:
0.022442836 = sum of:
0.022442836 = weight(_text_:22 in 1444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022442836 = score(doc=1444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Graphic details : a scientific study of the importance of diagrams to science (2016)
0.00
0.0016832127 = product of:
0.008416063 = sum of:
0.008416063 = product of:
0.016832126 = sum of:
0.016832126 = weight(_text_:22 in 3035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016832126 = score(doc=3035,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 3035, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3035)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- As the team describe in a paper posted (http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.04951) on arXiv, they found that figures did indeed matter-but not all in the same way. An average paper in PubMed Central has about one diagram for every three pages and gets 1.67 citations. Papers with more diagrams per page and, to a lesser extent, plots per page tended to be more influential (on average, a paper accrued two more citations for every extra diagram per page, and one more for every extra plot per page). By contrast, including photographs and equations seemed to decrease the chances of a paper being cited by others. That agrees with a study from 2012, whose authors counted (by hand) the number of mathematical expressions in over 600 biology papers and found that each additional equation per page reduced the number of citations a paper received by 22%. This does not mean that researchers should rush to include more diagrams in their next paper. Dr Howe has not shown what is behind the effect, which may merely be one of correlation, rather than causation. It could, for example, be that papers with lots of diagrams tend to be those that illustrate new concepts, and thus start a whole new field of inquiry. Such papers will certainly be cited a lot. On the other hand, the presence of equations really might reduce citations. Biologists (as are most of those who write and read the papers in PubMed Central) are notoriously mathsaverse. If that is the case, looking in a physics archive would probably produce a different result.
-
Information visualization in data mining and knowledge discovery (2002)
0.00
0.0011221418 = product of:
0.005610709 = sum of:
0.005610709 = product of:
0.011221418 = sum of:
0.011221418 = weight(_text_:22 in 1789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011221418 = score(doc=1789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1450166 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.041411664 = queryNorm
0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1789)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 23. 3.2008 19:10:22
