Search (270 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  1. Hrachovec, H.: Offen gesagt: Beschwerden eines Archivars (2018) 0.08 
    0.07890731 = product of:
  0.15781462 = sum of:
    0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048027072 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
    0.10978755 = sum of:
      0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06256474 = score(doc=4443,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
      0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 4443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04722281 = score(doc=4443,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4443, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4443)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Open Access Archive für Fachdisziplinen unterscheiden sich von organisationseigenen Repositorien durch ihre geringere institutionelle Verankerung und konstitutive Translokalität. Aus ihrer Sicht fallen manche Schwierigkeiten der Open Access-Initiative besonders ins Gewicht. Am Beispiel eines kleinen disziplinären Repositoriums Sammelpunkt (für Philosophie) werden zwei Punkte hervorgehoben. Erstens finden sich Journalbeiträge (bisweilen in unterschiedlichen Versionen) immer häufiger in mehreren, offenen oder gebührenpflichtigen, Archiven. Und zweitens können spezialisierte Sammlungen der Anziehungskraft dominanter Portale im akademischen sozialen Netz nichts entgegensetzen. Die Gründe dieser Entwicklung sind zu analysieren. Eine konzeptuelle Unzulänglichkeit liegt darin, dass die publikumswirksame Rede vom offenen Zugang zur Forschungsliteratur bei näherem Hinsehen zu undifferenziert ist, um unbeabsichtigte Praktiken auszuschließen.
    Date
    5. 6.2016 17:23:26
    20. 9.2018 12:22:52
  2. Swiaczny, F.: Elektronisches Publizieren bei MATEO (1998) 0.08 
    0.078455955 = product of:
  0.15691191 = sum of:
    0.11643521 = weight(_text_:26 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11643521 = score(doc=2356,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.6621607 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
    0.040476695 = product of:
      0.08095339 = sum of:
        0.08095339 = weight(_text_:22 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08095339 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29
    12.12.1998 12:26:24
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.35-38
  3. Vogt, T.; Botz, G.W.: Open Access - schöne neue Welt? : Ein Interview mit Georg W. Botz, Koordinator der Open Access Poliy der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (2013) 0.07 
    0.067979515 = product of:
  0.13595903 = sum of:
    0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08233212 = score(doc=794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
    0.053626917 = product of:
      0.107253835 = sum of:
        0.107253835 = weight(_text_:access in 794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.107253835 = score(doc=794,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.6355177 = fieldWeight in 794, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=794)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    26. 6.2013 18:14:11
  4. Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011) 0.06 
    0.05636237 = product of:
  0.11272474 = sum of:
    0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03430505 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
    0.078419685 = sum of:
      0.0446891 = weight(_text_:access in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0446891 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03373058 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
    Date
    27. 7.2011 20:55:26
  5. Brown, D.J.: Access to scientific research : challenges facing communications in STM (2016) 0.05 
    0.049107354 = product of:
  0.09821471 = sum of:
    0.02744404 = weight(_text_:26 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02744404 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.15607277 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
    0.070770666 = sum of:
      0.043786198 = weight(_text_:access in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.043786198 = score(doc=3769,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.25944903 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
      0.026984464 = weight(_text_:22 in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.026984464 = score(doc=3769,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The debate about access to scientific research raises questions about the current effectiveness of scholarly communication processes. This book explores, from an independent point of view, the current state of the STM publishing market, new publishing technologies and business models as well as the information habit of researchers, the politics of research funders, and the demand for scientific research as a public good. The book also investigates the democratisation of science including how the information needs of knowledge workers outside academia can be embraced in future.
    Content
    Inhalt: Chapter 1. Background -- Chapter 2. Definitions -- Chapter 3. Aims, Objectives, and Methodology -- Chapter 4. Setting the Scene -- Chapter 5. Information Society -- Chapter 6. Drivers for Change -- Chapter 7 A Dysfunctional STM Scene? -- Chapter 8. Comments on the Dysfunctionality of STM Publishing -- Chapter 9. The Main Stakeholders -- Chapter 10. Search and Discovery -- Chapter 11. Impact of Google -- Chapter 12. Psychological Issues -- Chapter 13. Users of Research Output -- Chapter 14. Underlying Sociological Developments -- Chapter 15. Social Media and Social Networking -- Chapter 16. Forms of Article Delivery -- Chapter 17. Future Communication Trends -- Chapter 18. Academic Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 19. Unaffiliated Knowledge Workers -- Chapter 20. The Professions -- Chapter 21. Small and Medium Enterprises -- Chapter 22. Citizen Scientists -- Chapter 23. Learned Societies -- Chapter 24. Business Models -- Chapter 25. Open Access -- Chapter 26. Political Initiatives -- Chapter 27. Summary and Conclusions -- Chapter 28. Research Questions Addressed
  6. Wolf, C.: Open Access Helper : neue Funktionen kurz vorgestellt (2021) 0.05 
    0.049022995 = product of:
  0.09804599 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=138,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
    0.056879934 = product of:
      0.11375987 = sum of:
        0.11375987 = weight(_text_:access in 138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11375987 = score(doc=138,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.67406833 = fieldWeight in 138, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Open Access Helper <https://www.oahelper.org> ist eine Browser-Erweiterung, die es Ihren Nutzern leichter machen soll, Open Access Kopien für wissenschaftliche Literatur zu finden. Dabei prüft Open Access Helper im Hintergrund anhand der ausgezeichneten APIs von unpaywall.org and core.ac.uk. Neben der Möglichkeit Open Access Kopien zu finden, hat Open Access Helper <https://www.oahelper.org> nun einen wichtigen Schritt gemacht, Ihre Nutzer noch besser zu unterstützen. Dank der Zusammenarbeit mit einer Bibliothek in Irland, kann die Erweiterung Ihre Nutzer nun besser unterstützen. Als Bibliothek können Sie für Open Access Helper Ihren* EZProxy* und/oder ein *Anfrageformular* bzw. *Link Resolver* hinterlegen. Es entstehen Ihnen und Ihren Nutzerinnen und Nutzern hierbei keine Kosten. Open Access Helper gibt es für Chrome, Firefox, Safari (macOS) und auch für iPad & iPhone. Download Links finden Sie unter https://www.oahelper.org oder über eine Such im App / Extension Store Ihrer Wahl. Weitere Informationen finden Sie unter https://www.oahelper.org.
    Date
    15. 2.2021 13:26:25
    Object
    Open Access Helper
  7. Rodrigues, R.S.; Abadal, E.: Scientific journals in Brazil and Spain : alternative publishing models (2014) 0.04 
    0.041780934 = product of:
  0.08356187 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
    0.042395804 = product of:
      0.08479161 = sum of:
        0.08479161 = weight(_text_:access in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08479161 = score(doc=1504,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5024209 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper describes high-quality journals in Brazil and Spain, with an emphasis on the distribution models used. It presents the general characteristics (age, type of publisher, and theme) and analyzes the distribution model by studying the type of format (print or digital), the type of access (open access or subscription), and the technology platform used. The 549 journals analyzed (249 in Brazil and 300 in Spain) are included in the 2011 Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. Data on each journal were collected directly from their websites between March and October 2012. Brazil has a fully open access distribution model (97%) in which few journals require payment by authors thanks to cultural, financial, operational, and technological support provided by public agencies. In Spain, open access journals account for 55% of the total and have also received support from public agencies, although to a lesser extent. These results show that there are systems support of open access in scientific journals other than the "author pays" model advocated by the Finch report for the United Kingdom.
    Date
    26. 9.2014 20:28:06
  8. Grötschel, M.: Best current practices : Recommendations on electronic information communication (2002). Endorsed by the IMU Executive Committee on April 13, 2002 in its 69th session in Paris, France (2002) 0.04 
    0.040084027 = product of:
  0.08016805 = sum of:
    0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 1413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05488808 = score(doc=1413,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 1413, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1413)
    0.025279973 = product of:
      0.050559945 = sum of:
        0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 1413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050559945 = score(doc=1413,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 1413, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1413)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Communication of mathematical research and scholarship is undergoing profound change as new technology creates new ways to disseminate and access the literature. More than technology is changing, however; the culture and practices of those who create, disseminate, and archive the mathematical literature are changing as well. For the sake of present and future mathematicians, we should shape those changes to make them suit the needs of the discipline.
    Date
    26. 5.2002 16:06:53
  9. Hartmann, C.: ¬Das elektronische Publizieren und seine Auswirkungsmöglichkeiten auf Bibliotheken (1989) 0.04 
    0.03965472 = product of:
  0.07930944 = sum of:
    0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048027072 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
    0.03128237 = product of:
      0.06256474 = sum of:
        0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06256474 = score(doc=2833,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The telecommunications service is a scientific tool which libraries should use to save time in supplying information. Information can be read, retrieved, copied or discussed immediately with the help of electronic publishing. The service has great social potential. International cooperation is important yet national identity must be maintained and access to information guaranteed. If librarians regard electronic publishing simply as a technology, the readers will not accept it and the system will become ineffectual. More research is needed on copyright law problems. Electronic publishing improves data bank access and should overcome inequalities between regions and sections of the population.
    Date
    22.11.1995 10:17:26
  10. Digital libraries: current issues : Digital Libraries Workshop DL 94, Newark, NJ, May 19-20, 1994. Selected papers (1995) 0.04 
    0.039227977 = product of:
  0.078455955 = sum of:
    0.058217604 = weight(_text_:26 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058217604 = score(doc=1385,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.33108035 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
    0.020238347 = product of:
      0.040476695 = sum of:
        0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 1385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040476695 = score(doc=1385,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1385, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1385)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 1.1996 18:26:45
    26. 2.2003 18:36:34
  11. Nelson, G.M.; Eggett, D.L.: Citations, mandates, and money : author motivations to publish in chemistry hybrid open access journals (2017) 0.04 
    0.038199246 = product of:
  0.07639849 = sum of:
    0.02744404 = weight(_text_:26 in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02744404 = score(doc=3838,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.15607277 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
    0.048954453 = product of:
      0.09790891 = sum of:
        0.09790891 = weight(_text_:access in 3838) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09790891 = score(doc=3838,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.58014566 = fieldWeight in 3838, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3838)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Hybrid open access refers to articles freely accessible via the Internet but which originate from an academic journal that provides most of its content via subscription. The effect of hybrid open access on citation counts and author behavior in the field of chemistry is something that has not been widely studied. We compared 814 open access articles and 27,621 subscription access articles published from 2006 through 2011 in American Chemical Society journals. As expected, the 2 comparison groups are not equal in all respects. Cumulative citation data were analyzed from years 2-5 following an article's publication date. A citation advantage for open access articles was correlated with the journal impact factor (IF) in low and medium IF journals, but not in high IF journals. Open access articles have a 24% higher mean citation rate than their subscription counterparts in low IF journals (confidence limits 8-42%, p = .0022) and similarly, a 26% higher mean citation rate in medium IF journals (confidence limits 14-40%, p < .001). Open access articles in high IF journals had no significant difference compared to subscription access articles (13% lower mean citation rate, confidence limits -27-3%, p = .10). These results are correlative, not causative, and may not be completely due to an open access effect. Authors of the open access articles were also surveyed to determine why they chose a hybrid open access option, paid the required article processing charge, and whether they believed it was money well spent. Authors primarily chose open access because of funding mandates; however, most considered the money well spent because open access increases information access to the scientific community and the general public, and potentially increases citations to their scholarship.
  12. Solomon, D.J.; Björk, B.-C.: ¬A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012) 0.04 
    0.037002854 = product of:
  0.07400571 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
    0.03283965 = product of:
      0.0656793 = sum of:
        0.0656793 = weight(_text_:access in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0656793 = score(doc=365,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.38917357 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Article processing charges (APCs) are a central mechanism for funding open access (OA) scholarly publishing. We studied the APCs charged and article volumes of journals that were listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals as charging APCs. These included 1,370 journals that published 100,697 articles in 2010. The average APC was $906 U.S. dollars (USD) calculated over journals and $904 USD calculated over articles. The price range varied between $8 and $3,900 USD, with the lowest prices charged by journals published in developing countries and the highest by journals with high-impact factors from major international publishers. Journals in biomedicine represent 59% of the sample and 58% of the total article volume. They also had the highest APCs of any discipline. Professionally published journals, both for profit and nonprofit, had substantially higher APCs than journals published by societies, universities, or scholars/researchers. These price estimates are lower than some previous studies of OA publishing and much lower than is generally charged by subscription publishers making individual articles OA in what are termed hybrid journals.
    Date
    26. 8.2012 13:15:02
  13. Björk, B.-C.: ¬The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles : a failed experiment? (2012) 0.04 
    0.037002854 = product of:
  0.07400571 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
    0.03283965 = product of:
      0.0656793 = sum of:
        0.0656793 = weight(_text_:access in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0656793 = score(doc=366,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.38917357 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Since 2004, mainstream scholarly publishers have been offering authors publishing in their subscription journals the option to free their individual articles from access barriers against a payment (hybrid OA). This has been marketed as a possible gradual transition path between subscription and open access to the scholarly journal literature, and the publishers have pledged to decrease their subscription prices in proportion to the uptake of the hybrid option. The number of hybrid journals has doubled in the past couple of years and is now over 4,300; the number of such articles was around 12,000 in 2011. On average only 1-2% of eligible authors utilize the OA option, due mainly to the generally high price level of typically 3,000 USD. There are, however, a few publishers and individual journals with a much higher uptake. This article takes a closer look at the development of hybrid OA and discusses, from an author-centric viewpoint, the possible reasons for the lack of success of this business model.
    Date
    26. 8.2012 13:14:49
  14. Schirmbacher, P.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des elektronischen Publizierens auf der Basis der Open-Access-Prinzipien (2006) 0.04 
    0.036536586 = product of:
  0.14614634 = sum of:
    0.14614634 = sum of:
      0.098923534 = weight(_text_:access in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.098923534 = score(doc=26,freq=10.0), product of:
          0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.5861577 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
            3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
              10.0 = termFreq=10.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
      0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04722281 = score(doc=26,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04979191 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Ausgehend von der Beschreibung des wissenschaftlichen Publikationsprozesses wird der Not-For-Profit-Bereich näher untersucht. Dabei wird insbesondere Wert auf die Einordnung der Open-Access-Philosophie gelegt und die unterschiedlichen Veröffentlichungsformen werden dargestellt. Beschrieben werden der "Golden Road to Open Access" und ebenso der "Green Road to Open Access". Den Abschluss des Beitrages bildet eine Diskussion der Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des" Green Road to Open Access" als einer alternativen Publikationsform.
    Date
    27.10.2006 14:21:22
  15. Schmale, W.: Strategische Optionen für universitäre Repositorien in den Digital Humanities (2018) 0.04 
    0.03581924 = product of:
  0.07163848 = sum of:
    0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048027072 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
    0.023611406 = product of:
      0.04722281 = sum of:
        0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 3909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04722281 = score(doc=3909,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3909, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3909)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    5. 6.2016 17:23:26
    20. 9.2018 12:22:39
  16. Miller, E.J.: ¬An Introduction to the Resource Description Framework (2001) 0.04 
    0.035675768 = product of:
  0.14270307 = sum of:
    0.14270307 = weight(_text_:description in 1049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14270307 = score(doc=1049,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 1049, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1049)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Susol, J.: Access to information in electronic age : situation in Slovakia (2000) 0.03 
    0.033989757 = product of:
  0.067979515 = sum of:
    0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04116606 = score(doc=5495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
    0.026813459 = product of:
      0.053626917 = sum of:
        0.053626917 = weight(_text_:access in 5495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053626917 = score(doc=5495,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31775886 = fieldWeight in 5495, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5495)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Electronic publishing brings about some substantial shifts in technological as well as socio-political patterns that were in place during the era of paper publications. The tension between producer and consumer side of the information cycle is the most significant feature of this change. Authors and publishers try to maximise their revenues from the marketing of information and backed by the possibilities of technology they force major changes in legislation governing the area of (public) information access. In this environment, the society's interest in a wide-spread accessibility of electronic data must be balanced by substantial financial investments - a solution that only the rich economies of the world can feel comfortable with
    Date
    17. 1.1997 17:19:26
  18. Björklund, L.: Document description in the future (1992) 0.03 
    0.033635437 = product of:
  0.13454175 = sum of:
    0.13454175 = weight(_text_:description in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13454175 = score(doc=5939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5811713 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Proposes a combination of markup (e.g. SGML), natural language processing and artificial intelligence techniques for document description and information retrieval of primary scientific writings. By using markup to code parts of the documents while producing them, natural language techniques to understand them and rules and plans to pick up the most important parts of the documents, then tailored information packages could be created at different levels
  19. Adler, S.: ¬The birth of a standard (1992) 0.03 
    0.029729806 = product of:
  0.11891922 = sum of:
    0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 5950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11891922 = score(doc=5950,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 5950, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5950)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the evolution of the SGML from its initial acceptance as an international standard for data description and data interchange, in Oct 86, to its technical completion and widespread acceptance
  20. Proceedings of EP'96 : the Electronic Publishing, Document Manipulation and Typography Conference, held in Palo Alto, CA, 24-26 Sep 96 (1996) 0.03 
    0.029108802 = product of:
  0.11643521 = sum of:
    0.11643521 = weight(_text_:26 in 7085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11643521 = score(doc=7085,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04979191 = queryNorm
        0.6621607 = fieldWeight in 7085, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7085)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    4. 2.1996 18:13:26

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 144
  • d 123
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 228
  • el 33
  • m 18
  • s 9
  • r 4
  • x 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications