-
Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000)
0.15
0.14761 = product of:
0.19681333 = sum of:
0.08408859 = weight(_text_:description in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08408859 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.36323205 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03430505 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.078419685 = sum of:
0.0446891 = weight(_text_:access in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0446891 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03373058 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.09
0.08735311 = product of:
0.17470622 = sum of:
0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08324346 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.09146276 = sum of:
0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044239953 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.04722281 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04722281 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Creativity is now a core requirement for successful organizations. Libraries, like all organizations, need to produce and utilize new ideas to improve user service and experiences. With changes in cataloging such as Resource Description and Access (RDA), the opportunity to rethink cataloging practices is here now. Everyone has creative potential, although catalogers may have both a personality and work environment that make it more difficult. To be able to maximize creative capacity, catalogers need the proper work environment, support from their organization, and a plan for accomplishing creative goals. Given that environment, catalogers may create ideas that will shape the future. (RDA).
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
-
Rodman, R.L.: Making the connection between processing and access : do cataloging decisions affect user access? (2000)
0.09
0.08503106 = product of:
0.17006212 = sum of:
0.11643521 = weight(_text_:26 in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11643521 = score(doc=518,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.6621607 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
0.053626917 = product of:
0.107253835 = sum of:
0.107253835 = weight(_text_:access in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.107253835 = score(doc=518,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.6355177 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 3.1997 19:56:26
14. 8.2002 17:10:26
-
Panchyshyn, R.S.; Park, A.L.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) database enrichment : the path to a hybridized catalog (2015)
0.07
0.074503206 = product of:
0.14900641 = sum of:
0.11772404 = weight(_text_:description in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11772404 = score(doc=2017,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.5085249 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
0.03128237 = product of:
0.06256474 = sum of:
0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06256474 = score(doc=2017,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article examines the benefits of a Resource Description and Access (RDA) enrichment project for libraries. Enrichment projects "hybridize", or enrich legacy Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) bibliographic records with RDA data. Until a replacement for MARC is developed, bibliographic data will continue to be encoded in MARC 21 in many integrated library systems. Library catalogs contain records coded under both AACR2 and RDA standards. RDA enrichment projects benefit the patron experience because the data is cleaner and more consistent for patron use and display, cataloging staff workflows are simplified, and the consistency of the data is advantageous for system development and data exchange with other communities
-
Lubetzky, S.: Writings on the classical art of cataloging (2001)
0.06
0.061404407 = product of:
0.122808814 = sum of:
0.08233212 = weight(_text_:26 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08233212 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.4682183 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.040476695 = product of:
0.08095339 = sum of:
0.08095339 = weight(_text_:22 in 2622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08095339 = score(doc=2622,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2622, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2622)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 26. 8.2005 15:12:32
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Technicalities 22(2002) no.1, S.19-20 (S.S. Intner)
-
McCathieNevile, C.; Méndez Rodríguez, E.M.: Library cards for the 21st century (2006)
0.06
0.059933145 = product of:
0.11986629 = sum of:
0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10090631 = score(doc=240,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
0.018959979 = product of:
0.037919957 = sum of:
0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037919957 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents several reflections on the traditional card catalogues and RDF (Resource Description Framework), which is "the" standard for creating the Semantic Web. This work grew out of discussion between the authors after Working Group on Metadata Schemes meeting held at IFLA conference in Buenos Aires (2004). The paper provides an overview of RDF from the perspective of cataloguers, catalogues and library cards. The central theme is the discussion of resource description as a discipline that could be based on RDF. RDF is explained as a very simple grammar, using metadata and ontologies to semantic search and access. RDF Knitting the Semantic Web Cataloging & Classification Quarterly Volume 43, Numbers 3/4 has the ability to enhance 21st century libraries and metadata interoperability in digital libraries, while maintaining the expressive power that was available to librarians when catalogues were physical artefacts.
-
Bianchini, C.; Guerrini, M.: ¬A turning point for catalogs : Ranganathan's possible point of view (2015)
0.06
0.059933145 = product of:
0.11986629 = sum of:
0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10090631 = score(doc=2006,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
0.018959979 = product of:
0.037919957 = sum of:
0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 2006) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037919957 = score(doc=2006,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2006, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2006)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Since the end of the last century, catalogs have been changing more and more quickly. This change is following a recognizable course, beginning with the publication of Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, passing through the reorganization of international cataloging principles, the revision of international standards of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (International Standard for Bibliographic Description), and the foundation of new cataloging codes, such as Resource Description and Access. While principles, models, and rules are well established, bibliographic formats seem to be a bottleneck and users seem far from libraries. This article aims to present an overview of current changes, potential convergences, developments, and weak points from Ranganathan's point of view.
-
Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007)
0.05
0.053216573 = product of:
0.106433146 = sum of:
0.08408859 = weight(_text_:description in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08408859 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.36323205 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.02234455 = product of:
0.0446891 = sum of:
0.0446891 = weight(_text_:access in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0446891 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- There is evidence that many individuals and organizations in the library world do not support the work taking place to develop a next generation of the library cataloging rules. The authors describe the tensions existing between those advocating an incremental change to cataloging process and others who desire a bolder library entry into the digital era. Libraries have lost their place as primary information providers, surpassed by more agile (and in many cases wealthier) purveyors of digital information delivery services. Although libraries still manage materials that are not available elsewhere, the library's approach to user service and the user interface is not competing successfully against services like Amazon or Google. If libraries are to avoid further marginalization, they need to make a fundamental change in their approach to user services. The library's signature service, its catalog, uses rules for cataloging that are remnants of a long departed technology: the card catalog. Modifications to the rules, such as those proposed by the Resource Description and Access (RDA) development effort, can only keep us rooted firmly in the 20th, if not the 19th century. A more radical change is required that will contribute to the library of the future, re-imagined and integrated with the chosen workflow of its users.
-
Kemp, R.: Catalog/cataloging changes and Web 2.0 functionality : new directions for serials (2008)
0.05
0.052681718 = product of:
0.105363436 = sum of:
0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08324346 = score(doc=2254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
0.022119977 = product of:
0.044239953 = sum of:
0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 2254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044239953 = score(doc=2254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 2254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2254)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article presents an overview of some of the important recent developments in cataloging theory and practice and online catalog design. Changes in cataloging theory and practice include the incorporation of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records principles into catalogs, the new Resource Description and Access cataloging manual, and the new CONSER Standard Record. Web 2.0 functionalities and advances in search technology and results displays are influencing online catalog design. The paper ends with hypothetical scenarios in which a catalog, enhanced by the developments described, fulfills the tasks of finding serials articles and titles.
-
Seikel, M.: General notes in catalog records versus FRBR user tasks (2013)
0.05
0.052681718 = product of:
0.105363436 = sum of:
0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08324346 = score(doc=1929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
0.022119977 = product of:
0.044239953 = sum of:
0.044239953 = weight(_text_:access in 1929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044239953 = score(doc=1929,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1929, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1929)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article analyzes the literature concerning uses of notes in bibliographic records and also certain grammatical conventions used by catalogers to communicate information about the resources they are describing. It shows that these types of data do not aid the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) user tasks in the resource discovery process. It also describes how general notes are addressed in Resource Description Access (RDA), and advocates that cataloging practices involving most general notes and such conventions as bracketing and abbreviations should be discontinued with the widespread use of RDA.
-
Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998)
0.05
0.05117034 = product of:
0.10234068 = sum of:
0.0686101 = weight(_text_:26 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0686101 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.03373058 = product of:
0.06746116 = sum of:
0.06746116 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06746116 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 23.10.1996 17:26:29
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.05
0.05117034 = product of:
0.10234068 = sum of:
0.0686101 = weight(_text_:26 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0686101 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.03373058 = product of:
0.06746116 = sum of:
0.06746116 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06746116 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future? : Access to information in the year 2006 (1982)
0.05
0.050105035 = product of:
0.10021007 = sum of:
0.0686101 = weight(_text_:26 in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0686101 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.3901819 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.031599965 = product of:
0.06319993 = sum of:
0.06319993 = weight(_text_:access in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06319993 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.37448242 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.122-135
-
DeZelar-Tiedman, V.: Doing the LibraryThing(TM) in an academic library catalog (2008)
0.05
0.045089893 = product of:
0.090179786 = sum of:
0.02744404 = weight(_text_:26 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02744404 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.15607277 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.062735744 = sum of:
0.03575128 = weight(_text_:access in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03575128 = score(doc=2666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.21183924 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.026984464 = weight(_text_:22 in 2666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026984464 = score(doc=2666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2666)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Many libraries and other cultural institutions are incorporating Web 2.0 features and enhanced metadata into their catalogs (Trant 2006). These value-added elements include those typically found in commercial and social networking sites, such as book jacket images, reviews, and usergenerated tags. One such site that libraries are exploring as a model is LibraryThing (www.librarything.com) LibraryThing is a social networking site that allows users to "catalog" their own book collections. Members can add tags and reviews to records for books, as well as engage in online discussions. In addition to its service for individuals, LibraryThing offers a feebased service to libraries, where institutions can add LibraryThing tags, recommendations, and other features to their online catalog records. This poster will present data analyzing the quality and quantity of the metadata that a large academic library would expect to gain if utilizing such a service, focusing on the overlap between titles found in the library's catalog and in LibraryThing's database, and on a comparison between the controlled subject headings in the former and the user-generated tags in the latter. During February through April 2008, a random sample of 383 titles from the University of Minnesota Libraries catalog was searched in LibraryThing. Eighty works, or 21 percent of the sample, had corresponding records available in LibraryThing. Golder and Huberman (2006) outline the advantages and disadvantages of using controlled vocabulary for subject access to information resources versus the growing trend of tags supplied by users or by content creators. Using the 80 matched records from the sample, comparisons were made between the user-supplied tags in LibraryThing (social tags) and the subject headings in the library catalog records (controlled vocabulary system). In the library records, terms from all 6XX MARC fields were used. To make a more meaningful comparison, controlled subject terms were broken down into facets according to their headings and subheadings, and each unique facet counted separately. A total of 227 subject terms were applied to the 80 catalog records, an average of 2.84 per record. In LibraryThing, 698 tags were applied to the same 80 titles, an average of 8.73 per title. The poster will further explore the relationships between the terms applied in each source, and identify where overlaps and complementary levels of access occur.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Oddy, P.: ¬The case for international cooperation in cataloguing : from copy cataloguing to multilingual subject access - experiences within the British Library (1999)
0.04
0.040084027 = product of:
0.08016805 = sum of:
0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05488808 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.025279973 = product of:
0.050559945 = sum of:
0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050559945 = score(doc=5181,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:32:26
-
Howarth, L.C.: "Is there a catalog in your future?" : Celebrating Nancy J. Williamson: Scholar, educator, colleague, mentor (2010)
0.04
0.040084027 = product of:
0.08016805 = sum of:
0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05488808 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.025279973 = product of:
0.050559945 = sum of:
0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050559945 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Bezugnahme auf: Williamson, N.J.: Is there a catalog in your future?: Access to information in the year 2006. In: Library resources and technical services. 26(1982), S.122-135.
-
Schürmann, H.: Sacherschliessung nach RDA (2015)
0.04
0.037629798 = product of:
0.075259596 = sum of:
0.05945961 = weight(_text_:description in 1831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05945961 = score(doc=1831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.25684384 = fieldWeight in 1831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1831)
0.015799982 = product of:
0.031599965 = sum of:
0.031599965 = weight(_text_:access in 1831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031599965 = score(doc=1831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 1831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1831)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Die Resource Description and Access (RDA) wird für den deutschsprachigen Raum das neue Regelwerk für die bibliothekarische Erschliessung der Bestände. In diesem Regelwerk wird auch die Sacherschliessung neu geregelt. Zurzeit sind diese Seiten noch leer. Doch wie soll ein Regelwerk für die Sacherschliessung aussehen? Kriterien für eine Regelung fehlen, zu stark hat sich das Umfeld der Inhaltserschliessung in den letzten Jahren geändert. Auch von der Schlagworttheorie her sind noch keine Hinweise in Sicht. Deshalb wird in verschiedenen Gremien intensiv diskutiert, wie eine zukunftsfähige Sacherschliessung aussehen könnte. In welchem Rahmen bewegt sich die Diskussion und woran soll sich die Regelwerksentwicklung für den Sachkatalog orientieren? Der Beitrag erwägt zwischen der Sachkataloggeschichte einerseits und dem modernen Datenmanagement im Netz andererseits die Bedeutung und die Rolle eines Sacherschliessungsregelwerks.
-
Danskin, A.: "Tomorrow never knows" : the end of cataloguing? (2006)
0.03
0.03010384 = product of:
0.06020768 = sum of:
0.04756769 = weight(_text_:description in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04756769 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.20547508 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.012639986 = product of:
0.025279973 = sum of:
0.025279973 = weight(_text_:access in 6109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025279973 = score(doc=6109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.14979297 = fieldWeight in 6109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The purpose of this paper is to review the challenges confronting cataloguing as we have known it and to consider how these challenges might be confronted and whether they may be surmounted. The main focus of this paper is on cataloguing rather than the catalogue, although it is obviously difficult to separate one from the other. First of all, what does "cataloguing" mean? For the purposes of this paper I have adopted a broad definition incorporating the following activities: - description of the resource sufficient for purposes of identification and for differentiation from other similar resources - identification and control of access points - identification and control of relationships with other resources - subject analysis of the resource - assignment of subject indexing terms - assignment of classification numbers The challenges facing cataloguing are all too well known. In no particular order, the major challenges are: - Increasing inputs - New kinds of information resource - Competition from other mediation services. - Perception that cataloguing is high cost and offers poor value for money. - Fiscal constraints - Declining workforce This is a daunting list. We have a choice, we could, to paraphrase John Lennon, "Turn off our minds, relax and float down stream", until we retire, take voluntary redundancy, or retrain as marketing consultants; or, we can choose to confront these challenges and consider what they really mean for cataloguing.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Rethinking what we catalog : documents as cultural artifacts (2008)
0.03
0.029729806 = product of:
0.11891922 = sum of:
0.11891922 = weight(_text_:description in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11891922 = score(doc=789,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.5136877 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Cataloging is at its most interesting when it is comprehended as part of a larger, meaningful, objective. Resource description is a complex task; but the essence of librarianship is curatorship of a collection, and that sense of curatorial responsibility is one of the things that makes resource description into cataloging-that is, professional responsibility is the difference between the task of transcription and the satisfaction of professional decisions well-made. Part of the essential difference is comprehension of the cultural milieu from which specific resources arise, and the modes of scholarship that might be used to nudge them to reveal their secrets for the advancement of knowledge. In this paper I describe a course designed to lend excitement and professional judgment to the education of future catalogers and collection managers by conveying the notion that all documents are, in fact, cultural artifacts. Part of a knowledge-sensitive curriculum for knowledge organization, the purpose of this course is to go beyond the concept of documents as mere packets of information to demonstrate that each is a product of its time and circumstances. Bibliographic skill leads to greater comfort with the intellectual and cultural forces that impel the creation of documents. Students become comfortable with the curatorial side of cataloging - the placement of each document in its cultural milieu as the goal of resource description, rather than the act of description itself.
-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.03
0.026132219 = product of:
0.104528874 = sum of:
0.104528874 = sum of:
0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050559945 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05396893 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04979191 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Examines in detail the author cataloguing practices adopted by the Italian National Library Service, as set out in its 1995 Cataloguing Guide (Guida SBN), and discusses how far these practices accord with the standard 1979 RICA author cataloguing rules. Since the author headings prescribed by RICA include personal names, corporate names and titles, this survey looks at all such SBN catalogue entries having an access point function. Presents many examples of standard and variant forms of heading, and reviews control procedures
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 20:40:57
